
Said the 2022 law was written to bring vendors into the permit system, and that enforcement first punishes immigrants and refugees rather than the corporations behind the stands.
Choose any timestamp in the meeting record to play that moment here. When opened directly from disk, timestamps open on YouTube instead.
Open the full recording on YouTubeTuesday, February 7, 2023
Councilmember Bacerra's item on unpermitted sidewalk vending then drew the sharpest split of the night.
▶6:12:04
Said the 2022 law was written to bring vendors into the permit system, and that enforcement first punishes immigrants and refugees rather than the corporations behind the stands.

Wanted a permitting pathway giving Santa Ana residents priority rather than removal.

Asked what is actually failing in enforcement and whether an ordinance would change anything.

Backed it at length and said residents are afraid to complain publicly.

Supported enforcement and asked that the resolution also lobby the state legislators who wrote the law.

Brought the item and asked for enforcement plus a resolution seeking local control back from the state.

Listed more than twenty junctions and said the county health department must act.
He asked for enforcement of the rules already on the books and a resolution asking Sacramento to hand local control back, and Mayor Amezcua, Councilmember Penaloza and Councilmember Phan agreed.
▶6:18:18
Said the 2022 law was written to bring vendors into the permit system, and that enforcement first punishes immigrants and refugees rather than the corporations behind the stands.

Wanted a permitting pathway giving Santa Ana residents priority rather than removal.

Asked what is actually failing in enforcement and whether an ordinance would change anything.

Backed it at length and said residents are afraid to complain publicly.

Supported enforcement and asked that the resolution also lobby the state legislators who wrote the law.

Brought the item and asked for enforcement plus a resolution seeking local control back from the state.

Listed more than twenty junctions and said the county health department must act.
Councilmember Hernandez argued the opposite, that the newer state law is meant to bring vendors into the permit system and that enforcement first punishes very vulnerable people.
▶6:40:38
Said the 2022 law was written to bring vendors into the permit system, and that enforcement first punishes immigrants and refugees rather than the corporations behind the stands.

Wanted a permitting pathway giving Santa Ana residents priority rather than removal.

Asked what is actually failing in enforcement and whether an ordinance would change anything.

Backed it at length and said residents are afraid to complain publicly.

Supported enforcement and asked that the resolution also lobby the state legislators who wrote the law.

Brought the item and asked for enforcement plus a resolution seeking local control back from the state.

Listed more than twenty junctions and said the county health department must act.
A second run of speakers asked the council to hold back a zoning code update that would stop a nonprofit health clinic opening, but the city attorney said an urgency ordinance already in force made that pointless, and the second reading passed six votes to one.
▶5:08:42The council approved a $305,895 contract for the rent stabilization registry portal four votes to three, the dissenters objecting that start-up money is being borrowed from the housing fund with no certainty it can be paid back.
▶5:41:19
Said she lacked the history behind the decision and wanted the background first.

Called the programme a boondoggle and noted the fund it borrows from has taken in nothing since April 2022.

Objected to the vagueness of a plan to explore reimbursement rather than guarantee it.

Moved approval, noting the council sets the fee and so controls whether the fund is repaid.

Said the city spends far more elsewhere with less to show for it.
It kept the $500,000 of food distribution money with the two highest scoring bidders, after a long argument about whether a third group that had left parts of its application blank should be carved back in.
▶6:04:43
Said no two organisations can cover the whole city.

Pulled the item and asked what happens to the 700 families the group feeds each week.

Moved to carve out $83,333 for United Across Borders, then withdrew it to let the item move.

Cited the reporting scores and the risk of having to repay federal money out of the general fund.

Said a bid with blank answers should have been ruled non-responsive and that personal experience cannot decide contracts.

Moved the staff recommendation and asked the city to help weaker applicants improve next time.
It also disbanded its school collaboration subcommittee, because the other school districts had stopped answering invitations.
▶6:09:36Representative transcript excerpts—not inferred positions.

In addition to those health dangers that these vendors pose, they also create more dangers by forcing people to not be able to use the sidewalks, but rather to walk into traffic. And we've seen these vendors, where are they at? On many busy streets. They're on…
Let's prepare to vote. So let me see if we have this. Madam Clerk, we have, because I have a question here. So we have the Public Safety and Homelessness City Council Subcommittee, that is Councilman Hernandez, Councilman Becerra, and myself. The Legislative…
Councilmember Peñalosa is absent. Councilmember Fan? Yes. Councilmember Vasquez? Yes. Mayor Potem-Lopez? Mayor Amesqua?

For purposes of conflict of interest analysis under the Political Reform Act, money that is received as salary from a public agency is not defined as income. And so it does not create a conflict under the Political Reform Act. Perfect. Unless there's some…
The current summaries were prepared during an in-session review of the transcripts. This prototype shows only sentences with a timestamp citation. 0 uncited sentences were withheld from this page.
Splits in votes or reasoning
Said she lacked the history behind the decision and wanted the background first.
Called the programme a boondoggle and noted the fund it borrows from has taken in nothing since April 2022.
Objected to the vagueness of a plan to explore reimbursement rather than guarantee it.
Moved approval, noting the council sets the fee and so controls whether the fund is repaid.
Said the city spends far more elsewhere with less to show for it.
Said no two organisations can cover the whole city.
Pulled the item and asked what happens to the 700 families the group feeds each week.
Moved to carve out $83,333 for United Across Borders, then withdrew it to let the item move.
Cited the reporting scores and the risk of having to repay federal money out of the general fund.
Said a bid with blank answers should have been ruled non-responsive and that personal experience cannot decide contracts.
Moved the staff recommendation and asked the city to help weaker applicants improve next time.
Said the 2022 law was written to bring vendors into the permit system, and that enforcement first punishes immigrants and refugees rather than the corporations behind the stands.
Wanted a permitting pathway giving Santa Ana residents priority rather than removal.
Asked what is actually failing in enforcement and whether an ordinance would change anything.
Backed it at length and said residents are afraid to complain publicly.
Supported enforcement and asked that the resolution also lobby the state legislators who wrote the law.
Brought the item and asked for enforcement plus a resolution seeking local control back from the state.
Listed more than twenty junctions and said the county health department must act.
38 items in agenda order
1,170 merged speaker turns are available in a dedicated reading view. It opens with unidentified speech hidden.