!
0:06Read the April 21 meeting.
1,311 merged speaker turns. Unidentified speech is hidden by default; timestamps open the public recording.
Transcript
Thank you.
0:38Thank you.
1:10Thank you.
1:36Thank you.
2:09Thank you.
2:40Thank you.
3:04Thank you.
3:35Thank you.
4:07Thank you.
4:34Thank you.
5:03Thank you.
5:32Thank you.
6:08Thank you.
6:35Thank you.
7:06Thank you.
7:38Thank you.
8:02Thank you.
8:32Thank you.
9:04Thank you.
9:32Thank you.
10:06Thank you.
10:39Thank you.
11:07Thank you.
11:39Thank you.
12:05Thank you.
12:35Thank you.
13:06Thank you.
13:37Thank you.
14:07Thank you.
14:37Good thing I'm alive.
15:08Thank you.
15:36Thank you.
16:07Thank you.
16:36Thank you.
17:08Thank you.
17:36Thank you.
18:09Thank you.
18:34Thank you.
19:07Thank you.
19:36Thank you.
20:09Thank you.
20:34Thank you.
21:04Thank you.
21:37Thank you.
22:07Thank you.
22:38Thank you.
23:09Thank you.
23:36Thank you.
24:09Thank you.
24:38Thank you.
25:12Thank you.
25:39Thank you.
26:06Thank you.
26:38Thank you.
27:08Thank you.
27:31Thank you.
28:05Thank you.
28:37Thank you.
29:06Thank you.
29:37Thank you.
30:08Thank you.
30:40Thank you.
31:03Thank you.
31:35Thank you.
32:09Thank you.
32:37Thank you.
33:08Thank you.
33:37Thank you.
34:09Thank you.
34:36Thank you.
35:03Thank you.
35:37Thank you.
36:11Thank you.
36:36Thank you.
37:09Thank you.
37:35Thank you.
38:07Thank you.
38:34Thank you.
39:00Thank you.
39:39Thank you.
40:09Thank you.
40:37Thank you.
41:02Thank you.
41:36Thank you.
42:06Thank you.
42:36Thank you.
43:08Thank you.
43:38Thank you.
44:06Thank you.
44:34Thank you.
45:04Thank you.
45:36Thank you.
46:07Thank you.
46:38Thank you.
47:05Thank you.
47:39Thank you.
48:07Thank you.
48:37Mayor, you're ready. All right. Let's start the meeting. I hereby call the Santa Ana City Council meeting to order. This meeting is taking place with in-person attendance and by teleconference via Zoom. The public may access the meeting via the Santa Ana YouTube channel or the city's website. Please bear with us as the technology may disrupt the flow of the meeting. Madam Clerk, please conduct the roll call.
49:04call councilmember becerra councilmember hernandez councilmember lopez councilmember fan here councilmember vasquez president mayor pro tempino here mayor mesqua president four members that is
49:28a quorum thank you madam kirk are there any additions or deletions to the closed session agenda there are none do any council members need to announce obsessions on any closed session items hearing none do we have any speakers madam clerk for closed session we do not have any in-person
49:41!
49:56Thank you.
50:33Thank you.
51:02Thank you.
51:34Thank you.
52:04Thank you.
52:35Thank you.
53:05Thank you.
53:30Thank you.
54:02Thank you.
54:36Thank you.
55:03Thank you.
55:35Thank you.
56:04Thank you.
56:35Thank you.
57:03Thank you.
57:30Thank you.
58:04Thank you.
58:38Thank you.
59:04Thank you.
59:36Good thing I'm alive.
1:00:02Thank you.
1:00:34Thank you.
1:01:01Thank you.
1:01:27Thank you.
1:02:02Thank you.
1:02:35Thank you.
1:03:04Thank you.
1:03:29Thank you.
1:04:03Thank you.
1:04:33Thank you.
1:05:03Thank you.
1:05:35Thank you.
1:06:03Thank you.
1:06:33Thank you.
1:07:01Thank you.
1:07:31Thank you.
1:08:03Thank you.
1:08:34Thank you.
1:09:05Thank you.
1:09:32Thank you.
1:10:06Thank you.
1:10:34Thank you.
1:11:03Thank you.
1:11:36Thank you.
1:12:03Thank you.
1:12:37Thank you.
1:13:05Thank you.
1:13:34Thank you.
1:14:01Thank you.
1:14:32Thank you.
1:15:08Thank you.
1:15:34Thank you.
1:16:07Thank you.
1:16:29Thank you.
1:17:04Thank you.
1:17:30Thank you.
1:18:09Thank you.
1:18:33Thank you.
1:19:03Thank you.
1:19:30Thank you.
1:20:04Thank you.
1:20:35Thank you.
1:21:06Thank you.
1:21:31Thank you.
1:22:03Good thing I'm here.
1:22:29Thank you.
1:23:03Thank you.
1:23:31Thank you.
1:23:58Thank you.
1:24:33Thank you.
1:25:07Thank you.
1:25:35Thank you.
1:26:35Thank you.
1:27:05Thank you.
1:27:37Thank you.
1:28:04Thank you.
1:28:36Thank you.
1:29:00Thank you.
1:29:35Thank you.
1:30:05Thank you.
1:30:36Thank you.
1:31:07Thank you.
1:31:32Thank you.
1:32:04I'm going to go to bed now.
1:32:54Thank you.
1:33:02Thank you.
1:33:34Thank you.
1:34:04Thank you.
1:34:33Thank you.
1:35:04Thank you.
1:35:35Thank you.
1:36:04Thank you.
1:36:35Thank you.
1:37:05Thank you.
1:37:34Thank you.
1:38:05Thank you.
1:38:35Thank you.
1:39:01Thank you.
1:39:34Thank you.
1:40:06Thank you.
1:40:35Thank you.
1:41:05Thank you.
1:41:35Thank you.
1:42:05Thank you.
1:42:35Thank you.
1:43:02Thank you.
1:43:34Thank you.
1:43:58Thank you.
1:44:33Good night, everyone.
1:44:56Thank you.
1:45:31Thank you.
1:46:02Thank you.
1:46:36Thank you.
1:47:00Thank you.
1:47:33Thank you.
1:48:06Thank you.
1:48:33Thank you.
1:49:02Thank you.
1:49:32Thank you.
1:50:04Thank you.
1:50:36Thank you.
1:51:03Thank you.
1:51:35Thank you.
1:52:05Thank you.
1:52:34Thank you.
1:53:05Thank you.
1:53:36Thank you.
1:54:05Thank you.
1:54:33Thank you.
1:55:05Thank you.
1:55:27Thank you.
1:56:03Thank you.
1:56:31I'm sorry.
1:57:24Thank you.
1:57:32Thank you.
1:58:02Thank you.
1:58:32Thank you.
1:59:02Thank you.
1:59:32Thank you.
2:00:02Thank you.
2:00:34Thank you.
2:01:02Thank you.
2:01:37Thank you.
2:02:02Thank you.
2:02:34Thank you.
2:03:03Thank you.
2:03:33Thank you.
2:04:02Thank you.
2:04:33Thank you.
2:05:05Thank you.
2:05:35Thank you.
2:06:03Thank you.
2:06:33Thank you.
2:07:23Thank you.
2:07:30Thank you.
2:08:04Thank you.
2:08:30Thank you.
2:09:04Thank you.
2:09:35Thank you.
2:10:01Thank you.
2:11:07Thank you.
2:11:32Thank you.
2:11:59Thank you.
2:12:33Thank you.
2:13:05Thank you.
2:13:30Thank you.
2:14:02Thank you.
2:14:36Thank you.
2:15:03Thank you.
2:15:32Thank you.
2:16:02Thank you.
2:16:33Thank you.
2:17:03Thank you.
2:17:32Thank you.
2:18:03Thank you.
2:18:33Thank you.
2:19:03Thank you.
2:19:35Thank you.
2:19:59Thank you.
2:20:29Thank you.
2:21:01Thank you.
2:21:30Thank you.
2:22:01Thank you.
2:22:30Thank you.
2:23:02Thank you.
2:23:29Thank you.
2:24:04Thank you.
2:24:37Thank you.
2:25:02Thank you.
2:25:29Thank you.
2:26:00Thank you.
2:26:32Thank you.
2:27:08Thank you.
2:27:34Thank you.
2:28:02Thank you.
2:29:05Good thing I'm alive.
2:29:50Thank you.
2:30:06Thank you.
2:30:34Thank you.
2:31:08Thank you.
2:31:36Thank you.
2:32:04Thank you.
2:32:28Thank you.
2:33:04Thank you.
2:33:34Thank you.
2:34:05Thank you.
2:34:35Thank you.
2:35:03Thank you.
2:35:35Thank you.
2:35:59Thank you.
2:36:35Thank you.
2:37:02Thank you.
2:37:33Thank you.
2:38:04Thank you.
2:38:31Thank you.
2:38:59Thank you.
2:39:35Thank you.
2:39:59Thank you.
2:40:30Thank you.
2:41:03Thank you.
2:41:29Thank you.
2:42:04Thank you.
2:42:27Thank you.
2:43:03Thank you.
2:43:35Thank you.
2:43:57Thank you.
2:44:27Thank you.
2:45:03Thank you.
2:45:55Thank you.
2:46:06Thank you.
2:46:35Thank you.
2:47:04Thank you.
2:47:34Thank you.
2:48:01Thank you.
2:48:35Thank you.
2:49:05Thank you.
2:49:35Thank you.
2:50:01Thank you.
2:50:28Thank you.
2:51:05Thank you.
2:51:33Good thing I'm alive.
2:52:17Thank you.
2:52:34Thank you.
2:53:04Thank you.
2:53:34Thank you.
2:54:03Thank you.
2:54:34Thank you.
2:55:06I'm going to use a brush to paint the background. I'm going to use a brush to paint the background. I'm going to use a brush to paint the background. I'm going to use a brush to paint the background.
2:55:37I'm going to use a brush to paint the background.
2:55:44Thank you.
2:55:55Thank you.
2:56:23Thank you.
2:56:54Thank you.
2:57:25Thank you.
2:57:58Thank you.
2:58:24Thank you.
2:58:56Thank you.
2:59:26Thank you.
2:59:55Thank you.
3:00:25Thank you.
3:00:56Thank you.
3:01:26Thank you.
3:01:54Thank you.
3:02:28Thank you.
3:02:54Thank you.
3:03:24Thank you.
3:03:52I'm sorry.
3:04:45Thank you.
3:04:53Thank you.
3:05:23Thank you.
3:05:54Thank you.
3:06:23Thank you.
3:06:54Thank you.
3:07:22Thank you.
3:07:55You can go ahead, Mayor. Thank you so very much. Good evening, everybody. I hereby reconvene the Santa Ana City Council meeting to order. Madam Clerk?
3:08:21This meeting is taking place with in-person attendance and by teleconference via Zoom. The public may access the meeting via the Santa Ana YouTube channel or the city's website. Please bear with us as the technology may disrupt the flow of the meeting. This is a meeting to conduct the business of the city. There's an opportunity to call for a recess or break or even to clear the meeting room if a meeting becomes too disruptive to properly conduct business. Warnings will be provided prior to any action being taken. We appreciate your cooperation. For everyone's safety, per the Fire Marshal, please do not stand or place objects in the
3:08:30aisles, in front of the dais, along the back wall of the Council Chamber, or in front of any entrances and exits. During City Council presentations, guests of individuals being recognized are invited to come to the front to take photos.
3:08:58For roll call. all go ahead thank you councilmember becerra here councilmember hernandez present councilmember lopez here councilmember fan councilmember vasquez president mayor pro tempano present mayor mesqua
3:09:11present all seven members present thank you madam clerk before we uh proceed to the pledge of
3:09:26allegiance please make your announcement for members of the public on zoom or teleconference to request to speak during public comments on agenda or non-agenda items you must dial star star 9 from your phone or click the button labeled raise hand in Zoom now in order to be in the speaker queue once public comments commence. This does not apply to public hearing item numbers 25 and 26 or the Housing Authority agenda for which comments will be heard during those specific public hearing or meeting. Please hold your comments on those items until specifically called upon. Thank you.
3:09:30CHAIRPERSON WONG.
3:09:57Thank you very much. The first item on the agenda is the Pledge of Allegiance. Can I get Carlos from the OC Labor Fed please to come up and lead us in the pledge?
3:09:58Right hand over your heart. Ready begin. I pledge allegiance to the flag of the United States of America and to the republic for which it stands, one nation under God, indivisible, with liberty and justice for all.
3:10:16Thank you very much, Carlos. Appreciate it. Words of inspiration will be provided by Chaplain Vega. Please come to the podium, sir. And thank you so very much for joining us.
3:10:33If you would please bow your heads.
3:10:43Gracious Heavenly Father, we come before your Holy Throne, giving you honor, glory and praise. Lord, you are the source of all that is good. And we are blessed and grateful for all you have bestowed upon us. Lord, we thank you for our incredible city of Santa Ana, our Honorable Mayor, City Council, City Staff, and all courageous first responders. Lord, we are grateful and we thank you for our freedom and the opportunity to gather, unite this day. We ask for your hand of blessings to be upon tonight's meeting and proceedings. We thank you for your amazing grace, your unending love and wisdom.
3:10:46We ask that you would guide and direct tonight's meeting and that it be of your divine wisdom, that it be productive with integrity, accountability, and with respect towards one another. Lord, we thank you for helping us accomplish our work and our goals this day. City of Santa Ana, I leave you with a scripture bound in the book of Numbers, and it says, may the Lord bless you and keep you and protect you. May he sustain you and guard you. May the Lord make his face shine upon you with favor and be gracious to you, surrounding you with his love
3:11:27and kindness. And may the Lord lift up his face and countenance upon you with divine approval and give peace to you and give you a tranquil heart. In Jesus' name we pray, amen. Amen.
3:12:05Amen. Thank you very much.
3:12:19Madam Clerk, are there any additions or deletions to the City Council agenda? No, there are not. Thank you very much. We're gonna change things up a little bit because I hear that Valley High School students have homework to go do. Councilman Vasquez wants me to pull you guys up first so you can go, he specifically says so you can go home and do your homework. So, all right, let's do, Councilman Vasquez, you want to come on up please the valley high school boys soccer team come on up here in the front and join us please
3:12:27I am so proud of these boys as they went through their CIF journey and the whole time they They were fighting and coming back. Many times they were down a few points and like real men, they grew up. They grew up during a game and they were resilient and came back. And I was proud to hear of them being down like zero two or was it zero three at one time? It was two zero and they came back. So today we are proud to recognize these group of student athletes, the Valley High School soccer team. This season was not just about winning games,
3:13:35It was about discipline, teamwork, and representing our school with pride. From the very first match, this team demonstrated focus, resilience, and commitment to excellence. They faced tough opponents, overcame setbacks, and continued to improve with every game. Their dedication and practice translated into outstanding performance on the field. What sets them apart is not just their talent, but their character. I know half of them are my students. I know they're really just great, funny kids and I enjoy having them in class. They supported one another, held each other accountable, and played as a unified group.
3:14:14Their worth, ethics, partnership, and respect for the game reflect the very best of Valley High School. The highlight of the season came with their incredible run in the CIF playoffs. With determination and composure, they rose to the challenge and achieved something truly remarkable, earning the CIF championship title. first since 2006 and semi-finalists for the state regionals. This accomplishment is a testament to the preparation, teamwork, and belief in one another. We also want to recognize the coaching staff. I really appreciate the work the coaches put in, their leadership, the guidance,
3:14:53and commitment to developing these young athletes. Thank you to the families, teachers, and supporters who stood behind this team every step of the way. To the players, you have made your school and community incredibly proud. Your success will be remembered not just for the title you earned, but for the way you earned it. Congratulations Valley High School boys soccer team on an astounding season and your CIF championship victory.
3:15:28I just want to thank my coaches, my teammates for making this a great season and go Falcons.
3:16:07Thank you.
3:16:31all right next up councilmember becerra with the modern day high school girls soccer team come on up
3:17:04You know, I think the reason why they didn't come up so quickly is we didn't say it right. All right, the state champion modern day girls soccer team.
3:17:32Oh, I apologize, Council Member Becerra. State champion modern day.
3:17:44Congratulations, ladies. Girl power in the house.
3:17:52So today, here we are. Santa Ana has been modern day's home since the school began over 75 years ago back in 1950. Today, we are proud to recognize the incredible achievements of Santa Ana's own state champion, modern day girls soccer team. This season, the Monarchs delivered an extraordinary performance, finishing second in the highly competitive Trinity League, advancing to become CIF Open Division finalists, and then going on to claim both the CIF Open Divisional Regional Championship and, as I've already said, the CIF State Championship.
3:18:22Now, notably, this historic season marked the program's first-ever state championship. And that state championship came in the very first year that a state title game was played, an accomplishment that will forever be a part of modern-day history. Their dominance did not go unnoticed, as they earned recognition as the number-one ranked ranked team in California by Max Preps, solidifying their place among the elite. This team's success is a testament to their discipline, teamwork, and commitment to excellence.
3:18:58We also would like to recognize several of the standout student athletes on this team. So Valentina Labouchagne, where's Valentina?
3:19:35There she is.
3:19:44So Valentina is a senior who earned first team all Trinity League and first team all CIF honors recording 24 goals 24 24 goals and 21 assists so it wasn't just all goals 21 assists and was named Excalibur MVP then we have Addie Rodriguez where's Addie she just went to practice ah see See, she's so committed, she couldn't come here. She had to go to practice. So Addie's a junior who was honored as the CIF Sportsmanship Athlete of the Year while also earning first-team All-Trinity League and first-team All-CIF, contributing four goals and eight assists.
3:19:47Next we have Kendra Hansen. Where's Kendra? Gosh, we've got some dedicated Monarchs here. Kendra is a sophomore. Obviously, there's going to be some good things for her to come. She's on the U-17 US National Team. She received first team All-Trendy League and first team All-CIF honors with seven goals and eight assists. And then, do we have Natalie here? She is. All right, where's Natalie? All right, Natalie. Natalie, Natalie Goodwin is a junior who earned first team All-CIF recognition and contributed one goal and one assist. So these accomplishments reflect not only athletic excellence,
3:20:28but also leadership, sportsmanship, and dedication. It is my honor to present the certificate of recognition on behalf of the city, of the Santa Ana City Council to the entire Mardi Gras soccer team in celebration of what has been a truly historic season. Coach, congratulations.
3:21:08So coach, would you like to say a few words? uh thank you so much it is an honor and privilege to be um in santa ana just want to thank the city the council uh mr visera and um you do so much for modern day and we just want you to know how much we value the city of santa ana and we love bringing positive energy and recognition and so So thank you. And I would also like to, we have a daughter, Sophia Montiel, whose dad is a retired law enforcement officer.
3:21:34I think I see him somewhere. Yes.
3:22:09And so...
3:22:11Carlos is true and true Santa Ana. He went to Monterey. He's raising his family in Monterey. And this year we got a chance to give back to the community. And thank you for introducing us to Illumination. and it's a homeless shelter. The girls were incredible and we're just so grateful that we could be a part of it.
3:22:16Good evening everyone. My name is Chloe Mix and I'm a senior and midfielder on on modern day girls soccer. Tonight I have the privilege of speaking on behalf of modern day girls soccer and we are so grateful for this invitation. I for one can say that according to history, I'm having one of the coolest senior years ever. This soccer program has shaped us into who we are and who we wanna be and for us to be able to go so far and have this experience together has been so fun and so rewarding. I'm so proud of my team and the hard work we put in this season and it was a true show that every single person mattered
3:22:50and made a difference on and off the field. We owe some huge thank yous to our families and everyone who came out to support us, and a few special thank yous to Mrs. Claire, our principal, who made the trip out to Sacramento with us, and Ms. Bergeron, who was our rock solid this whole year. Of course, thank you to our coaching staff for never giving up on us and pushing us through the whole way. We also would like to give a small shout-out and thanks to Boyce Soccer, because we were in a huddle and we told ourselves that if we lost and we had to never hear the end of it
3:23:25from boys soccer yeah so I know we're all so excited to be able to represent modern day in Santa Ana by making history and bringing home number one
3:23:56Thank you.
3:24:42Next one is by Mayor Pro Tempano-Losa, recognizing modern day's high school boys soccer team. Come on up.
3:25:22Thank you, Madam Clerk. Thank you, Mayor. All right. Thanks, congratulations. Gentlemen, how you doing? Welcome. Come on down, just scooch down, all the way down.
3:25:45All right. So, is this all of you? All the way down, all the way. Double up if you need to. All right. Good evening, everyone. Today, we are proud to recognize the outstanding achievements of Ward 6's own modern-day boys soccer team, an exceptional group of student athletes who exemplify excellence, determination, and true championship spirit. That's all of you guys, right? This season, the Monarchs reached the pinnacle of high school soccer, earning the title of Trinity League Champions, followed by an incredible run to become CIF Open Division Champions.
3:26:00Round of applause for them, please.
3:26:41CIF Open Division Regional Champions and ultimately CIF State Champions. Their success extended beyond the state as they were recognized as MaxPreps National Champions, a remarkable distinction that places them among the very best teams in the country. The championship run marks the second CIF Open Division title in the past three years, highlighting the sustained excellence and strength of this program. In addition, this season's victory secured the program's first-ever CIF state championship achieved during the inaugural year of the state title game, making this accomplishment even more historic. We would also like to recognize
3:26:45several standout student-athletes. Now please step forward when I call your name James Oblera, midfielder, Trinity League MVP and CIF player of the year with 12 goals and 14 assists and OC Varsity County Player of the Year. Santiago Chalero, forward Trinity League offensive player of the year with 17 goals and 8 assists, all CIF and all county first team honoree. Nathan Enriquez,
3:27:26Oh, he's at practice.
3:28:02Who's a goalkeeper, who is the goalkeeper, Trinity League Defensive Player of the Year with 14 shutouts, all CIF and all county first team selection. Matthew Miranda. Not here. Midfielder, Trinity League first team selection with 11 goals and six assists and all county second team honoree. Isaiah Covarrubias.
3:28:06Defender, Trinity League First Team and All-CIF honoree with six goals and seven assists, also named to All-County Second Team. These achievements are a testament to the team's hard work, resilience, and commitment to one another both on and off the field. Congratulations to the Mater Dei Boys soccer team on a truly unforgettable and historic season. Your community is incredibly proud of you and we look forward to all that you will accomplish in the future. Thank you for putting, helping put Santa Ana on the map. Would the team captain or anybody else want to come up?
3:28:34I'm James Obleda. I'm one of the team captains on here and I just wanted to come and say I wanted to say how proud I am of my boys and how well we did this year and making history for our school and Santa Ana. I'm extremely honored, We're extremely honored to represent modern day and the city of Santa Ana in such a positive way. I want to thank all the parents Modern day the facilities everybody you guys your actions don't go unnoticed And then I also want to thank Santa Ana for all you do for us. Thank you
3:29:12Thank you one of the coaches And thank you for thinking the parents too because oftentimes they get forget forgotten and they do a lot
3:29:46So thank you. I wanna say again congratulations to all you boys. These are not young men that are just soccer players. These are young men that achieve off the field as well. Many of them attain a GPA of 4.0 or higher. Many of them are gonna go on to college and do incredible things outside of the soccer field. So I'm proud of each and every one of you and enjoy this moment because it doesn't come around every year. Thank you again to all our parents. Thank you to our administration, to Mr. Miller, Ms. Clare, Mr. Brennan, and everybody that supported us in the city of Santa Ana,
3:29:56especially that's gotten behind modern day since 1950 thank you I just want to
3:30:25say a special shout out to Ash Jones here when I first met him he was like this tall so it's insane to see how much you've grown so congratulations to all of you guys let's gather up
3:30:33Thank you.
3:31:02I don't know. Mr. Chairman?
3:31:25I don't know.
3:31:35And does the City Council want us back? Yes. I was going to say, it might come down.
3:31:39Do you want to come down? I don't know. That'll do. You can put it together on the back of the bus. I want to come to the back of the bus.
3:31:46Thank you.
3:32:02Squeeze in a little bit.
3:32:23One more, one more. Ready? One, two, three.
3:32:39Perfect, thank you.
3:32:45Thank you.
3:33:00All right. The next presentation is mine. and it is to the apprenticeship career fair volunteers partners and staff for the exceptional contributions to the community come on up and join me please all of you all of you everybody that's here for this it was a huge success huge Huge success. Come on up. Did some leave? Some people leave. Sorry. They had to work.
3:33:43Okay, so some people had to leave because, you know, we ran a few minutes late. But before I start, I really want to say thank you you know, to the city staff, because they worked very hard to do this, and to our partners that are here here tonight and our partners that are not here. So let me start off with our partnership. We're grateful for the partnership and participation of the labor organizations, training partners, and community organizations who helped make this event possible. Labor 652.
3:34:24Yes, round of applause please. Western State Carpenters, the Orange County Labor Federation, SEIU United Healthcare Workers, the LA Orange County Building and Construction Trade Council, Laborers Training School, Santa Ana College, UA Local 582 Plumbers and Pipefitters, Operating Engineers Local 12, and IBW Orange County. Thank you. Thank you all very, very, very much. I always say we're a family. Now let me talk about city staff. We have Adesali Delgado. Yes, yes. Yes. Jeannie Mercado, Sandy Barba, Carlos de la Riva,
3:34:59Janine Salgado, Nay Buen, I'm sorry, Deborah Sanchez, Jesse Hernandez, Ivory Medina, Juan Cazares, Gabriela Garcia, David Gonzalez, Jessica Guerrero, Rochelle De Jesus, if I say your name wrong, I apologize, Waldo Borella, Edward Rios, Katie Ho, Daniel Garcia, Julie Castro, Arianna Rodriguez, is Savannah Spicer and Fernando Chevarria. Those are city staff members that made this all possible. So thank you all very, very much.
3:35:41And I wanted to recognize all of them because our partners and our city staff, because this is the second annual apprenticeship career fair. And I remember when I went to the city manager and our deputy city manager, and I had met with the laborers and the carpenters, and I was, can we do this? And they said, yeah, let's do it, let's do it. it so but we're gonna turn it over to the work center okay that's good we come up with the ideals and you all do the work so thank you so very much and we had about 300 people give or take the first year and I have to say that this
3:36:15year we welcomed more than 1,000 we say that number again more than 1,000 attendees from Santa Ana Orange County and across Southern California Demonstrating a strong demand for career pathways that provide stability, opportunity, long-term growth, great pay, medical, dental, retirement, all those wonderful things that they give and a great job. So my son works for one of the trades and he is extremely happy with his. The apprenticeship career fair connected residents directly with hands-on opportunities in skilled trades by offering access to training programs,
3:36:46mentorship and careers that led to family sustaining wages. These are not just jobs, they are pathways to economic mobility and brighter futures. I want to specifically again recognize the Santa Ana Work Center for your leadership and organizing this very impactful event. And we're looking forward to next year and it'll be even bigger, maybe we'll have 2,000 people. people. And because we've done such a great job, another city where Mickey Mouse lives wants to join and have a career fair as well. And then the people across the street, the
3:37:28county, they also want to have one, but they want us to move ours to Anaheim. And we said, no, we did it first. You're going to come here to Santa Ana. So if they want to have their own, they can, but they won't get a thousand people. I just want you to know that. So, but what does this reflect? This reflects our commitment to investing in people and creating opportunity for everyone. And I wanna emphasize how proud Santa Ana is to stand alongside our labor partners. Unions have been long at the heart of protecting workers and creating pathways for prosperity. And I know that because I was a member of a union for 30 years.
3:38:05They fight for fair wages, strong benefits, safe working conditions, and dignity on the job. Just as importantly, they invest in people through apprenticeships that allow residents to earn while they learn and build lasting careers. So I just wanted to say, to recognize each and every one of you, trying not to fall here, I wanted to recognize each and every one of you and say thank you. And I know there's a lot of people that are not here, so please thank them from all of us in the City of Santa Ana because a thousand people, successful, successful. So now what do we do next year or the end of this year?
3:38:42I keep looking at the deputy city manager like we do another one in October, right? But we're just gonna make it bigger bigger and better and offer people jobs and a future So with that anybody want to come up and speak? Yes, please
3:39:18What an honor to receive this award on behalf of the Santa Ana Work Center. Thank you mayor for all your support city managers office and everyone who helped out to make this event a success. Our unions, it was a pleasure working with all of you. I know for a couple months we were going back and forth, emails, just coordinating this wonderful event that brought so many opportunities, real, like you were saying, Mayor, real career opportunities to our Santa Ana community. So I do wanna thank everyone who supported us, and thanks again. Thank you, thank you.
3:39:32Thank you for the support. This is a true partnership with the City of Santa Ana and I'm Adam Elliott, local 582 plumbers and pipefitters, and we've taken in several century high school pre-apprenticeship from the Building Trace Pre-Apprenticeship Program. These kids are doing a great job for us and so it's a real thing with no student debt. I just wanted to throw that out there.
3:40:12yeah thank you thank you anybody else
3:40:34carlos camacho orange county labor fed just thank you mayor for partnering with us and exposing uh exposing your community to good union jobs thank you thank you all very much again and
3:40:41thank you for staying and being here tonight with us and let's take a photo thank you
3:40:53Thank you.
3:41:28Everyone come a little closer together.
3:41:40Then I have to touch him.
3:41:47I'll tell you. Right here, please. Good.
3:41:51Thank you.
3:42:19Hi, may I please ask the representatives of Bangla Viet to come up?
3:43:10up. No, up here.
3:43:17Oh, it's leaning. All right, well, I lean left.
3:43:31Hi, everyone. Thank you so much for being here. Today I'm doing the proclamation for Black April, recognizing April 30th as Black April, and it's being presented to Nguyen Viet Daily News. For those of you who don't know, on April 30th, 1975, South Vietnam fell to communist forces, marking the fall of Saigon. The event not only led to one of the largest mass exoduses of Vietnamese refugees in modern history, excuse me, of refugees in general in modern history,
3:43:35but also signaled the beginning of a new chapter for Vietnamese people, both in Vietnam and abroad. The fall of Saigon, though a time of immense tragedy, also marked the birth of the vibrant Vietnamese American community we know now. Every year on April 30th, the Vietnamese American community comes together to commemorate Black April or Tang Tu Dinh. This day marks the fall of Saigon, the end of the Vietnam War, and the fall of South Vietnam. It is a bittersweet moment for the Vietnamese diaspora mourning the loss of our country, the hardships
3:44:12endured, the lives lost, but it also reflects the incredible strength and and resilience of the communities that emerged from such tragedy. Between 1975 and 1995, over 3 million people fled Vietnam to escape the ravages of war and political persecution, including my parents and myself. The majority of these refugees found new homes in the United States, with Southern California emerging as a central hub for our community.
3:44:50The area is known today as Little Saigon and serves as a symbol of resilience, heritage, and the hope of the Vietnamese diaspora.
3:45:22Little Saigon in Orange County is home to over 200,000 Vietnamese residents. It is the largest concentration of Vietnamese people outside of Vietnam. And according to the recent U.S. Census Bureau data, approximately 25,000 Vietnamese Americans reside right here in Santa Ana, which is a testament to our community's strength and growing influence. This neighborhood represents both the history of our past and the bright future that we continue to build. And for those of you who don't know, Santa Ana was home to the first Vietnamese American grocery store, and the home where a lot of Vietnamese people in Southern California still live.
3:45:32In fact, if you leave California, Orange County, Vietnamese people in other states as well as other countries refer to coming to Little Saigon as coming to Santa Ana. So sometimes if you watch YouTube videos, they'll say, hey, I'm going to Santa Ana, and they really mean Little Saigon.
3:46:11Ngo Viet Daily News was founded in 1978. It is the first Vietnamese language newspaper in the United States. Upon immigrating to the United States three years prior, journalist Ngoc Yen Do saw there was a demand for Vietnamese news source in the United States due to the influx of Vietnamese immigrants. Do started the paper with his wife and children in their home garage with $4,000 in savings. Over the last 47 years, Nguoi Viet Daily News has become a cornerstone of Vietnamese American news outlets. With its focus on preserving and promoting the culture, Nguoi Viet, as it's known, has played a pivotal role in uniting
3:46:30generations of Vietnamese Americans. The paper continues to cover local matters in Little Saigon and to report on issues relevant to Vietnamese communities. And it's actually read worldwide. And they have a YouTube channel that is also watched worldwide. What happens here in Little Saigon is something that the Vietnamese diaspora all over the world pays attention to. In the five decades since the fall of Saigon and the remarkable journey of the Vietnamese American community in this country, we have built families, families, businesses, and legacies that continue to shape our collective future.
3:47:11As a proud Vietnamese American refugee myself, I am honored to present Nguyen Viet Daily News with the proclamation to declare April 30, 2026 as Black April. With this, we commemorate the lives lost during the Vietnam War era and honor the resilience and contributions of the Vietnamese American community.
3:47:48Thank you.
3:48:07Thank you very much, the city council, and especially to the councilwoman, Tai Viet Pham.
3:48:18I'm very grateful that the city recognized this event, and I think she said it all for us about the situation that happened to our country 51 years ago. But in a few days, a few more days, we will commemorate this event in our community. But I would like to say this. This commemoration is not only limited to the Vietnamese American community. I would like to extend also this commemoration to the 58,000 U.S. service members who sacrificed their lives
3:48:28to our sect in defending the freedom in our country during those wars. And untold, service members who came home physically and mentally injured because of the war. I also want to express our gratitude to our community to the welcoming of this country to our immigration, you know, in this country in the first days when we escaped the war. And I want to thank you, this country,
3:49:06who gave us a second chance of life in this free country. And just forever we are grateful. And I will share this kindness to our community. Thank you very much.
3:49:45Thank you.
3:50:41Thank you.
3:51:14Thank you.
3:51:34Thank you very much. Great presentations. At this time, Mr. City Manager, can we please have the presentation? Thank you.
3:52:15Yes, Mayor. The Senate Police Department is going to present a 2025 year-end update and our Chief Robert Rodriguez will help us with that.
3:52:24Good evening, Mayor and City Council. I appreciate the opportunity to provide an update of what your police department accomplished in 2025.
3:52:42At the core of everything we do is simple, our mission to protect life, preserve peace, enhance the quality of life, community trust, constitutional policing, and neighborhood focused strategies. What that means is that we use a neighborhood based approach to address specific concerns in each community, not a one size all fit strategy.
3:52:54This slide represents our calls for service throughout the year. Your department responded to over 435 calls for service. That includes emergency calls, non-emergency calls, and officer-initiated activity. As you can see, we received 109,606 911 calls for the entire year 2025. And I know these are large numbers, but what's important here is to understand that behind every number, it's a community member that requested assistance and that we responded. responded.
3:53:19In regards to workforce and staffing, we also made progress. We hired 32 officers in 2025 and reduced our vacancy rate despite the challenges that a lot of agencies are facing today. In 2025, we started with 45 vacancies and we ended up with 31. What that means is it strengthens our service delivery and it makes us more responsive to our community.
3:53:59Our investigations division, they closed 2800 cases, closed 3000 cases and they opened 2800 cases were assigned. What's important to notice is that this past year we closed more cases than we opened, which is rare. We had 161 arrests from investigations divisions and there was a lot of support from our forensic and crime scene support.
3:54:31Our crimes against person, this is our section that involves our homicide team, our gang gang enforcement and they investigate the most serious crimes. We The majority were solved and there were 10 arrests made in those 13 homicides. The Crimes Against Persons Division seized 72 firearms and made 395 arrests in 2025. This slide also shows a graph of our gun seizures. Even though 72 firearms were collected by the Crimes Against Persons Division, overall
3:55:04Overall we collected 295 firearms removed off the street in 2025. What's important to see here is the relationship between 2024. We removed more guns in 2024. However, even though we removed fewer guns in 2025, the increase of juveniles in possession of firearms increased. East. Our Special Investigations Division, they conducted over 320 operations. They focused on gangs, narcotics, and organized criminal activity. Through target operations, they removed dangerous
3:55:43drugs, illegal firearms, and disrupted criminal networks operating within the city. These are proactive efforts to design to prevent crime before it impacts our community. A lot of these drug seizures were obviously a collective effort by all officers and detectives involved, but more importantly we got to give credit to our canine narcotics dog, Poppy, who is present here today with Corporal Marshall.
3:56:23She's a black lab, so it's a friendly dog. So don't, you know, they're all friendly. I'm a dog person. They're all friendly. But canine poppies here, if anyone wants, you know, to hang out with canine poppy.
3:56:54Our quality of life team. This is an area where many of you have most likely seen the most impact from. They made over 2,300 arrests, 748 citations. They addressed repeated offenders and did a citywide cleanup operation. It's a balanced approach. They also obviously did a lot of, they did shelter placements and reunifications with families. families.
3:57:17Our directed patrol is in addition to cold. They focus on more specific problem areas. These are locations identified through our community feedback and data. Places where issues persist by targeting these areas, we create immediate improvements and long-term solutions.
3:57:45And of course, we wouldn't be a department without community engagement. engagement. We had over 104 community events. Over 35,000 residents were engaged. This builds trust and partnerships with our community. On the traffic side of the house, our traffic division investigated 29 fatal traffic collisions. They did numerous DUI enforcement and education education, and focus on reducing fatalities.
3:58:06In closing, what you see here reflects a department that's committed not just to enforcement, but also to service, accountability, and partnership.
3:58:43And that concludes my presentation.
3:58:55Thank you, Chief. We really appreciate that. And thank you, because I know Mr. City Manager, I had asked for the end of the year presentation. I think it's important for the community to hear from you, Chief, about all the things that are happening and the many, many calls. So if there's any comments by any Councilmember? Councilmember Hernandez?
3:58:58»» Thank you, Madam Mayor. Thank you, Police Chief Rodriguez for your report. A lot of information that was shared today. My question pertains to traffic safety. So you list 29 fatal collisions investigated. How many of those collisions involve law enforcement?
3:59:19That we investigated? None.
3:59:41Do we have law enforcement officers who may drive a vehicle who have ever hidden a car being driven by a civilian? Yes. Are any of those numbers included in the traffic safety?
3:59:44No, because those were investigated by us. That's a personnel matter.
3:59:57Okay. I just, I think when we talk about traffic safety, I want to not separate the police department from the issues that we are experiencing in the community because they're not isolated. My concerns are there's 29 fatal collisions and they were rightfully investigated by the police department. I am also very worried about residents who may be driving. I experienced this last council meeting I called the city manager literally leaving the city council chambers an Officer was speeding on Civic Center in Bristol passed by me without sirens without any of that
4:00:01That could have easily been a collision on Civic Center and and Bristol so I was interested in learning because I know that This has been an ongoing topic for the city is reducing liabilities reducing accidents occurred by police officers. So I wasn't sure what that 29 entailed, so I'm very thankful for you clarifying. Although that remains a very important liability for the city to address, I hope that we continue to train our officers. With respects to reducing liabilities as it pertains to accidents, what type of preventative measures has the department taken
4:00:39taken to ensure that we're reducing liabilities in the areas of, let's say, car accidents?
4:01:20Yes, thank you, Councilmember, for the question. So our officers receive advanced officer training, which includes driving. It also includes pursuit driving. And then in addition, what I have done is we send every officer in our patrol division Division and also in our Investigations Bureau back to hands-on emergency vehicle operations and driver training.
4:01:25That's wonderful, Chief Rodriguez. Do you have an idea how many officers have been trained within our department since you've made this decision to get them retrained?
4:01:52I don't have the exact number, no. Okay.
4:02:01Would you say it's a majority of the police department or do you think in terms of a percentage percentage-wise of 100%, would you say we're at 30%, 50%?
4:02:04I'd say at least about 75% to 80%.
4:02:14That's a very high threshold. Thank you. That right now remains the top questions that I wanted to ask you. I think you broke down the special investigations well in terms of the narcotics and the enforcement, the quality of life team. I know that a concern that I have is going to be making sure that we are effectively solving crime. I see that you shared that you guys have closed a number of investigations. So I think that that's a positive. If there's something that I would like to see more of is Santa Ana PD having a more community-based approach to the policing that they do.
4:02:16do. I think it's important that officers start to become more familiar with the residents and the communities that they serve. The Artisa Pilar Neighborhood Association, long before was a council member, we would have the opportunity to meet with an officer, share our concerns, what have you. But over the last several years, I've been seeing maybe lesser engagement from our police department with neighborhood groups. I think that that would be helpful in repairing sharing the relationship with the community, seeing them where they're at, hearing them out.
4:02:56In addition to sharing these great statistics that you've shared, I also think it's important that our department listen to the community. Maybe we have a forum on listening to the community in areas where we can make improvements. I think that that would be healthy. I think that can potentially improve relationships with the community. Given that the community feels very disenfranchised by this department, I want to be adamant that I want to see that work happen. I want to see a better working relationship with our residents. And that will conclude my comments for this round. Thank you.
4:03:28VICE CHAIR HARDIN. Thank you, Councilman Herndon. Any other comments?
4:03:59Chief, I just want to close out and say thank you. I know under SB 43 that your officers have been placing people that they're picking up in hospitals under SB 43. CHAIR POWELL.
4:04:05Yes. VICE CHAIR HARDIN.
4:04:15And I believe in the first quarter just of 2026 there's been eight people that have been placed in the hospital. CHAIR POWELL. Yes. So thank you as well as the 2025-2300 arrest. The SB43 has come in very handy. Can you talk a little bit about that?
4:04:16Yes, SB43 is the new legislation that came into place where if someone's gravely disabled we can place them as long as there's a bed available for them. We place them in a bed space so they can get us some help.
4:04:32Thank you so very much. And I would just like to say that I have a Neighborhood Association Leaders Meeting every single month at the Police Community Room or here in City Hall. And all neighborhood leaders are invited to attend so that that way they can interact with the City Manager, the Deputy City Manager, Parks and Rec, Budget, the Directors, and as well as you, Chief, and about all three of your Deputy Chiefs and the both Commanders members come so the community leaders have an ability to meet you there and also invite you to come out to their meetings. So thank you for doing that.
4:04:47And to all the community leaders that do come out to the Neighborhood Association leaders meeting, thank you for doing that because you are present at all of those meetings. And that says a lot because previously we did not have that type of interaction. So thank you. No other questions or comments? Thank you, Chief, so much for your presentation.
4:05:25Madam City Attorney, do we have anything to report out of closed session?
4:05:46Mayor, we do not have any reportable action.
4:05:50Thank you. This is the time of the meeting for the City Council to receive items from the public on agenda and non-agenda items. Madam Clerk, please explain the public comment procedures and call the first speakers, please.
4:05:53Yes, thank you, Mayor. Pursuant to resolution number 2025-004, speakers are requested to address the City Council directly and to refrain from profane language, racial epitaphs, and libelous or slanderous statements that disturb the decorum of the meeting. Pursuant to the Brown Act, the City Council may not enter into discussion at this time. Speakers will have three minutes for their comments. Before calling speakers, I'll report the summary of emails provided as of today at 2 p.m. We received a total of 18 e-comments, seven on non-agenda topics, and 11 regarding item number
4:06:0527. Those were distributed to the City Council and posted online for public review. We'll now hear We will hear from members of the public that are physically present in the Council Chamber followed by those on the conference call or Zoom to provide comments on agenda or non-agenda items. Please state your name and the ward or neighborhood that you reside in for the record. I'll call three names at a time here in the Chamber. If you could please line up behind the center podium in the aisle way. Sue Palak, Karen S., and Abe Q. These are the first three speakers. Sue, Karen, and Abe.
4:06:33Jonathan Hernandez, let me tell you something. The gentleman that called to talk about the Vietnam War, he's the reason why you should be standing for the flag. And I'm going to tell you right now, I'm from that era. I am 80 years old, and I go back to those 51 years. So I'm calling you out, shame on you. Tonight I'm going to, I'm Sue from Ward 4, you all know me. Councilwoman Lopez, I'm addressing you tonight.
4:07:11What I'm hearing is that you spent $20,000 for a one-week business seminar trip to Harvard when you didn't think anybody noticed.
4:07:42You found a legal way to do it, but was it morally right for the taxpayers that you serve? The look that Councilman Panellosa's face when he discovered this at an open council meeting said it all. He looked disgusted, he was shocked, and he was upset. Maybe $20,000 seems like an inconsequential amount to drop in the bucket when we are dealing with looming $19 million budget deficit, but think about this. Do you know what $20,000 could buy that would make a difference for working people, students, and seniors? Let me break it down for you.
4:07:51It could provide for 898 senior bus passes or 434 student bus passes or 289 regular bus passes. Then you have the audacity to go and spend $3,000 of Santa Ana taxpayer money on the Anaheim Latino Muslim Unity EID Fair. In my opinion, it sure looked like trickery and bait and switch because you held it in Anaheim when the city signed off on the fair that was to be held at 1610 East 1st Street, but it was not. What's the source of your payback money? You know, I'm intrigued now.
4:08:24I really would like to know how you're paying this back. Are we taxpayers just supposed to forget about this as we go to the voting booth?
4:09:06I cannot trust you with our taxpayer money. I will never vote for you to represent us in the city, county, or the state. And I will write in dog catcher instead next to your name. And I vote no for a 1.5% permanent tax increase. And the reason why is, is because I don't know where that money is actually going to get spent or how it will end up being repurposed. You should apologize to your constituents and to the entire city. I think that this issue is going to follow you all your political career. I will be back.
4:09:16Karen S., A.Q., Giovanni Chavez.
4:09:56Good morning. Good evening, council members and mayor. My question is very simple. I want to address it to Ms. Valerie and Ms. Phan. I would like to know when I can meet with you in private. I'm giving you the opportunity in private first about a matter that I wrote Ms. Valerie about 10 months ago that hasn't been resolved regarding the grant program. So when would you be able to meet with me? I would like to resolve it in private. If it can't be resolved, then I will make it public.
4:10:00I can't respond to you other than my chief of staff will meet you outside, okay? I'm giving my card and she'll help you.
4:10:36Okay, because I've tried the…
4:10:42No, no, I can't. We can't have a discussion.
4:10:43No, I understand that, but I have tried other avenues, so I want to definitely watch.
4:10:46She's right there. She'll meet you outside.
4:10:50That resolved. Thank you. Thank you.
4:10:51Abe Q, followed by Giovanni Chavez and Emma Gottfried.
4:10:57Good evening, City Council and staff and fellow Santaneros. My name is Abe. I also live in Ward 3 and I'm a member of the Police Accountability Committee of CSO Orange County. We're here tonight to defend trans- to demand transparency around the anti-ice protests that happened on June 9th and the following days. We demand a detailed report and a public hearing on those anti-ice protests. Item 10 on the agenda is a three-page summary that justifies the violence SAPD unleashed on protesters, not just Santa Ana residents, but adults and youths from all over Orange County.
4:11:09County. The summary states that all uses of force were, quote, applied in accordance with legal and department policy, but many people disputed those claims at the June 17th city council meeting. The truth is that officers deployed tear gas and fired rubber bullets indiscriminately into crowds. They injured a school board trustee and a woman with a baby stroller. Someone even filed a claim against the city and there has been no updates on that. Lawrence, Tony Lawrence Olson, give us some updates on his case. Officers damaged They damaged a small business in a video that went viral before the city addressed it, and
4:11:40they shot people in the head and torso with 40mm launchers. Again, go over the comments on the June 17th city council meeting. Someone was struck in the jaw by a 40mm projectile. Shame! I was there on the 11th. I was marching with hundreds of people on Main and 5th, and we saw an SAPD armored military vehicle driving south on Main Street. There were officers hanging off to the side. They were dressed in full tactical gear carrying rifles as if they were entering a war zone. zone. That vehicle ended up turning around and leaving in less than two minutes. Because
4:12:12the truth is that the department's response to these protests was disproportionate and aggressive and the people who were there that day, myself, some of the council members here, even Supervisor Sarmiento, everyone believes in the fact, we are all united on the fact that SAPD were the ones to escalate to using violence. According to the report, there were 27 arrests made and only five protesters injured, but this is all the information we get. That's it and we wanted a full detailed report the department has reportedly refused to publish any body camera footage from these protests and these specific
4:12:43incidents but the public has a basic democratic right to know what happened and to determine for itself if the department's use of force is justified we have a right to determine who is policing us and how they do it especially when over 24 million dollars of taxpayer money has been spent on police misconduct settlements over the last 10 years like Sue said think about how that money could go towards working-class people. Let's not give more money to Santa Ana PD. They're getting 160 million of this year's budget. We spent only 17 on community development and our
4:13:14libraries programs. That shows where where our priorities are. CSO fights for community control of the police and that is what we need to get real transparency and accountability from Santa Ana PD. We need to expand community involvement in the police oversight commission. We need to increase the commission's powers and budget so they can investigate killer cops like Luis Casillas and isaac ibarra and so we can hold the department accountable when they brutalize protesters who are standing up for our communities these protests are not going to stop they're going to keep coming
4:13:44they're going to keep getting bigger fire killer cops luis casillas and isaac ibarra justice for
4:14:11noah rodriguez next three speakers giovanni chavez emma gottfried jrc good evening mayor and city
4:14:16council i'm giovanni chavez santa ana resident in ward six and i'm here to speak in favor of item Item 27. I first want to thank Council Member Phil Becerra for agendizing this item, which would encourage our state legislators to amend the legislation adding Santa Ana the Speed Safety Pilot Program under AB645. The safety of our kids should always be our main and most important priority. I have spoken to hundreds of residents, many of which have expressed concerns about the speeding that happens near school zones and highly populated areas in the city. These are real concerns.
4:14:27concerns. No one should have to raise a family or build a life here looking over their shoulder. For years we have been told that we cannot add speed bumps on all streets where speeding occurs because they would delay emergency response times and cause safety hazards. This proposal would be easier to implement, it's efficient, and it will deliver faster results for our residents. This speed safety pilot program focuses specifically on school zones and high injury areas, the areas most in need. It builds an automated fine system in the the most dangerous speeding areas. The revenue from these fines will go directly to building
4:14:59safe street infrastructure, so as we're dealing with the looming budget deficit, we can address speeding while funding safety at the same time. It's a win-win for our communities. Therefore, I encourage the Council to approve this item. The safety of our children is not political and this is a common sense proposal we can all unite behind. Together, we can make a positive impact for the present and the future of our city. Thank you.
4:15:33Emma, followed by Jair and Yohan Lopez.
4:15:57Before I start, I notice that y'all keep changing the camera angles to not show the banner back there. That's shameful.
4:16:08But good evening, City Council. My name is Emma Gottfrieden. I'm a member of community service. Community Service Organization, Orange County, and its Police Accountability Committee. We're here to demand a detailed report and a public hearing on SAPD's actions during the anti-ICE protests on June 9th. This very room was filled with hundreds of people right after these protests, people lining out the door, speaking for hours about the city's, how frustrated they were with the city's response to ICE and the National Guard's presence here in the city and how SAPD responded, and we haven't forgotten what SAPD did.
4:16:17While our community was out here protesting ICE and the National Guard and trying to protect each other, SAPD brutalized us. They fired over 250 less lethal munitions and 35 chemical agent munitions. That's not protection, that's not the actions of a police force trying to protect public safety and promote de-escalation, as the report on this item says and that presentation just given. This response by SAPD is one of countless situations that shows that SAPD is not here to protect our community and still refuses to be transparent with us and it requires real oversight and accountability. At a time when we need more transparency,
4:16:56the city manager and city attorney's office reached out to council member Phil Becerra and our mayor to attack Santa Ana's Police Oversight Commission to try to remove its ability to independently investigate to investigate situations like this. If Santa Ana's Police Oversight Commission was fully staffed and empowered at the time, they could have conducted independent investigations in the incident. When people were injured, they could have submitted these complaints to the Oversight Commission.
4:17:37And in this report given on this item, they stated that all the operations are conducted in accordance to department policy, which means that that policy needs to change. change. And the Oversight Commission should have the power to change it, should be one of many things that have the power to change it, and every resource to pursue that. We need a stronger Oversight Commission, not a weaker one. And we're demanding, and once again, we're demanding a full detailed report on this incident and a public hearing on SAPD's response. And also, the police year-end update that was just given was filled with very vague
4:18:04cherry-picked information that report did not promote any transparency or give any context to SAPD's actions that's just shameful thank you for your time and justice for Noe Rodriguez
4:18:45greetings council members mayor my name is Jair and I'm here today to not only voice my support for the Santa Ana residents of the Coach Royal Mobile Home Park, but I am also here to talk about the blessings and responsibilities, and you'll see how this connects in just a moment. This week, I've thought a lot about the prayers and the blessings that were given to me by Creator, by God, and in my eyes, many of our community members, there is a knowledge that I'm sure you're aware of that there's a conviction that the Creator does not let us down, even in our hardships.
4:19:07And when he answers our prayers and pours us with those blessings, we practice gratitude. And how do we practice that gratitude as believers? As human beings abiding by the law of community, we take responsibility, right? But what does that mean? Regardless of whether you believe in this creator or other entities, you've been given a blessing of sitting on those seats. You ask for that. So you have that responsibility. You ask for that responsibility. And your responsibility, as I'm sure you've experienced, can be tiresome, stressful, and
4:19:39it feels like you can't satisfy everybody, compassion fatigue, but regardless, you've been given this blessing because you asked for it. You asked for this responsibility. Remember that. One question I do have in regards to this matter is how money distorts blessings and responsibilities. responsibilities. Does money distort blessings and responsibilities? Yes, of course. It's not a secret that financial contributions that have an influence on the direct action of political leaders. It is why institutions such as the Santana Police Officers Association
4:20:16donates to your campaigns. It is why entities like the Western Manufactured Housing Communities Association donated a thousand to fill, two thousand to Amesqua, donated sixty thousand in a campaign against the RSO, the rent stabilization and just cause eviction ordinance, why manufactured housing education trust PAC donated almost $7,000 to Phil, $12,000 to Amesqua, about $2,000 to Penalosa, and another $49,000 to the campaign against the RSO again. So the second question, two parts, is, is this what's influencing your frequent responses that
4:20:50that there is nothing you can do to enforce what you know is an unjust and illegal acts by Kingsley against the cultural mobile park home residents? Or is it the fact that in the RSO regulations, policies, and procedures handbook, which provides just cause eviction protections for most tenants to occupy a residential real property or mobile home under the enforcement section of page 14, check it out it's left blank who enforces that so if an ordinance is not being implemented and enforced when they're supposed to be designated bodies like the rental housing board then there should not be some kind of audit on this
4:21:25ordinance and its enforcement so remember it's your responsibility to the people you asked for this responsibility so take it up
4:22:04Next, the next three speakers, Johan Lopez, Hector Bustos, and John Ramirez.
4:22:15Good evening. My name is Isabella, and I'm here to voice for Johan Lopez on behalf of Johan Lopez with Affordable Dentists. Good evening, council members and Mayor Mezcua. We are here to address a critical and preventable public health issue in Santa Ana, limited access to basic dental care. In partnership with Affordable Dentists, our community initiative provides free dental screenings and oral health education to under-deserved families, focusing on prevention and early intervention to reduce long-term health costs. This effort is supported by faculty from the UCLA School of Dentistry and student volunteers
4:22:23volunteers from Santa Ana College, University of California Los Angeles, and University of California Irvine, bringing together experienced clinicians and future providers in a unified community effort. Untreated dental disease remains a leading cause of pain, miss work and school, and preventable healthcare costs. By delivering care directly into the community, we remove barriers and provide immediate impact. We would welcome the opportunity to partner with the city to expand this initiative through the following. Community events and city facilities, public health outreach coordination, community awareness efforts.
4:23:04We respectfully request a brief meeting with your office to discuss implementation and alignment with city priorities. We thank you for your leadership and commitment to the health of Santa Ana residents. and we look forward to working together to expand access care. Respectfully, Mia Amaya, Johan Lopez, and Jaime Fernandez from Community Health Medical and Dental Care Clinic. Thank you.
4:23:45Hector Bustos, John Ramirez, Carla Alvarado.
4:24:20Thank you. Good evening, Mayor and City Council. My name is Hector Bustos and tonight I'm here to speak on behalf of CHSPA. CHSPA provided a letter via email outlining concerns that the organization has over item 27, seeking that the City of Santa Ana become a part of an automated speeding ticketing program through AB645. Nearly 100 petition signatures were collected in less than 24 hours from Santa Ana residents concerned about this item. so Chispa is urging the City Council to pause this item and not move forward with requesting changes to AB645 until there has been deeper research, clear information, and meaningful community
4:24:25engagement. I want to be clear that Chispa supports safe streets and effective solutions that can reduce speeding and make streets safer for all, especially pedestrians and cyclists. If our goal is to truly make our streets safer and reduce traffic related injuries and deaths, then we should be consistently investing in solutions that are proven to work. There's strong evidence that infrastructure-based improvements, things like speed humps, race crosswalks, bulb-out sidewalks, and safer street design are effective at slowing down traffic and preventing harm before it
4:25:01happens. These approaches address the root of the problem. They change driver behavior in a consistent and preventative way without relying on punishment or data collection after the fact if the council chooses to move forward with the request to be included in the automated speeding ticketing program then we strongly urge you to begin an intentional community engagement process now a process that not only gives community members the ability to share their position on this but also understand this program and how it will impact them people deserve to understand how these systems work what data is being
4:25:34being collected and how it will be used and what safeguards are in place. That level of engagement has not happened yet. If the Council decides to move forward in exploring this, the next step must be a highly publicized study session that is accessible to the public with clear information, community education and opportunities for meaningful dialogue. That study session should be proactive, multilingual and designed to reach the communities most most impacted, not just those already engaged in the process. So again, CHSPA's request to the City Council is simple and reasonable.
4:26:10We're asking you to pause this item and not move forward at the time, but if you choose to move forward, that you direct staff to conduct a more comprehensive analysis of how these programs have worked in other cities, including costs, timelines, effectiveness, and any other unintended consequences, as well as directing staff to present all of this information in a work study session that is that is accessible to all residents thank you
4:26:45next three speakers john ramirez carla alvarado diana t
4:27:13good evening mayor city council members and city staff my name is john ramirez and i've been a resident in santa ana my entire life and currently reside in the piccolo neighborhood i'm here tonight I'd like to speak in favor of agenda item 27 that requests state legislation amend AB645 to allow our city of Santa Ana to establish a speed safety system pilot program. This is pretty self-evident why we need this. We obviously have people speeding left and right in our city. It's led to injury and even death. And that needs to slow down. In a perfect world, the speeding will stop completely, but that ain't ever going to happen.
4:27:21so getting people getting speeding to drop considerably is the next best thing and I believe this program can definitely help in that regard I was at my own neighborhood Association meeting in piccolo recently and a majority of residents that sorry a majority of residents at that meeting stated they want they wanted more police enforcement due to illegal parking and speeding in our neighborhood and I promise it's not me being biased towards having more enforcement my neighbors actually stated this at our meeting and i bet the same sentiment of
4:27:59support resonates among the majority of residents throughout our city because as it's well known for anyone paying attention public safety is at the top of the list among residents surveyed when we take the budget survey every year the bottom line is if we all care about public safety we should all be supportive of this agenda item that councilman becerra has brought forward and And thank you, Council Member Becerra, for bringing it forward.
4:28:35Please support agenda item 27. Doing so means a safer Santa Ana, which is what we all want, but more importantly, what we all need. I hope all of you support it. Thank you, Mayor, Council Members, and city staff, and to our police and fire personnel present tonight, thank you for all you do, and please stay safe out there. Have a good night.
4:29:03Next three speakers, Carla Alvarado, Diana T., Frank Bahena.
4:29:27Good evening. I come here once again to talk about our situation in Coach Royal. I want to be very clear of what we're dealing with. It doesn't start or end with retaliatory baseless evictions, harassment, threats, intimidation, What we're experiencing is real estate theft, systemic loss of people's homes, their equity, and everything they have worked for over years and decades. These are not just residences, these are people's lifetime investments.
4:29:35Through coordinated pressure, abusive process, and strategic displacement, residents are are being pushed into losing their homes, including myself and a lot of other residents that are sitting behind me. Under deeply unlawful circumstances, not in isolated incident, but as a part of a pattern. The city of Santa Ana has already met with 45 residents who can testify to this, 45 residents and counting. We have spoken to people across multiple parks. The stories are consistent, the tactics are consistent, is consistent and the outcomes as well. That is the definition of a systemic issue.
4:30:14At that point, this is no longer a private dispute as you guys try to sweep it under the rug and have me just litigate my case. It is a matter that warrants referral and investigation at the appropriate enforcement level, including the California Department of Justice and the District Attorney's Office. And yet, despite repeated requests and begging you guys to do so, this has not happened. I have begged each and every one of you guys for that. So I will ask this clearly because the people of Santa Ana, not only ourselves, deserve clear responses. At what point does this threshold for action get met?
4:30:53How many residents need to come forward? How much more damage are we waiting to see? Before this is recognized as a pattern requiring enforcement because when dozens of residents, hundreds of residents are present in consistent accounts over displacement and loss of property, and the response remains inaction or deflection, that is not neutrality. That's failure to intervene when intervention is warranted. We did not come here asking you to litigate our cases. We came here because you have a responsibility to this community to ensure that when there is credible evidence of a pattern of harm, it is not ignored.
4:31:31This is not complex, it's not unclear, and it's not going away. Ignoring it does not make it disappear, it enables it. So today we're just asking you to acknowledge it, and we're asking for a formal referral to the appropriate agencies, recognition of this systemic issue affecting multiple residents, a transparency on what steps this city will take, and the audit of the RSO because the enforcement is unclear, so it's not being implemented and defeats the purpose of it. Thank you.
4:32:12Next three speakers are Diana and then Frank and Rain Mendoza.
4:32:47Hi, my name is Diana and I'm a resident of the Pacific Park neighborhood. I'm here in support of the Coach Royal mobile home park residents and to support the demands of Kingsley Out. I'm a proud member of the immigration committee of CSO and I'm here to talk about why this is important to our organization. The residents of Coach Royal have faced years of mistreatment, harassment, and home theft at the hands of Kingsley management. The residents of the mobile home parks are primarily immigrant and working class. They work hard and sacrifice a lot to be able to have these homes.
4:32:52As you all know, the Trump administration has created an atmosphere of fear for immigrants. A lot of people are already afraid to go grocery shopping, drop their kids off at school, or or even go to work due to the potential to be picked up and brutalized by ICE. Generally, people feel the most safe at home during these times. That is their refuge. Kingsley Management has ruined that for these residents. They are no longer safe even at home. They face harassment and threats of calling ICE on them. A lot of their homes have even been taken. So imagine working so hard and sacrificing so much to buy a mobile home.
4:33:26It becomes your refuge during these times and then it is stolen from you. Shame! This is a disgrace and an injustice to the immigrant community of Santa Ana. We have a sanctuary city ordinance that states that immigration is the cornerstone of Santa Ana. It states that the city welcomes, honors, and respects residents regardless of their immigration status. That the city wants to address the fears and concerns of its immigrant residents. Kingsley's actions go against the spirit of this entire entire ordinance. They are exploiting the fear of the immigrant population in Santa Ana. They are hoping the fear will be enough to force
4:34:02the residents to keep their heads down and their mouths shut. They are exploiting this community and their fear to increase their profits by stealing their homes. This is a multi-million dollar corporation from Utah. Why are we allowing them to exploit Santa Ana like this? Why are we allowing them to create more fear in the community alongside Donald Trump. I'll repeat that this is a disgrace and injustice to the immigrant community of Santa Ana and we demand Kingsley out now.
4:34:41Next three speakers, Frank Bahena, Rayn Mendoza, Guadalupe Baragon.
4:35:18Hello to the City Council.
4:35:30AI. I don't know if you guys have seen the YouTube videos of Iran mocking us and trolling our current president. Which while it might be a bit embarrassing, you cannot deny has been effective to use AI in those instances. Today I'm here to talk about the item number 27, about the ALDRs, and why we should not continue moving forward with this item number. For three reasons. One, AI is unreliable. Two, it is basically mass surveillance for people and residents living here. And three, the cost.
4:35:35So to start off, we want to use these cameras for safety, which is an honorable goal, and who doesn't want safety for their community? The truth is, according to the ACLU in 2026, a grandmother, Kimberly Williams, from Maryland Maryland, no, take that back, from Oklahoma, was arrested on a warrant that was basically – I'll take one sec.
4:36:17Kimberly Williams, a grandma, was arrested wrongfully for six months because AI was used to wrongfully arrest her for a warrant in Maryland even though she lived in Oklahoma.
4:36:48And this isn't a one-off case. This has happened constantly throughout the years. According to the ACLU and others, the error rate of these cameras are around 10%
4:37:04and they tend to have bias towards low-income and minority groups. Second, mass surveillance. It doesn't just catch crime, it tracks everyone. which according to the ACLU has led to abuses in its data, which not with being shared with out of state, such as Texas, to be able to enforce their abortion bans, as well as ICE, the same ICE who has terrorized the residents of our city,
4:37:22and to even people outside of the police department to be able to follow their exes or whomever they find fit to be able to follow.
4:37:54And number three, the cost. According to the OC register in 2024, it cost around $400,000 for a two-year contract to install and maintain these cameras. And I'm sure it will go up as the time goes by. And not only that, six days ago, the Institute for Justice in San Jose has filed a class last auction lawsuit against these cameras due to privacy and due to privacy and the Fourth Amendment violations which will which will
4:38:05increase our cost to this city thank you next three speakers rain Mendoza Guadalupe Barragan Carlos Barragan
4:38:38You guys don't want to show the banner. I don't know why. Maybe you support Kingsley. You don't support the residents? What's going on here?
4:38:50You can restart my time. This meeting started like an hour late or something, like an hour of awards. Anyway, I'm Rain. I'm with the Immigration Committee with CSO and I'm here to make a public comment in support of the Santa Ana residents that the City Council has done everything to neglect. When the Coach Royal residents have come to make public comment or reached out to individually to some of you, like you Mayor Mezcua, there is always the same tired answer that nothing can be done. First of all, you have an ordinance. The rent stabilization and just cost eviction ordinance in place to protect renters, including
4:39:06owners of mobile homes. There is section 8-3122, which includes the provisions on anti-harassment, repeated acts intended to drive out residents, and threatening to report immigrants to the authorities. These are all things Kingsley Corporation has done to countless residents in Coach Royal that violate this law. City Council claims to be unable to do anything due to this being a private property. However, just as recent as last year, the Orange County Superior Court granted the city's requests for a preliminary injunction against the property and business owners of Royal Roman Motel,
4:39:40Royal Grand Inn and Marisco El Tapatio y Antojitos located on East First Street. So this city council can step in and do something even if it is against private property, so we see an example of this. You do so when it comes to the issue of homelessness which many of which some of you in this council have never hid your disdain for. Again we see the same example with the city stepping with taking El Centro Cultural de Mexico to court back in 2021 for the homeless encampment. So you sued El Centro, a pillar to this community, so you can use your cops to toss homeless people's
4:40:17belongings into the trash and put them out of a place where they were allowed to stay there by the property owners. So you can do all that and you can use the courts and the police and all your resources to terrorize a very vulnerable community but you can't lift a finger when there is a company that operates in san anna that acts like thugs that harasses evicts and even in extreme cases causes the suicide of one of the residents yes that did happen shame on you you have existing laws and resources at your disposal and we demand kingsley out now also i wanted to fill in some
4:40:52gaps for your 2025 sapd review you forgot to mention the murder of freddie washington and henry gonzalez jr and also the brutalization of the anti-ice protesters and killer cops isaac ibarra and luis casillas still being on the payroll shame
4:41:28The next three speakers, Guadalupe Barragan, Carlos Barragan, Sylvia Ayala.
4:41:52but here we are again and we are not going to let him take his finger off the bar. All of you have told us to demand and that we demand. You already know that we demand the Kinsley Corporation, we already demand it. We do not need you to give us an education of what has to be done. It is your responsibility to do this. You have to sobrepasar la línea y si se sienten incapaces de ayudarnos mándenlo al fbi a una a otra otra categoría necesitamos ayuda no sé qué van a hacer que están
4:42:13haciendo en esas en esas asientos que se les ha puesto necesitamos que respondan hay familias enteras con niños ustedes son una ciudad santuario que lo que están haciendo que es lo que van a hacer por la comunidad de santa ana vivimos We are here. They need to respond. Phil Becerra, you wanted to intimidate us when we came to your office. What are you going to do? We need you to respond to us too, Jonathan Hernandez. You went and you supported us. We need more of your support. City Manager, we need your help. Please, Valeria Mezcua, I know my presence doesn't please you
4:42:50because you scolded my daughter. I don't know what you were thinking when you said you were going to come with the big guns. We are waiting for you.
4:43:30And even if you laugh, that is a lack of respect. One last thing. We don't want reprisals. Do you know what I mean?
4:43:47Good evening to all the members of the Santa Ana community. I know that you don't like my face. You don't like seeing my presence here, but I'm here again. We are not going to move from this topic. You're all telling us that we need to sue Kingsley. You don't need to tell us what to do. You don't need to educate us on what we need to do. You need to respond to our needs. You're telling us that you can't do anything. Well, then take this to the FBI. Take it somewhere else. I'll stick it to a higher category. We need your help. What are you going to do? You're there to represent us. You're sitting there.
4:44:03Our families are being affected. Children are being affected. We have a sanctuary city in Santa Ana, so what are you going to do? Santa Ana is the community. You need to respond to this. Mr. Becerra, you intimidated us when we came to see you. Mr. Hernandez, you came to visit us, you came to support us, now we need you to support us even more. Mr. City Manager, we need your support. Valerie Emescu, I know you don't like me, and I know that you scolded my daughter, I don't know for what reason, and you said that you're going to be bringing the big guns. What do you mean by that?
4:44:38We are here waiting for you. You're laughing at us, or you're smirking at us, and you're saying that you're going to do something. We're waiting for that.
4:45:16The next three speakers, Carlos Barragan, Silvia Ayala, Patty Cabada.
4:45:27They're not going to let us do what we came here to do. You know what? We're not happy that we've been robbed. We're not happy. We don't agree. We're dealing with a corporation that is a white collar mafia. And you know what? We need help. If you don't give us help, I understand. You've already said that you can't help us. They sent us a man named Saulo Mesquite, something like that, and he made us do some They have USB drives. We are people of 70 years old. We are from the old school. We don't even know what that means. And you know what? They make us waste time. Just say, we can't.
4:45:57We have already passed, in any case, with the county. The county also told us the same thing. We can't help you. It's okay. We passed with the state. It said the same thing. We can't. It's very good. You know what? We are going to go, we are going to talk, to escalate more, more from here on, with the Department of Justice and as the lady just said, I think if not, to get to the FBI, because you know what? These people cannot continue coming from other states to steal from us here, to take away our properties, to take away our money. We have done it to the right.
4:46:36We have worked decades to buy our properties to the right, without doing anything illegal, like they do. You know, I feel horribly bad for all this. There are 10 children who took me out of there, 10 of my grandchildren, my two daughters and my two grandsons. You know what? It's very bad. We have 30 more houses that were taken from them and stolen. Here they are, many of them are present. You know, I need to write a book about this, so that the truth can be seen.
4:47:14They are trying to say that César Chávez raped and that he didn't rape. You know what? The truth, that doesn't concern me. It's 70 years, 80. If he raped, if he didn't rape, he would be before a Supreme Court and he would go to trial.
4:47:51Carlos, your time is up. Magia al rojo vivo en Santa Ana. May God bless you. Excuse me.
4:48:38Good evening, my name is Carlos Barragan. And we are here to talk about this issue. They have stolen, this corporation has stolen over $500,000 of our property. We're here to ask for your help. You say that you can't, but when somebody takes candy from a kid, the kid is crying. That's what we are here to do. We are not happy that they have stolen our properties. We are dealing with a corporation which is white collar mafia. We are here to ask for your help, but now you say that you can't.
4:48:52You sent us some guy named Saul LaMesquita, and he brought some USB drive. We're 70 years old. We don't know anything about USB drives or anything like that. If you can't help it, just tell us. Just tell us that you can't. We went to the county. The county told us that they can't. Fine. We went to the state. The state also told us that they cannot help us. That's fine. Now we're going to have to go higher. We want to escalate this. Like the lady said, we might need to go to the Justice Department, go to the FBI, because they are stealing our property. They're stealing our money. And we've done everything right.
4:49:31We've done everything work for decades. And they want to take this away. We haven't done anything illegally. We've done everything right. And now it's terrible. Ten of my kids, ten kids are displaced, ten of my grandkids, two of my daughters and their husbands. There have been 30 homes that have been stolen. I think I'm going to be writing a book that exposes the truth, that is what is going on.
4:50:10and we we need to work work on this there's the talking about Cesar Chavez and that Cesar Chavez raped someone that was 70 or 80 years ago and he will be judged by the ultimate judge they talk about Christopher Columbus in school they told us that he discovered this country we were here in this country before. I guess I'm going to write a book. The title of the book would be something like the book, The Boot on the Neck or Rediscovering the Truth or What's Happening in Santa Ana. God bless you.
4:50:41I am one of the people who came to complain about the problem that they made with us, that they took our house. I am one of them. Almost three months ago and until today, nothing has been solved, and no one has said anything. On the contrary, they are telling us that the city of Santa Ana cannot help us.
4:51:39is otros ayudarnos a recuperar nuestras casas porque nos quitaron nuestras casas hasta hoy es una pregunta que nadie respondido porque nadie respondido porque nadie le importa porque si fuera uno de ustedes dos de ustedes tres cuatro cinco de ustedes ya se hubieran vuelto locos todos ustedes para recuperar sus residencias porque ustedes viven en residencias no en casas morocon como nosotros y es una pena que nadie de ustedes esté disponible ayudar nos como dijeron ellos pues ya se habló mucho a ustedes que son la ciudad que son los
4:52:31gobiernos que son todo lo que dicen ser ustedes pero nada más son para ustedes no para el pueblo tengo 40 años aquí y nunca ha recibido una ayuda de ustedes porque ustedes no se preocupan por el pueblo ustedes se preocupan por ustedes When you take a check from the entire people, you certainly work, but we have to work even more than you. The humiliation that you make to us, those who have money, is not worth it. It is not worth it because we are human beings. We are made of flesh and blood like you. It hurts.
4:53:08le duele entonces no entendemos porque nadie está disponible ayudarnos a solucionar el problema no sé porque no han desnudado a la persona que nos ha quitado nuestra casa yo al igual que todos se vienen a quejar del mismo problema me dieron un mensaje hoy de que la ciudad no está disponible de que el condado no está disponible. Entonces, díganos abiertamente si no están disponibles a hacer nada por nosotros, para como dicen ellos, ir a hablar con el FBI, buscar otras
4:53:45personas que sean más altas que ustedes para ver si están disponibles. Porque yo creo que aquí con ustedes ya no hay nada que hacer. Gracias.
4:54:23.
4:54:35I was here three months ago when this thing started. I was one of the people who came here to, they took our house away. We want to know why they took our house away. We don't even know why they're taking our house away. Three months ago we came here. We're here now and there's still no solution to the situation. You're saying, the city of Santa Ana is saying that they cannot help us. It's very sad, it's very sad that you, being Mexican like us, cannot help us. And if you cannot help us, you know, this is sad.
4:54:43And if you that are Mexicans need to hear us, and for the people who do not speak Spanish, they need to translate for them. It's not fair that you're not doing anything for us. They're taking away our homes. We don't even know why they're taking away our homes. There is no answers. There is no explanations as to why this is happening. You are not doing anything. If this would happen to you, you would go crazy trying to get your property back. but because you live in nice homes you don't live in mobile home mobile homes
4:55:21like we do you don't care the city is you are the city you're the government you're not doing anything we need to to help us you need to help us you're not helping the people I've been living here for over 40 years and you have not done anything for me we pay for you we're you're paid by the people and we need to work even harder because to support to help you to support you and we have been humiliated by people who have money we are human beings just like you we hurt
4:55:58just like you and if you're not going to help us solve this issue we need to this we need to find out why we these people you need to reveal why these people took took our property, why these people took our homes, and I received a message from the city that they cannot help us. They're not available to help. The county is not available to help. Then if we do not get help, then we're going to go up higher to the FBI to more people who can actually help.
4:56:36Patty, go ahead.
4:57:13Good evening. My name is Patrice Acabada. I'm a former resident from here.
4:57:16I'm here in support of the residents from Kingsley Mobile Home.
4:57:21I'm not a lawyer, so I have questions for those of you that are, and you have some at your disposal. It seems that the residents that are undocumented have been going through a variety of things. Now my question is, does fraud and extortion, if you look into it, would it help those undocumented documented residents that have been victimized, would they be able to apply for a U visa? Have you looked into that? Have you asked the district attorney to look into the situation there? I keep hearing from the residents there, because I am speaking to the residents there. I keep hearing the same things,
4:57:26and that's nobody here can help them. But all of you have relationships relationships with different people within our county at county levels. So if crimes are being committed, why is the district attorney not being called to investigate? At least to open an investigation. Because if a woman who is legally allowed to be here with a residence card kills kills herself with her son finding her, I would think that that would make you want to put a little bit more effort than what you're currently doing to help the residents there.
4:58:08This is not a situation that should just be tossed to the side. These are your constituents. This is an election you're, I need to remind all of you, all of you, your public servants, As easily as you were put there, you can easily be voted out. Those residents that are behind me, they have a lot of support, not only from this city, but from surrounding cities and counties. So I would think that it would be wise of those of you that are running for a seat this term to take the time out of your day to invest with these residents.
4:58:46and not erase their comments on your social media, not to ignore phone calls because your actions speak louder than words and if you are currently sitting at this position and you're failing them then what are you going to do to your constituents once you move up to a higher position? You will fail miserably because you have a woman who committed suicide and I think that's the part that that is bothering everyone so much is that her suicide, a working mother, has been disregarded as if it means nothing. But it means everything to her son, everything to her family.
4:59:28So I urge you, please use your resources to help your constituents that are coming out to you, asking you for your help, because again, you're public servants. Patricia, your time is up.
5:00:09Mayor and City Council, that concludes the public speakers that are currently present.
5:00:28Thank you, Madam Clerk. Mr. City Manager and Madam City Attorney, can you please give us an update on the work that the city has been doing around the mobile home police? I know I spoke to Assemblyman Avellino-Valencia's office this morning as well. So can you please give an update? Thank you.
5:00:32Mayor, if I could just start. I know the last time we had some speakers, we also offered a brief update. So I just want to make sure that the speakers understand that there is a state mobile home residency law that HCD ‑‑ Can you speak louder, ma'am? I'm sorry. There is a state mobile home residency law. The law is administered by a state department called HCD, Housing and Community Development. The city is preempted from enforcing those rules. So that's one set of laws that are on the books that the residents can pursue. pursue, but we cannot pursue for them.
5:00:48They will have to individually, just like they've come here before you, they would need to petition or bring those complaints before HCD. The last meeting, I did read into the record, so if those individuals would like to go back to that last meeting, I did read into the record the law, the contact information and what they could do. So that's one level. The second thing is, I do just want to state, I think it is extremely unfair to accuse us of not doing anything i know that when people get emotional we talk in absolute statements but it's
5:01:24just not fair our housing staff and the attorney and the city attorney's office who's assigned to do work on housing issues has been looking at our ordinance has given staff direction on what petitions can be filed and we are working we have met with with the residents and we are right now have the petition process going through the process under our ordinance. It may not be giving the results that they want immediately, but that ordinance can only do so much. So we have the state law, we have the city law. I also understand, and
5:01:57maybe City Manager's Office can expound on this, that there have been suggestions of who to contact at the state level. So I think those are three things that that we've done. What I'd like to do for the city council, and I think this is a little bit unfortunate, we've done some extensive, extensive review and legal research to determine the whys, how did this happen? Like to also just state that I'm not, as your city attorney, a particular fan of Kingsley Management. They sued us twice, they tried to challenge our ordinance, they've been difficult to work with at best, and quite frankly, they don't have the best reputation
5:02:35in the state of California when it comes to mobile homes. That's just true. So as I want the residents to understand that as a city attorney I understand that and I will do everything we can to enforce the laws and make sure that the management company complies with the laws But at the end of the day when we research this for every resident that's come forward They all have different circumstances Some of them were subject to legally enforced eviction laws once that's happened quite frankly there's nothing we can do when there's a court order that has evicted them in other cases there was a court order they were legally
5:03:12represented by attorneys these people had legal representation and they exhausted their remedies under those legal issues there were orders to sell some of those molehomes and we can't undo that so what I'd like to do is work with staff to maybe get you some of those things in writing I've been hesitant to do that because I did not want to violate their personal privacy privacy. Because for many of them, some of them signed agreements and took cash. But you know, if that's what we need to do to make sure that the other residents in the city understand that we're not do nothing people, that we are dedicated to helping them
5:03:46and that we've tried, I will work with staff to get you a written response on those issues. But that's what we found. Legal and legally enforceable orders in the court, settlement agreements that were signed, and court orders to sell some of the units.
5:04:19Thank you, Madam City Attorney. I really appreciate that. and it sounds like we've done some extensive work and I know some of the families walked out and are outside talking to Councilman Hernandez but I would hope that they can hear what you are saying right now so yes I think it would be great if you could get something together and we can have a copy of it and then we can share it as as as we need to Mr. City Manager you need you would like
5:04:33to add anything so in addition to that right so we work with both you know county um supervisors to try to medicate, as you hear one of the comments, they were also unable to provide any additional assistance because again, the law's very specific as far as who can assist and where the legality as far as assistance falls into. So again, as the city attorney Carvalho said, it's not that we don't want to, we're limited by the parameters that the state law prescribes. So we have reached out to Avelina Valencia through your office. We've done it through county supervisors. I've met with Senator Tom Umberg.
5:04:55And as a last resort, and only because again, we wanna make sure that our residents understand that we're doing the best we can, given the parameters and legal standings that we have. We probably reach out through our Townsend Public Affairs to coordinate a meeting with ACD ourselves to see how we can facilitate. But in the end, again, we're limited by the prescribed aspect of what's been done legally and how the laws just limit our ability to provide any additional assistance. Again, it's not like we don't want to. It's just a state law.
5:05:36Thank you for clarifying that. And thank you, Councilmembers, for allowing me to just bring that up so that they could give an update. And we'll finish with the rest of the comments that we have. And then we'll come back for the—because we have five Zoom calls that we—I was hoping they would all stay so they could hear what we've been doing. And so, again, all the work, we all up here appreciate it. And so, we'll get back to it. We'll get back to it. So, go ahead, Madam Clerk.
5:06:05Madam City Attorney, can you just make sure that when you present the information to us, it's a public presentation? So it's right at the beginning of the meeting, so that way those that are here present can hear and get informed. Again, as you had indicated, it's not that we don't want to help. It's what we are limited to do. We did speak to Avellino Assemblyman Valencia's office. They did refer them to the Department of Justice. They've been referred to the FBI. So there's been numerous things going on. And they reference rent control. I would please put that in as well.
5:06:31And because, yeah, I know you all, the staff have done, I think all of us up here know you've done, you've gone above and beyond. And so we care, but we just want to make sure that we're also showing what we've done so that we can share the correct information. So thank you.
5:07:05And last thing I would say for anyone in contact with the residents, if they would please share with me the contact information for their attorneys, I would be happy to reach out to those attorneys and speak to them as well. We are committed to trying to help where we can. We haven't gotten that information from them.
5:07:22Thank you, Madam City Attorney. Thank you, Mr. City Manager. Madam Clerk, go ahead with the Zoom calls, please.
5:07:39Yes, thank you. We will now begin the Zoom speakers. When unmuted, please announce your name and the ward or neighborhood that you reside in within the City of Santa Ana for the record. heard. Linda Yabuki, please unmute.
5:07:44Hi, good evening. Are you able to hear me? Yes, please go ahead.
5:07:59Hi. So my name is Arlinda Yabuki. I am here to speak in regards to Ward six is specifically. Good evening, Mayor and members of the City Council. What comment the city's Council's recent efforts to extend the moratorium on new and expanded industrial projects And to introduce the neighborhood initiative and environmental services, I must emphasize that our work is far from complete. The health, well-being, and future of our residents depend on decisive and immediate action. The legacy of pollution in our neighborhoods is just an abstract issue. It is a tangible crisis that is impacting the lives of countless individuals.
5:08:03individuals, higher rates of respiratory disease, cardiovascular issues, and mental health struggles are linked to industrial activities that have become the norm, particularly for those living in near industrial zones. The Orange County Health Care Agency reports alarming statistics such as children in Santa Ana face significantly higher asthma hospitalizations rates compared compared to the county average. In 2023, the Orange County Fire Authority revealed a 7% increase in health-related services calls in areas plagued by industrial pollution, a stark indicator of rising health crisis in our own backyards. The evidence is clear.
5:08:42Living near industrial facilities exposes residents, particularly low-income communities of color, to harmful pollutants that jeopardize their physical health and amplify mental distress. stress. This is not just a health concern. This is an issue of social equity and justice. It is time for the City Council to take bold and targeted action. I urge you to invest in comprehensive environmental health assessments of our most affected neighborhoods. By implementing proactive measures such as rigorous air and soil quality monitoring, we can identify the
5:09:23specific pollutants threatening our residents and develop effective interventions. I implore the council to prioritize initiatives that mitigate pollution and foster cleaner environments increasing tree planting community gardens and recreational spaces it's not just environment it's not just beautification it is vital component of healthier more vibrant community that enhances air quality and fosters social interactions our community's well-being should be our highest priority by taking these necessary steps we can foster a safer healthier santa ana for everyone
5:09:57one. Let us send a strong message to our residents. Their health matters and we are dedicated to equitable solutions that uplift our entire community. Together we can transform Santa Ana into a place where health and well-being are not just aspirations but realities for all. Thank you all for your time and attention to this matter.
5:10:32Next speaker on Zoom, Victor Mendez.
5:10:54Hi, can you hear me okay?
5:11:00Yes, please go ahead. Okay.
5:11:02Item 10, the report on the anti-ice demonstration, you know, as people say, it has some limitations, but that's not surprising because of the pending legal claims that surround the situation at this time. You know, there's only so much you can disclose, so much you can write about. I do feel it was a tactical mistake to not have the independent director just pursue this and come through their own objective conclusions.
5:11:04But it is what it is. And it's interesting that those who are criticizing this report don't realize the persons that are so-called pro-police union are the ones that wanted the independent director to do this in the first place. So it's a very confusing situation, and I really just hope you revert back to letting the independent director do his job in the future and allow the process to move forward. You know, the conclusions may have been the same as the police chief, but we don't know. The process just didn't allow for that type of endeavor. I will say there seemed to be some data that's not evident.
5:11:30You know, we don't know how many officers were deployed each day. We don't know how that measures against the protesters each day. and I'm interested to know if the cost included the workers compensation expenses for the injured officers you know as well as the overtime expense to backfill them while they're out of duty because of the injury so this is a real cost to the city you know and also cost to repair vehicles or any damages incurred you know it's ironic to me that a time when groups are asking the city for more funding for legal and living expenses for our immigrant families. The city had to spend
5:12:06$460,000 to protect the right of those who advocate for them. You know, frankly, I think some of this could have been done a lot better and more effectively, and I would have liked to have seen that money spent on the families who really need it versus trying to de-escalate a tense situation. Something we should all learn for the future in our democracy. I saw a Facebook post on Measure X. I just feel that while it's compelling, I just feel that what I'd like to feel education on in the future is just how well the city is spending the money in terms of efficiencies and economies.
5:12:44These are the stories I think people want to hear about. We know you do a good job with our policing, our services, but how are we spending that money? What type of savings are we getting? What are you doing to make that dollar stretch out like we all have to do in this economy? These are the types of things that are going to be very compelling stories as we move forward into a Measure X decision. And I certainly would like to see it. And if it's not there, it'd be very difficult for myself and the public to support Measure X going forward. So hopefully we'll see more, you know, more education about how well the city is spending
5:13:19their money and what improvements they're making. I fully support the Speed Safety Pilot Program. You know, I personally witnessed a lot of exhibitions of the speed. I saw a guy in one of our malls, our malls in the parking lot, do donuts. It's just kind of a little bit without control and I think something needs to be done.
5:13:48Victor, your time is up.
5:14:06All right, thank you.
5:14:07Next speaker, Yesenia Marujo.
5:14:09Yesenia Marujo speaking. Yesenia Marujo speaking.
5:14:19Yesenia Marujo speaking.
5:14:26I am here to express my disappointment with the update of the zoning code of the city of Santa Ana. So far, we have not seen proposals that benefit our neighborhood.
5:14:33Various community organizations have joined together to successfully promote the inclusion of 77 environmental justice policies in the update of the general plan in 2022. Many of these policies could help address the problems of our community. These policies promise, for example, to create areas of damming between polluting facilities and schools. They also promise the creation of open spaces and the participation of the community. unfortunately no memos visto nada de esto en el código significación
5:14:47utilizaré mi tiempo para enfatizar las numerosas oportunidades que tenemos para mejorar nuestra comunidad a través de la actualización del código significación la zona industrial cerca a nuestra comunidad nos expone a una contaminación peligrosa esta área podríamos ser rezonificada to reduce this contamination. We understand that property rights must be respected, however, there are many properties in the area classified as industry that are currently open spaces, !
5:15:26sustancios en nuestra comunidad a través de una serie de reuniones con nuestros vecindarios planeamos la siguiente demanda primer demanda rendición de cuentas respecto al plan general las 17 pólizas de justicia ambiental incluida la actualización del plan general de deben verse reflejadas en la actualización del código de zonificación número 2 un borrador completo de actualización del código acompañado de un cronograma claro que permita la participación and contribution of the community. The expansion of what is currently proposed as an industrial park in order to cover the
5:16:15entire industrial area located between McFadden and Eddington streets. The community also has questions about whether an industrial park constitutes the best option for zoning for our area. Your Florida Florida
5:16:52! Your Florida Florida Florida Florida Florida Florida Florida Florida Florida Florida Florida Florida Florida Florida Florida Florida Florida Florida Florida
5:17:06Florida Okay, muchisimas gracias.
5:17:23Good evening. My name is Yesenia Marujo. I'm from the Cornerstone Village Neighborhood Association and also with the UCI Community Justice. And we're talking about the zoning code in Santa Ana. We reviewed this, and this does not benefit the neighborhoods
5:17:28where it proposes the things. and we like to include for you to include the 77 issues of environmental justice and we are here to to help we're asking you to help this this this issue and we would like for you to promise that we are going to have community COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT AND THAT THE ZONING CODE IS GOING TO BE INCLUDING THE COMMUNITY. SO WE WOULD LIKE TO HAVE OPPORTUNITY FOR THE COMMUNITY TO BE INVOLVED IN THE UPDATE OF THE
5:17:49ZONING CODE UPDATES. AND NUMBER ONE, WE HAVE TO ENGAGE INTO DEAL WITH THE POLLUTION AROUND THE AREA AND THE REZONING. AND WE UNDERSTAND THAT THE PROPERTY RIGHTS HAVE TO BE be protected. So in addition to that, we have to look at the industrial areas and we are looking at vacant lands so that we can rezone those to better serve the community and the community of Santa Ana. We don't see, we met and we don't see any proposals that are going to benefit
5:18:27the community so we are we have some demands from our meetings that we like to present to you and that is one that they 77 environmental justice areas need to be included in the rezoning the we need to have a copy of the full draft of OF THE REZONING OF THE CODE AND TO HAVE FULL COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT AND WE PROPOSED TO HAVE THOSE BUSINESS PARKS BETWEEN MCFADDEN AND EDINGER TO HAVE THE OPTIONS FOR THE BEST
5:19:06OPTIONS FOR THE COMMUNITY AND NUMBER FOUR TO HAVE THE BUSINESS PARK TO HAVE THE OVERLAY IN THE SPECIFIC ZONES FOR AROUND THE
5:19:48cornerstone village next speaker on zoom sandra de anda please unmute
5:19:57hi good evening please go ahead yes okay good evening mayor mesquin and council members my name is sandra and i'm speaking on behalf of the orange county rapper response network as the director of policy and legal strategy and i'm also a ward 4 resident i'm here today to express my strong concerns with item 27 which proposes advancing a resolution to amend ab645 to allow santa ana to implement a speed safety system pilot program i want to be very clear we support safe
5:20:09safe streets. We want to see fewer injuries, fewer deaths, and safer conditions for pedestrians, cyclists, and families. But we believe we can and must get there without expanding surveillance. The proposed program relies on automated cameras and radar systems that capture images of vehicles and license plates. While this may be one approach to traffic safety, it is also an expansion of surveillance infrastructure that deserves careful scrutiny when ab645 was originally passed it faced significant opposition from organizations like the human rights watch
5:20:46black lives matter california and the aclu california action these groups raise concerns about privacy data collection misuse and the disproportionate impact on low-income and immigrant community communities and those concerns are not theoretical in chicago speed cameras issue tickets in majority black and latino neighborhoods at twice the rate of white neighborhoods in washington dc drivers and black segregated areas were over 17 times more likely to receive a moving violation than drivers in white areas these patterns show us that automated enforcement enforcement does not operate neutrally.
5:21:25It often reflects and reinforces existing inequities. This is especially concerning in Santa Ana where the city already has the license plate reader technology through flock safety.
5:22:04And given Santa Ana's reported 19 million budget deficit, how will the city ensure that this program program does not become revenue driven enforcement how do we guarantee that the expansion of automated ticketing is not shaped by the need to generate revenue rather than by genuine public safety goals we also want to highlight that there are proven non-surveillance solutions that make Street safer these are strategies that slow traffic without collecting data and without placing additional burdens on communities so today we are asking the council to pause we We urge you to conduct comprehensive research
5:22:22on how other cities have implemented AB645, including cost, timelines, and unintended consequences. Engage in meaningful community outreach, especially with immigrant communities and those most likely to be impacted. Sandra, your time is up. Thank you.
5:23:00Next speaker on Zoom, Emilio Ramirez. Please unmute and make your comments.
5:23:20Hello, good evening, the members. I would like to express my opposition to item number 20 for the street widening of Warner between Oak and Grant. I'm very thankful and I respect what the public works department at Santana has to do amazing work. And I am aware that that this project would also have protected bike lanes. However, this project would not increase the safety of our streets. If you look at the proposed project, it is right next to the Dale High Community Center with the outdoor library.
5:23:29And there is barely any fence. There's a section that actually doesn't have any fence between the park and Warner. Warner is already a very busy arterial. And let's remember, this is an arterial highway, and even that protected bike lane does not protect those bicyclists from high-speeding cars. We have item number 27 today, which I also have concerns because there is an issue with having incentivization of getting revenue, as the previous speaker talked about. And this is a clear example of something that can be done to reduce speed.
5:24:12The best way to reduce speed is through infrastructure, which has been repeated on numerous occasions. And I'm sure the council is aware of this. So I want the council to reconsider this project. It is $25 million. I understand it is, you know, it doesn't come directly from the city. Some of it is from other funding. But just because we have the funding, that doesn't mean that this is not going to cost us in the long term. We're going to have to maintain this road as it is widened and as it increases capacity with more cars. Lastly, I would really encourage you to look at the map.
5:24:54There's a bunch of houses with driveways on Warner Street.
5:25:31We already made the north side of Warner for this project a long time ago, which was a huge mistake. big and now the neighborhood on the south side is gonna have a highway literally on the doorstep if you just go to google maps and look at it it's just right there there's no uh buffer or anything and i don't know if there was any outreach to the people that live on warner but this would definitely affect me as a homeowner in a very detrimental way and i would be very scared for my family to go out on the street thank you
5:25:36mayor and city council that concludes the public speakers in zoom that were there when we begin
5:26:18speaking thank you madam clerk we appreciate it thank you to all the speakers that came out tonight at this time we're going to go to the consent calendar items consent calendar items 7 through 24 before us council members please announce items that you'll be abstaining from due to a conflict and if there are any requests to pull an item for further discussion please let us know I am gonna pull item 23 councilmember Vasquez any items item 10 please 10 yes councilmember Lopez thank you
5:26:21councilmember Becerra item 13 only thank you council member Phan I'd like to recuse myself from item number 19 as all-american asphalt is a client of my
5:26:54employer rattan and tucker thank you thank you and councilman hernandez is not present so go ahead madam clerk i'll make a motion to approve the remainder of the item i'm so sorry mayor okay
5:27:04i would like to pull item 20 and just record a no for item 16 madam clerk please
5:27:13thank you mayor great i'll make a motion to approve the remaining items is there a second second thank you madam
5:27:23Motion by Mayor Mesquite, seconded by Council Member Becerra to approve consent calendar items number 7 through 24 with the exceptions of items 10, 13, 20 and 23 pulled for separate discussion and consideration.
5:27:34If you don't mind, Councillor Vasquez, I know you pulled item 10 and the rest of the Council.
5:27:47I'm sorry, go ahead. Sorry. I'll go ahead and do a roll call vote. Please. Council Member Becerra?
5:27:53Yes.
5:27:59Council Member Hernandez? Absolutely. Council Member Lopez? Yes. Council Member Phan? Yes. Council Member Vasquez? Yes. Mayor Pro Tem Penalosa?
5:28:00Yes.
5:28:12Mayor Meskwa? Yes. Vote is six ayes, no nays with a recorded absence by Council Member Hernandez and a recusal on item number 19 by Council Member Phan and a no vote on item number 16 which will pass 5-1-0 and with the absence by Hernandez. Motion carries. Thank you.
5:28:13I would just like to ask if we can do item 23. I don't know if he's still here, Chief, with his doggy. I shouldn't call him a doggy, but was it Poppy?
5:28:31No, Mayor. Poppy had to go home.
5:28:40He had to go home. Okay. So that's what I figured. I'm sorry. So I'm going to move the item for approval.
5:28:43I'll second.
5:28:49Thank you. Prepare to vote, please. Madam Clerk, do you roll call?
5:28:50call? Item number 23. Yes. And moved by Mayor Mesquita, seconded by Mayor Portempeñuelosa to adopt a resolution of the City Council of the City of Santa Ana authorizing the agreement between Corporal Patrick Marshall and the City of Santa Ana relating to the purchase of a police canine. Council Member Becerra? Yes. Council Member Hernandez? Council Member Lopez? Yes. Yes. Council Member Pan? Yes. Council Member Vasquez?
5:28:56Yes.
5:29:24Mayor Pro Tempino-Lizzo?
5:29:25Yes.
5:29:27Mayor Meskwa? Yes. So it is six ayes, no nays with an absence by Council Member Hernandez. Motion carries.
5:29:28Okay. And then the next item is Council Member Vasquez, do you mind if we wait on ten because it's going to be a long discussion? I'm hoping maybe not, but I'm hoping it might be.
5:29:36so item 13 councilman Becerra go ahead thank you madam mayor so this is the item it's a appropriation adjustment and lease agreement with Aldridge Electric for office space at the Santa Ana Regional Transportation Center as far as the item is concerned I want to thank staff for negotiating a higher rate from the tenant but since we are talking about the train station my My question for you guys is what are we doing to bring in some other businesses to that site?
5:29:45So we are working with Public Works Agency and Economic Development to enhance our facilities and bring more staff. So you're going to be seeing probably an RFP coming up soon so we can expand some of the uses down there.
5:30:19I mean, I don't know how long we need it to be vacant before we get, you know, try to get some interest out there.
5:30:34We're moving on it. Yeah, we're moving on it.
5:30:38Okay, great. I'll move this item then.
5:30:39I'll second. Go ahead, Madam Clerk, a roll call.
5:30:41Motion by Councilmember Becerra, seconded by Mayor Meskwa to approve the recommended actions for item number 13. Councilmember Becerra?
5:30:46Yes.
5:30:53Councilmember Hernandez? Councilmember Lopez?
5:30:54Councilmember Phan? Yes. Councilmember Vazquez?
5:31:00Yes.
5:31:05Mayor Pro Tempagnoloza?
5:31:05Yes.
5:31:06Mayor Meskwa?
5:31:07Yes. Yes.
5:31:09So it is five ayes, two no nays with two absences by Councilmembers Hernandez and Lopez. Motion carries for item 13.
5:31:10We're going to go to item 20 now, Madam Clerk.
5:31:17Item 20 was pulled by Mayor Pro Tempagnolosa.
5:31:24That's correct.
5:31:27Go ahead, Mayor Pro Temp.
5:31:28Thank you, Mayor Misku and thank you, Madam Clerk. Item 20, I pulled off the consent calendars to award a construction contract to Los Angeles for the construction of the Warner Avenue Street Improvements Projects in the amount
5:31:30of basically $25 million and change. Thank you. Mr. City Manager and staff, I'm sure you can imagine why I pulled this item. There's been, as representative of the Doha neighborhood and Madison Park and that industrial area, there's been a lot of concern. I'm concerned over the last five plus years now of the delays that we've been seeing and experiencing just like the delays we've been seeing on Bristol Street and every other major arterial that's been under construction in the city for my entire life.
5:31:46With item 20, and Mr. City Manager, you let me know if you want me to defer to you or public work staff or who I could ask. i have a couple questions just on so the public could get an understanding of how we got here and where we're coming from when it comes to warner street so let's see let's hear the questions right
5:32:25and then uh uh director of public works uh rui rosas will assist in also responding okay um so
5:32:45So can we briefly explain to the residents that are listening why this project has taken more than 10 plus years since the first, even the exhibit shows that it was first approved in 2015. We're now in 2026. And I know there was property acquisitions, which take a long time. And I believe the last property was acquired in 2021, 2020, I believe. I believe, but since then it's still, that's been five years already. And we've seen, like Bristol Street, vacant lots for years and years. So what has caused the delays?
5:32:55Why are we not seeing any completion on this project as of yet?
5:33:35Mayor Patan, Mayor of Council, thank you for the question. There are a number of factors that have gone into why this project has taken so long. Firstly, I'll address the phase of Warner that has been under construction that we had a terrible contractor. Terrible contractor and delays from Edison and the communication companies in getting their utilities underground. Since then, we've taken action against the contractor. Who's that contractor? The contractor is Lone Rock is the name. and we are in active litigation lawsuits with them.
5:33:41Since removing them from the job, city staff have taken proactive steps to bring in various contractors, and I hope the public has seen some progress. We have had traffic signals completed, street lights installed. Very recently, landscaping was installed. We are moving inch by inch on Warner trying to get this project through.
5:34:24more broadly speaking to warner corridor it is as you said as you identified a 25 million dollar construction contract for this second phase it takes time to acquire the grants to execute the paperwork to get to this point but we're happy to finally be here and with council's approval hopefully of this item today we are on track to finish the warner improvements completely by October of 2027.
5:34:48Okay. I guess I'm trying to help the public understand why these delays happen. I always get frustrated at the idea of piece milling these projects with a grant here, a grant there, and we still need another 10 million to complete the project. You know, I think of someone's private home. If a house needs a new roof, you know, and someone only has half the cost saved up, you don't remove the entire roof and just do the half and be like, well, you know what? Maybe in a couple years I'll save the other half to complete the rest of it, right?
5:35:17So, and I say that because the delays we see, I mean, we're all representatives and live here in Santa Ana, but as many of our residents, we don't just stay here in Santa Ana, right? We venture out into other cities, into neighboring cities, into Irvine, into Tustin, into Anaheim. And we see this construction, this level of construction in other cities where these delays don't seem to occur. As frequent visitors of these other cities, we see how quickly these construction projects start and complete.
5:35:55So what, and I know you're not an employee of those other cities, but what would cause that fast track approach in these other cities to get these projects completed? Sure. Great question.
5:36:31Funding, having it all in place. And to your point, Mayor Pro Tem, we in Public Works with current leadership are no longer buying into a phased piece-by-piece approach. And so some of these other cities, you name them, Irvine, Anaheim, they fully fund the projects and get them done out and quick. With this item here today, we are fully funding the remaining piece of Warner. and this team is dedicated to get this done because as you and other members of the council have pointed out these projects have been long delayed and long
5:36:49been you know asked for by the community to complete but that that's the answer
5:37:26to the question so are we move as a city and as a public works agency and as a municipal government moving away from phase 3 construction is that what you're telling me correct we're not going to build half a bridge so um moving forward let's say first street for example which is on the horizon and i hope the residents are paying attention to that is that going to be when that comes to us is that going to be a 100 funded phased construction or not phase construction but from start to finish i mean no phases just one full our objective when it
5:37:32comes to first street if council approves the project is to begin and deliver it fully once
5:38:08funding is fully acquired okay so with warner and and i i realize that this is the same contractor and i'm still trying to understand the delays on the utility pole removal uh i realize that this is the contractor that did phase 3a of the bristol street project between civic center and washington which is still not completed. We all see them across the In-N-Out. There's multiple utility poles that are now barricaded with orange water barriers that Public Works put up so cars don't crash into them.
5:38:16It's been about a year since, or about six months since we saw construction finish, but those utility, when can we expect those utility poles to be removed and that area finished.
5:38:53Thank you. I'll address two things.
5:39:09Which is the same question for Warner, because those utility poles are still there. Correct.
5:39:12So LA Engineering did a fantastic job in constructing the elements of Bristol that they could construct. The poles are in the way, fact. We are working with, at this point, Charter and the communication companies, AT&T, so they can come in, finish their work, and get these poles removed. We are still about three to four months away from that happening. It is unfortunately the same situation that we're in on Warner, working with AT&T, Verizon, Charter, Spectrum, so that they can finish their underground work and we can get Edison to take the poles out.
5:39:17But we are confident in this contractor's ability to work around the poles to deliver as much of the work, LA Engineering for Bristol, I think while there were a lot of traffic disruptions, really focused on getting work done in a timely manner.
5:39:53And I appreciate that Director Rose has about that, what this contractor's ability to work around, but the residents dealt with two years of construction on that phase of Bristol between Civic Center in Washington and the delays and the narrow one lane in each direction on random times throughout the day usually traffic hour and rush hour um what we're gonna have to deal with it again when these polls because it's not just they're not just going to come in and remove these polls in 30 seconds in the middle of the night i mean i can imagine that it's going to be a couple days maybe weeks when
5:40:11these polls are removed and those areas where those polls were in now need to get fixed so we're talking more lane closures so would it not make more sense to i mean i guess what's so the utility the private utility companies is what we're waiting on for these poll removals what what is i mean what is the delay what is the reason they're giving us that they can't remove these polls tomorrow i mean would it make more sense for one of our heavy duty public works trucks to accidentally back into one and knock them down? I mean, it's a serious question, because at this point it's been years.
5:40:50Fair question. I often share that same sentiment of I hope, you know, the poles were just getting knocked down. They, the utility companies, operate on their priority, on their schedules and their projects, and it is as frustrating to anybody else as it is to us because it is not a surprise. We've been in communication with them since 2018 that these projects are coming, prioritize accordingly, but yet here we are. So at this point, we're doing everything we can to get them to finish the job.
5:41:30Have we thought about pursuing any legal remedy against these private utility companies?
5:42:09There are matters with the CPUC and legal paths that we are definitely exploring.
5:42:17Okay. If I may, Councilmember, and I appreciate the Public Works Director being so nice, right? But again, so utility companies, Edison, Verizon, AT&T, Charter, if it was just at the local level, we would do it a lot faster, a lot quicker. But some of these restrictions, some of these limitations, the aspect he's talking about, the CPUC, state legislating requirements. So they don't have to rush. Today we authorized my city manager to ignore the government affairs from Edison, find out who the boss is, send him a little email, hey, what's happening to my digital sign on
5:42:25North Main? When am I going to get activated? When am I going to get my stuff from my third and Broadway private sector component? So, and so I appreciate the language that ValuWare's director, Rosas, does his collaborating, partnership, contact, but when these utility companies and the state relations do not allow the local municipality, even a county seat like Santa Ana, right, to show some level of fortitude, we're limited to emails, possible litigation, that even the city attorney's
5:43:07we do need changes that allow that level of limitations because for us, you said it yourself, the council members get frustrated, our public businesses get frustrated, our residents get frustrated, and so for us, like Rudy who lives here in Santa Ana, I myself live in Santa Ana, as the city council, we get frustrated because in essence, those level of delays not only raise costs for us, right? We're not allowed to finish our projects on time, but we're looking competent, which is even worse. And so, whoever, if we have an opportunity for a new legislator, right, from our dais here,
5:43:40those are the things that we'll be looking at to change so that if we get more power, then that's the case. Thank you for that, city manager.
5:44:22So can we, as a city, in any way, shape, or form, go in there and remove these utility poles ourselves and do this work and bill these utility companies for that work that we did no okay and i just wanted to make that clear because they're members of the public that have also you know this is the number one thing is they come up and they're like well why can't you just do it you know and and and it's and i know there's many areas that we the city we just we get frustrated with the delays and we just do the work ourselves ourselves and we bill. So that is something we cannot do in this situation. Not in this situation.
5:44:28Councillor Neill. Councillor Neill. Just one more. Just so that Warner doesn't get lost. What was the two-year relief? When did Edison come and tell us after two years that they faced it, they could not do it?
5:45:06I believe the timeframe was in 2021 they were supposed to have plans done and that's when they came back and said, sorry, we need to redesign everything. After two years, correct?
5:45:17two years yeah well i i hope our city attorney is listening and exploring avenues i just discussed
5:45:29this with our public works designated attorney last week okay thank you for that so the last
5:45:38final question i will ask and just in regards to the specific contractor not the contractor but just the way this this uh contract is written it says actual completion date will depend on the the contractor's schedule, 350 working days. So can you explain why are we depending on the contractor's schedule? If I'm a contractor, if I'm a private business and I'm taking on this workload, I would expect that I have the capacity to do this work. But if we're now relying on this contractor's schedule, what is, do we have an anticipated start time?
5:45:44Thank you for the question. In the staff report, we identify a couple of things. A number of working days. Contractor must complete the work within a number of working days. That means a non-rain impacted Monday through Friday, they are working in our inspector's count. They can't, if they decide they're not working on a day like today, sorry, that's a day you lost. If they don't complete it within, in this particular case, it's 350 days, we start assessing penalties.
5:46:25For this contract,
5:46:58I apologize, I don't see the, but it's in thousands of dollars a day of penalties that we assess. When we say dependent on the schedule, it's simply because before we start, we say contractor, submit your schedule, and we lock in a start and an end. And that is the end that is dependent. So in the staff report we say October because that's about what 350 working days get us. But before we start, we lock in a schedule with that contractor and that is the official end date
5:47:02from that schedule. So in this case, what is the completion date? Anticipated October 27 based on
5:47:32the 350 working days after if Council approves, we have a meeting with the contractor next week
5:47:41at which point we settle on that schedule okay so I would appreciate if I mean I know I know you guys are have been doing night and day difference from what we had a couple years ago so thank you Rudy for your leadership and trying to move this and the city manager for moving this ship in a more appropriate direction when it comes to these heavy projects that seem to go years and years and very wasteful. I mean, you're talking millions of dollars in waste with these delays in mind. I mean, so whatever we could do to have control
5:47:48and ensuring that these projects are completed in a timely manner, and if there's delays, I mean, let's go, whoever the problem is, let's go full force, Sonia. I mean, it's just frustrating. And it's a never-ending joke in our community of these projects. So I would hope that we, you know, help expedite these whenever we can. With these, so do we have a start date for this contract?
5:48:28Well, I know, but hypothetically, if it's approved today, what's the...
5:49:07If approved today, we would start our notice to proceed within two weeks, which is essentially that's when we start counting days. The contractor has to proceed to execute the project. Two weeks from tomorrow? Correct.
5:49:12Okay. And that's when the 350 working days start? Correct. And that's minus weekends, minus holidays, and minus any rainy days? Correct. Okay. So, all right. Well, those are the only questions I have, and I hope, can we include other neighborhoods aside from the Del High neighborhood? Because I know I appreciate that you're notifying the Del High neighborhood with notifications, but I would hope that we are notifying Madison Park, we're notifying Memorial Park, and many of the residents in Ward 4 that use Warner to get to that side of town. I mean, it is a nightmare every morning, and I don't like the idea of just notifying
5:49:28neighborhood right next to it because this is a major thorough fare that many residents throughout the city use. So what does that look like in increasing that 1,000 foot radius to 5,000 feet? Consider it done.
5:50:09Mayor Pro Tem, can I make a recommendation? Go ahead, Mayor. They actually sent out a notice or some sort of social media as well to the entire city regarding the construction. Are you good with that?
5:50:24Yeah. On the social media thing, a couple years ago we allocated, budget is tight, but we allocated funding for sponsoring social media posts from the city about these certain situations. It was mostly done during the pandemic. Just geographically sponsor over the city so that anyone in the city sees what's going on, some important information. Is that? We can expand on that.
5:50:33It was in close session. Some of the stuff that was we're actually done by adding a bigger team to our social media communications team, excuse me, allows us to do that. So we can work public works, we can share more information, we're a little bit more active, as you see in the social media platform, so we can provide that
5:51:00easily. Yeah, it's a lot cheaper than postage, I could tell you that. Yes. So you'll have a further
5:51:20reach. And again, any meeting that we go to, right, those are the type of aspects that we're also presenting with neighborhood associations and leaders wonderful thank you mr city manager
5:51:25thank you mayor those were my comments you make a motion no i'll make a motion
5:51:36i'll make a motion to approve thank you councilman hernandez let's do a uh rule call vote motion by
5:51:42mayor mesqua seconded by councilmember hernandez to approve the recommended actions for item number 20 construction contract to los angeles engineering inc for the construction of warner avenue street improvements councilmember becerra yes councilmember hernandez yes councilmember lopez yes councilmember fan yes councilmember vesquez yes mayor pretend penulosa yes mayor mesquite yes vote of seven
5:51:49ayes no nays motion carries thank you at this time we're going to go we are going to go to if you allow me to there are people waiting for us here to do some business here before we go the next one And I'm going to close the consent calendar and I'm going to open the public hearing at this time. Madam Clerk, please provide instructions to the public. Would like to make a comment on public hearing items only. You're going to reopen it.
5:52:13I'm sorry? You're going to reopen the consent. Correct.
5:52:35Yes, I will. That's why I looked at you and you were getting the thumbs up. Okay, yes. Go ahead.
5:52:37Madam Mayor, I just wanted to record my votes. I am no on 21 and 22 on the consent calendar. Thank you.
5:52:42CHAIRPERSON WONG. OKAY. SO WE THAT WAS CLOSED. SO WE'RE GOING TO GO BACK AND OPEN IT. HE SAID NO IN 21 AND 22 COUNCILMEMBER HERNANDEZ.
5:52:51YES MA'AM.
5:52:57OKAY. AND THEN WE'RE GOING TO GO BACK NOW MADAM CLERK TO THE PUBLIC HEARING.
5:52:58I WANT YOU TO VOTE TO OPEN IT. YEAH I WAS GOING TO SAY RIGHT. YOU HAVE TO TAKE A VOTE TO OPEN THE CONSULTATION. TO REOPEN THAT VOTE.
5:53:01OKAY. LET'S.
5:53:08I'M SORRY. I WAS TRYING TO BE COOPERATIVE. I'm violating some rule here. No worries. Let's take a vote so Councilman Hernandez can reopen and he can vote.
5:53:11So are you moving to reopen the consent calendar?
5:53:22Yes, I'm moving to reopen the consent so Councilman Hernandez can vote.
5:53:25Okay.
5:53:29Thank you, Madam.
5:53:29And with a second for that vote?
5:53:30I'll make a motion to move the… Okay.
5:53:33I need a second.
5:53:34Okay. Second.
5:53:35Second. Okay. So this is to reopen the consent calendar vote to allow Councilmember Hernandez to record his votes on items 20 and 21. one um councilmember becerra yes reopen thank you councilmember hernandez yes councilmember lopez yes councilmember fan yes councilmember vasquez
5:53:36mayor patempany yes mayor mezcla yes that is six eyes no nays with the absence by councilmember VASQUEZ, WE CAN REOPEN TO CONSENT CALENDAR FOR VOTING PURPOSES. NEW SPEAKERHANDER HERNANDEZ, GO AHEAD.
5:53:57NEW SPEAKERHANDER HERNANDEZ, NO ON ITEM 21 AND 22. NEW SPEAKERHANDER HERNANDEZ, THANK YOU.
5:54:13NEW SPEAKERHANDER HERNANDEZ, THANK YOU. NEW SPEAKERHANDER HERNANDEZ, WE CAN REFLECT THOSE VOTES WITH THE ADDITIONAL VOTES THAT HAD PREVIOUSLY BEEN ALLOCATED ON THE CONSENT CALENDAR. SO THAT WILL JUST MAKE THE VOTES ON ITEMS 21 AND 22. EXCUSE ME WHILE I GET THERE, PLEASE. NEW SPEAKERHANDER HERNANDEZ, NO. Will be 6-1 with the recorded no votes by Councilmember Hernandez and the other items 7-0 with his yes votes recorded.
5:54:17Thank you, Madam Clerk. At this time, we're gonna close the consent calendar of the public hearing. Before the public hearing item number 25, Madam Clerk, please provide instructions to the public who'd like to make a comment on this public hearing item only.
5:54:43Yes, thank you. Members of the public joining us by way of Zoom or conference call who would like to make a comment for public hearing item number 25 only which is a public hearing relating to the bellaterra residential community and temple project please dial star 9 from your phone or select raise hand from zoom in order now in order to be called once the public hearing is opened thank you
5:54:56thank you item number 25 is public hearing relating to the bellaterra residential community and temple project do you need a presentation i don't believe so no okay great at this time are any questions about from the council i now open the public hearing for members of the public that would like to provide their comments in person and virtually madam clerk do we have any speakers
5:55:15mayor and city council we do not have any speakers in person for this public hearing nor on zoom nor did we receive any e-comments related to public hearing item number 25.
5:55:38thank you no further comments i hereby close the public hearing any council members have any Any additional comments or questions? Hearing no further discussion, is there a motion and a second, please?
5:55:46I'll make a motion to move the item.
5:55:57I'll second.
5:56:00Prepare to vote, please. Motion by Councilmember Hernandez, seconded by Mayor Meskwa, to approve the recommended actions for Public Hearing Item Number 25, inclusive of adopting a mitigated negative declaration and mitigation monitoring and reporting program. Environmental Review Number 2023-25. First reading of zoning ordinance amendment number 2026-02, an ordinance of the City Council of the City of Santa Ana approving an amendment to specific development number 53 to update residential development standards and allow places of worship subject to approval of a
5:56:02conditional use permit for property located at 4006, 4010, and 4018 West Hazard Avenues. Adopt a resolution of the City Council of the City of Santa Ana approving CUP conditional use permit number 2026-03 as conditioned to allow a place of worship located at 4006, 4010 and 4018 West Hazard Avenue, and adopt a resolution of the City Council of the City of Santa Ana approving tentative track map number 2026-01, county map number 19332, as conditioned to subdivide the project site into 13 develop allots and one common area lot to accommodate the proposed Bellaterra residential community and place of worship development at 4006,
5:56:314010 and 4018 West Hazard Avenue. Council Member Becerra? Yes. Council Member Hernandez? Yes. Council Member Lopez? Yes.
5:57:07Yes.
5:57:15Council Member Phan. Yes. Council Member Vasquez.
5:57:16Yes.
5:57:19Mayor Pro Temponulosa. Yes. Mayor Meskwa. Yes. Vote of seven ayes, no nays, motion carries.
5:57:20Madam Clerk, you are skilled. All right. Before hearing public item number 26, Madam Clerk, please provide instructions to the public who would like to make a comment on this hearing item only.
5:57:26Members of the public joining us by way of Zoom or conference call who would like to make a comment for public hearing item number 26 only, only which pertains to the annual action plan and budgets for CDBG home and ESG funding. Please dial star 9 from your phone or select raise hand from Zoom now in order to be called upon once the public hearing is open. Thank you.
5:57:37»» Number item 26 related to the fiscal year 26-27 annual action plan and budgets for the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development. I don't believe we need a presentation. We all read thank you very much. Are there any questions by the Council? Seeing none, I now open the public hearing for members of the public that would like to provide their comments in person and virtually. Madam Clerk, do we have any speakers?
5:57:57Yes, we do, Mayor and City Council. While we did not receive any e-comments related to this public hearing and there is nobody on Zoom, we do have five speaker cards. If you could please line up behind the podium. Sammy Park. Uzma Islam. Esther Yee.
5:58:21Speaking time is three minutes.
5:58:41Good evening. Thank you so much for giving me this opportunity to let me speak. Dear Mayor and Council Members, my name is Sammy Park, and I'm the financial councillor with the Cambodian family in Santa Ana. We're a nonprofit organization that's been helping and serving the community for over 40 years. I'm here to ask for your support in approving the CDBG funding. Our financial education and empowerment program predominantly serves low income, limited English
5:58:46proficient parents and seniors in Santa Ana, but this program is also open to youths and families. We help community members overcome systemic economic barriers and build a more secure financial future. We provide workshops, both in person and virtual, covering basic banking, credit, budgeting, savings, and home ownership. Partnership. Participants also receive one-on-one coaching to set and achieve financial goals, along
5:59:21with referrals to trusted, low-cost banking and community resources. A key focus is asset protection, including education on how to prevent scams, identity theft, and predatory lending that often target vulnerable populations. For example, we recently assisted a senior from Santa Ana who lost $10,000 to an online scam. So, through a program like ours, we aim to prevent these situations through education and support. The Cambodian family of Santa Ana respectfully ask you to approval of the CDBG budget so
6:00:00we can continue serving and protecting our community in Santa Ana. Last but not least, just thank you so much for your attention and happy Cambodian New Year from our community.
6:00:42Thank you. Next speaker, Uzma Islam.
6:00:57Esther Yee.
6:01:05Dear Council Members, excuse me. Thank you so much for this opportunity for a public comment. And I know it's a very late night, so I appreciate your attention and your commitment to tonight. My name is Esther Yeh. I am a staff attorney at Community Legal Aid SoCal's Family Law Unit here in Orange County. I've been there since 2024, where I specialize in working with domestic violence survivors, including City of Santa Ana survivors under the CDBG funding. I wanted to come tonight just to say thank you for investing in this work since 2017 and for considering the recommendation for continued funding for our free legal services.
6:01:12Over the past nine years with your help, we have served dozens of domestic violence survivors every year, assisting them to obtain family law services and protective orders that help them find safety and well-being. Because of this funding, the City of Santa Ana has been a leader in Orange County in in providing legal solutions to its domestic violence survivors. We have more family law clients from Santa Ana than any other city in Orange County. Last year we closed 206 family law cases for Santa Ana residents. And because of this grant, we were able to provide extended service, including representation to half of these clients.
6:01:53Thank you again. And please let me know if you have any questions. Thank you so much.
6:02:33Sarah Bemmerwald to be followed by Claire Braeburn.
6:02:40Good evening, Mayor and Council Members. My name is Sarah Bemmerwald and I'm the Chief Operations Officer at Human Options where I've had the privilege to work for the past 12 years. I want to sincerely thank you for recommending the CDBG funding for our agency. This is more support than we've ever received from the City of Santa Ana, and we deeply appreciate your commitment to survivor safety. Our co-deployment model where our advocate responds alongside Santa Ana Police Department to 911 calls for domestic violence assistance has received overwhelmingly positive feedback
6:02:48from survivors over the past decade and has helped more Santa Ana survivors get connected to lifesaving services such as emergency shelter, counseling, and legal advocacy. We're grateful for the city's partnership in helping sustain this important work. Thank you.
6:03:22Claire Braeburn.
6:03:39Good evening, Mayor and Council members. My name is Claire Braeburn. I'm the Executive Director and Co-Founder of America on Track. and I will keep this very brief. I just wanted to say thank you to city staff for their hard work on the annual action plan and for recommending support for our Brighter Futures for Children of Prisoners program. We know that this federal funding is meant to reach the most needy residents and our Brighter Futures program is doing that by working with youth who are impacted by parental incarceration. And we know their risk factors are higher.
6:03:52they've got more chance of academic challenges, trauma, and future justice system involvement. Your past investment is doing great. We're seeing 80 to 90 percent of the youth seeing advances in engagement and behavior and overall progress, so we know that prevention services work and we thank you for the current recommendation and for your partnership in helping us continue this important work. Thank you.
6:04:26Mayor and City Council, that concludes the public speakers.
6:05:01Thank you. No further comments I hear by close of public hearing. Do any Council members have any comments? Councilman Hernandez?
6:05:04Thank you, Madam Mayor. I want to thank the public speakers for showing up today. Your dedicated services to Santa Ana is duly noted and greatly appreciated. We have a list of wonderful organizations such as America on Track, Community Health Initiative, Community Legal Aid, Human Options, Lutheran Services of SoCal, Mary's Shelters, Moms OC, Mosaic Movement, Nati's House, OCTAQ, Project Hope Alliance, Straight Talk, and the Cambodian Family in Wise Place. A very diverse array of funding of $1,240,000. I'll go ahead and make a motion to move this item.
6:05:10Thank you. So second. Second by Mayor Patan. Hearing no other discussion, we'll move to the next item.
6:05:43There's a motion and a second. Motion by Councilmember Hernandez, seconded by Mayor Pro Tempagnolosa to approve the three recommended actions for Public Hearing Item Number 26, approving the Fiscal Year 2026-27 Annual Action Plan and Budgets for the Community Development Block Grant, Home Investment Partnerships Grant and Emergency Solutions Grant for submission to the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development. Councilmember Becerra? Yes. Councilmember Hernandez? Yes. Councilmember Lopez? Yes. Councilmember Phan? Yes. Councilmember Vasquez?
6:05:49Yes.
6:06:17Mayor Pro Tempagnolosa?
6:06:19Yes.
6:06:20Mayor Mezcua? Yes. So it is six ayes, no nays with an absence by Councilmember Phan. Motion carries. All right. Thank you. Let's go to Item 10, please.
6:06:21Go ahead, Madam Clerk. I'm sorry?
6:06:33About which one? I'm sorry.
6:06:39My apologies, everyone. I recuse myself from the public hearing item due to an abundance of caution after doing discussing with the city attorney as there was a conflicts check issue and I'm not sure if my firm may have represented any of the nonprofits and so just to avoid any type of issues I have recused myself from that item thank you
6:06:41madam attorney city attorney similar to councilman Hernandez we had closed it so
6:07:03do we need to reopen it no because she's she's public hearing nobody can say
6:07:07there's something wrong I just want to make sure so thank you thank you thank Thank you, Council Member Fann. I appreciate it. Item number 10, Madam Clerk.
6:07:14Yes, Mayor. Item number 10 was pulled for discussion by Council Member Vasquez.
6:07:21And it pertains to the update on Santa Ana Police Department response to June 2025 anti-ice demonstrations.
6:07:28I believe we have our presentation. Mr. City Manager, Chief.
6:07:34Who will be doing the presentations?
6:07:40Chief of Police, Robert Rodriguez.
6:07:42Perfect. Thank you.
6:07:43Actually, it's going to be Commander Lopez, my Executive Officer from Internal Affairs, will provide the presentation.
6:07:45Thank you. Commander Lopez, if you can come up here to the podium. You need to sit there or can you come up here to the front, sir? Can you do it from here?
6:07:52Yes.
6:08:00Perfect. Thank you.
6:08:01Give me a second, Commander. Mayor Weill.
6:08:04So, Mayor and City Council, before we begin the presentation, I just wanted to acknowledge that today's presentation is intended to be a high-level overview of the Department's response to the anti-ice demonstrations. Due to pending civil litigation and ongoing internal investigations related to these events, events, the department is constrained in the level of detail we can provide at this time. These limitations are necessary to preserve the integrity of the investigative process, ensure compliance with applicable laws, including personnel confidentiality, but more importantly to protect the city's legal position.
6:08:13As a result, we may be limited in our ability to respond to specific questions. We appreciate the council's understanding on this matter.
6:08:51Thank you, Commander Lopez. What we'll do is you'll give your presentation and then at that time I'll open it up for questions.
6:08:59Okay.
6:09:05Thank you.
6:09:06Good evening, Mayor Mesquite and members of the City Council. In tonight's presentation, I will provide an overview of the Santa Ana Police Department's response to the anti-ice demonstrations that occurred back in June of 2025. This presentation outlines a summary of our operational approach, resource deployment, operational actions, use of force, and the overall impact to public safety and the city resources. Our goal throughout these events was to balance the protection of First Amendment rights with the need to maintain public safety and order. As previously mentioned, due to the open litigation and open internal affairs and
6:09:08administrative investigations, the video that I'm about to present has been and shortened.
6:09:48However, these short videos provide a small glimpse of the context for the conditions officers faced during several of the demonstrations throughout the June anti-demonstrations. While many individuals exercised their First Amendment rights peacefully, there were moments where activity escalated into unlawful and unsafe behavior. These situations required police intervention to protect lives, property, and critical infrastructure. Our role was not to limit speech, but to ensure that demonstrations remain safe for participants, officers, and the broader community.
6:10:00The Santa Ana Police Department's response was grounded in state law, department policy, and established department procedures. The department operated under Policy 429, which governs First Amendment assemblies, and Procedure 3004, which outlines the use use of 40 millimeter less lethal launcher. In addition to several California Pena Code sections guided enforcement decisions related to unlawful assembly, incitement of riot, failure to disperse, and refusal to disperse after a warning. Command staff utilized the incident command system and coordinated through the Emergency Operations Center. This allowed for real-time assessment,
6:10:36resource coordination, and adjustments based on evolving conditions. At every stage, our priorities were safety, de-escalation, and the protection of civil rights consistent with national best practices.
6:11:14As demonstrations evolved over multiple days, the Santa Ana Police Department developed and implemented incident action plans to ensure organized and consistent responses. Officers were directed to use measured, policy-driven actions. The focus remained on preserving lawful expression and maintaining and or restoring order while minimizing harm to those participating in the demonstration. Prior to any enforcement action, clear dispersal orders were issued in both English and Spanish using amplified sound systems to ensure they were audible to all individuals present. present.
6:11:28Additionally, officers were required to be equipped with and activate body-worn cameras during enforcement actions to promote transparency and accountability.
6:12:03Under California Penal Code 407, an unlawful assembly occurs when individuals gather with the intent to engage in violent or unlawful conduct. For Santa Ana Police Department Policy, Department Policy 429, peaceful gatherings were monitored without interference. During the June 2025 demonstrations, when public safety risk emerged, officers first attempted voluntary compliance through communication and de-escalation efforts. If those efforts were unsuccessful, a formal dispersal order was issued. These orders included clear instructions, identified exit routes, and provided reasonable time for individuals
6:12:16to leave the area. Enforcement actions were only taken when individuals failed to comply with lawful orders.
6:12:55So the enforcement activity, during the dates of June 9th, 10th, 11th, and 14th, a total of 24 arrests were made. This included 20 misdemeanor arrests and four felony arrests. These arrests were based on observed violations of law during the incident.
6:13:04More specifically, for June 9th, our department responded We responded to anti-ice demonstrations stemming from federal immigration enforcement activity occurring throughout Orange County and throughout California. These events drew hundreds to over a thousand participants in Santa Ana area and surrounding communities reflecting both the scale and community impact and concerns of the issue. With the support of multiple regional partners, we coordinated a unified mutual aid response consistent with the size and complexity of the event. Our estimated crowd size within our operational area was approximately 1,500 individuals.
6:13:23Our primary objectives were to facilitate lawful First Amendment activity while maintaining public safety and protecting property. Despite de-escalation efforts, enforcement action became necessary due to both unlawful and unsafe behavior within the crowd. A total of 10 misdemeanor arrests were made on June 9th. Regarding less lethal force, personnel deployed 105 rounds of 40-millimeter less lethal munitions and 29 CS chemical agent munitions. These tools were used in a targeted manner to disperse individuals engaging in violent or unlawful conduct.
6:14:01On June 10th, demonstrations continued at a smaller scale, with a more limited number of assisting agencies. agencies. Our approach remained consistent, prioritized communication, issued clear dispersal orders, and allowed lawful activity to proceed whenever possible. Nonetheless, our estimated crowd size within our operational area was approximately 1,000 individuals. Enforcement actions resulted in one felony arrest and three misdemeanor arrests. Less lethal options included included 19 bean bag rounds and 23 rounds of 40 millimeter munitions and six CS chemical agent deployments.
6:14:41The reduced numbers reflect both a smaller crowd size and early compliance by many participants following dispersal orders.
6:15:19On June 11th, demonstrations continued with an increase in attendance with the crowd size growing to approximately 1,500 participants. We maintain mutual aid support and continue to emphasize a measured coordinated response. Our strategy remained focused on de-escalation, high visibility deployment, and structured crowd management to reduce the likelihood of conflict while preserving ability for lawful expression. Enforcement actions resulted in two felony arrests and one misdemeanor arrest. Less lethal force included 28 beanbag rounds and 42 rounds of 40 millimeter munitions.
6:15:30Notably, no CS chemical agents were deployed on this date, reflecting our commitment to using only the level of force necessary based on the conditions and behavior observed on the ground.
6:16:07On June 14, the activity was more limited, with an estimated crowd size fluctuating between approximately 500 to 2,000 individuals throughout the event. Operations were supported by two assisting agencies. agencies. While the crowd size was reduced compared to prior days, there were still instances that required enforcement action to maintain public safety and order. Officers made one felony arrest and six misdemeanor arrests. Less lethal tools deployed included tall beam backgrounds and 45 rounds of 40 millimeter munitions. Across all four days of activity, our department remained committed to balancing the protection
6:16:20of constitutional rights with the responsibility to maintain public safety. All enforcement actions and use of force were conducted in accordance with department policy, applicable legal standards, and under consistent supervisory oversight.
6:16:58There were five reported injuries among arrestees and three injuries to Santa Ana police personnel. Due to the scale of the duration of the events, Santa Ana PD coordinated with multiple partner agencies through mutual aid agreements. The agencies included but not limited to Anaheim Police Department, Brea Police Department, California Highway Patrol, Costa Mesa Police Department, Fountain Valley Police Department, Fullerton Police Department, Garden Grove Police Department, Huntington Beach Police Department, Irvine Police Department, Laguna Beach Police Department, Newport Beach Police
6:17:16Department, Orange County Sheriff's Department, Orange Police Department, Placentia Police Police Department, Tustin Police Department, and Westminster Police Department. This collaboration ensured sufficient staffing and enhanced public safety capabilities.
6:17:49Officers assigned to these events wore standard uniforms and equipment with protective gear available as needed. They were trained to maintain situational awareness and apply officer safety tactics consistent with department policy. Any use of less lethal tools or chemical agents was conducted in strict compliance with Department policy, post guidelines and California law.
6:18:07Each use of force was evaluated based on necessity, proportionality and the opportunity for de-escalation. All force used during these events was documented in compliance with Department policy and Assembly Assembly Bill 48, as well as PINAA code section 136.52.1. In accordance with state law, Santa Ana Police Department completed and published a public report within 60 days detailing the use of less lethal and chemical agents during these incidents.
6:18:31The majority of force used involved less lethal options. There were 215 deployments of 40 millimeter less lethal rounds and 59 beam bag deployments. Chemical agents were used 35 times. Lower level control techniques such as control holds and take downs were also used in limited numbers. There were no taser or wrap restraint deployments during these events. This figures reflected reliance on tools intended to reduce the likelihood of more serious bodily injury. injury.
6:19:05Senate Police Department implemented sustained multi-shift staffing across key areas including downtown and high traffic corridors. This increased staffing allowed for rapid response, improved escalation efforts and effective crowd management. We also utilized mutual aid partners when necessary and implemented rotating schedules schedules to reduce fatigue and maintain performance and safety standards.
6:19:40The response to these events required significant personnel and resource investment. Total expenditures for June 9th, 10th, 11th, and 14th were approximately $399,257. These costs were primarily driven by overtime for sworn and non-sworn personnel, as well as necessary materials such as protective equipment restraints and operational supplies
6:20:07in closing santa ana police department remains committed to protecting constitutional rights while ensuring public safety we continuously evaluate our responses to events like these to improve our practices strengthen community trust and ensure transparency
6:20:32thank you commander lopez councilman vasquez so i because i kept asking you to wait you go right I'll go right ahead first, sir.
6:20:49Thank you. Thank you, Commander Lopez, for that thorough presentation. I was there on June 9th, the Monday I went after school, and I joined Councilmember Hernandez, and there was peaceful protests. Unfortunately somebody left a case of water bottles at the edge by the federal building, building and there was one guy throwing water bottles up against the federal
6:20:55building. Like an hour after I got there he started throwing water bottles and
6:21:29the it would have been easier I believe for the security to go to go indoors and and let the water bottles hit the side of the building.
6:21:40But the police department came,
6:21:55and this one person was chased off by the other protesters. I saw him as he headed down towards Ross. From there, the protesters chased him out, and we were being hit by tear gas. Yes. Myself and all the other protesters there because of this one person's actions.
6:22:01On the first, can I ask you a question? On that first day, the mutual aid was called on by the guards at the federal building?
6:22:27Yes. Well, at some point, they contacted the SENA Police Department.
6:22:39And on the other days, did they also call for mutual aid, or is that?
6:22:43Well, they weren't necessarily calling for mutual aid. I believe the department ourselves, we were protecting the rights of the demonstrators in our city, so we called for the mutual aid.
6:22:48From the other departments? Correct. Okay. Okay. And is this normal for our protests, for us to call for mutual aid like May Day or any other protests? I've been involved in protests for the last like 25 years, and I rarely have seen other departments. Let me know if I'm wrong.
6:23:02It's situational dependent, depending on what, how the demonstrations are going, the amount of people. Again, it could be several different factors that may provide us intel that we will request for mutual aid.
6:23:23And did the federal building security call for mutual aid every, on the four days, or did we ever call?
6:23:40Again, I'm not familiar if they ever actually called for mutual aid from us. Okay.
6:23:49Many departments have different thresholds for different actions. Are we aligned with them on using less lethal munitions or for using tear gas? Are we equally aligned or does every department have different thresholds?
6:23:53I would say that all agencies in the state of California abide by the same state laws as it relates to the use of chemical agents and munitions. We also adhere to the post guidelines mandated by the California State Peace Officers Standards. It is possible that every agency may have more limited access to different actions or munitions.
6:24:10Okay. And, you know, when we, this was June, and I go back to May 1st of that year, and we had a May Day with more people at May Day than we had at this event, I feel, at a May Day protest. And the May Day protesters were like, why aren't the police in our face? you guys stayed away, you allowed people to march, and I was just wondering, what's the difference between May Day and June 9th through the 13th?
6:24:42I can answer that. The difference between previous protests or demonstrations, in this specific case in June, we were requested by the federal officers at the courthouse. The unknown variable was the actions and response from the federal officers, which they requested our mutual aid, and we responded. In May Day incidents, it's our city, our residents. We have the experience and the practical experience of engaging and allowing our community to
6:25:17exercise their First Amendment rights. And unfortunately, in June at the onset, that's what had occurred.
6:25:57Right. And I have seen the professionalism from May 1st to this.
6:26:06And it is in my opinion that this day set it off. Our actions set off the next three days. when you have peaceful protesters and one person was not following direction and the use of tear gas and you know calling other departments in and a set the table for what was to happen on this day
6:26:17day, which was we were going to use munitions and we were going to use tear gas. It seemed like that's a new, it was new for Santana that I hadn't seen before. Me having protested in many protests for the last 20 years. You get me? So it just seems like that day was not only about one day, but it was about four days. So we did have issues and I really want to take any lessons we learn and I want to apply them. And when we call for mutual aid
6:26:47and what's it even i would like the police oversight commission to look into what departments we want to call in for police over for mutual aid like not everybody's friendly to brown and black people and being a young man a latino mexican kid growing up in santana we were pulled over many times in many cities across the county and we were told we pulled you over because you're mexican when it was allowed to say we pulled you over for these reasons right uh so i i want the police uh
6:27:27oversight commission to look into possibility or or yourself or the department looking at which departments are safer to work with to support to not incite uh this kind of work with people now. We deployed tear gas on the first day and then we a few other days.
6:28:05I didn't feel it was affected. Did you guys feel the tear gas was affected when it was deployed
6:28:30on May 9th on that day? Did people disperse? I wasn't on the scene. So just to clarify, Councilmember, you mentioned the deployment of tear gas not being a common practice or other munitions on on the first day of the onset i just want to uh for the council and for everybody listening that first day of the demonstrations um if i'm not uh mistaken there commander lopez we did not deploy any munitions until later at night those were all federal officers who deployed those munitions so that was not triggered by the san adam police
6:28:34Okay, thank you. And then, perfect. I appreciate that. And then when we do use tear gas, because I know there were children present, and what effects does tear gas have on children? I was going to ask this question, but you cleaned it up for me. They were present when I was there, but do we use tear gas when we see children present? presence, because we don't know the effects of tear gas on children and as they're growing with their respiration system, what effects it, there's no study because nobody wants to study that, right? It's inhumane.
6:29:16But do we make sure there's no children around when we use that kind of a weapon?
6:29:55We definitely take all safety considerations and that's why we before we deploy any less lethal, we declare an unlawful assembly and we give plenty of time for the crowd and the demonstrators to respond. We provide egress routes so they can egress from the location and only when there's a you know, continued criminal activity, and we balance that to ensure that it does not impact public safety in regards to children or innocent bystanders.
6:30:02Okay, thank you. And then we use, we call them less lethal munitions, but if not lethal, what kind of damage can they cause on a person?
6:30:39So they obviously could cause damage. Prior, many years ago, they used to be called non-lethal. Then the vernacular changed to less than lethal or less lethal, because at times, depending on how it's used or if it's a wrongful impact, it can cause serious bodily damage.
6:30:51We have to be very careful. But many protesters reported indiscriminate firing into the crowds. And I'm worried that we were doing indiscriminate firing into the crowds. And does that seem something that came out of the report?
6:31:13You know, in regards to what committee members allege, I can't uh give an assessment on that with pending litigation and pending internal investigations because we do also have some internal affairs complaints from those incidents so i understand the community's uh request for transparency on that but they're still ongoing civil litigation and once the civil litigation is completed in the internal investigations there will be more
6:31:32transparency on that. Thank you. And when you're doing your investigation, I would also like to see what us using these weapons, less than lethal weapons does when you indiscriminately shoot if it was indiscriminately shot into crowds because it feels like that's agitating the crowd when you just happen to be somebody within the area used by the PD or the federal government, with the federal guards would be good to know because I would be agitated as I could have been
6:32:06shot I know I did get tear gassed or if I was hit by some tear gas and hurt by it that would agitate people that weren't agitated before did we receive any complaints we did receive complaints obviously there's how many complaints did we receive from the police oversight and uh
6:32:42and for the department do we have those numbers i believe we received anywhere from three to five complaints uh through our our you know our department i don't recall if we actually received any through the oversight?
6:33:04Oh, we don't know. Can we find out?
6:33:24Just one from the oversight.
6:33:27Okay, so they have one to work with. And then Andy, I just want to ask, when the investigation is done, can we release all the body camera footage to PRAs as we can legally do so, and also the report for the basis of each arrest to any PRA?
6:33:30We can do that as long as we're applicable to all laws and all litigation is resolved, yes.
6:33:51Thank you. Councillor Faisal, I'll come back to you. Thank you. Councillor Hernandez, your mic's up.
6:34:00Thank you, Madam Mayor. Thank you, Police Chief Rodriguez and your staff for answering these questions, preparing today's presentation. I think that this is a good faith effort to listen and to work with our community. So I want to say thank you to you both. So in today's presentation, the first slide was freedom of expression. And you showed a video of a young man on what appears to be like a mini bike burning donuts. Nobody condones that. You showed another video of a young man appears to be standing on a street light
6:34:08Nobody condones that either. That's dangerous. These people are putting their lives at risk, but they're not putting the lives of others or any officers in that video lives or any ICE officials lives at risk. I don't see on these videos any acts of violence. I don't see a single piece of evidence that was included in this presentation of a water bottle, a firework, a brick. And I think that that's the type of information I want to see when my department fires over 200, you know, variety of different chemical agents,
6:34:46bean bags, what have you, at the public. And that's where I think the public came out in such large numbers because many of those members like myself like councilmember vasquez we showed up with nothing but our voices many of us didn't have water bottles to we weren't throwing that we didn't condone it you guys had a drone i'm sure you guys have body cams you probably saw people like myself telling people to stop but yet people like myself were still shot with beanbags I was tear gassed and whatever the stuff that leaves white residue when it hits you pepper balls I was hit with at least
6:35:26eight of those I kept my shirt and I remember when I I didn't understand what was hitting me because it happened so quickly and they don't really hurt until you get home and you see maybe what the hell happened to my back and when I started seeing other people carrying that white residue on them that's when I started doing my research on well what is that residue because whatever I have I got several of them on my back and it wasn't until I saw other people being shot at and it was thanks to journalism from the santanero where you had journalists taking pictures of people that were
6:36:06shot by these chemical agents or beanbags or not less not non-lethal rounds and that's when I I learned that some of these rounds will leave prints on your clothes. In this case, the example I'm providing is white markings. The decision-making foundation on slide three I found to be very informative as the first bullet point talks about law, policy, and procedure-driven decision-making guided in the department's response to the anti-ICE demonstrations, prioritizing safety, de-escalation, and civil rights and aligning with national practices for managing civil unrest so we are
6:36:42one of the only departments in orange county where our our policies are public on san anna pd's
6:37:23website correct chief i believe other agencies are also because that also became uh legislation and into law so other agencies have their policies and that's that's a step in the right direction
6:37:28And one of the policies that we do have on our website is a use of force policy, correct?
6:37:41Yes.
6:37:48Can you tell me, do we have a de-escalation policy?
6:37:49I believe there's a section in de-escalation, our use of force policy.
6:37:52I looked at our policies and I didn't see a section on de-escalation. But de-escalation is listed here as the first bullet point. So I'd like to know, what are these officers referencing in terms of de-escalation? Is there a training that they may have attended? Is there a series of trainings you maybe send some of these officers to?
6:37:56If they see a situation and you have a bunch of people who are unarmed and they're protesting, what are they going off of if you tell them to de-escalate?
6:38:19So obviously they're going to practice de-escalation based on certain levels of threshold depending depending on the actions of the demonstrators. You mentioned in your statement, you started off with, we only saw videos of burnouts. Yes. And of someone climbing a traffic tri-light. So our intent tonight was not to create an adversarial presentation, us against the public, but we have plenty of videos of actual law violations that we also didn't include also because of this ongoing civil litigation. and they're removed for that fact.
6:38:29So our officers take into considerations the totality of the circumstances, you know, public safety also, and there were acts of brick throwing, which, like I said, there is evidence of that, but we just didn't want to bring it forward here today because we wanted to have some dialogue.
6:39:10Thank you, Chief. And part of why I think this dialogue is so important, gentlemen, is when we look at the enforcement activity, your first bullet point mentions the policy-driven actions to restore order while minimizing harm. We are a department that has militarized equipment under Assembly Bill 481, which requires law enforcement agencies to gain approval from their local governing body. This city council did approve the use of militarized equipment. At the time of this protest, we were still not in compliance with AB 481. Is that correct?
6:39:31That is correct.
6:40:08Thank you, Chief, for your honesty. Now, on the day of the first protest of June 9th, can we confirm that we received a call from U.S. Attorney Bill Asali requesting mutual aid? Or in the event that we don't have mutual aid, that the feds would be sent out to our city and they would control the perimeter? and they were essentially were going to use their own mutual aid. Was that a call that our city received? Yes. Thank you. I think that the public should know about that.
6:40:09And the reason I wanted to mention that is because Santa Ana initially was not at the scene and it was just the federal agencies. And at some point. The U.S. attorney called the city of Santa Ana and essentially demanded that our officers showed up. So I want to give the public the transparency as to why Santa Ana PD showed up was because of the fact that we wanted to protect our residents from the feds and the potential violence escalating. When Santa Ana PD did show up, there was a large number of protesters.
6:40:43And from what I saw, many of whom were utilizing their First Amendment right within the law. There were some people standing on federal property, some people standing in a federal parking lot. And there were people who were doing things that the public just simply doesn't support. Burning donuts, climbing poles. And so when I saw the violence begin to escalate, I saw people being shot at with pepper balls, tear gas, chemical agents. And at that point, that's when I saw the public throwing water bottles in response.
6:41:20I was at the protest for several hours and was tear gassed at least three times. I didn't leave because I live in that district. I live in Ward 5. My constituents live there. I went to Santa Ana High School. My family lives not too far around the corner. And I didn't feel comfortable leaving my residence there knowing City Hall is right here. I know that there was a number of assisting agencies, but my concern is going to lie with Santa Ana PD. Not only did I see the members of the public indiscriminately be shot, I saw youth, young kids.
6:41:58I worked with the city manager to potentially identify a student's backpack who was 14 years old. I saw an elderly woman be tear gassed. I'm sure body cams will show that elderly woman just sitting down onto the section of the street that divides City Hall. She was just sitting right in between it. And those were things that you don't ever forget when you see that type of violence take place in your city. My concerns were you listed that there were five arrestees who were injured. What is the extent of these injuries?
6:42:35I don't have those injuries with me today.
6:43:13Okay. As a result of some of these injuries, did the city receive any claims due to the police misconduct? Or the police conduct, rather?
6:43:15Yes, we received a civil claim, which is now a civil litigation, and we received the complaints that were mentioned earlier.
6:43:25Thank you, Chief. And then, no officer should be injured on the job. I saw that three officers experienced injuries with respect to them and their health. I want to be adamant that no member of the public should attack our law enforcement here in Santa Ana. These individuals should be given the same respect to make it home safely. And so I want to be firm that I don't support the public harming any of our officers. Do you know to what extent these officers were injured? Was it because bricks were being thrown? Was it fireworks? I'm just trying to get an understanding of where the threat or the potential risk of
6:43:34a threat came from.
6:44:16I believe at least one of them, I don't know about all three, at least one of them was struck by whether it was a brick or a water bottle or something was thrown at them.
6:44:18Thank you, Chief. And in summary, I just want to close on the use of force summary. you mentioned SAPD approved force options are control hold 16. And as we know, a control hold excludes a carotid artery choke, correct?
6:44:29That is correct.
6:44:45Thank you. And then takedown, that's pretty traditional. I mean, we see takedowns are part of police, you know, business. They're able to do that. Zero tasers were used on the public. Zero wraps were used. There were 215 less lethal 40-millimeter rounds. I'm interested in what triggers our department to decide to use those less lethal rounds. Is it the size of the amount of people that may be in front of this protest? I want to know what the threshold is once our officers decide, okay, we need to use non-lethal rounds.
6:44:46So when you're using a less lethal round such as a beanbag or a 40 millimeter, it's intended to be specific to an individual committing an act of violence or whatnot or a threat to the community. It's not what's considered an area dispersal or indiscriminately deploying less lethal such as a beanbag or 40 millimeter.
6:45:23Thank you, Chief. And have we as a city, given that we use these 215 rounds of less lethal 40 millimeters, do we as a department to reduce liabilities check body cams on those 215 rounds that were shot to ensure that these officers were following protocol and that they were using reasonable force?
6:45:52Yes, like any other use of force, whether it's in a demonstration or whether it's a regular day-to-day contact on an arrest, we review all evidence to include BWC or to include any cameras from nearby businesses or any evidentiary value that we may gather.
6:46:15Councilman Hernandez, can I come back to you?
6:46:37Yes, Madam Mayor. I'm just going to close very briefly. Go ahead. The last question I have, Chief, is going to pertain to there is four punches listed. And I know in the state of California, police are very limited to be able to punch somebody unless it is deemed objectively reasonable to gain control or a situation or to an effect an arrest. An example would be if somebody reaches for an officer's firearm, an officer at that point, is able to justifiably use a fist, open palm, to that extent. How are these officers able to punch on four different occasions
6:46:39if they had non-lethal rounds and all these other munitions they could have used? What were those situations where somebody was punched four times?
6:47:18In regards to punches, is that under strikes? I believe so, yes. Okay, so we list them as strikes. It doesn't specify there were punches. It could have been when an officer is pushing a crowd back with a baton. We have to document that, too. So I'm not sure if it was a punch, but I can't speak to the specific incident in regards to a punch. But we will look into that.
6:47:28Thank you, Chief. And just with respect to times, I just wanted to share in closing that the expenditure was $399,257 in public monies being used for overtime for costs sworn and non-sworn. Materials dates June 9th, 10th, 11th, and 14th. Those will be the end of my first round of questions and comments. I thank you both for your answers. Thank you.
6:47:56CHAIRPERSON WONG. Thank you, Councilman Hernandez. Are there any other Councilmembers that have not had an opportunity to speak? Councilmember Lopez? Thank you.
6:48:19Let's see.
6:48:29So, I mean, I think that this report is important. I think everybody can agree that it is long overdue and people have wanted transparency transparency into the process and also hearing some of, I think, the train of thought that you're presenting makes me want to ask more questions.
6:48:33When I hear you say that you were concerned about protecting the rights of demonstrators and so because of that concern you invite other agencies into the city to deal with does that doesn't quite click right like if if you're concerned about the first amendment the civil liberty uh or the constitutional rights of sanana residents the question is why would you invite other agencies to help suppress those constitutional rights so i i can respond to that
6:48:58Councilmember Lopez. So when it comes to mutual aid request and we have information that there is a demonstration or based on previous day events that there's an ongoing demonstration that's going to continue, we have to plan for it and make those requests in a timely manner. because if we fail to act and don't have those requests, those can have some very unintended consequences and compromise public safety for our entire city. So those requests are done in advance
6:49:34and are held, are drafted and submitted to our mutual aid partners, because we can't wait till the last minute to request those mutual aid responses.
6:50:15so is it fair to say that without knowing you know the response to a rally or a demonstration the city will go ahead and say well we need mutual aid because we don't know what will happen and so mutual aid is placed without fully understanding what's happening no so what happens is we we have
6:50:27to it's almost like making a reservation because obviously there's other demonstrations throughout throughout the county, throughout other counties, right? So we have to plan accordingly. And when we set certain things in place to ensure if it meets that threshold, then we request, earlier there was a comment about can we pick and choose which cities we can't? Because it's what's available at the time of the request.
6:50:51Okay. And when it comes to gatherings, demonstrations, rallies, protests, what triggers that mutual aid concern or call or reservation?
6:51:19It's usually based on the size of what we expect, the size of the demonstration. We look into the issue also. And a lot of times, as mentioned, the May 1, we're very familiar with May 1. It's two, what I refer to as two known variables, us, the city, and our community, which I think we work great together. But when we have a known variable like an outside entity, which is a federal agency, I don't know what their policies, protocols, or procedures are. So I have to be prepared for that.
6:51:34Got it. Okay. So the report tells us what was deployed.
6:52:12It doesn't tell us why necessarily. And so one of the questions that I have that I know many people have had for many months is when you're talking about the chemical that was released into the air, what chemicals were released into the air?
6:52:19Andrew, can you provide that one? Yes. So to answer your question, your last question about what chemical agents it's a ccs gas or chemical agents typically it's through a handheld
6:52:36hand-delivered canister so that was the only gas that was used yes yeah and can you tell us why that gas what it does like why do you release it excuse me what what the purpose of releasing it into a crowd?
6:52:49So again, the only times that, you know, per AB48, the only times that the department can actually utilize either chemical agents and or less lethal munitions is in defense of great bodily injury or a threat to life to either officers or to anybody else in the community. So those are the only times. So when we report that 215 less lethal rounds were deployed, that means that there was 215 incidents where someone was committing an act of violence.
6:53:07And that can range, right? Is it fair to say that can range from... Do you categorize as an act of violence someone climbing a utility pole?
6:53:42No.
6:53:54Okay. So what are the acts of violence?
6:53:54Again, throwing water bottles, concrete, fire extinguishers, any things that can hurt officers or anyone else.
6:53:56Okay. And then what does the chemical do?
6:54:05It's just an irritant. It causes irritation to the eyes, essentially like OC spray.
6:54:10Like what?
6:54:17OC spray.
6:54:18Okay, got it. And then I also wanted to know, because the reporting, we heard this from public comment, right, it's not as robust as what the council member had asked. He had asked about, if I'm not mistaken, like including some footage, you obviously chose what footage to include.
6:54:19And, you know, I remember Council Member Vasquez asking for more information, detailed injury injury reports, command decision documentation.
6:54:41And so can you just let us know why some of that was not included in this report out in the attached report?
6:54:54Yes, absolutely, Councilmember. And that's exactly what I mentioned before the presentation, that a lot of these decisions are going to be mitigated in litigation. litigation and any statements we make today on why, how, and what we did can compromise our legal position for the city and liability and also in our internal affairs investigation and to allow the due process on both ends to take place before we provide a detailed report as requested.
6:55:02So our community could be waiting 10 years?
6:55:35It depends on litigation. I'm not sure.
6:55:39I just want to clarify, Mayor and Councilmembers. So the city has received four government tort claims and one lawsuit in which the city and the county and our chief were personally named. So we have four tort claims that could turn into lawsuits and then the one lawsuit. So one of the things that we would just caution this evening is that we not discuss the specific liability.
6:55:42liability. And I think where how the department was approaching this is that we want to make sure that none of us are called to be potential witnesses, you know, in that litigation or in those tort claims. But I do think the distinguishing factor and I think Council Member Vasquez referenced this is while we do what we need to do to defend the city and we're just going to caution that we're not going to have a conversation about the liability because that shouldn't be done here in open session. We have other avenues, for example, the case that's filed, we could do a
6:56:06a closed session report because that would be the proper venue proper arena and that wouldn't and i just want to say this because this is the law and my job as city attorneys to make sure everybody understands is for transparency there are other laws councilman vasquez i think you referenced this that might be subject to public disclosure under a public records act or in the discovery process so that is not to say that that material is not available to members of the public or to to our Police Oversight Commission, but what we wanted to do today is make sure that we
6:56:36didn't initiate a conversation in which we were discussing that liability. That may have been the reason why they did not include that information for today's presentation, so that they wouldn't have to discuss it and we'd create a forum for that. But if other laws applied during that discovery process, then we will be fully transparent. We will follow the law, and if a Public Records Act request is made, then we'll follow the law.
6:57:05Yeah, and logically, I understand what you're saying, right? There are claims against the city because people were injured that day. And so you're saying that there are things that cannot be discussed, but they haven't been discussed in months, since last June.
6:57:29And as I said, there is a proper venue arena for that. And now that we have the lawsuit that's been filed, we can schedule this for a closed session conversation so that the decision makers here of all of you can be privy to more of that information. But what we wanted to do is make sure that we did not open up the forum and cause any of this information to be used in the litigation.
6:57:51»» I don't know, Chief, I think, were you going to say something? Okay.
6:58:15»» Council Member Lopez, anything else? »» No, but I know my three minutes are up. So I don't know if you want to move on.
6:58:19No, go ahead. Everybody's gone over. Can you just do three more?
6:58:24Thank you. So I wanted to know how communication with DHS happened.
6:58:27I'm sorry, what was the question? How communication with DHS happened? Because they called the city, right? So was it just via phone?
6:58:37Yeah, I'll answer that question because I was actually the one that received the initial phone phone call. And so I took in that phone call and I reached out and calling the city manager and the police chief just to communicate and say, it is my understanding that there is an incident that is occurring downtown and I've gotten a call from the Department of Justice individual requesting that we get some law enforcement support. I think there was one or there was more than one phone call. That phone call was then followed up with with a second phone call that said, it's getting very, very serious.
6:58:49We are very concerned for the safety of our individuals and the federal property. And quite frankly, if your department, and it wasn't in a threatening manner, but it was basically, if your department cannot provide the security that we need, then we're gonna bring in federal resources. And we had a discussion about what that might look like in terms of safety for our community, and what that would mean to people in our community. And so a decision was made at that point. But yes, the communication came in initially directly from an attorney at the federal level to me.
6:59:25And so how many conversations happened besides the two or three?
6:59:56It was just the two. I got the two phone calls. After the first phone call, I made an attempt to reach out to the chief. He was busy, obviously. And so that first phone call wasn't answered. So then I tried the city manager and had a brief conversation. and after the second phone call, I recall I called the city manager, and I think he was with the chief at that time, and so I communicated that, and then I had no further contact with them.
7:00:02And so then I'm assuming contact stayed with you in the department predominantly.
7:00:28Yes.
7:00:34And how many other calls did you all have?
7:00:36Those are the only two calls or the two calls or the call that I had, but there was some coordination between whoever my incident commander was and their incident commander at the federal courthouse. So there was dialogue between those folks at the operational level, but this call came from higher up, hence why it came through the city attorney, city manager, and myself.
7:00:39Got it. And so I'm assuming at that point our officers were deployed to go, you know, be at the federal building, right? And then at what point, I'm trying to understand why officers were given the directive to form a line of defense or a line of control.
7:01:04So once again, that's more on the operational level that we don't want to get into too much dialogue about. But they were sent, as we said earlier, at the request of the federal agents.
7:01:26Right. I'm trying to understand. They're calling, they're asking for help, SAPD responds, and so why, I'm trying to understand why our officers would create a line of control if the crowd was like dispersed at that point. It was later into the day and I just, you know, I have the picture, I just looked it up, right, right? And you know, they obviously move the crowd forward to the park. So I'm trying to understand what was the level of threat that you perceived from people like myself that
7:01:45were there that day in order for them to move forward towards us?
7:02:24I think the best way I can answer that question is we're trying to create some distance between between our community and the federal officers.
7:02:30So that's like assisting the federal officers?
7:02:40No, that's a public safety. That's not assisting. It's a mutual aid response. If we don't respond-
7:02:44But whose public safety are you centering if you're coming towards the crowd and you're creating a line to protect the other agents?
7:02:50Yes, so I think we're maybe misunderstanding here. When they request mutual aid, because as the city attorney mentioned, when they are in fear for their officers, federal officer safety, it's not an issue of us assisting or not assisting. It's we have to, and that's through a mutual aid is under government code, and we have an obligation to respond. If we don't respond, they will send another agency to take over our city. Not just another federal agency, it could be another local agency such as the Orange County Sheriff's Department.
7:02:59So we are obligated to respond, but it's also for the safety of our community, because if they're in the middle of an engagement with federal officers, the best thing is to create some distance.
7:03:38Yeah, I don't disagree with that. I don't disagree with residents like myself not charging masked men that have guns, right? And this is something that all three of us discussed, right? Because I was on site, I was sending you text messages letting you know I'm here, it's 10 at night, nothing's going on, and that was the purpose of communicating to leadership of the city, having eyes on the ground so that things wouldn't escalate. because we're having this conversation about public safety, but again, I'm trying to think whose public safety was prioritized that day
7:03:55when we're obviously being sued because people were hurt. People from our community were hurt, seriously hurt. And I know you've heard the stories of people that just wanted to be there because of how strong they feel. And this is what I was trying to, I think, help the city with when I was saying we need to prepare for what is coming to our community. And I was very clear when I sat here and I told people, we're not gonna allow this, we're not gonna allow just anyone to come into our city and rip us away from our parents, right? And that's what the council couldn't recognize in February when they decided not to support the request
7:04:35of implementing a body of people that can help the city respond, right? because how can anyone think that we would just sit by, stand by and do nothing when we're being discriminated against, when we're being targeted, when we're simply saying our constitutional rights should not be violated, our civil rights should not be violated, our families should be kept together and now we're in a position where SAPD, we don't even know if our department is gonna respond to kidnapping calls in our community right? Because so many times we have heard now, well, we don't want to get involved,
7:05:17we don't want to do anything. So who do we have in our community that we can call to help us and to protect us? When there are people with guns literally, quite literally stopping in the middle of streets of intersections and residents of our city have said, can you You guys do at least the bare minimum of ensuring that if someone is blocking an intersection that they're being told, you should identify yourself and at least don't block the intersection if you're here to actually do your job legally and correctly.
7:05:58It's very frustrating to be in this position when we're now being told publicly, well, we can't actually answer questions because of all of the litigation that our city is is facing because of what actually happened and occurred, and to not even be able to have the pathway for so many members of our community to just understand what needs to happen for you to declare a demonstration, a rally. There are different things, by the way. There's escalation here. How do you classify a rally? How do you classify a demonstration as unlawful?
7:06:35Usually when we declare an unlawful assembly, as Commander Lopez mentioned, there's got to be some criminal act and immediate threat to violence or safety, whether it's to the community or to any officers, regardless of who they are. And just to take you back to your statement about who's safety when we respond, respond, that's everybody's safety, even the community. If you recall the most recent incident at the federal building, we did not respond. And I continuously reassess our not response. But what happened there? Someone lost an eye.
7:07:19And I always think maybe if I would have created that barrier, that person would have never lost an eye. So that is the balance that we have to deal in a split second and decide.
7:08:00Yeah. Councillor Hennepin-Lopez, can I ask you a question? In all seriousness, when you said the Council did not move for it, what item are you talking about?
7:08:13Oh, it was when I brought the item about reinstating the sanctuary advisor group.
7:08:20Okay. I didn't know which one you were talking about. Okay, thank you.
7:08:26Earlier last year.
7:08:28Can I go to a different person and then I'll show back to you? Perfect.
7:08:29Anybody on this side? Council Member Fan?
7:08:36Thank you so much, Commander, for the presentation and Chief, both of you for answering questions. My question is I think a clarification or follow-up regarding the pending tort claims matters. Once the tort claims or litigations were done and we had this type of presentation after that would you be able to answer questions once the appeals were let's say handled or there was a final judgment maybe that's a question for madam city attorney absolutely i mean we know that even
7:08:43under the attorney-client privilege and investigatory privilege under the public records act that once litigation is completed everything is subject to disclosure there may be at least on the attorney side maybe some work product privilege or something that might disclose how we normally defend a case but for the most part everything would be subject to disclosure at that point
7:09:16But even then, if a case is finally adjudicated, appealed, and let's say the appellate court says, you know what, we're not taking it, or we've made a determination, and if this city council decides to waive attorney client privilege or attorney work product, though I would never support such an action, we can do that, correct?
7:09:34Absolutely. I would say yes, because that privilege belongs to the council, and if there were a majority vote on the council to waive privilege, then I would have to produce the information, and they would have to answer your questions.
7:09:52Thank you. And if these tort claims are made against individual officers or specific officers, people who responded that day, which I imagine there may be some, I don't know, because I don't know the extent of these tort claims, while the claims are pending or the litigation is pending and we produce these files or discuss these items in a way that is detrimental to these individual officers, would we be potentially violating POBAR?
7:10:02are? Potentially, if there's any personnel or internal review of the potential use of force, I just I do want to say for the record that with respect to the lawsuit, the Olson lawsuit, and this is part of, you know, my job is defend the city. At least in that case, no individual officers have been named. There are some does, you know, obviously, there's more information. Interestingly enough, our police chief was named in that litigation, which we will do everything we can to get that get our chief dismissed as would be typical in in this type of action. And the investigator, as disclosed in the lawsuit,
7:10:28so I'm not disclosing anything that's not already public, the investigator from the Santa Ana Police Department, clearly, when responding and doing the review, clearly said that the people involved were wearing green uniforms, not blue. And so we will use that in our defense as well.
7:10:58Thank you, and I guess what I was trying to get at is that while I understand there's frustration relating to the pending litigation matters and claims, should we have a misstep that would violate other state laws if there eventually was a determination of culpability or you know a violation of policy or other things by us violating Pobar potentially that could actually prevent us from taking adequate action against a peace officer who may have been responsible in some way on a personnel action is that correct that is correct. So by actually being more sensitive to what state laws is
7:11:14preventing us from disclosing at this time because there are pending litigation matters, we are ensuring that we reserve the right to take personnel action against anybody who may have violated our policies or the law. I think that's what everyone here on this council would like to see, that if there was in fact an an officer who did violate the law, we go through the entire process so that we can actually take personnel action that's not gonna be overturned. I am not interested in keeping anyone who's gonna violate the law because we're forced to. And that has in fact happened here in this city, or at least to my understanding.
7:11:54And I don't want us to make a hasty judgment because there are people in the public who don't understand what processes are required for us to go through these types of investigations and lawsuits. My follow-up question, Chief, is relating to a response, for example, one of our, my colleagues mentioned that if a member of the public feels threatened because there are armed individuals, you know, stopping people in the street, blocking intersections, you know, we don't know who they are the answer would be you would have to call 9-1-1 is that correct no matter where
7:12:34you are that is correct right there's a gunman people carrying guns out in public you would call 9-1-1 and the police would respond and so i guess i'm a little bit confused when we're talking about who pd is supposed to be protecting when in fact at least my understanding is in that those situations people were not necessarily calling 911 and for the cases that there were i believe
7:13:14we did respond that's correct there was i can't remember exactly how many calls came in but with follow-up conversation to those callers there was no actual allegations of someone wanting to make a crime report or they said yes they were wearing uh said police on it they were federal agents there was more uh dialogue that came out in some of those calls that uh you know and i i empathize and uh and how our community feels i feel the same way uh that it's wrong but
7:13:42unfortunately there's a supremacy clause that we can't interfere when it's actual federal agents
7:14:24Okay. And then another question I had was relating to our response when federal agents were calling, right? Because they were saying there is an issue with crowd control, there are issues of people coming to the building and things like that. Obviously, I think everybody up here is familiar with the right to assemble, right, under the First Amendment, where I think all of us in some form or fashion have been part of a protest or assembly multiple times. times. I guess my question there is, what did you... So there's this conversation about
7:14:31who was PD protecting? What did you see your role as, or Santa Ana PD's role as that day?
7:15:06I just want to clarify one thing real quick, because I think I understand where you're headed. I just want to make sure that we put this in context. Chief can verify they're doing their law enforcement work and they're they're doing what they need to do and they were not there at the scene right because they were monitoring and assessing and there was communication in fact i recall in talking with the chief they felt like at that moment it was under control and things were good the communication that i got was not from law enforcement from another attorney
7:15:17right and and my understanding is at that moment that attorney was getting communication from his his people who were saying, we think people could breach our windows and our doors, and we have people holed up in here. But I just wanna make it clear, I think what was happening at that moment, at least as I communicated it was, it was becoming a issue of protecting the building and protecting the people inside it. And I did not know at that time whether the people inside it were, I don't wanna just say this, merely other law enforcement officers or merely people from Department of Homeland Security. What I was concerned about was
7:15:47was were there other members of the public in the building? And so when I had my first communication, I was made very clear like, hey, we're holding the line, we're not seeing anything that's gonna cause us to go run in. But in that second communication, I think there was more of a concern, at least the caller that called me to say, I have to protect people in this building. Again, didn't differentiate whether they're members of the public, doing business in the building, I think it was like five-ish or six o'clock initially. And so that was my concern.
7:16:22So I want you to know as I communicated that I believe that we had a duty to protect human life regardless of who those human beings were.
7:16:51Right, and I guess what I'm trying to get at is if we receive a call from any members of the public saying there's a concern, there's a safety issue, we need PD to show up, you would show up, right?
7:16:58That's correct.
7:17:11So if members of the public during the protest said, oh my gosh, these federal agents are shooting at us, please PD there are these strangers shooting at us you would show up yes okay so I think what I'm really frustrated about up here is that there are balances to the rights to protest and there's a balance to safety for the people existing in these buildings and I think we're while we're trying to parse out what is the best way to handle these types of protests what I did see over over time is that we reassess the situation, and the next time they called and said,
7:17:12hey, we're being attacked, we didn't just send our officers out, we actually monitored the situation using drones that we borrowed from other agencies so that we didn't send a bunch of SAPD officers out to, you know, armed during a protest. And there were other protests in downtown Santa Ana that went just fine because we actually had officers helping to corral people during the the protests march. And I guess what I'm just trying to say is that I hope that as we're talking about this, we're also looking at the fact that if you were a civilian inside
7:17:51the building with hundreds of people throwing things at you and you're not able to leave to go home, it is just as scary a situation. And that is exactly what has happened, not just in this chamber that happened you know what people who are protesting see is one vantage point and the people who are inside the building see a different vantage point and i don't think anyone's right is better than the other do i agree that we should have maybe you know looked at different ways to use you know quote non-lethal uh munitions like tear gas and stuff yes i you know there are
7:18:25we know that in santa ana when there are protests there tend to be a lot of young people right and i'm not saying it's right i would like to know where their parents are and all of those other things but those are situations that we should look at as our policies and that's up for the police oversight commission to do but i think what we're doing up here is we're failing to see that at that time it was something that we've never encountered before it's a situation that at least as far as i know we've never had the national guard sent in based based on a lie by a federal representative.
7:19:01We had issues where literally we have strange people in the city using guns, and we had a bunch of protesters who did in fact try to stop federal vehicles from leaving, and I believe many of those also carried civilian employees, federal civilian employees. So if you're looking from the vantage point of a federal civilian employee just trying to go home, it was really scary too.
7:19:37Again, I hope that once these lawsuits are over, we can get a full debrief, we can get more information, and we can see where we failed, where we could do better, and how we can adjust our policies. But until then, I don't think we're going to get that kind of full debrief that we're asking for, because it would be detrimental to the city as well as to the residents who who are either filing these lawsuits or subject to these lawsuits. That's it. Thank you.
7:20:03Thank you. This is a receiving file. So I just want to go back really quick.
7:20:34And Madam City Attorney, yes, stop me at any time if I'm overstepping. And I'm going to try to be very simple and not overstep anything. anything.
7:20:41Commissioner López, what is the definition of mutual aid or chief?
7:20:53Commissioner López- Mutual aid, again, like the chief mentioned, it's governed by government, California government code. I believe it's 8055 to 8668. And essentially, it falls under the California Emergencies Act, where agencies in need of of assistance will call or request assistance by other agencies to come and assist. And this is not only just for crowd control issues, but in case and matters of a hurricane or earthquake where cities are logistically, you know, short of resources, then they will
7:20:58have mutual aid for other agencies to come and assist in different issues.
7:21:37And so all the agencies that you listed, did we call them for mutual aid?
7:21:43Yes.
7:21:52And that was because the number of protesters or that it was because it was getting out of control? And I'm very sensitive to this issue. I want to be very clear. So what was the reason we called mutual aid?
7:21:53Those factors and among many other factors, again, the type of crowd, the amount of crowd we had, what we were seeing, the violence that was being observed, and so we called mutual aid at that point.
7:22:07So Council Member Vasquez brought up a good point earlier about when we're using—I'm trying to think of all things. we're trying to be very careful how we say this in China. When we're spraying, when you're using the gas and you're spraying where children are.
7:22:26So, and I guess I think your question, Council Member Vasquez, was like, what about the kids, right? How do we avoid the children? Which is very important. There were a lot of children out there. And so I guess my lens is a little different. And so I look at like, is your job to, your job is to keep everyone safe, correct?
7:22:50Correct.
7:23:14So those that were, those employees in the Federal Building that were trying to get home that day because they were scared, when you got the phone call, Chief, it was to get them out safely to get them home or assist. And you weren't assisting ICE. It was the Department of Homeland Security that called or what, who, right? Am I correct or am I wrong?
7:23:15That's correct. They all fall under Department of Homeland Security, but it was the, from my understanding, the federal employees inside the federal courthouse, not courthouse,
7:23:40federal building. Inside the federal building were federal employees. Again, Madam City Attorney, when I step out, I'm trying to, I'm treading lightly. They were federal employees, whether it was the secretary, the custodian, the receptionist, whoever it was, they needed to get out and get home safely. And they could not? Is that accurate?
7:23:49That's correct. It was my understanding, as Madam City Attorney said, it was about maybe 530, end of day for the professional staff from the federal building.
7:24:13Okay. So, and I appreciate the presentation and I learned a lot as well because I don't think we've never, I've never asked you like how many rounds. And so, it's great to have this presentation. But I think as the City's Attorney has indicated and the Chief and all of you and even Councilmember I'm a fan is like we really can't go into detail right because of litigation and once that's complete then you know we can share lots of things I'm sure and so when Councilman Vasquez talked about the you know spraying where there's children and so in my mind I go to where I've been right and
7:24:23And so there's children that in time, Councilmember Fountain said, you know, where are the parents? And I'm not going to go down that road, but there were children out there. And I guess my question, too, is where were the parents? And I know some of them probably took their children there to teach them this is the right thing to do. We're fighting because this is wrong. You know, we don't want ice here. We don't want our families torn apart. I agree with all of that.
7:25:03But I also think, and correct me if I'm wrong, as police officers, you were mindful of the fact that there were children, there were elderly, there were disabled, there were people from all walks of life there from what I could see where I was watching it from. Is that correct?
7:25:28Absolutely.
7:25:49Absolutely. And so no officer, maybe I can't ask this question, maybe I can.
7:25:49I don't want to believe, and I hope I'm wrong, I know I'm wrong, but there's no officer pointing, you know, his less lethal at a disabled person and saying, I'm going to shoot this person because, you know, I don't like them, the way they look. It would be on their body camera.
7:25:58That's correct.
7:26:14So everything that occurred June 9th, 10th, 11th, and 12th, those are the dates?
7:26:159th, 10th, 11th, and 14th.
7:26:23and 14th, excuse me, all of that is on body camera.
7:26:25Yes.
7:26:29And when we go to court, I am sure it will be used in court, correct?
7:26:30Correct.
7:26:36So, and I'll stop there because then I don't want to go into this. So, when I sit here and I listen to all the questions in the presentation, I really appreciate it. One as the mayor, one as a resident here, because I think somebody said it up here, you know, we've never had the National Guard in Santa Ana terrorizing our community. Los Angeles had it, we had it. So somebody talked about green uniforms and blue uniforms and so our masks. And so Chief, did our officers, our Santa and PD officers, those dates, did they wear masks, sir?
7:26:37If they wore masks, the only masks that were authorized to wear are the gas masks, which is standard issued for all our officers.
7:27:18And that's where I wanted you to state. So if our officers had masks on, they weren't the ones that I swear were they covering their face. They were gas masks.
7:27:26That's correct. Unless it was an undercover officer.
7:27:36Okay. So if it was an undercover officer, he was protecting himself.
7:27:40Correct. But I'm not sure if there was any.
7:27:45We don't know, basically. We just don't know, right? And so, but if they needed to wear their gas masks, that's what they were wearing?
7:27:47Yes.
7:27:54Okay. So they were not wearing masks. I would, I don't recall that seeing any bike ice hat on. And so, so I just want to be clear because, yes, we've waited a long time for this presentation. And I really appreciate it. And I think somebody up here said, you know, we don't, I think Councilmember Fann said, you know, we don't want our officers injured or whoever said it. and we don't want our community injured. And I feel very strongly about that. That's no secret. I don't want anybody injured.
7:27:55But when the city attorney tells us that there is litigation pending, any of us up here that asks a question or open the door can hurt us as a city in that litigation. Is that correct, Madam City Attorney?
7:28:27Well, having discussion of potential litigation in public most certainly exposes you to greater financial risk. That's correct.
7:28:45So there's a lot of I'm not an attorney, lots of them in my family, and I sit next to one who, you know, has always great points. But it does expose us to a higher risk, which means possibly paying more money or not paying more money, right?
7:28:52Yeah, and I also want to make clear, it's not because we think we have liability. I want to make that clear. it isn't like we're trying to hide anything. We just don't want things to be taken out of context
7:29:08and used against us or you know. No and I appreciate that and so that's why I just wanted to just have that I wanted to ask you that make that comment so and again I have I could say a lot of things I'm just being very careful and you said multiple times Commando Lopez that Santa Ana Police Department was out there to protect the community
7:29:17And so you had peaceful protesters, and quite a few of them, many of them. And then you had protesters that were throwing the frozen water bottles, or I don't know what they were throwing, at officers.
7:29:42Is that correct or is that not correct?
7:30:01Yes, they were throwing different items, yes.
7:30:04So which places officers in danger? Great bottle injury can occur.
7:30:07Correct.
7:30:12Just like it could occur for a protester that may end up doing something really bad and get injured during the protest. So many people could have been injured those days.
7:30:13Correct.
7:30:26So what was the number total of injuries?
7:30:26That were reported and documented were five.
7:30:31For all June 9th, 10th, 11th, and 14th?
7:30:35Yes. Yes.
7:30:40Okay. So for all four days there were five injuries, which is five too many, but I'm glad to hear I mean, and I'm sure somebody will take it out of context and blog that I said something awful, but I want to be really clear about what I'm saying. It could have just been God awful, and it could have been 50 to 100 people injured and officers. So five is five too many, but I'm glad that it was just a few people, because it could have been really bad on both sides, right?
7:30:41And so it's a receiving file, and the presentation, in my opinion, has information that you can share, correct?
7:31:16Yes.
7:31:26And so I think, and I could be wrong, and I don't want to be disrespectful to any of the Council members or anybody up here, and many of us up here, a few of us, are very clear on what the role of law enforcement is. And I think that this is just such a very sensitive matter. It's a very sensitive issue, you know, and we're still dealing with ICE issues. And the City of Santa Ana has done a phenomenal job of assisting with housing and rent and food and legal defense. And so when litigation, when we finish it, and I hope as Councilmember Lopez, I hope
7:31:28it's not 10 years, I hope it's quickly, but then the City Council, whoever's sitting up here can share that information. Is that correct, Madam City Attorney?
7:32:08I'm sorry, I was communicating with Councilmember Hernandez. Can you repeat that, please?
7:32:19What I said is that once a litigation is complete, whether it's five years, two years, ten years, we can share it out here.
7:32:24Yes. And I believe that through that litigation, as I said, through the discovery process, much of this may come out anyway. Correct.
7:32:32So I'm going to just stop there because I'm going to say the presentation was as thorough it possibly can be under the circumstances. And thank you for sharing it. I know there were some difficult questions and understanding, and I really hope the community, when they're watching, they understand what mutual aid is, why you have to call mutual aid. I would have, I mean, I have a great relationship with the Sheriff's Department, but if the sheriffs would have responded and not our agency, things would have been very different. Or if another agency would have come in and responded
7:32:41because the city manager tells the chief, which he won't, but if he did, I would hope he would, you know, stand down, let another agency go in, then the circumstances would have been very, very different. I can't stress that enough. They would have been very different. different. When the federal government says if you don't respond, we will send in resources. That's a scary comment to me because I know what that means. And I don't think the community fully,
7:33:20some people don't grasp that. So I would rather any day of the week have Santa Ana police officers officers because they're trained well and they're good at what they do and they're qualified and they care about this community. So many of our officers are from this community, grew up in this community, live in this community that I would not want a federal agency to come in and take over our city and take over from our leadership under the chief with the city manager with all of you because it would would be and it would have been very different.
7:33:59So with that, this is a receiving file. Madam City Attorney, did we miss anything? And then you can close out, Councilmember Vasquez. Did we miss anything, Madam City Attorney? That we were good? We stayed within the lines? We didn't color outside the lines?
7:34:39Okay. Can you close it, Councilman Vasquez, please? Thank you.
7:34:54And that threat of federal troops coming in is very scary.
7:34:56I didn't use the word threat.
7:35:03I just said if they came. If they came. That being said, I didn't see any frozen water bottles. It was summer. They were there from 3 to 5. It was hot, out, being thrown. And what we saw is when the guards, the federal guards, would go in the building, the crowd would step away from the building and start having conversation. station. And when they came up, people would come closer. To me, it would be easy for the guards to stay in the building. As far as people leaving safely, I would hope there's a fire exit or a
7:35:04second exit that leads to the back to this side where people can take an Uber or exit or find their car in the parking station right next door to us here so i um i appreciate the work uh the report and uh and last comments any lessons learned from the department from these four
7:35:46days i would you can share please i don't know if that we're going to go into litigation now i think we're coming out of the lines if we say any lessons learned madam city attorney i'm not an attorney but i would be do we learn any less i i i think if we don't get into like oh we would have
7:36:11operationally changed it but if their insights or you know closing statements if you'd like chief
7:36:26just to make a closing comment and without putting us in a situation when you're when you're in court
7:36:31sir yes thank you and uh i uh council member mayor council members i appreciate this opportunity to be able to also present this item here in front of you and to our our community um like if every every other incident, whether it's a demonstration, whether it's a tragic incident, a fatality, or just not just but a use of force, we always evaluate them with every lens that we have through our laws, our best practices. And we can always look at what we did good, what we could have done better, and what we did wrong.
7:36:36And we'll evaluate once all these processes have been completed. And I'm sure there will be some takeaways, not just from our department, but throughout the state, as mentioned earlier. This was a very volatile demonstration that we had never seen before across our entire nation. So that's something that we can always grow from and take some lessons learned from.
7:37:17Thank you, Chief. Chief, at this time we have to vote to go past midnight or decide what can be done before midnight. Thank you so much, Commander. We really appreciate you presenting to us today. Thank you, sir.
7:37:44Thank you.
7:37:55So it's 11 p.m. and so we need to vote. So either we go past midnight or we take on an item quickly or we – and we don't have any closing comments from city manager, city council. So what is the will of the council at this time?
7:37:56Madam Mayor, I'd like to make a motion to continue the items to the next council Council meeting, given that these items don't have any deadlines and we're not subject to having the Housing Authority meeting be completed by today, I'd like to make a motion to continue these items to the next Council meeting with respects to our staff who have been working all day, who have been here since morning. I just want to respect their time. Thank you.
7:38:11I'll go ahead and make a sub motion that we at least get through item 27 and then convene the meeting.
7:38:33I'll second the original motion.
7:38:39I'll second the sub motion.
7:38:42Madam Clerk?
7:38:46So the substitute motion is by Council Member Becerra, seconded by Mayor Pantampanulosa to hear item number 27 prior to closing the meeting and continue the housing authority items to the next meeting.
7:38:49I'm sorry, can you say that again?
7:39:02To hear item 27 tonight and continue the housing authority meeting to May 5th.
7:39:04Got it. Thank you.
7:39:10That's the sub motion. Does that include closing comments?
7:39:12Yes. So all we will do is take item 27 and that's it? Correct.
7:39:15So the motion on the floor is to hear item 27 only, no further action or discussion beyond item 27. That's correct. That's correct. Council Member Becerra?
7:39:19Yes.
7:39:28Council Member Hernandez?
7:39:29Respectfully, no.
7:39:31Council Member Lopez? No. Council Member Phan? Yes. Council Member Vazquez?
7:39:32No.
7:39:38Mayor Pretemperino-Losa?
7:39:41Yes.
7:39:43Mayor Metzger? Yes. Four ayes, three nays. Nays by Councilmembers Hernandez, Lopez, and Vasquez. Motion carries. So, item 27 will be the only item remaining this evening.
7:39:44So, just to be perfectly clear, item 27 only, no City Manager comments, no Council comments, and once we take care of item 27, this meeting will be adjourned. Councilman Becerra? Thank you, Madam Mayor.
7:39:55Mayor. So this item is to discuss and consider directing the city manager to direct staff to draft and bring back a resolution for council consideration that would be sent to Assemblymember Valencia and Senator Umberg requesting that the state legislature amend AB645 to allow the city of Santa Ana to establish a speed safety system pilot program as soon as possible. So this council voted unanimously to adopt the Vision Zero plan back in 2024. That plan's goal was to eliminate or is to eliminate traffic related fatalities and serious injuries in Santa Ana by 2040. Are you leaving Councilmember
7:40:08Hernandez? Okay, I just want to make sure. It's been up all around all day. Back on Saturday, April 5th, 2025, a car was racing down Seggersham Avenue and collided with a tree in the median right near Grissett Place, and that collision resulted in the loss of five lives. Three young girls were ejected from that vehicle. The driver and the remaining passengers that were trapped in the car needed the jaws of life to be removed from the vehicle. Four died at the scene that night. Another young girl died from her injuries a few days later. Just three months later, not that far
7:40:50way less than a half mile down sagashirm avenue right near bear a car veered off the road struck a tree and a cinder block wall and resulted in one death and one injury why because it was speeding well beyond the speed limit in that area now posting police officers at problem spots in the city is not feasible there's there's no way like having a an officer with a speed camera or I'm sorry, radar gun 24 hours a day, that's not going to help. And we've heard folks talk about speed humps. Well, speed humps, I mean, and Director Rosas, tell me if I'm wrong, but I don't think you're
7:41:28going to get speed humps allowed per state standards on Sagastrom, on Fairview, on Bristol, on any other arterial where we're seeing high speeds. So what do we do? So I was out in Chicago. Someone brought up Chicago. I was in an area near the Loop which is downtown and we were in a lift my wife and I and as we were all going you know random or different speeds all sudden we got past this one part again near the downtown and everybody just immediately just kind of went into the same exact speed it was like a procession and I
7:42:05thought oh my god did I miss something what's going on here and I lean over to to the Lyft driver and I said, what are we doing? What's going on here? And he said, oh, we have speed cameras on this stretch of road here in Chicago. And I look and there's a sign that says, you know, this area from X to Y streets has speed cameras. And again, everybody, I looked down at the Lyft driver's speedometer and it was right at the speed limit. And everybody around him was was exactly at that speed as well. So I'm thinking to myself, well, given what happened on Sagerstrom, two fatal accidents over there,
7:42:45and we've had these throughout the city, so what do we do? So in exploring this, found that the state of California had approved Assembly Bill 645. And what AB645 does is it allowed only six cities throughout the entire state of California to establish a speed safety pilot program. These cities are Los Angeles, San Jose, Oakland, Long Beach, San Francisco, and Glendale. Now no disrespect to Glendale, but Glendale which has a
7:43:25hundred thousand people less than Santa Ana and comparable physical size, but they made it onto the list. Now why does that matter? Because if your city is not on that list you don't even get to explore pilot program so for us to be able to try to accumulate data i'm sorry i don't think san anna is comparable to los angeles or san francisco and we're definitely not comparable to glendale so how would we be able to collect our own data well we would have to have state law amended well around the time that ab645 was approved four Pepperdine students lost their lives in a high-speed crash on PCH in
7:44:03Malibu. The Malibu City Council immediately began urging their state representatives to be able to install speed cameras along PCH and so a year later their state senator Ben Allen was able to get SB 1297 passed so that Malibu could join those other six cities that were included in AB 645 but it would also require Malibu to follow all the requirements of AB645. So they got SB 1297. SB 1297 essentially said everything AB645 said except now add Malibu. So I want to highlight real quickly some of the requirements that are in AB645. So first it requires a city to engage
7:44:44in a public information campaign at least 30 days before implementation. So you're not just going to see cameras pop up without some sort of public information effort. Two, requires the city to issue warning notices rather than citations for violations detected within the first 60 calendar days of the program. Three, requires the city to develop uniform guidelines for, among other things, the processing and storage of confidential information. And then four, requires that all photographic or administrative records made by the speed speed cameras to remain confidential.
7:45:25Now, I don't believe anybody on this dais wants this type of data shared with ICE. So between SB 54, our state sanctuary city law, and I'm sorry, sanctuary state law, and the requirements within AB 645, Santa Ana were to eventually ever be given permission from the state to have a speed safety program, we would adopt requirements to keep that data safe and out of the hands of certain agencies. Also as a part of the pilot program that was adopted by the City of Los Angeles, believe it or not because I
7:46:02know there's been a lot of talk about police and this program, in the City of LA the program is not not administered or maintained by their police. It's actually administered by their Department of Transportation and in Santa Anna since we don't have a separate DOT that would fall under our city's public works so lucky you Rudy if we go forward guess what you got so now now the thing about this program if we were to go forward with it this is something that would actually reduce the amount of police traffic stops and the potential impacts related to them because obviously this would not involve a police officer
7:46:39officer pulling somebody over, this would be based on the equipment finding that somebody was over the limit. And by the way, it's not if an area is posted at 40 miles per hour. If they're at 41, they get a citation. I believe it's up to about five miles over the limit. In regards to the actual speed cameras, one, all they have to do is do a quick Google search. When I heard some of the commentary about the speed cameras, literally one quick Google search. They capture photos and video of vehicles exceeding speed limits in which they specifically record the license plate number, precise speed, time, date,
7:47:20and location. Now that's important because I think there's confusion. I hope it's just confusion and not deliberate misinformation, but if it's confusion I think there's confusion between the license plate readers, which this council's already approved and have been installed, and the speed cameras. The but they're not subject to AB645. Speed cameras would be. So tonight, the request before us this evening, as I mentioned earlier, is to direct our city staff to draft and bring back a resolution for council consideration at our May 5th city council meeting that would be sent to Assembly
7:47:55Member Valencia and Senator Umberg requesting that the state legislature amend AB645 to allow the city of Santa Ana to establish a speed safety system program as soon as possible. And let me be clear this is not to do anything other than ask our legislators to begin the process to have us included in that list of cities that are allowed to do a pilot program we're not discussing camera location we're not discussing technology we're not discussing anything other than saying hey legislators can you please do us a solid can you get us on that list so that we can then begin that
7:48:34that process. So I hope that my colleagues will be amenable to that. And thank you very much.
7:49:11Thank you, Councillor Becerra. Just to clarify, so they receive, because I looked it up, if they violate chief corrective, they receive like a postcard, hey, you violated the speed, if we were to be accepted into the pilot program, you violated the speeding law,
7:49:16but there's no citation. So what it actually does, as Councilmember Becerra said, there's an an education phase and you initially receive almost like a warning that you've been... You're speeding. Exactly. And then after a warning and after a certain period of time of education, you then receive a citation, but it's an administrative citation as mentioned through whether it's public works or Department of Transportation. Has nothing to do with PD. And then it's progressive...
7:49:29Can you say that again? Again, it has nothing to do with PD.
7:50:01Right, so it's almost like a parking citation because it doesn't even go to your driving record. It doesn't capture who the driver is. It goes to the vehicle, and it's progressive based on how many miles per hour you're over the speed limit. So one example, if you're 11 to 15 miles per hour the speed limit, it's a $50 fine. fine, 16 and 25 over the speed limit, $100 fine, 26 and over are $200 fine.
7:50:06But it steps to get there.
7:50:35Right. Exactly.
7:50:37And that's why I just want to be clear. So Rudy's name will be on it, not yours. But okay. Yes. Everybody knows where Rudy lives too. No, I'm just kidding.
7:50:38And these administrative citations can be doubled based on risk areas such as school zones or construction zones. but they can also based on income they can also be reduced that's great that's
7:50:45great and thank you for mentioning that because yeah I read on it Thank You councilman Becerra for bringing this forward you know when you talk about schools right we have a lot of parents that come to us and or the school district and say hey we want you to pay for this city because Mikey pays for everything when they have a billion dollar budget but we'll talk about that another day um so this would be something that we could do and maybe the city manager will give it to Rudy to handle um but I like what it says here and thank you Councilman Becerra for making it
7:51:02very clear because the speakers that came tonight they clearly did not read this because it says or if they did it didn't matter the bill requires the participating city to engage like you said in public information campaign so that's what they asked for which is what we would give them and then It would begin detecting violations, including information relating to when the system would begin detecting violations, where the systems would be located.
7:51:30But the bill requires the participating city to issue warning notices, warning notices, rather than notices of violations for violations detected within the first 60 calendar days of the program. And it goes on and on. And so that's good information to know.
7:51:57And then it says, and here's the one thing, and I know when I met with Rudy to talk about First Street and his team, you know, Santa Ana ranks fourth out of the 15 highest population cities in California in injury slash fatality traffic collisions for bicyclists and fifth for pedestrians, according to the California Office of Traffic Safety. and so I had that conversation with Rudy's team about you know First Street and fatalities and bicyclists and so I I will be supporting the item mr. city manager so any other comments by any of the council members if not we have direction there's
7:52:18Go ahead.
7:53:02I guess I'm mostly curious about the cost of these.
7:53:05Because we're talking about our budget, and I understand that the item is just to say, let's get the state to pass a law to include us in this. But I am really interested in how much these cameras cost. Wouldn't we have to install them on all these major intersections?
7:53:11And then, well, I mean, that's my question. Yeah, because I'm not particularly curious about sending staff and our lobbyists to go work with, you know, these state legislators to pass a bill that we're not going to implement because it's going to cost a million dollars to implement. I think it's a really important thing to implement and I feel like it's like we're trying to make promises to the community that we're not going to be able to do because we're looking at a $19 million budget deficit. And I'm trying to balance like how much is it going to actually improve public safety versus
7:53:29the amount of money where if we're going to spend a million dollars would I not spend a million dollars in something else whether it's in PD code enforcement or public works to to install something, actual physical infrastructure that would slow people down, et cetera. Those are the questions that I have regarding this issue.
7:53:59And I just wanna remind just the Mayor and Council members that if you were to advance this item to a Council, right, remember, because you're not making that decision tonight, so if you're gonna advance this to an item on the agenda, then you could advance it with a, and please estimate cost so that you can make that decision at that time. I just want to make sure, because I'm really trying to make sure these days that we are disciplined about this policy. That 80, we used to call them 85As, they come out of the charter, but we really sometimes, the question is, do you even want to consider it?
7:54:17You're not making the decision on yes or no. If you say, we'd like to at least have an opportunity to analyze, get information, we'll bring it back. If you're like, nope, don't even want to consider it, then you'd vote no and we won't bring it back.
7:54:46So I guess before I go there, do we even have a general idea of what that might be? because if we have a general idea and you're like yeah actually it's gonna cost us a million dollars I'm like no don't don't spend your time doing that I'd rather you spend your time do something else but if you're saying actually we have no idea or it might be a couple hundred thousand dollars then
7:54:59okay send one of our management right I can only tell you the only information I would have is that we had budgets that were related to the red light camera programs that we had and I can tell you that the program budget as I recall eight years ago was over a million dollars but that was all I know I'm just saying because i can only guess i'm just saying you're asking that's all i can tell you we don't
7:55:17have any information chief you were going to say something no i was going to comment that uh in regards to the red light that required a different process different and also that involved uh police because it was a cbc code so there was more costs that were involved for this project i i don't know what the cost would be and as mentioned that probably something that would that would come out of another city department.
7:55:37The other thing I'd like to add real quick is that as far as this being a pilot program, in other words, let's not get ahead of ourselves. We're not gonna talk about millions of dollars of investment to deploy these in 50 locations. I mean, to be very honest with you, I don't know about you guys, but the accidents that have happened on Sagerstrom, I mean, I know it's in Ward 4, but the loss of life and the fact that we had so much loss of life, I mean within one year this this has not been a long time ago this was literally last April that we lost all those children over there so for me this is
7:56:02you know how do we do something you want to put speed humps there if Rudy can promise speed humps and it could truly solve the issue over there then I'll go over there and help Rudy put the damn things in myself but that's not an an option. And so to even be able to at least have one segment, especially one that's been as lethal as Sagerstrom has been, I think it's worth exploring it. And by the way, Senator Allen took him over a year to get the state law amended. And God willing, God willing that we are in a better place financially in a year from now or two years from now,
7:56:39we may not be. And I'll tell you right now, the city of LA and the city of Oakland did did not exactly deploy their cameras on day one. It took them a little bit of time. So again, this is a longer process and that's why bringing it to you guys tonight is to simply say, let's allow Senator Umberg and let's allow Assemblymember Valencia to start that process. I mean, we know Sacramento is not a place known for efficiency. So to get this process started tonight would be great.
7:57:15Any other comments, questions? Councilman Lopez.
7:57:43Yeah, I have a question. I have a question. And obviously I think that the issue of people dying because of speeding cars is really important. I just brought recently something that can help us. I wanted to know how your meetings with the Senator have gone about this item, yeah. Glendale City Council.
7:57:47We haven't started since it has been approved by City Council.
7:58:11Okay.
7:58:15They're looking for directions tonight
7:58:16just start meeting with them? Oh, and I ask that because what my office has heard is that it's going to be very difficult for that pilot to be amended, for any other city to be included, right? It was years of coalitions working together and to select those cities and so, you know, I asked like what the conversations have been hoping that they're already in agreement um with this but then coalition members have reached out to say you're you're not going to amend this bill
7:58:18so i'm confused well sb 1297 which was done by senator allen did exactly what i'm asking for
7:58:58it amended the initial bill so it has been done i don't have a problem with like the idea the the concept at all. It's, I think it's more of the train of thought, like are we gonna send you on this journey of speaking with the assembly member, the senator about this item, when frankly, you know, you guys should have already.
7:59:05So I don't know if they're open to opening the, that's the key, I don't know.
7:59:28Well I hope you'd appreciate that I've had those conversations with our legislators. I wouldn't waste their time if they hadn't at least express some sort of interest in seeing what the council would like to do so if there is an interest here then we should allow our staff to then go ahead and proceed so if you're okay with the concept say yes so that they can proceed
7:59:33well I could share you know whatever information I have heard and that was the most concerning one that they're saying to me this isn't gonna happen because then it means that the the entire bill all the cities that have have been included would have to be brought back, that it would obviously upset people, but that's just what I'm hearing from one of the organizations that helped put this bill together. And again, I don't have an issue with the concept because they actually fought really hard to implement strong rail guards in place to ensure that it was handled by a different agency that was, I think, one of the important points
7:59:52that the chief discussed. And so I'm open to it, but I think what, let us know, if this is something that the Senator and the Assembly Member can do so that the community is clear and we're not just here presenting something that they're gonna think is gonna happen when it might not happen at all.
8:00:34Can I just clarify a couple of things real quick, Council Member? First of all, it wouldn't unravel anything. I'll say it fourth and fifth and sixth time if it works. Senate Bill 1297 amended the original Assembly Bill. It didn't unravel anything. It literally took AB645 and said Malibu too. That's all it did, didn't unravel anything. Didn't do one single thing. LA, Oakland, San Francisco, Long Beach, Glendale, nothing impacted them except they just said Malibu too. That's it. I've had the conversations with our legislators. Again, they're waiting to see for the council to send them a resolution that says, yes, proceed.
8:00:52So that's all this is. This is nothing more, just to simply, because if you're saying you're supporting the concept, then you say yes to them and then they can proceed. That's it.
8:01:31Yeah, it's just weird that they're, well, one, I hope you can appreciate, right, like that they shouldn't have to wait for this council to tell them to do anything and everything to protect our community. And that's why I was hoping that conversations have already begun.
8:01:41done but it's fine well no I and that's a good point but I use example of you know the needle exchange everybody said we can't change that you can't beat that it's a done deal and we did we beat that and they're not coming to Santa Ana so some of us went up and testified I've testified with the sober living task force with the body brokering I mean you got to work it doesn't necessarily mean Mr. City Manager, that you will go up and testify or Rudy will, but who knows the council members don't go up to testify or, you know, the police department to say how many fatalities we've had
8:01:57or whatnot. So there's work to be done, but this is just the beginning. And so I think that's why it's just direction for you. If there's no other comments, I think you can hear. Yeah, go ahead,
8:02:34Council Member. We got just a few minutes. Yeah, I was trying to find some information information about this also, and the City of Glendale's Speed Safety System Impact Report from March 10th, 2025 indicated that the fiscal costs, such as the initial purchase of equipment, personnel and other ongoing costs include
8:02:44approximately $1 million per year for five years to cover nine locations. Glendale's about 30 square miles with about 190,000 residents. $320,000 for salary and fringe benefits, $605,000 for vendor operational costs, $75,000 for other city costs, for a total of $1 million.
8:03:06I'm not supportive of that at this time. I don't, of all the list of issues and items that we have on our CIP, as well as budget priorities, I don't think this is the way to go. So I would like to see what other options we have to work on safety on Segerstrom, whether it is because we need to add another light.
8:03:28There are so many ways I think we can use our public work infrastructure to stop people from speeding, all of those things. Let's look at that. So I'll leave that to staff to look into.
8:03:53Thank you. Let me say something really quick and then you can close it out. So after that accident on Segerstrom, you know, a couple of us went down there. I went down there and met with people that were there. And I came back here and asked, what can we do? How do we prevent this? And it was very emotional and it was just awful. And I was told, well, not much. Really nothing. And people just need to slow down. And I'm not making up, there's no mentiras here. That's exactly what I was told, not much. And you're talking about losing four children.
8:04:07Four children, is it four, correct, four?
8:04:49That was more than four, but yeah.
8:04:51Four or five, how many? About five. Driver, three, four in the back. Correct.
8:04:53Three propelled from the vehicle.
8:04:56Yeah, and so for me, tonight is not about discussing how much it's costing. It's just bring us back a report to say, say, hey, it's not going to PD, it's going to go to a different department, and what can we do? And that's our job as policymakers and just as humans. Like, when we talk about the homeless, we don't want them laying on the street in their own stuff. That's inhumane to leave them out there. That's why City of Santa Ana has done a phenomenal job of getting them in programs and helping them and, you know, because it's inhumane to let them lay out there in their feces and everything else.
8:04:57And so for me, when we're talking about losing lives, I'm not saying go spend $2 million. I'm not agreeing to this because that's a cost here. I'm saying I support the item to go do the research, come back in 60 or 90 days, because we're in the budget time right now, come back in 60 days. This is what we have. This is the cost. This is how many staff Rudy thinks he'll need. I guess you've been nominated. How many staff it will take, or we don't have the funding because we'd rather have five parties in this city like a cannabis festival that I don't support we'd rather have parties
8:05:35then save lives and so especially we're talking to any lives but definitely our children I'm a parent and so I think what you're asking councilman Becerra is What can we do? What can we not do? What is the cost? Let me finish before you interrupt me. What, because this means a lot to me because I came back after that accident. I went there three days and stood there with those families and it was very difficult for me. And so when you say, well, I was like, can you put speed bumps? No.
8:06:16Can we put big slow down sign? We put it for a little bit.
8:06:58Did it help? No.
8:07:04But I'm just I'm supporting this item because if you could come back with something if four of us agree up here or the majority or whoever all of us I would think human life is very just as much as we put the effort into affordable housing just as much as we put the effort into immigration defend legal defense for immigration just as much there are so many things that we're very passionate about we should be very passionate about losing the lives of our children or our families on that street or throughout this city because I know I am and I've been this way since day one I'm not doing it because it's political season
8:07:08I've been this way since day one so I should be really clear I came back and I asked how do we prevent this what can we do and it wasn't Rudy it was somebody else sitting in that chair and other people who said nothing we can't do nothing so i think
8:07:45councilman sarah your item is just to look into it it's it's literally to ask our legislators to pursue the legislative process right a cost of a whopping zero and they may come back and say
8:08:03there's nothing we can do and we say okay thank you have a nice day or they come back and they say this is what we can do and then we bring it back to the council is that is that am i missing
8:08:15But we've got to give them direction.
8:08:24Okay. That's all I want to know. Okay. Thank you.
8:08:25Wait, but that's not a cost of zero. With the state legislature, there is a limited amount of staff time for things that we want them to do for us. We have to lobby them. We have to pay our lobbyists, whether it's a state or federal lobbyist, we have to spend time on that. It's not just infinite. And I think all of us up here care about when someone dies from speeding. I live off Segerstrom, so I had a house there. I drove by it every day. So just because I don't support a program that's gonna cost us potentially a million dollars without knowing the efficacy,
8:08:28people know the speeding rates. This is in the middle of the night someone screwed up and we lost lives. We don't know the efficacy of this program. What we should direct staff to do is look at what options we have to make Segerstrom safer. not to go lobby the state legislature on an issue we don't know if it's effective, we don't have the money to implement, and we don't know if it's going to do anything because paying $50 for a fine is not necessarily going to slow people down, especially if they're already not obeying by stated speeding signs. That's what I'm more concerned about. So I would be happy to
8:09:06support motion or direction to say, Director Rosas, Mr. City Manager, find out how we can make speeding in the city less deadly how can we get staff to slow down or excuse me not staff members of the public which includes by for example bike lanes that some members of this council don't support like the bump outs that we have on main street those things slow people down so they don't run into pedestrians but we have complaints all the time because guess what people don't pay attention so that's what i'd love to see not to pursue some type of lobbying business with the
8:09:42state for something we don't know is effective let's pursue grants for programs that we already have in place for cip that we're trying to get funded that's what i'd like to see thank you
8:10:17so let me ask director rosas what i mean what's in the cip for segers from that hasn't been funded what is it what bulb outs i have not seen this plan where at grissett and segershrim are the plans for bulb outs and flashing crosswalks and speed humps and all the things where are those? Where has it been?
8:10:28We can do that if you want to agendize what the improvements are. So, I mean, part of our discussion when we talked last year with our budget components, we added more patrol officers, right? More motor aspects to try to do that. There was a temporary sign. We are adding some components in different part of the city. So we can bring up a bigger type of presentation if you want, but I think it's getting lost from the original intent of this was right do we go seek a resolution seeking umberg or veleno valencia to help change the resolution I mean change the ab-45
8:10:47that's one there's a big distinction between us not making the assumption somehow the city has done enough because there are accidents right obviously we don't endorse any speeding in our streets right obviously we want to do more lighting, more crosswalks, more enforcement, so more comprehensive aspect. But it's not for lack of staff trying. And, you know, how do we impede folks from dying on the streets? Well, obviously, you know, we try to mitigate all aspects. It's not an indifference from city staff.
8:11:27Mayor Paterson of City of New York City Manager, let me just say something. I in no way believe that you or our director of public works didn't put some thought into it. After that tragic accident, I know staff was thinking about it. And now we have a sign-up that tells you how fast you're going. But that's it. There was nothing else that physically could be done. And that's why I'm sitting here with this item before us. It's not for a lack of wanting other things. And to Councilmember Phan's point, yes, I actually do support a lot of the traffic calming measures.
8:11:57I know there are Councilmembers up here who do not, who have frustrations because they've heard constituents complain about them. That's fine. line. I've supported them. Bike lanes, I've supported those. Hell, I mean when when Relay Bristol gets built and the village gets built, guess what you're gonna see around it? Class 4 bike lanes. Who lobbied for it? Me. So if there's anybody up here that wants to slow down traffic and make it safe for pedestrians and bicyclists, it has been me. And so bringing this item for us tonight is not because for a lack of trying other things. And if we could get those other things that don't
8:12:29involve cameras i would love it but it just i represent an area that has streets that are naturally inclined to speeding and racing and what can i do so i'm throwing everything out on the table if everybody wants to you know thumb their nose out it's too expensive or or insert name of non-profit came in and spread misinformation about fine but i don't want to see you at those funerals i don't i don't want to see you there with the photo ops i don't shame on you
8:13:01Mayor, may I just ask, I want to make sure of something that's really important to me. Go ahead. I want to make sure we're consistent and we're not being hypocritical. I want to say this very loud and clear at whatever 1130 it is tonight. It's 1135. As your city attorney, I do not ever recommend that you have discussions on this dais about liability, public safety, danger, and these types of words. I just want to be consistent about that issue. I understand about other things, but I want to make sure that we're being consistent.
8:13:29I appreciate that you're giving legal advice, but as a policymaker sometimes we say things up here, guess what?
8:13:57We just had a discussion where you asked me to limit discussion on issues of liability.
8:14:04And that's why I said I appreciate your... I'm trying to be consistent.
8:14:09I appreciate your input.
8:14:12So Mr. City Manager, you have the direction or not, and I want to be clear that if somebody needs to go lobby in Sacramento, I'll fly my happy backside up there like I've done many times, and I'll pay for it. I don't need the city to pay because I have a retirement because I had a real job and I worked, you know, so I understand others don't have that. So I'll pay for that myself and go lobby for this because, and again, it's no disrespect to anybody sitting up here whether you care or you don't care. We have to address this. And so we're going to always come back with these kind of policies. And again, we spend money.
8:14:13Boodle parties. We spend a million dollars on parties. I'm going to say that until I'm blue in the face.
8:14:49Mayor, I'm also just interested in the cost as well. So if I'd be supportive of seeing something come back to us to see what that cost looks like to implement this. And just for the record, I'd be supportive of protected bike lanes if they didn't take 50 years. So I mean, that's pretty much it. But that's it for me, Mayor. Thank you.
8:14:54Great. Thank you. I think we're good.
8:15:15So there's clarity in the direction. I THINK COUNCIL MEMBER SERRA WANTED US TO READ BACK THE RESOLUTION IN TWO WEEKS TO SEEK THE SUPPORT OF OUR ASSEMBLYMAN AND OUR STATE SENATOR TO AMEND 645 INCLUDES IN THE PILOT PROGRAM, CORRECT?
8:15:17TWO WEEKS CAN YOU DO? I DON'T KNOW THAT WE HAVE ENOUGH TO MAKE A VOTE HERE. IT'S VERY DISAPPOINTING THAT COUNCIL MEMBERS ARE LEAVING BEFORE THE ITEM IS DONE. I DON'T KNOW THAT WE HAVE MAJORITY DIRECTION. WE DON'T HAVE ENOUGH FOR DIRECTION HERE. So we'll bring it back in two weeks. And then there's, we don't council.
8:15:36Well, I just want to be clear. So we had council member Hernandez, who's been bebopping around the entire night, dragging our city manager outside. Couldn't even be bothered to stick around for this item. And then we have two more council members leave.
8:15:50Yes.
8:16:01It's good to know where the priorities of safety are.
8:16:02The rest of us are sitting here. I can say that we don't ever leave the four of us. We're pretty regular.
8:16:04We have four, that's the four of them. So there's majority.
8:16:10Councilman Vazquez, you didn't say anything. You're good. Bring it back.
8:16:15I listened to everybody and I took it in and I'm worried more about the cost and I want to see some measures on Segerstrom. I want to see bike lanes or bump outs, whatever we can do to slow down the traffic in that area.
8:16:19Can we not do two weeks, Councilman Bessette, only because we're in budget time, maybe 30 days?
8:16:35What is the direction at this point? Right, the item, again, the item before us, Councilor Peceta can correct me, Councilor Durek item is for us to just get a resolution to have Assemblyman Valino and Senator Umberg
8:16:40include the city in the pilot program and to ask for amend 645. That's his request to my understanding. If it's transferred or differed to other mitigating aspects, that's totally out of this request. That's fine.
8:17:02I'm supportive of that. Good, Councillor Velsos. Councillor O'Farran. I'm good.
8:17:17Councillor O' Since we're doing the budget soon, can't we just bring back an item that, whether it's the CIP or something like that, regarding the street?
8:17:22We can certainly do that.
8:17:33Yeah, but not as part of this.
8:17:34I'm just saying. What we're trying to determine is, do we have four votes to bring the resolution back? Yes, I'm not supportive of moving forward with this.
8:17:36Correct. Mayor and City Council, City Attorney, if I may, based on what I heard in the notes that I took, I do believe that there's support of four to bring something back regarding this resolution. That's good. To bring the resolution back. There's an openness to hearing the resolution and including cost information. All right. Meeting is adjourned.
8:17:41Thank you.
8:18:04