
Objected to how the item reached the agenda, saying he wanted the pattern on the record.
Choose any timestamp in the meeting record to play that moment here. When opened directly from disk, timestamps open on YouTube instead.
Open the full recording on YouTubeTuesday, September 17, 2024
The council voted four to three to endorse Proposition 36, the state ballot measure raising penalties for some theft and drug offences.
▶6:47:54
Objected to how the item reached the agenda, saying he wanted the pattern on the record.

Cited the Legislative Analyst on unfunded costs forcing cuts to city services, and said the measure misses auto theft, cargo theft and fencing.

Voted against; the clerk recorded his no with those of Councilmembers Lopez and Vazquez.

Placed the item on the agenda herself and said after the vote that the three against had voted no on the safety of the community.

Voted for it but called the decision a difficult one, and said she doubted there would be money to prosecute the felonies it creates.

Said reclassifying theft does not stop the person robbed being a victim.

Spoke mainly to establish that the mayor was entitled to agendize the item directly.
Councilmembers Hernandez, Lopez and Vazquez voted against, and Mayor Amezcua said from the dais afterwards that they had voted no on the safety of the community.
▶6:48:01
Objected to how the item reached the agenda, saying he wanted the pattern on the record.

Cited the Legislative Analyst on unfunded costs forcing cuts to city services, and said the measure misses auto theft, cargo theft and fencing.

Voted against; the clerk recorded his no with those of Councilmembers Lopez and Vazquez.

Placed the item on the agenda herself and said after the vote that the three against had voted no on the safety of the community.

Voted for it but called the decision a difficult one, and said she doubted there would be money to prosecute the felonies it creates.

Said reclassifying theft does not stop the person robbed being a victim.

Spoke mainly to establish that the mayor was entitled to agendize the item directly.
The public hearing on the Related Bristol project, a 41-acre mixed-use redevelopment at 3600 South Bristol Street, was continued to 1 October with a list of questions the council wanted answered first.
▶5:28:33No named councilmember contribution could be reliably linked to this item.
That continuation passed six votes to nothing, with Mayor Pro Tem Phan recused.
▶5:28:41No named councilmember contribution could be reliably linked to this item.
Councilmember Penaloza's motion to take up the consent calendar rather than adjourn passed four votes to three.
▶7:16:17No named councilmember contribution could be reliably linked to this item.
The balance of the consent calendar then passed seven votes to nothing.
▶7:19:22No named councilmember contribution could be reliably linked to this item.
Items 10, 12, 18 and 19, both public hearings, and the councilmembers' item on rescinding the meeting filming rules were all held over to Monday 23 September.
▶7:19:38No named councilmember contribution could be reliably linked to this item.
The current summaries were prepared during an in-session review of the transcripts. This prototype shows only sentences with a timestamp citation. 0 uncited sentences were withheld from this page.
Splits in votes or reasoning
Objected to how the item reached the agenda, saying he wanted the pattern on the record.
Cited the Legislative Analyst on unfunded costs forcing cuts to city services, and said the measure misses auto theft, cargo theft and fencing.
Voted against; the clerk recorded his no with those of Councilmembers Lopez and Vazquez.
Placed the item on the agenda herself and said after the vote that the three against had voted no on the safety of the community.
Voted for it but called the decision a difficult one, and said she doubted there would be money to prosecute the felonies it creates.
Said reclassifying theft does not stop the person robbed being a victim.
Spoke mainly to establish that the mayor was entitled to agendize the item directly.
Voted against continuing; the clerk recorded her no with those of Councilmembers Hernandez and Lopez.
Voted against continuing at that hour.
Said it was not appropriate to conduct business at that hour and that staff who had worked all day deserved better.
Said anything that could be approved that night should be approved.
Proposed pulling the items members wanted to discuss and voting the remainder rather than carrying everything over.
30 items in agenda order
1,607 merged speaker turns are available in a dedicated reading view. It opens with unidentified speech hidden.