Meeting transcript

Read the December 20 meeting.

1,617 merged speaker turns. Unidentified speech is hidden by default; timestamps open the public recording.

Official recording

Transcript

Open official recording ↗
Unidentified

almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty

0:00
Unidentified

almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty

0:08
Unidentified

almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty

0:19
Unidentified

almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty

0:37
Unidentified

almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty

0:41
Unidentified

almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty

1:00
Unidentified

almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty

1:05
Unidentified

Thank you.

1:28
Unidentified

almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty

2:04
Unidentified

almighty almighty almighty

2:09
Unidentified

almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty so she knows to tell you when she's ready.

2:24
Unidentified

And she'll see it changed. and she just looks at the curing monitors, she'll know.

2:51
Unidentified

And then we'll say, live, you're on. Live, you're on. Exactly. All right, thanks. How many, too? John, did you do your Zoom test? I love them.

2:57
Unidentified

Did you do your Zoom test, too? Awesome.

3:09
Unidentified

Make sure when we start the real team, the door gets closed. Absolutely. Amen.

3:16
Unidentified

This is so great!

4:14
Unidentified

almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty

4:19
Unidentified

almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty Thank you.

4:37
Unidentified

Thank you.

5:20
Unidentified

almighty

5:55
Unidentified

almighty almighty

6:04
Unidentified

almighty almighty almighty almighty

6:07
Unidentified

almighty almighty almighty almighty

6:10
Norma Orozco

almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty

6:11
Norma Orozco

almighty

6:15
Unidentified

almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty

6:16
Norma Orozco

almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty

6:17
Unidentified

almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty

6:19
Unidentified

This is John, can you hear me? We can hear you, John. You sound great, how do I sound? You sound good. Can you try a few other mics please?

6:24
Unidentified

Testing, one, two. Sound good.

6:41
Unidentified

Testing one, two. Sound good. And can you also test the city manager's mic please?

6:49
Unidentified

Test one, two. Sound good. Thank you very much.

7:01
Unidentified

Thank you.

7:20
Unidentified

almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty

7:49
Unidentified

almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty

8:10
Unidentified

Thank you.

8:23
Unidentified

Thank you.

8:55
Unidentified

Thank you.

9:24
Unidentified

Thank you.

9:51
Unidentified

Thank you.

10:23
Unidentified

Thank you.

10:50
Unidentified

Thank you.

11:24
Unidentified

Thank you.

11:49
Unidentified

Thank you.

12:21
Unidentified

Thank you.

12:49
Unidentified

Thank you.

13:21
Unidentified

Thank you.

13:50
Unidentified

Thank you.

14:24
Unidentified

Thank you.

14:54
Unidentified

Thank you.

15:21
Unidentified

Thank you.

15:51
Unidentified

almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty

16:20
Unidentified

almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty

16:22
Unidentified

Thank you.

16:36
Unidentified

Thank you.

17:05
Unidentified

almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty

17:28
Unidentified

almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty

17:48
Unidentified

almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty

17:56
Unidentified

Thank you.

18:09
Unidentified

almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty

18:35
Unidentified

Thank you.

18:43
Unidentified

Thank you.

19:10
Unidentified

Thank you.

19:41
Unidentified

Thank you.

20:17
Unidentified

Thank you.

20:43
Unidentified

almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty

21:10
Unidentified

almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty

21:48
Unidentified

Thank you.

22:12
Unidentified

almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty Thank you.

22:41
Unidentified

I love you.

23:39
Unidentified

almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty

24:15
Unidentified

almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty

24:57
Unidentified

almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty

25:11
Unidentified

Thank you.

25:27
Unidentified

Thank you.

25:49
Unidentified

Thank you.

26:21
Unidentified

I love you.

26:51
Unidentified

Thank you.

27:16
Unidentified

Thank you.

27:54
Unidentified

Thank you.

28:18
Unidentified

Thank you.

28:49
Unidentified

Thank you.

29:19
Unidentified

Thank you.

29:46
Unidentified

Thank you.

30:23
Unidentified

Thank you.

30:55
Unidentified

Thank you.

31:18
Unidentified

almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty

31:46
Unidentified

almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty Thank you.

32:06
Unidentified

Thank you.

32:52
Unidentified

Thank you.

33:24
Unidentified

Thank you.

33:47
Unidentified

Thank you.

34:16
Unidentified

Thank you.

34:47
Unidentified

I'm awesome.

35:35
Thai Viet Phan

Yes, I have my venti peppermint mocha up there.

35:38
Thai Viet Phan

It's true. I just stopped talking to him at all. Hi.

35:58
Unidentified

So far away.

36:11
Thai Viet Phan

Jessie. Yeah. Yeah.

36:18
Valerie Amezcua

Thank you. Clerk, at this time, can we start the meeting, please?

36:23
Kristine Ridge

Recording in progress.

36:28
Valerie Amezcua

I hereby call a special closed session meeting to order. This meeting is taking place with in-person attendance and by teleconference via Zoom. The public may access the meeting via the Santa Ana YouTube channel or the city's website. Please bear with us as the technology may disrupt the flow of the meeting.

36:31
Norma Orozco

Madam Clerk, please conduct your roll call. Councilmember Becerra.

36:53
Norma Orozco

Councilmember Hernandez.

37:03
Norma Orozco

Councilmember Peñalosa.

37:06
David Penaloza

Present.

37:08
Norma Orozco

Councilmember Phan. Here. Councilmember Vasquez.

37:10
Benjamin Vazquez

Present.

37:15
Norma Orozco

Mayor Pro Tem Lopez. Mayor Amesqua. Present. We have quorum.

37:16
Valerie Amezcua

Any of the members would like to take this time to announce their abstentions at this time?

37:23
Valerie Amezcua

Madam Clerk, do we have any speakers for this special closed session? No, we do not.

37:32
Valerie Amezcua

At this time, we will be recessing to the portion of the meeting to consider the items listed on the special closed session agenda, and we'll be back in a little bit. Thank you all very much.

37:41
Kristine Ridge

Recording stopped.

38:03
Unidentified

Thank you.

38:07
Unidentified

Thank you.

38:38
Unidentified

Thank you.

39:11
Unidentified

Thank you.

39:41
Unidentified

Thank you.

40:14
Unidentified

Thank you.

40:46
Unidentified

Thank you.

41:14
Unidentified

almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty

41:43
Unidentified

almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty

42:06
Unidentified

Thank you.

42:16
Unidentified

Thank you.

42:49
Unidentified

Thank you.

43:16
Unidentified

almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty

43:43
Unidentified

almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty Let's go.

44:02
Unidentified

Thank you.

44:50
Unidentified

Thank you.

45:14
Unidentified

Oh, oh, oh, oh.

45:42
Unidentified

Thank you.

46:14
Unidentified

Thank you.

46:47
Unidentified

Thank you.

47:16
Unidentified

�������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������

48:11
Unidentified

Thank you.

48:19
Unidentified

almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty

48:44
Unidentified

almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty

48:49
Unidentified

almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty

48:56
Unidentified

almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty

49:03
Unidentified

almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty

49:08
Unidentified

almighty almighty

49:14
Unidentified

almighty almighty

49:21
Unidentified

almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty Thank you.

49:24
Unidentified

almighty almighty

50:04
Unidentified

almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty Thank you.

50:08
Unidentified

Thank you.

51:03
Unidentified

Thank you.

51:34
Unidentified

Thank you.

52:04
Unidentified

Thank you.

52:33
Unidentified

Thank you.

53:08
Unidentified

Thank you.

53:36
Unidentified

Thank you.

54:08
Unidentified

almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty

54:33
Unidentified

almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty

54:53
Unidentified

Thank you.

55:06
Unidentified

Thank you.

55:33
Unidentified

almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty

56:04
Unidentified

Thank you.

56:36
Unidentified

Thank you.

57:07
Unidentified

Thank you.

57:38
Unidentified

Thank you.

58:05
Unidentified

Thank you.

58:32
Unidentified

Thank you.

59:08
Unidentified

Thank you.

59:38
Unidentified

almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty

1:04:33
Unidentified

almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty

1:06:11
Unidentified

almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty

1:06:15
Unidentified

almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty

1:10:50
Unidentified

�������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������

1:12:18
Unidentified

almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty Thank you.

1:18:50
Unidentified

almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty

1:19:53
Unidentified

almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty

1:19:55
Unidentified

almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty

1:23:26
Unidentified

almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty

1:24:04
Unidentified

almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty

1:30:27
Unidentified

almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty

1:32:03
Unidentified

almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty

1:34:36
Unidentified

almighty almighty

1:34:54
Unidentified

almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty

1:34:57
Unidentified

almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty

1:36:37
Unidentified

almighty almighty

1:37:22
Unidentified

almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty

1:37:27
Unidentified

almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty

1:43:08
Unidentified

almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty

1:44:06
Unidentified

almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty

1:44:17
Unidentified

almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty

1:44:34
Unidentified

almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty

1:52:48
Unidentified

almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty

1:55:23
Unidentified

almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty

1:55:42
Unidentified

almighty almighty almighty almighty Let's go.

1:56:22
Unidentified

almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty

1:59:24
Unidentified

almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty

1:59:47
Unidentified

almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty

2:00:53
Unidentified

almighty almighty

2:01:10
Unidentified

almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty

2:01:13
Unidentified

almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty

2:01:25
Unidentified

almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty

2:06:58
Unidentified

almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty

2:07:17
Unidentified

almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty

2:07:48
Unidentified

almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty

2:08:29
Unidentified

almighty almighty almighty almighty

2:19:35
Unidentified

almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty

2:19:40
Unidentified

almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty

2:19:53
Unidentified

almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty

2:23:04
Unidentified

almighty almighty

2:23:23
Unidentified

almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty

2:23:27
Unidentified

almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty

2:25:04
Unidentified

almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty

2:25:16
Unidentified

almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty

2:31:45
Unidentified

almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty

2:32:05
Unidentified

almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty

2:32:35
Unidentified

almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty

2:35:45
Unidentified

almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty

2:36:01
Unidentified

Oooh Oooh Oooh Oooh Oooh Oooh Oooh Oooh Oooh Oooh Oooh Oooh Oooh Oooh Oooh Oooh Oooh Oooh Oooh Oooh Oooh Oooh Oooh Oooh Oooh Oooh ! Oooh Oooh Oooh Oooh Thank you.

2:46:15
Unidentified

almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty

2:47:42
Unidentified

�������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������

2:48:40
Unidentified

almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty

2:49:11
Unidentified

almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty

2:49:32
Unidentified

almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty

2:53:11
Unidentified

almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty

2:53:29
Unidentified

almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty

2:55:11
Unidentified

almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty

2:55:31
Unidentified

almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty

2:56:41
Unidentified

Recording in progress.

3:07:34
Valerie Amezcua

Great, it says that we are on, that we're live. I hereby call the regular open meeting to order.

3:08:28
Valerie Amezcua

This meeting is taking place with in-person attendance and by teleconference via Zoom. The public may access the meeting via the Santa Ana YouTube channel or the city's website. Please bear with us as the technology may disrupt the flow of the meeting. Madam Clerk, please conduct the roll call.

3:08:37
Norma Orozco

Council Member Becerra?

3:08:57
Norma Orozco

Council Member Hernandez?

3:08:59
Norma Orozco

Council Member Peñalosa?

3:09:02
Norma Orozco

Council Member Phan? Here. Council Member Vasquez?

3:09:05
Norma Orozco

Mayor Pro Tem Lopez? Yes. Mayor Amesqua.

3:09:11
Valerie Amezcua

Present. Madam Clark, before we proceed to the Pledge of Allegiance, are there any announcements, please?

3:09:14
Norma Orozco

To request to speak on agenda or non-agenda items within the city's jurisdiction, please dial star nine from your phone or click the button labeled raise hand from Zoom at this time. Please announce your name and word or neighborhood you reside in within the city of Santa Ana

3:09:24
Valerie Amezcua

for the record. Great, thank you. If you can all please stand so we can do the Pledge of Allegiance.

3:09:41
David Penaloza

All right, if you could all please join me in putting your right hand over your heart, face our flag, and follow along. I pledge allegiance to the flag of the United States of America and to the republic for which it stands, one nation under God, indivisible, with liberty and justice for all.

3:09:53
Valerie Amezcua

Thank you. Thank you, Councilman Penalissa.

3:10:16
Valerie Amezcua

I'd like to call up Bob Barnett, our police chaplain.

3:10:21
Unidentified

The best words of inspiration I can give tonight is just a simple prayer of blessing on this meeting and upon our city. So Lord God, we're so privileged to be here. I ask tonight that your blessing would be upon this meeting. You'd bless our city council members and our mayor. Give them the wisdom they need for the decisions they need to make and give them a vision that not only finishes this year but looks well into the next year. I thank you for our city. Bless this holiday season, Lord. Keep everybody healthy, safe. Let peace be in the homes. And Lord,

3:10:30
Unidentified

we're so thankful for the people that serve this community. We're thankful for the first responders, the law enforcement, the fire authority. We ask that you keep them healthy, keep them safe. And Lord, we pray for our people, all of them, that this would be an increased measure of hope that as they look into this new year, they can smile at the future. We're so grateful, Lord, for all that you've done, but we believe there's so much more yet to be done. We ask this in the name of the Lord. Amen.

3:10:58
Valerie Amezcua

Thank you very much.

3:11:33
Valerie Amezcua

THIS TIME WE'RE GOING TO DO THE RECOGNITIONS. MAYOR PROTON LOPEZ.

3:11:38
Valerie Amezcua

I'M SORRY. I'M GOING TO MAKE A MISTAKE UP HERE. I KNOW I AM TONIGHT. I'M READING EXACTLY WHAT IT'S.

3:11:49
Valerie Amezcua

Thank you. We'll go to the next one at this time. Proclamation presented by Council Member Becerra to Santa Ana College, please.

3:12:43
Valerie Amezcua

Student-athletes.

3:12:52
Phil Bacerra

This is what we get for taking so long closed session, right? If I could have the athletes from Santa Ana College join me up here in front here. Wendy Milan, Jesse Mancia, is Jesse here? Antonio Wall, Sergio Gutierrez, Aldo Trujillo, Blaise Iglesias, Wyatt, Turlock.

3:13:25
Phil Bacerra

I think that's all it's here today, right? So come on in.

3:14:03
Phil Bacerra

Ladies and gentlemen, I wanted to take this opportunity to recognize some of the outstanding athletes that we have over at Santa Ana College. Now, over the past couple of years, we've had, you know, some great team sports, some good results have come out of there. But what I wanted to do tonight was recognize some of the athletes that have stood out and performed exceptionally well during the fall season. And so tonight I wanted to recognize some of those individuals. So I wanted to start off with women's soccer. If I can have Wendy come forward. Wendy, there you go.

3:14:12
Phil Bacerra

So Wendy was named to the All Orange Empire Conference first team for the second consecutive season. As a sophomore from Estancia, she scored three goals while collecting two assists in 16 games played. Good job. So some of the other folks that I wanted to recognize tonight that unfortunately could not be here were Matilda. I'm going to watch this. Help me, Matilda.

3:14:48
Phil Bacerra

All right, there we go. Ines Lopez. Well, let me real quick with Matilda. So as a sophomore women's volleyball she was named to the first team after a huge year for the dons the sophomore outside hitter finished with a conference high 67 service aces and the second most killed kills in conference at 375. in the process as a standout from portugal she also broke the school record in both categories she was also named to the 2022 all regional team and then also women's volleyball who couldn't be here tonight was Enes Lopez. She joined the all OEC first team as a sophomore

3:15:16
Phil Bacerra

from Portugal as well, check that out, who collected 322, third ranked in the conference in digs, taking over the third place spot in dig leaders in all program history. She also added 34 service aces at the libero position. And then also from women's volleyball who I wanted to recognize was Kaden Rafe. As a sophomore she made her second appearance on the all-conference second team after a breakout season. The center from Burns, Oregon led the conference and broke the school record in assists with 786 while adding 173 digs, 30 service aces, and 22 total blocks. I told you these guys

3:15:56
Phil Bacerra

were exceptional right? They're setting records left and right. Now we do actually have somebody I believe here from men's soccer Jesse nope okay just kidding Jesse is not here Jesse was a huge part of Santa Ana College's men's soccer team I went to the second round of the SoCal regionals he led the team with nine goals including two game winners to go along with six assists in his sophomore season he was also named to the all-conference first team after a wonderful season so Antonio wall all right we got one okay so antonio come on up

3:16:35
Phil Bacerra

so antonio was the leader of the sac men's soccer backline and was named uh 2022 all conference first teamer the sophomore defender from walnut scored two goals while also recording an assist to earn his second consecutive all conference honor congratulations and wrestling

3:17:18
Benjamin Vazquez

we have Sergio Gutierrez. There he is. How are you doing, Sergio? So Sergio,

3:17:37
Phil Bacerra

so Sergio advanced through the consolation bracket to take six overall in the 174 pound weight class to play six overall at the 2022 Wrestling State Championships. Gutierrez was the only don to medal in just his first season of wrestling at Santa Ana College. Aldo Trujillo? Nope, Aldo. All right, well Aldo, men's cross country. Aldo made the all-conference champ, all-conference team with a fifth place at the conference championships. Sophomore from Anaheim also qualified for state where he placed 37th overall to lead the Santa Ana men's cross

3:17:45
Phil Bacerra

country team and then we have for football blaze iglesias oh blaze huh you don't look like blaze sorry so blaze was named the 2022 american metro league defensive player of the year during his freshman season he posted a team high six sacks to go with 22 tackles and two fumble recoveries in nine games played the defensive lineman was also named to the 2022 all state team and then Wyatt all right

3:18:24
Phil Bacerra

there you go so Wyatt Turlock was a unanimous selection for the 2022 All-American Metro League first team after leading Santa Ana's offensive line at left guard the freshman was also tabbed a 2022 All-State member in his first season with Santa Ana College and then one more that could not be here tonight christian constantine and christian uh broke the san anna college single season record for receptions with 68 to go with 692 yards and eight touchdowns to earn a unanimous selection to the 2022 all aml first team in his sophomore year

3:18:57
Phil Bacerra

constantine also took over as the leader for career receptions with 102 in two seasons with the dons the receiver out of vermilion catholic was also named 2022 all state member as well so let's give it up for these fine athletes here

3:19:38
Phil Bacerra

and before you snap that picture i want to uh mary hegarty the athletic director wasn't able to be here tonight she's at a men's basketball game for uh san nina college but just wanted to thank her for her leadership and I also see Dr. Tina Miller from the Rancho Santiago Community College District Board of Trustees here with us tonight. Thank you Dr. Miller for being here and Dr. Annabelle Neri who couldn't be here as well. So we have a lot of wonderful things happening at Santa Ana College and I'm just so excited to be able to recognize these stellar athletes. So let's give it up for them one more time please.

3:20:01
Valerie Amezcua

Congratulations.

3:21:03
Valerie Amezcua

Thank you, Councilmember Becerra. The next one will be a certificate of recognition presented by Councilmember Pantolosa, Mayor Meswa, and Councilmember Becerra to Mari Carmen Reyes for her outstanding athletic accomplishments.

3:21:14
David PenalozaItem 1

Mari Carmen and whoever wants to join her, come up. You guys are more than welcome to. Parents mainly.

3:21:33
Thai Viet PhanItem 1

Do all the Bruins get to join you?

3:21:47
David PenalozaItem 1

All right, so good evening everybody. It is my honor to be joined by Marie Carmen Reyes tonight. Marie Carmen Reyes was born and raised in Santa Ana. She's a midfielder for the UCLA women's soccer team and the Mexican women's national team. She recently won the NCAA Division I National Championship with UCLA, defeating the University of North Carolina by a score of 3-2 in double overtime scoring the game-winning goal in the 107th minute of the match.

3:22:32
UnidentifiedItem 1

So round of applause. Come on guys.

3:23:11
Phil BacerraItem 1

Now for those of you that know it's not really commonplace for me to be up here congratulating anybody from ucla but obviously obviously what we saw marty carmen do was exceptional i mean national championship double overtime that's what any college athletes dream would be and and she lived it so uh she's joined here tonight with her parents jorge and carmen reyes she has two older brothers jorge and oscar her father and both brothers played professional soccer now one thing i i get to say that i'm very proud of again not the ucla part but the fact that she went to segerstrom high school in ward four and she earned all league and

3:23:22
Valerie AmezcuaItem 1

rookie of the year honors i'm extremely honored to be standing up here with you all the reyes family's amazing family with so are many others with the mexican national team maricarmen helped Mexico's national team qualified to the 2022, I'm going to say this wrong, Concaf Championship? Did I say it right? Yes. Scoring three goals during qualifying, she was called up to Mexico's

3:23:58
Valerie AmezcuaItem 1

national team for a pair of friendlies in Japan in 2021 and started for Mexico at the 2020

3:24:33
Valerie AmezcuaItem 1

U20 Championship, helping the team advance to the championship game and earning a U20 World Cup bid. She scored a goal in the round of 16 wins over Granada and started for Mexico in all three games in the 2018 FIFA U20 Women's World Cup. She helped lead Mexico to a gold medal at the 2018 Conca-cafe.

3:24:45
UnidentifiedItem 1

How do you say that? Conca-cafe.

3:25:11
Valerie AmezcuaItem 1

Well, Conca-cafe. I got it. Conca-cafe. U-20 championship and to a silver medal at the 2015 Conca-cafe U-17 championships.

3:25:13
David PenalozaItem 1

And, you know, I actually asked somebody earlier today, how do you pronounce that? Because we all know I can't even take an oath. So, you know, a word like CONCACAF is going to be a tongue twister for me, but CONCACAF is the Confederation for North America, Central America, and Caribbean Association Football. So, that is a really exciting and, you know, high honor. So, she also, Mari Carmen, is also a two-time Pac-12 championship winner and has become Adidas athlete as of October 2022. One of her greatest athletic thrills is

3:25:28
David PenalozaItem 1

winning the 2018 CONCACAF U20 championship representing Mexico and her hobbies include hanging out with family and friends and going to the beach. If she knows she's a little tan she just came back from Hawaii because I follow her on Instagram so I'm kind of jealous those looked like a beautiful vacation. Well well deserved by the way. Mari Carmen earned an undergraduate degree in sociology and is now enrolled in UCLA School of Education and one thing that I also want to highlight is you know when you think of you know singers athletes

3:26:08
David PenalozaItem 1

and and anyone really families any family you know you have the one child that's athletically gifted or or musically gifted and or or famous and then you got the others are not so, you know, don't really have any talents, just kind of fall behind. Let me tell you that this family, and it's their work ethic and their dedication to the sport, but her two older brothers, who I've known since I was five years old, went to elementary and middle school together in high school, went my senior year in high school. They made Saddleback High

3:26:46
David PenalozaItem 1

school the number one soccer team in the nation they were 2005 and I believe 2006 if I'm not mistaken they were the national champions across the entire country the best high school soccer team in the country Saddleback High School and that's George and Oscar Reyes were both on the team back there and and you know so it's not just Marty Carmen I don't know what you guys fed these kids growing up, but their athletic ability, and I know that that as well is also a pretty good soccer player himself. So, Maricarmen, congratulations. Continue to put Santa Ana on the map.

3:27:25
David PenalozaItem 1

And, you know, on behalf of the mayor, and in recognition, and the city council, in recognition of your outstanding athletic accomplishments, congratulations on single-handedly, with your team of course, winning the NCAA Division National Championship for UCLA and you know continuing to further put our city on the map and what one of the the quotes that is often used amongst the Reyes family is I'm just a kid from Santa Ana and that's something that I always think about when I'm out there in the community trying to also make our city better so now I would like to if you

3:28:07
UnidentifiedItem 1

want say a few words yeah well first off thank you to the first female mayor of Santa Ana that's incredible and David and Phil I appreciate you guys so much you guys have helped our family endlessly and everything that you've done for me is something that I'll never forget and hopefully I get to inspire the the youth that's coming after me that's my main goal so thank you for helping me do that and I'm just honored to be here this is something that I only dreamed of and I just want anyone that's listening to know that it's so awesome

3:28:46
UnidentifiedItem 1

to be able to stand here and be from Santa Ana and to have the privilege to represent this city is something that I don't take lightly and I take it everywhere I go I tell people I'm from Santa Ana this and everyone that I know knows that so I'm just extremely blessed to even have this chance to speak in front of these new faces and hopefully we continue to have conversations about helping the youth in our city because there's so much talent here that goes unnoticed and I hope that I can be that change as well and I hope I'm not the last person to win a national championship from Santa Ana so I'm just

3:29:27
UnidentifiedItem 1

so honored and I'm so happy so thank you guys for for having me

3:30:06
Thai Viet PhanItem 1

While they do that, can we do an eight clap? It'll trigger Phil.

3:30:43
UnidentifiedItem 1

I don't know.

3:31:00
David PenalozaItem 1

George, Oscar.

3:31:01
David PenalozaItem 1

Jorge, Oscar, you guys out there?

3:31:05
UnidentifiedItem 1

Hurry, hurry. I get him. Hurry, Oscar. He's got this.

3:31:06
UnidentifiedItem 1

I'm not sure what he's doing.

3:31:24
David PenalozaItem 1

So, no Jorge?

3:31:30
UnidentifiedItem 1

Harry, Harry, Harry, run!

3:31:37
David PenalozaItem 1

I know you're old, but you can still run.

3:31:40
UnidentifiedItem 1

Thank you.

3:31:53
UnidentifiedItem 1

Thank you. Thank you. Thank you guys. Thank you, council members.

3:32:13
UnidentifiedItem 1

Thank you. Thank you.

3:32:18
UnidentifiedItem 1

Oh, no, no, no, no.

3:32:24
UnidentifiedItem 1

There's a lot of us. Don't let the council members scare you off. There's a whole crew of us up here.

3:32:29
Valerie AmezcuaItem 1

Well, thank you, Councilman Becerra, for going up. I know that was a little challenging for you.

3:32:43
Valerie AmezcuaItem 1

All right, here we go. City Attorney, do you have anything to report out of closed session?

3:32:50
Sonia R. CarvalhoItem 1

Yes, Mayor, members of the council, members of the public, I'm pleased to announce that by unanimous vote this evening in closed session, the City Council has appointed our Norma Orozco as the acting City Clerk, retroactive to September 1st.

3:32:56
Valerie AmezcuaItem 1

Great. Thank you. This is the time of the meeting for the City Council to receive comments from the public on agenda and non-agenda items. Pursuant to the Brown Act, the City Council may not enter into discussion at this time. We will now hear from the members of the public that are physically present in the Council CHAMBLE FIRST AND THEN WE'LL HEAR FROM THOSE THAT ARE ON THE CONFERENCE CALL OR ZOOM. SO IF I CALL YOUR NAME IF YOU CAN COME UP AND THREE AND JUST AND WAIT HERE PLEASE. MARY ALCHAB MITCHELL I'LL CALL MITCHELL I APOLOGIZE IF I CYNTHIA GRUNSTRA AND JOSE ANDROTTI.

3:33:18
UnidentifiedItem 1

THANK YOU. GOOD EVENING CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS. CAN YOU TURN YOUR SPEAKER ON FOR ME THERE PLEASE? I'm sorry, go ahead.

3:34:01
Valerie AmezcuaItem 1

Can't hear you.

3:34:08
UnidentifiedItem 1

Good evening, City Council members. My name is Mary Alcalá-Mitchell. Closer? Okay.

3:34:10
UnidentifiedItem 1

All right. My name is Mary Alcalá-Mitchell. I'm a resident of Santa Ana, long time. And I'm here representing myself this evening concerning item 29 on your agenda.

3:34:19
UnidentifiedItem 1

I currently own four houses in Santa Ana that have been brought to your attention regarding code violations.

3:34:36
UnidentifiedItem 1

And I'm here to ask for a 90-day extension on your decision to take receivership of these houses that have been in question.

3:35:00
UnidentifiedItem 1

I met with code enforcement over a year ago.

3:35:15
UnidentifiedItem 1

After the passing of my husband.

3:35:29
UnidentifiedItem 1

Unfortunately, during this past year, I have been affected by long-term COVID and issues of family who are tenants in the property who were not able to pay due to COVID. I did, as a landlord, apply for COVID relief rental assistance, as they did. they were denied, which resulted in a substantial loss of income to me, which I had to absorb. I recently, last week, just received a first amount of funds that are due to me

3:35:35
UnidentifiedItem 1

that are to be used for the rehabilitation of the properties. If you take the properties into receivership, my biggest concern is that people will be displaced that are not living in substandard conditions currently. There are cosmetic concerns that need to be addressed, and I am in the position to follow through with that now.

3:36:16
UnidentifiedItem 1

So I'm asking for a delay of 90 days and that I may continue to speak with Mr. Verino, who I believe is your supervisor of the code enforcement, and to the code enforcement officer, Jerry Navarro, that I had been speaking with over the past year.

3:36:45
UnidentifiedItem 1

The outcome of following this course of action that you've been asked to take tonight will greatly detrimentally affect a large group of people who are also long-term residents of Santa Ana who are family. This is not a delaying tactic on my part. This is where I'm at and what I'm asking for.

3:37:08
Valerie AmezcuaItem 1

Sorry, your time is up. Thank you. Thank you.

3:37:32
Valerie AmezcuaItem 1

Cynthia Grunstra?

3:37:39
UnidentifiedItem 1

Good evening.

3:37:46
UnidentifiedItem 1

I'm going to read an email that I sent to Coordinated Entry System, CES, in September of this year, September 19th. Hello, my name is Cynthia Grunstra. I filled out an application for an emergency housing voucher in December of 2021 through the Illumination Foundation in Stanton. I have been homeless since February of 2017 in and out of shelters and am currently on the street. I do not have a documented disability, although this fact may change soon, and as you can see, I've currently been waiting nine months for this emergency housing. My grievance is due to the fact that I have repeatedly seen that people who are in shelters

3:37:49
UnidentifiedItem 1

who have applied for the emergency vouchers after me are assigned housing within just a couple of months. These are also individuals with no documented disabilities. There are also people who have applied for housing before me who have obtained vouchers within just a few months all through the shelter. I could provide the name of three such people as an example. I spoke about this to a woman at the Illumination Foundation who's handling my application, and she confirmed that it does tend to go faster for those in homeless shelters. Therefore, the people who are in the most danger every day who are on the street are left to wait.

3:38:30
UnidentifiedItem 1

It's been nine months and counting. I understand that this is a coordinated entry. However, if I'm already waiting almost one year, how is this emergency voucher any different than just being on the regular waiting list? And why is it that people in shelters, particularly at the Salvation Army Shelter in Anaheim, are given priority above those on the street. If you would kindly address these two questions, ASAP, I would greatly appreciate this. It's my intention to address this at a city council meeting and I was hoping to receive a reply before doing so. That was three months ago. I'm waiting one year now.

3:39:08
UnidentifiedItem 1

And I did not receive a reply or even any acknowledgement to my email. And I've also emailed the Orange County Housing Authority as well and they just kind of ping-pong me back to go to CES. So if I could get an answer from somebody at some point as to why I'm still waiting one year for an emergency housing voucher and why is it that at people in the shelters only it seems only the prof high-profile cases are getting getting taken right away and those of us on the street seem to be left waiting indefinitely. Mayor if you'd like

3:39:45
Kristine RidgeItem 1

I can have our Assistant City Manager meet her in the back and take her information down. It does seem like she's applied through a different agency and not ours.

3:40:24
Valerie AmezcuaItem 1

Yeah, I thank you, City Manager. I was going to let you know, I apologize, we can't respond from...

3:40:32
UnidentifiedItem 1

That's fine.

3:40:38
Valerie AmezcuaItem 1

That's fine. Somebody will speak to you this evening.

3:40:39
UnidentifiedItem 1

At some point, yeah, that's fine. I totally understand.

3:40:40
Valerie AmezcuaItem 1

They will help you out, and thank you so very much for coming.

3:40:42
UnidentifiedItem 1

Thank you.

3:40:45
Valerie AmezcuaItem 1

Jose Andrade, please.

3:40:48
UnidentifiedItem 1

Hello, Council Mayor. I'm up here to speak on a property that we have in our neighborhood. I'm from Ward 6, Logan Neighborhood Association.

3:41:01
UnidentifiedItem 1

Our quality of life has gone down so badly. 25 years ago when my mom 25 to 30 my mom was trying to get the properties moved out because all they do is bring in trash bring in trucks bring in this bringing that and I know you guys are doing something about it now I've seen some things but my question also was if you look at that map you see the yellow and then you see the pink the yellow is the first one is as 1020 or 10 2017 Logan okay

3:41:13
UnidentifiedItem 1

what I feel is gonna happen is that we're gonna get ping-ponged around they're going for one property where if you look at that whole thing all those four property the three properties they took all the fences out they took all the bricks out they took all everything out so that All is one, like one property.

3:41:54
UnidentifiedItem 1

If you guys go for one property, what's going to happen is that they're just going to move everything back into the next properties and into the next properties. If you look all the way down, all those properties is the same owner. And the same thing's happening all the time. Trash. Clean my house. I can go the next day. Put my finger down. dirty is all. Why? Because they move all this stuff out there. We have the construction companies that don't care. Finally, we got a one-way on Lincoln. It's helping a little, but it's still a nuisance. All these construction companies, they look at you and say,

3:42:19
UnidentifiedItem 1

call the city, call code enforcement, call whoever you want. By the time they get here, we're out of here. So I'm just hoping you guys do the right thing for us and help us out. Thank you.

3:43:00
Valerie AmezcuaItem 1

Thank you.

3:43:11
Valerie AmezcuaItem 1

Mikaela? Mikaela?

3:43:16
Valerie AmezcuaItem 1

I know you. You can bring it down, sweetie. There you go.

3:43:23
Valerie AmezcuaItem 1

Hi, sweetie.

3:43:31
UnidentifiedItem 1

Hi, my name is Mikaela Andrade. I live on Logan Street. I'm here to talk to you about our neighborhood. which is so dear to my heart. Logan is one of the oldest communities set back to the early 1900s. If you didn't know, Logan was the first community allowed Hispanics to buy homes in Santa Ana. With that being said, the businesses in our community have no respect for the residents that live here. One business in particular is right in front of my house. It's dirty and unpleasant to look at from my bedroom window.

3:43:33
UnidentifiedItem 1

Some Saturdays, they start work really early, and they drop bins, and my house feels like a tornado is happening. My house shakes so much, and the smell is awful. There are even rats. I don't think you would want rats or dirty smells in your neighborhood. In closing, I hope you hear our concerns and relocate the businesses we would like the properties back to the original homes, like my great grandma Chepa Fafor.

3:44:11
UnidentifiedItem 1

As a girl, I am really happy and honored to speak to the first female mayor. Thank you for all allowing me this opportunity. Have a great night, Merry Christmas, and Happy New Year.

3:44:47
Valerie AmezcuaItem 1

Melinda?

3:45:07
UnidentifiedItem 1

Good evening. Thank you for the opportunity to make a comment. Earlier this evening, I was stuck in a traffic jam and was told by the city clerk that I would not be able to speak on an agenda item in which my clients are the appellants if I did not come here before the city council meeting started and filled out a card. This person also stated that somebody else was not permitted to fill out a card for me, and I think that that is an improper policy to have and an improper rule to have.

3:45:15
UnidentifiedItem 1

I think that if folks want to come and make a comment on an agenda item, especially the agenda item such as the one that I'm discussing right now, which is item 41 on your agenda, I don't think that requiring folks to come at the beginning to fill out cards is appropriate. So if you could all consider revising that, if that is your policy, or educating your clerk if it's not your policy, I would appreciate it. Thank you.

3:45:56
Valerie AmezcuaItem 1

Thank you, Madam Clerk. The item 41 is discussed during the public hearing. So unless there's some legal reason, I think we can allow people to come in and fill out a card, because that's at a later time. So unless there's opposition, Sonia? If there's people here who want to speak during the public hearing on the items that are listed, please fill out a card and give it to the clerk. I'd appreciate it. And then you can speak at that time on those items in the public hearing. So if you'd like to fill out a new card, Melinda, you're more than welcome to speak. So thank you. Lori Ortiz.

3:46:24
UnidentifiedItem 1

Good evening, council members, and I want to congratulate you if you're newly elected and also if you're returning. Congratulations. My name is Lori Ortiz. I'm the president of the Confidential Association, also known as CASA. We are comprised of administrative and support staff with years of working in Santa Ana, and we continue to work through the pandemic. We're comprised of staff in every city department, including the city manager's office, whom the council works with daily.

3:47:24
UnidentifiedItem 1

Just for your information, we walked through this community to hand out Visa gift cards to the most economically impacted residents and assisted with phone calls from frightened residents and worked in HR to ensure we had employees to work through the pandemic.

3:48:04
UnidentifiedItem 1

We continue to show our dedication by working through this holiday season while many other cities in Orange County shut down for the holidays and we're all dedicated employees loyal to this community and the businesses. We supported the residents and council with our dedication and commitment and we have been working without a contract for at least six almost six months I should say. We've attempted to work with city negotiators for months and we ask you to please consider CASA and we're concerned the CASA board is concerned about a

3:48:25
UnidentifiedItem 1

comment on page two of the staff report that under option three the city is not required to meet and confer with the labor union proposals and costing of said proposals merely by exchanging the information between the parties during the course of negotiations.

3:49:02
UnidentifiedItem 1

So with option three and staff's recommendation of option three, that is our concern because

3:49:22
UnidentifiedItem 1

I think option one, we all agree that option one would be more reasonable to CASA members, and we ask you to please act in good faith to not implement new negotiation policies while our bargaining unit is still in negotiations, which we have been in for almost six months. And we wanted to let you know where we stand on that. But we do appreciate your time and your consideration. And we thank you for all you do for the community.

3:49:31
Valerie AmezcuaItem 1

Thank you.

3:50:11
Valerie AmezcuaItem 1

Madam Clerk, do we have anyone wanting to speak on the conference call or Zoom?

3:50:16
Norma OrozcoItem 1

Yes, we have one speaker.

3:50:21
Valerie AmezcuaItem 1

I'm sorry, I can barely hear you.

3:50:23
Norma OrozcoItem 1

Yes, we have one speaker.

3:50:25
Valerie AmezcuaItem 1

Perfect. Thank you.

3:50:27
Norma OrozcoItem 1

Speakers on the queue may provide their comments on agenda or non-agenda items within the city's jurisdiction with the exception of public hearing items 41, 42, 43, 44. When unmuted, please announce your name, ward, or neighborhood that you reside in within the city of Santa Ana.

3:50:30
Norma OrozcoItem 1

Before unmuting the calls, I would like to provide a summary of comments that we received via email. we received item number 29 regarding the receivership petitions when Santa Ana resident is in opposition. Item number 36, the resolution of intent to disestablish the downtown business improvement district when Santa Ana business in opposition of dissolution. Item number 38, the appointment of regional boards.

3:50:58
Norma OrozcoItem 1

One non-resident requested support of continuity of the board members for OCFA. Item number 41, public hearing.

3:51:34
Norma OrozcoItem 1

Those will be addressed at the public hearing. And we received a non-agenda item, one Santa Ana resident in support of efforts to reduce car noise. One Santa Ana resident thanking Councilmember Hernandez for the participating in and organizing a lunch for residents at the Southwest Community Center. One Santa Ana resident in support of discussing and reviewing the tickets parking ticket situation in Willard Park area. And one Santa Ana resident thanking the Santa Ana Police Officers Association for participating in the senior lunch at 2222 East 1st Street.

3:51:46
Norma OrozcoItem 1

Caller with the phone number that ends in 4010, please dial star six from your phone and proceed with your comment. You have three minutes to speak.

3:52:33
UnidentifiedItem 1

Hello, this is Victor Mendez, Ward 3. Before I begin, I have a quick question. I'd like to comment on item 44. I would understand that to be a separate comment period. Would that be correct? That is correct. So after I've concluded with item 27, which I'm commenting on, you'll just basically hang me up and loop me back into 44 when you're ready is that a correct understanding ma'am yes okay one minute okay i'm ready on item 27 uh you know my numbers show the city could be leaving about 50 000 on the table

3:52:49
UnidentifiedItem 1

uh first uh they're using a cpi which is really used for consumers um however aramark your contractor their costs are really driven by the wholesale price index not the consumer price index they purchase their goods on a global scale at a wholesale basis, not a retail basis. Wholesale price indexes are really trending about 8%, not 12% under the CPI. If you want to really look at CPI and kind of do apples to oranges, then look at the Social Security CPI, which is going to 8.7%, beginning 1-1-2-3.

3:53:29
UnidentifiedItem 1

The staff recommendation for Aramark basically is about 40% over what the CPI is going to be for San Anni senior citizens going into January 23. And that's how you kind of get a $50,000 differential. You know, the other thing you should consider that Aramark just recently reported their highest annual revenue in company history. They're making a lot of money off the so-called inflationary effect. The CFO even said how well they're managing inflation, that's inducing their record profit. I would simply recommend that you approve this item, but only with an 8% CPI and let staff come back with some transparency.

3:54:08
UnidentifiedItem 1

It's a wide, they need this 12.4%, and you can make a decision for there. And also request staff to look at maybe looking at using the sheriff's resources to provide meals and see if there's some money to save. While the numbers are really large or huge, let's not forget we had a pretty robust discussion over a few thousand dollars because the nonprofit wanted to wait a couple of fees for the kids. Lastly, I just wish to commend Council Member Hernandez for just an outstanding senior holiday dinner. The food was great. Mr. Hernandez and his partner's service was superb and the company was excellent. Thank you.

3:54:49
Norma OrozcoItem 1

that was the last speaker madame

3:55:33
Valerie AmezcuaItem 1

your little muffled i'm sorry so if you just sorry that was the last speaker madame mayor perfect great thank you we're going to go to the consent calendar at this time council members please announce any items that you will be abstaining from due to conflict and And if there are any requests to pull an item from the consent calendar, I will start to my right. Council members, please state your name to the motion and second to approve the reminder. Please cast your vote and the city clerk will announce and display as we move forward on the rest of the meeting. So Council Member Hernandez is not here.

3:55:35
Valerie AmezcuaItem 1

Councilwoman Tai Phan.

3:56:14
Thai Viet PhanItem 1

Thank you. I'd like to pull item number 29, please.

3:56:16
Valerie AmezcuaItem 1

You say 29? Yes. Thank you. Councilman Penelosa?

3:56:20
David PenalozaItem 1

I'm okay at the moment. Thank you, Mayor.

3:56:26
Valerie AmezcuaItem 1

None at this time. Mayor Pro Tem Lopez?

3:56:29
Valerie AmezcuaItem 1

Councilman Vasquez? 29 as well.

3:56:35
Valerie AmezcuaItem 1

Councilman Hernandez?

3:56:40
Johnathan Ryan HernandezItem 1

Item 40.

3:56:42
Valerie AmezcuaItem 1

Councilman Penelosa?

3:56:45
David PenalozaItem 1

None. Thank you, Mayor.

3:56:48
Valerie AmezcuaItem 1

I'm sorry, I apologize. I'm looking at Councilor .

3:56:49
Valerie AmezcuaItem 1

Councilor Macera.

3:56:55
Phil BacerraItem 1

Items 11, 12, and 30.

3:56:57
Valerie AmezcuaItem 1

11, 12, and 30? Yes. And I'm going to pull item 40 and 41, please.

3:57:03
Jessie LopezItem 1

40 is not part of consent, right?

3:57:18
Valerie AmezcuaItem 1

I apologize. It will be in the business. Thank you.

3:57:20
Phil BacerraItem 1

Through item 36.

3:57:24
Valerie AmezcuaItem 1

Councilman Hernandez, it will be in the consent. Thank you.

3:57:26
David PenalozaItem 1

Actually, can I pull 31, please?

3:57:32
Valerie AmezcuaItem 1

No, you had your turn. I'm just kidding.

3:57:33
Valerie AmezcuaItem 1

Okay. Okay, for the remainder, can I get a motion to approve the remainder?

3:57:39
Phil BacerraItem 1

So moved. Second.

3:57:42
Valerie AmezcuaItem 1

Moved by Councilman Peneloso, seconded by Councilman Becerra. Do you need a roll call?

3:57:45
Norma OrozcoItem 1

Excuse me?

3:57:56
Norma OrozcoItem 1

If you can please vote on your devices if they are available.

3:57:58
Valerie AmezcuaItem 1

Please vote on your devices. Thank you.

3:58:01
Valerie AmezcuaItem 1

These are fancy smancy.

3:58:06
Valerie AmezcuaItem 1

All right. Let's go to item 29, please.

3:58:16
Norma OrozcoItem 1

Motion passes by unanimous consent.

3:58:19
UnidentifiedItem 1

Do you want me to start?

3:58:26
Thai Viet PhanItem 1

So for item number 29, I actually do have to state a recusal for one of the properties for 1027 North Logan Street, Santa Ana, California, 92701. So I do ask that we bifurcate the discussion, if any, so that once you, maybe we can take action on the other properties. And if you get to discussing the Logan Street property, I will leave the room as I believe out of an abundance of caution that the property owner is a client of my employer. Thank you.

3:58:29
Valerie AmezcuaItem 1

Thank you. Any other comments? Councilman Vasquez.

3:59:01
Benjamin VazquezItem 1

I'm worried we just heard a speaker and we know some of these places have formal housing and I'm worried of carrying this on and displacing more people without any transition or any plan to get people. We're going to make things worse on the street in Santa Ana and adding to the homeless number. I just can't see myself taking one at a time and making sure where there is formal housing, how can we support those families? How can we support the building owners to make sure they can keep their buildings and be able to transition?

3:59:07
Benjamin VazquezItem 1

I would take one at a time and see how they're working because if there's formal housing there we can help some way or they could give more time because we're going to make things worse in Santa Ana.

3:59:43
Kristine RidgeItem 1

Honorable Mayor and Councilmember, we do have a presentation on this item if you would like to see that.

3:59:58
Valerie AmezcuaItem 1

Thank you, I was going to ask you, can we please have our presentation?

4:00:03
Kristine RidgeItem 1

All right, Executive Director of Planning and Building, Min Tai.

4:00:07
UnidentifiedItem 1

Thank you, Daniel. Good evening, Mayor and the City Council. The action that's being requested tonight is for your authorization for staff to file and prosecute a receivership petition as well as a nuisance abatement against the owner of nine real properties in the city the proposed action would simply authorize staff to have the authority to take these actions many of these properties the nine properties that we have

4:00:44
UnidentifiedItem 1

the nine properties that we have include residential properties as well as commercial property on a major street that have been an issue of property maintenance and creating an attractive public nuisance for our neighborhoods they also have detracting characteristics that affect property values and the quality of life for the built environment in their surrounding neighborhoods the property includes 2405 South Maple Street. As you can see an example here's a picture of the conditions

4:01:23
UnidentifiedItem 1

of the properties. All of these properties that are on this list have been a focus of enforcement for a number of years and there have been a number of notices as well as fines that has been provided to the owner and ample opportunity have been provided for them to also address these issues. I'll go over some of these pictures. This includes a property on North Broadway. As you can see, with some current action, they are taking formal actions, but still the progress is slow on the property. This property has been in dilapidation condition for many years. This is on 1001 North Freeman.

4:02:00
UnidentifiedItem 1

As you can see, the roofs are barely intact and the property is not well maintained. This property is on 1502 North Flower Street. It is one of the four properties that are on this list that belongs to a previous speaker who came and spoke, Ms. Mitchell.

4:02:41
UnidentifiedItem 1

A property also on North Flower by the same owner.

4:03:05
Johnathan Ryan HernandezItem 1

Mr. Mintai, if you don't mind just reading some bullet points just so the public is also aware, as to some of the violations or the statement of conditions that you guys are presenting to us?

4:03:13
UnidentifiedItem 1

These properties are all in violations of our current municipal code, as well as health and safety codes. They have repeated code violations, including lack of property maintenance, deteriorated roof, peeling paint on the exterior of the building, lacking landscaping, vehicle park, illegally in the parkways. They also have hoarding conditions and interior conditions that are substandard and not considered to be decent and safe living conditions. As you can see here on the pictures, these are unfit for human occupancy or use.

4:03:26
UnidentifiedItem 1

And this property is located on 1114 West Berkeley Street. This property here—Sorry, Min.

4:04:05
Thai Viet PhanItem 1

I did recuse myself from this property, so if we can discuss the other ones, and then I'll leave the room for this discussion. Thank you.

4:04:12
UnidentifiedItem 1

The final property that we have on this list is also on First Street. This is a commercial property that our code enforcement division has been dealing for a number of years with severe deliberation, compromised stairways, walkways, decks, and halls. They have damaged building sidings. there are transient prohibited use on the property, lack of landscaping, unsanitary conditions, trash and debris, loitering, as well as truck use on the property.

4:04:19
UnidentifiedItem 1

So as these properties are ongoing enforcement actions, the city has a process where we can take, in addition to the standard enforcement processes, is to go through the legal prosecution process by executing potentially either a nuisance abatement proceeding through the courts or seeking a receivership. And this is a last resort strategy so that we would be able to work with the courts to take receivership of the property, make the improvements due to the fact that many of the property owners on this list have either refused to comply or have not been able

4:04:50
UnidentifiedItem 1

to make the necessary improvements to bring the property into compliance now by the action of the city council tonight that action does not mean that staff will proceed with the authority to take those actions we will continue to work with the property owners so that they if by this notice would be able to comply with the requirements of the making the improvements in conditions we would not have to take those actions but this is simply a request for the council to

4:05:31
UnidentifiedItem 1

authorize to proceed with the noticing of the property owners that you know potentially we will take these final last resort action as it relates to the concern regarding existing residents or relocation and finding housing for tenants that are living in these conditions. Under the state health and safety codes, it does require that the property owner is legally obligated to provide relocation assistance to the tenants so that the tenants would have appropriate housing opportunity while the property owner is bringing the property into compliance with the code.

4:06:06
UnidentifiedItem 1

In addition to that, we often will approach any tenants that require help with assistance from a housing department to provide them with housing information and available opportunity for safe and decent housing in the city elsewhere. So that is the request tonight, is for the Council to consider taking the actions on eight of these properties, and I'll continue to talk about the property on Logan as a later point in this presentation.

4:06:47
Thai Viet PhanItem 1

Thank you so much. And thank you, Councilmember Vasquez for bringing up the issue about the residents. So I do understand, I'm trying to think back, you know, Councilmember Vasari, you had brought up a really great council requested item about red tag buildings, right? We had that issue before, and I thought we had an ordinance to allow the city to pursue obtaining fines to help their relocation. Did it never get completed?

4:07:20
UnidentifiedItem 1

There were discussions of that, but an ordinance was never put forth by the city council or requested by the majority of the council.

4:07:49
Thai Viet PhanItem 1

So, you know, one of the things I am concerned about is obviously we have the shelter. We have Carnegie. We have family rooms. I was able to tour the facility and it is, it was very different from what, you know, what you might imagine a shelter would look like. But I am worried that to say, I know even we had our seniors, Mr. Mendez, you know, for residents to fight for relocation assistance is much different and much more difficult when they don't have an attorney to take, to go to court with a landlord. So my question is, you know, what housing do we have?

4:07:57
Thai Viet PhanItem 1

Do we have a plan in place to help them relocate in the meantime?

4:08:39
Kristine RidgeItem 1

Council member Van, we would have, they would be able to avail themselves to the rental assistance programs that we have in place. And the commercial building that was red tag that you were referring to, we did provide rental assistance to relocate many of those individuals to a different apartment complex.

4:08:45
Thai Viet PhanItem 1

Do we know of any availability now to help them say, hey, in two weeks you're going to have to move into this unit, the city's going to help you pay rent?

4:09:02
UnidentifiedItem 1

In terms of the immediate next step actions, as I mentioned, the seeking of the authority to take these actions by staff is a first step. The next step in our process is to provide notice to the property owners of the authorization and the city's staff's ability to take these actions with the goal of incentivizing the owner to take actions prior to the city having to go down this route.

4:09:14
Thai Viet PhanItem 1

Right, and I completely appreciate that. I know it's not tomorrow that we're kicking everyone out, right, and doing receivership. My point is, and just to reiterate the concern, which is when we do, I want to make sure that people have a place to go and that we're not a boat adrift in the ocean trying to look for a place to live because we do know that there's housing scarcity in the city and things are expensive.

4:09:43
UnidentifiedItem 1

Based on the council action, what we can do is incorporate into our process a wraparound process to where not only do we notify the property owners but provide adequate to the residents of their rights under the code, under the state law, but also any assistance that we would have, we would coordinate through our housing department so that we can identify early on the issues and the situation for each residence in one each one of these households and providing assistance we can through our housing department.

4:10:09
Thai Viet PhanItem 1

Thank you. That would be great. I just want to make sure that, you know, we don't end up with anyone on the street because I understand it's dangerous to be in this building but it's also extremely dangerous to be on the street. Other than that, I am supportive. I think it would be extremely, you know, we'd be on the hook, I guess, to know that it's a dangerous place for people to live and to allow people to continue to be there. Thank you.

4:10:40
Valerie AmezcuaItem 1

Are there any other council comments? Mayor Pro Temp, please.

4:11:10
Jessie LopezItem 1

Thank you, Mayor. I just want to say great job to code enforcement because, and I want to say that because we've been working together for a very long time with MN, with city manager, with SAPD. So this has been an area of focus for us. We've had multiple meetings. And I just want to say that I'm supportive of this, but I also understand the comment of Councilmember Vasquez and Councilmember Fan. I think we understand, like, people we're not gonna be kicked out tomorrow, but we wanna see some sort of game plan in place

4:11:15
Jessie LopezItem 1

where we're gonna reach out to them, you know, in English and Spanish, whatever language it is that folks occupying these units are end. And ultimately for me in this part of town, we have so many folks in the street already that we don't wanna add to that because that causes, you know, issues. That means we're adding to the homelessness issue here in the city of Santa Ana. So yes, I'm very supportive of making sure that we're working with the property owners so that these are safe and habitable places. But we also understand that people are currently living in those units right now, specifically in the East First Street.

4:11:58
Jessie LopezItem 1

And so we wanna make sure that they understand this is coming, how can you prepare for this? What are your options? What are the resources that the city has in place? because we don't want people living in their cars we don't want people living in the streets so again thank you for all the work that you're doing specifically in my area I know that we've done a lot of good things and we have a lot more work to do and so thank you Councilman Vasquez thank you for that

4:12:35
Benjamin VazquezItem 1

presentation I'm really relieved but can we get a timeline for the renters of of what kind of help they might get from the city and also the owners of the property before we enforce anything of taking receivership, if we're gonna work with them?

4:13:06
UnidentifiedItem 1

Absolutely. Understanding that the residency and having housing, safe and decent housing for either the current tenant of these locations require that we would work with them for a relocation plan prior to us taking actions and proceeding with either the receivership action or the public nuisance. So I will work with our code staff as well as our housing staff to ensure that we have a plan in place to address the relocation prior to the city proceeding with any further actions

4:13:24
UnidentifiedItem 1

that would go down the path of receivership and nuisance abatement. However, we will work with the property owner as soon as this item is approved to provide them with notifications so that we can hopefully work on voluntary compliance instead of having to take the actions that we're proposing tonight.

4:14:04
Valerie AmezcuaItem 1

Councilman Panalosa.

4:14:27
David PenalozaItem 1

Thank you, Mayor Mesqua. Well, I just want to first and foremost thank Alvaro and City Attorney's Office and Min, your entire department code enforcement for bringing this item forward. I know that there's multiple properties on this list that are in Ward 6. There's one in the Del High neighborhood. There's one in the Memorial Park neighborhood. And the one on East 1st Street is along the Ward 3, Ward 6 border, which have all been really problematic for the areas.

4:14:29
David PenalozaItem 1

I heard somebody, you know, one of the speakers talk about, you know, COVID, COVID, how this is a result of COVID. But, you know, COVID's been here for two and a half years. I've lived in the city my entire life, and many of those properties on Flower Street have looked like that for over a decade. So it's complete negligence on wherever it started. You know, it's unfortunate, but this is causing, it's a ripple effect that's having existed in these neighborhoods. I want to point out one of the property on Berkeley Street is a couple streets from my

4:15:00
David PenalozaItem 1

house and the resident to the left, her name is Teresa and I hope she's not watching because she just threw her under the bus, but you know she flagged me down as I was walking Jack's a couple weeks ago, a couple months ago, it was earlier in the summer and she was like, hey, what's with this property right next door to her? My kid has special needs. Her other daughter has other issues. And there's a lot of young children in the house. And she took me into her backyard. The stench coming from that house on Berkeley was unbearable. The animals, the bugs, they've seen snakes crawling

4:15:33
David PenalozaItem 1

up this cinder block wall because of shrubbery that has grown over the height of the house. you're talking the entire backyard it's it's a forest it's um there's a lot there's no you can't see inside the entire house is covered in ivy I mean it is a mess and and the stench was unbearable and there are children living in these neighborhoods up against these homes surrounded in the front in the back to the sides and they're having to deal with this abandoned what looks like an abandoned home and that brings other, it's a magnet for, it's a broken window theory and it's a magnet for other problems.

4:16:14
David PenalozaItem 1

So I hope that this sends a message, I'm very supportive of the item, to other property owners in the city, whether it's residential, whether it's commercial, that, you know, we beefed up our code enforcement team for a reason. Last year we added over 10, almost 10 bodies to our code enforcement team for this purpose, because there are a lot of out-of-state owners that own residential properties, commercial, that are just, you know, showing pure negligence and are causing lots of problems in these neighborhoods with, especially that property on First Street. I mean, that is, you know, if we could reach in there and offer the people

4:16:53
David PenalozaItem 1

in there that are most likely using it as a drug home, as a drug house, hey we're gonna offer you another place to do drugs because that's what's happening on that East First property. And that is evident by just seeing the the numerous police calls, numerous reports from the city attorney's office. So thank you, code enforcement team, very supportive of this item. And I want to see more of these come before us because there's lots of properties out there, again, commercial and residential, that need this type of attention from the city and action. So thank you. Thank you. Councilman Becerra, please.

4:17:31
Phil BacerraItem 1

Thank you, Mayor Mesquad. So first and foremost, there's no excuse for any resident, any resident to live in the conditions that you showed us, Min. I mean, the pictures speak for themselves. It's disgusting to even say, well, it's maybe a little bit better than being outside. I don't know. You know, catching black lung, you may not catch black lung outside, but from some of those pictures, you sure will.

4:18:05
Phil BacerraItem 1

So as we're talking about where we're at today, you've come before the councilman and asking us to give you the permission to proceed with this receivership. So I imagine you didn't go out there, Alvaro didn't go out there, give him a $50 ticket and then come into your office the next day and say, you know what we need to do, man? We need to go take the property. I mean, correct me if I'm wrong, is that not how the process works? Like you don't just go from the initial citation and then catapult yourself all the way up to a receivership, correct?

4:18:31
UnidentifiedItem 1

That's correct. There's a due process that we follow.

4:19:00
Phil BacerraItem 1

So there's a couple more steps in between, right?

4:19:02
Phil BacerraItem 1

Just a few?

4:19:05
UnidentifiedItem 1

A number of steps and timeframe as well.

4:19:06
Phil BacerraItem 1

Okay. So it's not like somebody, you know, got a ticket and then a couple days later they're going, oh, my God, my property is going to be taken into receivership.

4:19:09
UnidentifiedItem 1

To give you an example, for a property to go from $50 to $2,800 requires a number of citations and notification and documentation and inspections by our staff in code enforcement on the property and sometime, very often time, office conference with the property owner as well.

4:19:19
Phil BacerraItem 1

Okay, thank you for that. So I think that your staff, from what you've just described, obviously works with these property owners. There are numerous opportunities for them to correct these deplorable conditions. One thing I'm very curious about in seeing these conditions, how many of these properties are eligible to be red-tagged? I mean, because I look at some of them, and it's not just from the filth standpoint that I wouldn't want to walk in there, but it looks like if I sneezed, the whole thing might fall apart. So help me understand why we're even talking about this.

4:19:40
Phil BacerraItem 1

Why haven't these things been red-tagged, at least some of them on there?

4:20:14
UnidentifiedItem 1

I think we are very aware of the situation of the properties and the tenants that are living in these homes. Our goal always is for volunteer compliance. However, as I mentioned, in worst cases, the worst of the worst, this is when we take actions to take receivership of the property so that we can guide the compliance or go through the court system to initiate a court order nuisance abatement. We have ran out of strategies. Some of these probably have included red tagging, as you saw in the picture.

4:20:17
Phil BacerraItem 1

Yeah, I was going to say because seeing those, I mean, if given the opportunity to place somebody in those units, nobody in their right mind would do that, right? Because they are terrible. They are filthy. They are dangerous. So when we talk about receivership, couldn't, you know, as we get to that point, wouldn't the receiver be possibly, I guess they could take responsibility for relocating the tenant, right? I mean couldn't they take on that action?

4:20:56
UnidentifiedItem 1

They would, but I think based on the City Council's direction tonight, we will also work with our staff and our housing department, as I mentioned, to provide a wraparound plan to work with the tenants if they're not the owner of the building to find them appropriate housing prior to city initiating these type of actions. Again, our goal is to really look for voluntary compliance and that is going to be our primary objective. We want the ability, because of the current standard and conditions of the housing and the properties, that we need to have this ability to take these actions to incentivize

4:21:26
UnidentifiedItem 1

the property owner to come to the table and work with us for voluntary compliance.

4:22:05
Phil BacerraItem 1

Well, given the process that you and your staff have to go through, it's not a simple process. So it's not, again, something that I believe you and your team are jumping, you know, wanting to jump into, right? In other words, voluntary compliance is absolutely the best outcome. Going through this entire circus is not the optimal outcome. So, I appreciate what you're saying. One thing I want to thank Council Member Pham for bringing it up, the fact that we had this discussion, and because of the property on 4th Street that was red-tagged, and the property owner put folks, put their lives in danger. I mean, put their lives in danger.

4:22:10
Phil BacerraItem 1

One fire, you would have had multiple fatalities. And for that property owner, who my understanding was, was trying to get off on the cheap to relocate people, giving them, I mean, not even a week's worth of rent, let alone a month or multiple months, or relocation costs or anything. And I can't imagine that's the only time that someone in the city has tried to do that. And so my hope at that time when we were having that discussion, Councilmember found, was to bring back more punitive measures to these scofflaw landlords so that they would have to pay because they are endangering people. This isn't, you know,

4:22:50
Phil BacerraItem 1

the items that are before us today, this isn't the pretty police coming in and saying, oh gosh, you know, you didn't paint your house again and, you know, you've got some chips on the beams or something. These are deplorable, unsafe, dangerous conditions. So, Min, Alvaro, I want to thank you guys for all the work that you've done on this. Again, I hope we do see more voluntary compliance. I hope that some of these scofflaw landlords see what has come forward tonight, and I hope they say, oh, maybe we should clean up our act. But in the event that they don't, I'm

4:23:24
Phil BacerraItem 1

pleased to see that you guys are exercising what's available to you. And if need be, I look forward to you bringing more of these back so that our residents don't have to live in dirty, dangerous conditions. So, thank you.

4:23:59
Valerie AmezcuaItem 1

Thank you, Councilman Becerra. If there are no other comments, Councilman Hernandez.

4:24:12
Johnathan Ryan HernandezItem 1

Thank you, Mayor Mesquois. First and foremost, Director Mentai, thank you for the presentation, sir. And thank you to code enforcement for the work that you guys are doing in our city.

4:24:18
Johnathan Ryan HernandezItem 1

I share similar feelings, and I'm thankful that you guys are proactively ensuring ensuring that any tenant in the city of Santa Ana is living in the highest standard of housing, ensuring that the city of Santa Ana's dollars are doing what they were tasked to do, and that is protect the resident. I do have some concerns on how we can do that. My question to you, Director Mintai, is what occurs after the repairs are made with the tenant and the property owner?

4:24:29
UnidentifiedItem 1

If you're talking about the status of their rental outcome and the corrections, it varies. There are times when the tenant would relocate and then come back. Or there are times when the tenant would relocate and permanently stay in the new housing and the owner, after compliance, would be able to rent out to new tenants. But the goal again is to, based on the council direction tonight, is to ensure that we have an answer to both questions when we do decide to execute and prosecute the tools that we have.

4:25:11
Johnathan Ryan HernandezItem 1

Absolutely. I think that it is the utmost important that should these, bless you, should these properties be under the recommendation of our staff of receivership. I would like to see that the current tenants, that they're offered first refusal, depending upon the landlord, you know, if they are looking to sell, I would like to see that the tenant has the first refusal. And I would also like to see that when these repairs are made, that the tenant has the first right to be able to lease that property again.

4:25:47
Johnathan Ryan HernandezItem 1

It is extremely important that we don't contribute to the crisis that we have in California of people experiencing homelessness. So it is of extreme importance to me and residents in Ward 5. Many of these properties are in Ward 5. And there are three off the bat, 1502 North Flower, 1516 North Flower, 1522, and 1615 North Broadway. So I would like to see that these tenants have relocation assistance, ample relocation assistance.

4:26:27
Johnathan Ryan HernandezItem 1

And I would also like to see if there is the possibility for any of these properties for us to take a look at if there are multiple homes owned by, for instance, a corporation. I would like to see that they also assist in relocation and in housing the tenant throughout the construction or repairs. So that is some direction I would like to share, Director Mintai. I did have a question for you on 1502 North Flower Street. This one is owned by, and it says the relationship here.

4:27:05
Johnathan Ryan HernandezItem 1

It states the statement of conditions, substandard health and safety conditions, violations. This historic GW Ross House residential dwelling unit currently has several broken, boarded-up windows preventing fire escape. I think that that is an absolute concern that needs to be addressed immediately. I don't know if receivership is the right move in this case, since broken windows and boarded up windows are something that can easily be fixed by a landlord or a property owner. I'm a property owner myself, and sometimes things like that happen. But I don't know if I would agree that it is at the level of other properties.

4:27:46
Johnathan Ryan HernandezItem 1

That is the one property where I am in a small disagreement with you guys, Director Mintai. I think that I wanted to know for 1502 North Flower, were we having any issues getting in contact with the owner of the property? Were they not responsive?

4:28:28
UnidentifiedItem 1

It's one of four properties on this list that are belonging to the same owners. And I believe the owner was represented today by Ms. Mitchell.

4:28:46
Johnathan Ryan HernandezItem 1

Yes, Ms. Mitchell.

4:28:55
UnidentifiedItem 1

So it's a pattern of the lack of compliance And while we continue with our enforcement process, we have not been successful in gaining voluntary compliance. Okay. I would say that is this a condition that we would potentially consider not pursuing a red tag or an abatement process as such? However, there is a pattern here of the property owners not taking the corrective actions necessary to address these life safety conditions.

4:28:57
UnidentifiedItem 1

And therefore, we would request the ability to have authorization to take these actions should we choose to. Again, I want to impress upon the Council that our goal is for voluntary compliance, and we use this as a stick in place of a, and provide the carrot for the property owner and its incentive to take compliance action.

4:29:34
Johnathan Ryan HernandezItem 1

Thank you, Director Mintai. Lastly, my direction that I would like to see, and are you going to be looking for a motion or a vote today from us?

4:29:58
UnidentifiedItem 1

That's correct.

4:30:07
Johnathan Ryan HernandezItem 1

Okay. My motion would be to return to the council with a plan for housing assistance and relocation assistance for the residents. That is my motion on the floor. I am supportive of the receivership recommendation, Director Mintai, but I do not see adequate plans in place to ensure further displacement. Unless you can give me reassurance that there is a plan in it.

4:30:08
UnidentifiedItem 1

I think each situation is unique, and as we work with each property, based on understanding the unique situation of the tenant and of the owner, we will be able to commit to working with our housing department on developing a relocation plan as required under state law, but also to look for local assistance working with local resources to ensure that we have a relocation plan prior to us executing an action and looking for receivership or in a basement nuisance. So that is our commitment.

4:30:36
UnidentifiedItem 1

If you authorize us to do that tonight, part of your motion would be for us to make sure those mechanisms are in place before we execute these actions.

4:31:14
Johnathan Ryan HernandezItem 1

That's good to know, and that provides me the reassurance I was looking for. Ultimately, I didn't want us to move forward with receivership and then figure things out as they go. Knowing that you guys do have plans in place, that is something that I was concerned about. So, thank you.

4:31:24
Valerie AmezcuaItem 1

Thank you, Councilman Hernandez. Councilman Becerra?

4:31:42
Phil BacerraItem 1

So I'm going to go ahead and move that we authorize the filing and prosecution of the receivership petitions against the owners of all these properties.

4:31:45
Phil BacerraItem 1

And Council's authorization would be to have staff develop and have in place relocation plans based on the individual property owner and property tenant situations. I'll second.

4:31:53
Valerie AmezcuaItem 1

I'll second. Seconded by Councilman Penelosa.

4:32:08
Thai Viet PhanItem 1

When you say all properties, you do not mean the Logan property, correct?

4:32:14
Phil BacerraItem 1

If you need to go, you need to go. We're doing all of them.

4:32:18
David PenalozaItem 1

If council member needs to recuse herself on that one, can that be noted for the record and separated?

4:32:23
Thai Viet PhanItem 1

I know there was.

4:32:31
Valerie AmezcuaItem 1

I'm not going to ask any questions.

4:32:33
Thai Viet PhanItem 1

I wasn't sure if people were going to discuss it.

4:32:35
Phil BacerraItem 1

Does she need to step off the dais while we vote on the others? Yes. Yes.

4:32:37
Phil BacerraItem 1

Okay, so then I'll amend my motion to have all but the Logan property for now.

4:32:43
Valerie AmezcuaItem 1

And then we'll come back and vote on the Logan. Correct. Okay. So let's prepare to vote, please. And what we are voting on is all of the properties with the exception of Logan, and then we'll vote on Logan afterwards.

4:32:47
Valerie AmezcuaItem 1

Let's vote.

4:33:02
Valerie AmezcuaItem 1

Did everyone vote?

4:33:08
David PenalozaItem 1

My screen hasn't changed. It's still on from the.

4:33:11
Norma OrozcoItem 1

Would you voice your vote and we can add it on here?

4:33:16
Valerie AmezcuaItem 1

I'm sorry, I can't understand.

4:33:19
Norma OrozcoItem 1

Would you voice your vote, Councilmember Peñalosa, and we can add on it.

4:33:21
Valerie AmezcuaItem 1

The motion passes. All seven of us vote.

4:33:28
Phil BacerraItem 1

Madam Mayor, while Council Member Fann's leaving, I'll go ahead and make the same motion but for the Logan property.

4:33:32
Johnathan Ryan HernandezItem 1

I'll second.

4:33:37
Valerie AmezcuaItem 1

Great, thank you. Seconded by Councilman Hernandez. Let's prepare to vote. This is for the property at 1027 North Logan Street in Santa Ana 92701. And I also would like to thank the staff for all the work that you have done to bring this forward. So thank you all very much.

4:33:37
Norma OrozcoItem 1

For this item, can we please do a roll call vote? Yes, sure. Councilmember Hernandez?

4:33:54
Norma OrozcoItem 1

Councilmember Becerra?

4:34:01
Norma OrozcoItem 1

Councilmember Peñalosa?

4:34:05
David PenalozaItem 1

Just for Mikayla, yes.

4:34:07
Norma OrozcoItem 1

Councilmember Vasquez?

4:34:11
Norma OrozcoItem 1

Mayor Potem Lopez? Yes. Mayor Amesqua? Yes. Motion passes 6-0-1.

4:34:14
Valerie AmezcuaItem 1

Thank you.

4:34:21
Valerie AmezcuaItem 1

Go to item 30, please.

4:34:24
Phil BacerraItem 1

Are we doing items 11 and 12 as well?

4:34:30
Valerie AmezcuaItem 1

Council comments on item 30.

4:34:37
Phil BacerraItem 1

Thank you, Mayor Mesquois. So this item, item 30, this is in regards to the reduced home occupation permit fees. I really just wanted to commend staff for doing this. So this was something that was, you know, it was kind of a byproduct of something that I've been harping on, which was our certificate of occupancy fees that were so out of whack and that were expensive. And staff did an amazing job at prior meetings, bringing it back with the multi-tier setup for the fees. And I really appreciate this coming back because I think especially we saw during COVID how many folks were working from home

4:34:43
Phil BacerraItem 1

and how many businesses were proliferating. And yet, you know, rather than have people operate, you know, out of compliance, this is a chance to bring folks into compliance and ensure that they're operating in a way that doesn't have negative impacts to their neighbors. And so, again, I appreciate the fact that this fee, I mean, he's being dropped by almost $270. So thank you, Min. Thank you, City Manager, for this. And so I'll go ahead and move this item.

4:35:21
David PenalozaItem 1

I'll second it.

4:35:49
Valerie AmezcuaItem 1

Thank you. Are there any other comments?

4:35:51
Jessie LopezItem 1

Mayor Pro Temp? Thank you, Mayor. I just want to thank staff for bringing this forth. This is reducing the permit fee from $320 to $50. And so I know this is going to help a lot of small businesses, a lot of entrepreneurs in our city. And so I'm really happy to support this item. This is something that I actually had added to the agenda during my first year. AND SO I'M REALLY HAPPY THAT STAFF HAS WORKED THIS ENTIRE TIME TO BRING THIS FORTH. AND GOOD LUCK TO ALL OF THE BUSINESSES THAT ARE GOING TO TAKE THIS PLUNGE AND EXPLORE THIS PATH. SO THANK YOU.

4:35:53
Valerie AmezcuaItem 1

ANY OTHER COUNCIL COMMENTS? I WANT TO START A SIDE HUSTLE NOW.

4:36:31
Thai Viet PhanItem 1

I'M SORRY? I'M GOING TO START A SIDE HUSTLE NOW.

4:36:34
Valerie AmezcuaItem 1

IT'S 50 BUCKS. LET'S GO. WE'RE GOING TO START A BUSINESS, RIGHT? ALL RIGHT. COUNCILMAN VASQUEZ, PLEASE.

4:36:38
Benjamin VazquezItem 1

I really appreciate this work that's being done and lowering the permits, and I know that helps too. Social justice, economically people are able to make money from home. What I'd like to see in the future is hopefully we get more yard sales maybe every once a month on the first Saturday. I know many families that rely on it. Many folks on unlimited funds rely on yard sales, especially as I see them in a walkthrough war two. And I'm hoping we could move it to in the future have a yard sales, at least one on a monthly basis on the first Saturday.

4:36:43
Valerie AmezcuaItem 1

Thank you. Any other comments? Counsel?

4:37:25
Johnathan Ryan HernandezItem 1

Yes. Wonderful job staff, fully supportive of the item. and for a later date, you better bring back that garage sale idea. I like that. But nonetheless, I'm very happy about this, guys, and looking forward to supporting it.

4:37:28
Valerie AmezcuaItem 1

Thank you. There was a motion and there was a second. Let's prepare to vote.

4:37:44
Valerie AmezcuaItem 1

We're good.

4:38:01
Norma OrozcoItem 1

Motion passes by unanimous consent.

4:38:05
Valerie AmezcuaItem 1

Great. Thank you. Item 31, please. Adopt a resolution amending the city's basic classification and compensation plan in response to the state's increased minimum wage rate. Yes. Councilor Van Wilson.

4:38:08
David PenalozaItem 1

Thank you, Mayor. I went ahead and pulled this item. Madam City Manager, if you recall, when we had our agenda briefing, I brought this up.

4:38:21
David PenalozaItem 1

Agenda 31, as the mayor mentioned this, to adopt the resolution amending and reestablishing the city's basic classification and compensation plan to ensure the city complies with the new California minimum wage rate of $15.50 going into effect January 1st, 2023. The reason why I pulled it, Madam City Manager, is because I was looking at the exhibit that's attached to the staff report, and I noticed that some of the positions that have this minimum wage or starting minimum wage here at the city are park maintenance aid, human resource, clerical aid, law clerk, police cadet, student intern. And

4:38:30
David PenalozaItem 1

I was driving down Bristol Street and I noticed the McDonald's on 17th Street and Bristol across from Santa Ana College was advertising a starting pay of $17.25. I almost pulled in and applied because I was like, oh shoot, you know, that's 17 bucks an hour for working on McDonald's. You know, that's unheard of because I know right now it is an employee's market. So I was going to suggest and see maybe our city attorney could chime in. If we could change this so that it's not 1550 and it's at least uncomfortable at least starting our

4:39:10
David PenalozaItem 1

minimum wage across the board for any new employee at at least $16.50 an hour versus $15.50 an hour because to see that the McDonald's down the street is going to start them off at $2 more than the city would and to be a law clerk here in the city you'll get paid less than if you worked on McDonald's I mean that's embarrassing and and that I think it could help us hire good talent it's all the part-timers are mainly Santa Ana residents so I would love to say you know that we're not a city or an agency that starts employees at $15.50 but at $16.50 which is not a lot but I want to be conscious of our budget as well and

4:39:52
David PenalozaItem 1

I understand that there aren't many positions that are part-timers so it shouldn't cause a big thing in our budget but is that something that is

4:40:33
Kristine RidgeItem 1

financially feasible Madam City Manager? Yes, Councilmember Penaloza there are I I believe six or seven incumbents. So it's very financially feasible to do. There are two of the classifications that are represented. The rest are unrepresented. So we can make an immediate change to the unrepresented. For those that are represented, we would need to meet and confer with the labor organization.

4:40:44
Valerie AmezcuaItem 1

Well, I'll support that 100%.

4:41:04
David PenalozaItem 1

OK. Well, I will make a motion to those that aren't represented to make it $16.50, a dollar above.

4:41:06
Kristine RidgeItem 1

The starting range?

4:41:14
David PenalozaItem 1

Yeah. to make that starting range 1650, which is a dollar above the state minimum wage, and it's still a dollar behind McDonald's on Bristol and 17th. So, I mean, maybe we could come back at a later date to match, not that we're going to match McDonald's, but look at what other local jobs in the city are paying. You know, it just makes sense. It's a lot of the local residents that are applying for these positions, and I'd like them to be compensated. So that's my motion.

4:41:15
Valerie AmezcuaItem 1

And I'll second. Don't drive by In-N-Out because I think they get paid more than that.

4:41:48
David PenalozaItem 1

They started at like $22,000. I saw that. Right.

4:41:53
Kristine RidgeItem 1

That's my plan B. So are you wording your motion, Council Member Penaloza, to amend the resolution to include the starting rate for the unrepresented classifications to $16.50 and still moving forward with the adoption of the resolution?

4:41:56
David PenalozaItem 1

That is correct.

4:42:10
Kristine RidgeItem 1

Okay. And I'll second it.

4:42:11
Valerie AmezcuaItem 1

And do we need to vote on that one, please?

4:42:14
Valerie AmezcuaItem 1

And Madam City Manager, those that are represented, you'll get back to us regarding.

4:42:25
Kristine RidgeItem 1

For those that are represented, we will still move forward with the state minimum wage because state code would trump any of the MOU terms. So those will be adjusted to the state minimum wage. Perfect.

4:42:29
Norma OrozcoItem 1

Council Member Hernandez, can you please vote?

4:42:41
Johnathan Ryan HernandezItem 1

Yes.

4:42:44
Valerie AmezcuaItem 1

I believe we covered all the items that were pulled. I had 11 and 12 here. Did somebody pull 11 and 12? I did. You did. I'm sorry. You pulled a whole bunch, didn't I? I did. Let's go to 11.

4:42:49
Phil BacerraItem 1

11 should be real quick. I just wanted to make sure with staff, as I was reading the staff report, you guys talk about gathering community input and you guys typically do a good job, but I just want to emphasize that I would like to see you guys go out to each of the wards when you do your community input gathering sessions. Duly noted. That's all. Is that a receiving file or do we?

4:43:02
Kristine RidgeItem 11

No, you're approving our budget calendar. So I'll move the item then.

4:43:24
Valerie AmezcuaItem 11

Thank you. Before we do that, I'd like to also piggyback on that. Before you bring it back, I wouldn't even vote on it, me personally, until I know that that you've met with everybody, all the city, all the neighborhoods, and all the people that want to hear about our budget. It's very important that they have a voice. So thank you.

4:43:28
Valerie AmezcuaItem 11

I'll move to approve. Thank you. Is there a second? I'll second. Thank you, Mayor Pro Tem. Let's prepare to vote.

4:43:51
David PenalozaItem 11

I just, yes, is it popping up? It did, right? Okay.

4:44:13
Norma OrozcoItem 11

The motion passes by unanimous consent.

4:44:20
Valerie AmezcuaItem 11

Thank you. Item 12, approve the annual calendar of regular City Council meetings for 2023. Councilmember Sarah?

4:44:23
Phil BacerraItem 12

Thank you, Mayor Mascua. So on this one, I noticed in looking at the proposed meeting schedule. So the first council meeting in September falls on the day immediately after Labor Day. And so what I wanted to throw out as a possibility for my colleagues is should, because in August, I think if we were to space out the meetings adequately, we would have potentially a meeting on Tuesday, August 29th, which would be two weeks after our regular second meeting that's scheduled in August, which would be August 15th. The rest of the calendar looked fine to me, but just for the sake of trying to keep business

4:44:30
Phil BacerraItem 12

going and the fact that I think it would probably be really difficult for everybody to try to come back to a meeting immediately after Labor Day, but knowing that we would probably have a business to conduct, my suggestion was to possibly have a meeting scheduled for Tuesday, August 29th.

4:45:08
Valerie AmezcuaItem 12

If there are no... I'm sorry, Councilman, go ahead.

4:45:24
Thai Viet PhanItem 12

I'm totally cool with that. But my only question, and it's maybe directed at people with little humans, because I know a lot of staff have children, and that's kind of the time they take vacation, because it's a two-week summer block. But otherwise, I'm okay with it, because I don't have kids. I just wanted to raise it as a concern. I don't know if anyone else has a problem at all.

4:45:29
Jessie LopezItem 12

That would mean that we have a meeting on the 29th, and then we come back the following week on the 5th? No, we wouldn't have a meeting on the 5th. Oh, you want to cancel the fifth? Correct.

4:45:53
Valerie AmezcuaItem 12

Just move it. We would only have a meeting on the 19th, what you're asking.

4:46:02
Thai Viet PhanItem 12

Oh, I guess school might already start for a bunch of people in August, huh?

4:46:07
Valerie AmezcuaItem 12

There you go.

4:46:10
Thai Viet PhanItem 12

Ah, okay. Never mind. I take it back.

4:46:11
Valerie AmezcuaItem 12

Don't worry for everybody if there's no opposition.

4:46:13
Johnathan Ryan HernandezItem 12

Yes.

4:46:17
Valerie AmezcuaItem 12

Yes, go ahead.

4:46:17
Johnathan Ryan HernandezItem 12

Yes, I wanted to recommend moving our meeting that we have for January 3rd. In the month of December, we would have met on the, I believe the 10th, the 20th, and then now on January 3rd. I would like to see if there is a consensus for anybody here on this dais who would like to move the meeting that we have for the month of January.

4:46:18
Valerie AmezcuaItem 12

It looks like January 3rd is crossed out.

4:46:44
Johnathan Ryan HernandezItem 12

Oh, okay, it is crossed out.

4:46:47
Valerie AmezcuaItem 12

It's kind of confusing, but we don't have one scheduled for it, correct?

4:46:49
Kristine RidgeItem 12

Correct. So for clarification purposes for the City Clerk's Office, what I'm hearing is you do agree with her recommendation on canceling the meeting on January 3rd and the council meeting that occurs on the 4th of July, which is a holiday and city offices are closed. And then in addition to that, it is being recommended that the meeting that would occur on September 5th is not held, but instead is held the week before on August 29th. So in the month of August, you would have a meeting on the 1st, the 15th, and the 29th. That is correct.

4:46:54
Valerie AmezcuaItem 12

Any other comments? Opposition? So moved. So moved. Second? I'll second.

4:47:30
Johnathan Ryan HernandezItem 12

Is there an interest for the month of July, colleagues, before we take a vote?

4:47:38
Valerie AmezcuaItem 12

To what?

4:47:42
Johnathan Ryan HernandezItem 12

To move our meeting from August to July?

4:47:43
Valerie AmezcuaItem 12

Well, in July, we have the 4th of July holiday.

4:47:48
Valerie AmezcuaItem 12

So then, I mean, whatever you guys want to do, but it would, looks like it's on the 18th. The other two Mondays would put us back to, other two Tuesdays would put us back to back.

4:47:52
Johnathan Ryan HernandezItem 12

Yes, I know it would leave us back to back. I know we have a pretty busy month of August. The Chicano Heritage Festival takes place the last Sunday of that month. And I would hate to see our staff on fumes to get us to this council meeting. So just wanted to open it up so that everybody can indulge and take that into account.

4:48:02
Johnathan Ryan HernandezItem 12

I am fully supportive if you guys want to do that. I know it'll be a busy month of August, but just wanted to fill this room out and see where you guys are at.

4:48:24
Kristine RidgeItem 12

We love being busy.

4:48:31
Johnathan Ryan HernandezItem 12

All right, all right.

4:48:32
Kristine RidgeItem 12

I would like to inform you that if you are doing a council meeting on a day other than the first and the third Tuesday of the month, we would have to agendize it as a special council meeting. And then there are some items that you would not be, you'd be prohibited from putting on the agenda.

4:48:33
Valerie AmezcuaItem 12

Everybody's okay with that? There's no comments? You made a motion? I did. There was a second? Prepare to vote?

4:48:52
Jessie LopezItem 12

So for clarification, are we doing back-to-back in July and only, okay.

4:49:00
Valerie AmezcuaItem 12

So July 18th, August 1st, 15th, and 29th, and September 19th. And then January 3rd at the top is cancelled as well. Got it. We're good? Yeah.

4:49:05
Johnathan Ryan HernandezItem 12

That'll work. That'll work.

4:49:17
Valerie AmezcuaItem 12

Okay. Let's prepare to vote please.

4:49:19
Valerie AmezcuaItem 12

Thank you.

4:49:24
Norma OrozcoItem 12

Motion passes by unanimous consent.

4:49:38
Valerie AmezcuaItem 12

I'm sorry. I apologize.

4:49:41
Norma OrozcoItem 12

Motion passes by unanimous consent.

4:49:45
Valerie AmezcuaItem 12

Great. Thank you so very much. Okay. So now we're going to go on to public hearing at this time. Before the public hearing. No.

4:49:47
Kristine RidgeItem 12

I don't believe we have covered the business calendar.

4:49:57
Valerie AmezcuaItem 12

Did we not cover that?

4:50:00
Valerie AmezcuaItem 12

Oh, thank you. We're now entering the business calendar.

4:50:04
Valerie AmezcuaItem 12

Any...

4:50:10
Norma OrozcoItem 12

We are on item number 38, the biannual review and appointment of regional board representatives. And tonight council is considering the recommended action one to review the regional board appointment list and appoint members and alternates to serve as representatives to various outside agencies through December 2024, or specific terms were noted.

4:50:12
Valerie AmezcuaItem 38

So this is my first time doing this, as we all know. So I'll go down the line as far as if you want to stay where we are. I know the Mayor Pro Temp sits on the OCTA board. So thank you. It's a lot of work and a lot of responsibility there. I would like to replace Nelita on the Orange County Water District Board. Councilman Hernandez?

4:50:39
Johnathan Ryan HernandezItem 38

I'd like to stay on the Sanitation District. And I know there is an opening in the Vector Control that will be vacant as well in the month of January. So I do have an interest there.

4:51:00
Valerie AmezcuaItem 38

You'd like to, you're interested in that one?

4:51:15
Johnathan Ryan HernandezItem 38

Yes, yes.

4:51:19
Norma OrozcoItem 38

If I can make a point of clarification, the vector control is, the term is through January of 2024 with former Councilmember Nelida Mendoza as the representative. I see.

4:51:20
Sonia R. CarvalhoItem 38

Yeah, there's a special provision in the law when the vector control boards were created. They said that members of those boards did not automatically change with their membership on city councils. So often it's a case that when you have a change of membership on city councils, you reappoint as as mayor just mentioned with respect to the water district for example but that does not apply to the vector control so those individuals will continue to serve their term even though they weren't elected to council

4:51:34
Valerie AmezcuaItem 38

perfect thank you councilmember Sarah thank you mayor mesquite well I want to

4:52:00
Phil BacerraItem 38

congratulate councilmember Lopez on being appointed OCTA I know that's gonna be a heavy lift for anybody in that position and so I would like to express my interest in succeeding councilmember Lopez as our city's rep to the Orange County Fire Authority.

4:52:05
Valerie AmezcuaItem 38

All right, thank you. Councilman Pham.

4:52:19
Thai Viet PhanItem 38

First, I'd like to state my recusal for the discussion and vote for the representative for the Orange County Water District, as that is a client of my employer, Rattan and Tucker. So I will leave when you talk about that item. But otherwise, I would love to stay on the Metropolitan Water District Board. I've learned a lot since I've been there. It's been a wild ride, but with everything that's going on in the country right now with our drought, we have a lot of work to do, and I'm excited to stay on if given the opportunity. Thank you.

4:52:22
Valerie AmezcuaItem 38

Great. Thank you. Councilman Becerra. I'm sorry. I apologize. I know. Can you all switch seats, please? I'm just kidding.

4:52:52
David PenalozaItem 38

Thank you, Mayor. I would just like to respectfully ask my colleagues to, if I could, I'm interested in remaining as a transportation corridor agency representative. I know that I am also on the Orange County Housing Finance Trust, but if anybody else is willing to serve in that one, I'm happy to turn it over, but I'm happy to continue serving in it as well.

4:53:02
Valerie AmezcuaItem 38

Great, thank you. Councilman Vasquez.

4:53:26
Benjamin VazquezItem 38

Thank you. I would like to do the alternate for the Sanitation Commission.

4:53:32
Valerie AmezcuaItem 38

You'd like to be placed in an alternate.

4:53:37
Benjamin VazquezItem 38

And also for the housing.

4:53:40
Valerie AmezcuaItem 38

For the Orange County Housing Finance Trust? Yes.

4:53:43
Valerie AmezcuaItem 38

And then Mayor Pro Tem Lopez.

4:53:51
David PenalozaItem 38

Really quick, just Councilmember Vasquez, just to inform you that one meets at I think 10 a.m. on Wednesdays. I think it's like once a month. How many times a month?

4:53:57
Valerie AmezcuaItem 38

Twice a month.

4:54:08
Benjamin VazquezItem 38

Do you want to do that?

4:54:09
Valerie AmezcuaItem 38

At 10 a.m. Once a month.

4:54:10
David PenalozaItem 38

I'll recuse myself from that one. It's a lot of missing.

4:54:12
Valerie AmezcuaItem 38

It actually says every two months or it's called. So do you want to remain on that?

4:54:14
David PenalozaItem 38

It's usually monthly, but it's Wednesdays at 10 a.m. I'll recuse myself.

4:54:17
Valerie AmezcuaItem 38

You want to stay until they call you and you can find out?

4:54:22
Benjamin VazquezItem 38

I'll just, no, I'll recuse myself from that one. I don't want to miss too much school.

4:54:26
Valerie AmezcuaItem 38

All right. Councilman Penelosa, then unless Mayor Pro Tem.

4:54:30
Valerie AmezcuaItem 38

Mayor Pro Tem.

4:54:35
Jessie LopezItem 38

Can't hear you, I'm sorry. Yes, I was recently appointed to OCTA to serve one term, and I'm happy to serve on the Housing Trust Board as well.

4:54:40
Valerie AmezcuaItem 38

On the Housing, perfect.

4:54:53
Valerie AmezcuaItem 38

Does that work for you, Councilman Penelosa?

4:54:56
David PenalozaItem 38

Yeah, I'm okay with that.

4:54:58
Valerie AmezcuaItem 38

Perfect. So what I have here, if I can, you want to read it out? Or would you like me to do it?

4:55:00
Norma OrozcoItem 38

Can we go, I have a list, can we vote as we go down?

4:55:07
Valerie AmezcuaItem 38

Can you start from the top?

4:55:11
Norma OrozcoItem 38

Yes. For Metropolitan Water District, I have Councilmember Pham.

4:55:13
Valerie AmezcuaItem 38

That's correct.

4:55:21
Norma OrozcoItem 38

Would we like to take a vote on each one or just go down the list?

4:55:22
Valerie AmezcuaItem 38

I'm okay with voting for the whole thing, unless you want to do it individually. Are you guys okay voting with the whole? All right, let's do the whole thing.

4:55:26
Norma OrozcoItem 38

For Orange County Fire Authority, Council Member Becerra. Orange County Housing Finance Trust, Mayor Pro Tem Lopez.

4:55:36
Norma OrozcoItem 38

I missed the OC Sanitation District. I did catch the alternate as Council Member Vasquez.

4:55:47
Valerie AmezcuaItem 38

Council Member Hernandez will remain? Yes. That's correct? Yes, that's correct.

4:55:54
Norma OrozcoItem 38

And Mayor Mesquah for Orange County Water District.

4:56:05
Valerie AmezcuaItem 38

That's correct.

4:56:08
Norma OrozcoItem 38

Southern California Association of Governments. I missed that one.

4:56:12
Valerie AmezcuaItem 38

We did not get it. That's Councilman Becerra wants to be.

4:56:16
Phil BacerraItem 38

I'd be happy to, in fact, Council Member Vasquez if you want to take that.

4:56:20
Valerie AmezcuaItem 38

Would you like to take that one, Councilman Vasquez? Which one is it? Southern California Association of Governments called SCAG. It's actually one I hear pretty interesting.

4:56:24
Phil BacerraItem 38

It's our regional MPO and you can meet remotely. That sounds good.

4:56:32
Valerie AmezcuaItem 38

You want to do that?

4:56:36
Phil BacerraItem 38

Yes, I'll take it. Perfect. And just real quick, Councilman Vasquez, it's a package deal. So you get SCAG and OCOG, which you could do both remotely. Nice.

4:56:37
Johnathan Ryan HernandezItem 38

Well, if he's going to .

4:56:48
Valerie AmezcuaItem 38

That was a great setup.

4:56:50
Johnathan Ryan HernandezItem 38

Oh, wait, there was more. Hold up, but hold up. But wait, there's more, because on the Sanitation District, we also have the Santa Ana River Flood Protection Agency.

4:56:51
Valerie AmezcuaItem 38

Which you're young. Yes.

4:57:00
Johnathan Ryan HernandezItem 38

So you'll be, we'll be joining and doing a lot of good work together. The good thing is, is it's remote and good board of directors. Awesome. Bless you. Not to serve.

4:57:01
Valerie AmezcuaItem 38

All right, you got that one. Thank you.

4:57:11
Thai Viet PhanItem 38

SKAG and the Orange County Council of Governance Board of Directors. And I just want to confirm that's okay, because I know we had talked about mornings, and that's also a morning meeting. That's all.

4:57:13
Valerie AmezcuaItem 38

Well, they may be able to work it out. We want to put you on something. Perfect. Okay, great.

4:57:23
Norma OrozcoItem 38

And they have for transportation corridor agencies, Council Member Peñalosa.

4:57:31
Valerie AmezcuaItem 38

That's correct. Correct.

4:57:36
Norma OrozcoItem 38

And I didn't catch if we had an alternate for that one.

4:57:38
Valerie AmezcuaItem 38

You need an alternate, Council Member Peñalosa?

4:57:42
David PenalozaItem 38

I never miss, but if anyone is, I mean, you never know.

4:57:44
Valerie AmezcuaItem 38

I'll take the alternate if he misses. and I'm going to go find him at home. Find out why he's missing.

4:57:48
Norma OrozcoItem 38

And I believe those are all.

4:57:58
Valerie AmezcuaItem 38

Perfect. Let's prepare to vote, please. Can I make a question?

4:58:00
Thai Viet PhanItem 38

May I make a motion to approve all of them except for OC Water District and then I'll leave the room. I'll second. Thank you.

4:58:05
Valerie AmezcuaItem 38

Okay, let's prepare to vote. There's no other comments.

4:58:14
Norma OrozcoItem 38

I'm sorry, can we repeat who motioned and who seconded?

4:58:29
David PenalozaItem 38

Councilmember Phan motioned and I seconded. Councilmember Peñalosa.

4:58:34
Valerie AmezcuaItem 38

And then we're going to vote separately on the Orange County Water District.

4:58:39
Norma OrozcoItem 38

Councilmember Becerra.

4:58:46
Valerie AmezcuaItem 38

Councilmember Becerra.

4:58:48
Phil BacerraItem 38

There it is.

4:58:49
Phil BacerraItem 38

I've got a big green circle on my screen.

4:58:53
Norma OrozcoItem 38

Motion passes by unanimous consent.

4:58:58
David PenalozaItem 38

Now I'll make a motion to approve the appointments to the Orange County Water District. I'll second that.

4:59:01
Valerie AmezcuaItem 38

Let's prepare to vote if there's no comments, questions.

4:59:09
Norma OrozcoItem 38

Can we do that one as a roll call vote, please? Yes. Councilmember Hernandez?

4:59:12
Johnathan Ryan HernandezItem 38

Yes.

4:59:17
Norma OrozcoItem 38

Councilmember Becerra?

4:59:18
Norma OrozcoItem 38

Councilmember Peñalosa?

4:59:21
Norma OrozcoItem 38

Councilmember Vasquez? Yes. Mayor Pro Tem Lopez? Yes. And Mayor Mezqua? Yes.

4:59:23
Norma OrozcoItem 38

Motion passes 6-0.

4:59:31
Valerie AmezcuaItem 38

Great. Thank you.

4:59:33
David PenalozaItem 38

Point of clarification, Mayor. Clerk, did you want to note the recusal of Councilmember Fein? Yes.

4:59:37
Norma OrozcoItem 39

I'm sorry, motion passes 601 with the recusal of Councilmember Phan.

4:59:45
David PenalozaItem 39

Thank you.

4:59:51
Valerie AmezcuaItem 39

Great. Let's move on now. To the next item is 38, 39.

4:59:52
Kristine RidgeItem 39

Mayor, we do have a brief presentation prepared if you would like it. Great. Thank you. Okay. So Executive Director Min Tai of Planning and Building.

5:00:00
UnidentifiedItem 39

The request action tonight before the City Council is to adopt an urgency ordinance by two-thirds vote amending the very section of chapter 41 of the Municipal Code to address three specific current and immediate threats to public health safety and welfare due to the absence of regulations to specifically regulate noxious use within the city when located in proximity to sensitive land uses the absence of clear definition defining and characterizing the various professional and administrative as well as medical and non-medical land uses in

5:00:26
UnidentifiedItem 39

the professional zoning district including regulations to minimize the impacts to the built environment, as well as the absence of standard for construction of electric fences for protection of private property as allowable construction under the state law.

5:01:05
UnidentifiedItem 39

Pursuant to SB 1000, the city was required to address environmental justice and general plan as part of the general plan update. The recently adopted general plan includes numerous goals and policy and implementation actions that were developed in collaboration with the community to address environmental issues that residents face on a daily basis. The proposed adoption will allow the immediate implementation of regulations to address the impacts of noxious land uses already existing in the built environment, as well as future uses where none exist today, and will enable the city to enforce on violators of environmental

5:01:24
UnidentifiedItem 39

regulations and require appropriate land use corrective actions. The absence of clear definition defining and characterizing the various unique professional, administrative, as well as medical and non-medical land uses inhibits the city's ability to apply appropriate land use requirements and applicable regulatory tools to permit, license, as well as regulating the continually changing medical, professional, and service industries and their impacts also to the built environment the need is urgent and has and will

5:02:03
UnidentifiedItem 39

continue to the city will continue receive a high rate of appeals regarding our decision and the permitting process to these type of administrative land uses within the P zoning lastly there have been near daily police and code enforcement related incidents regarding transient populations trespassing and causing damage to private non-residential properties abutting railroad rights-of-way in the city. The option and development standard for the installation of electric fencing type on private property to determine if this type of activities would be needed to help properly in order to protect and enjoy the use of their properties.

5:02:39
UnidentifiedItem 39

The proposed urgency ordinance will implement a clear and consistent regulatory framework work for requiring a conditional use permit for establishing and operating businesses that require a permit to either handle, store, emit or discharge regulated compounds, materials or chemical to be reviewed under a conditional use permit process as well as addressing nonconforming businesses when ownership change as including repeated violators of environmental regulations. It will also update the definition section of zoning code to clearly define counseling

5:03:21
UnidentifiedItem 39

services, medical offices, professional business, and administrative office. Use this and update the permitted use section of the various zoning code, such as the PEC1 and the various commercial zones to provide consistent use of these terms throughout the code so that it can be equally applied in different zoning districts of the city the ordinance will also establish a conditional use permit process for reviewing permitted medical offices operated by government government subsidized or non-profit or philanthropical entities in the professional

5:03:58
UnidentifiedItem 39

zones and finally the ordinance will establish a design land use standard to permit electric fences in the industrial zoning district only on properties abutting railroad right-of-ways subject to issuance of a minor exception and compliance with our development and design standards.

5:04:35
UnidentifiedItem 39

The absence of these regulations present a clear threat to the public health, safety, and welfare. It also had adverse impact on the existing community as well as negatively impacting property values, building, and fire safety. The changes are consistent with our recently adopted general plan policy on compatibility between land uses, environment-owned with justice goals, as well as maintaining a diverse economic base.

5:04:55
UnidentifiedItem 39

The adoption of the ordinance is exempt from CEQA requirements pursuant to CEQA sections 15061B-3 as well as B-5 because it will not result in a directly or reasonable foreseeable indirect physical change to the environment the notice of exemption will be filed upon the adoption of this ordinance in conclusion staff recommends that the city council approving the zoning ordinance amendment as an urgency ordinance by two-thirds vote to amend the various section of chapter 41 of the santa admissible code if adopted tonight these regulations will immediately become

5:05:26
UnidentifiedItem 39

effective and we can start implementing the regulations throughout the city that concludes

5:06:03
Valerie AmezcuaItem 39

my staff report. Thank you. Thank you. Are there any questions about Council? Yes. First of all,

5:06:09
Thai Viet PhanItem 39

thank you so much. I was actually driving down Fairview when I was thinking about electric fences before I saw this item on the agenda, which isn't abutting a railroad, but that's actually something I wanted to ask about, and maybe it's Madam City Attorney or Director Tai. high. One of the concerns we have a lot, a lot, a lot is not just the properties abutting the railroads, but the properties abutting the channels. If you're looking on Fairview, we have the Greenville Channel, all of those properties right above, right there, even with the awesome new fencing, thanks Nabil, and the investments we put in there, we still

5:06:19
Thai Viet PhanItem 39

do get trespassers, right, because a fence is a deterrence, but it is not a guarantee. people still climb over it they they dig under it I've seen videos and photos so I wanted to know if we can expand that allowance to properties abutting these public channels I mean you know it's not a high traffic area the only people who would be in that area are those who are actually trespassing I have been

5:06:57
UnidentifiedItem 39

informed by our same magic that some of those properties are actually potentially city owned or government owned and we would have the ability to implement these type of fencing without having to comply with our existing fencing requirement if the city choose to exercise that

5:07:28
Thai Viet PhanItem 39

option okay so um i totally i get that right but obviously we as the government move slowly when we can, when we get, we just invested, you know, six figures in adding new fencing, and then in order to upgrade them to have electric fencing, that's whatever the additional monies are, we're talking about our budget and whatnot. I guess I would just like to give these residents an opportunity to protect their own property because we hear, I get emails all the time about individuals climbing over the fences, climbing over the walls, going into their homes

5:07:44
Thai Viet PhanItem 39

or their backyards, breaking in, you know, leaving trash, vandalism, whatever the case might be, and there's nothing they can do about it.

5:08:24
Thai Viet PhanItem 39

I'll let you deliver.

5:08:38
Kristine RidgeItem 39

So, Council Member, I understand exactly your concerns. I would want to take time to explore that because with industrial properties abetting the railroad tracks, there's very few children in the area. It is industrial properties that are protecting chemicals and other storage of materials. So if you do, one is to research the expansion of electric fencing in other areas, particularly in residential areas, I would want to study it a lot more.

5:08:40
Thai Viet PhanItem 39

Yeah, only those that abut this type of public property where it's not, you know, the properties are immediately against the wall, and on the other side of the wall is the channel. And so in that case, the only people who are climbing over the wall will be those who are trespassing.

5:09:09
Kristine RidgeItem 39

For that one, I believe we could probably, if we have continued problem areas where they keep cutting through the fence and accessing city-owned properties, we could deploy some type of electrical fencing without having it even a part of the ordinance. So I'd be more than happy to explore that possibility as well.

5:09:26
Thai Viet PhanItem 39

So I will support this item. I will, you know, take staff at the Word to explore what this looks like because at the end of the day, every week or two, we're sending folks out to fix the fencing, to fix the digging, to fix all sorts of stuff. And it's about time that, you know, we don't have that problem. So I will support the item, but hopefully we can keep an eye out on those issues and maybe come back if necessary. Thank you.

5:09:45
Valerie AmezcuaItem 39

Are there any other questions? Yes, Mayor Patel.

5:10:13
Jessie LopezItem 39

Yeah, thank you. the only proposed change that I that I have for the council is changing the proposed zoning code regulation from 500 feet to a thousand feet and correct me if I'm on that might be in par with the CARB recommendation do you know off the

5:10:15
UnidentifiedItem 39

top of your head man mayor pro tem so the 500 feet was directly related to the air resources board recommendation for when to locate residential which is the most sensitive type of land use along either major corridors or high emission location. Certainly, we can look at options to further extend that distance, but it would require that we look at what is necessary to justify the further distance. As this is an urgency ordinance, we want to make sure that we rely upon substantiated information that are publicly available for our decision-making process so that it would be legally defensible

5:10:33
UnidentifiedItem 39

and can withstand legal challenge.

5:11:13
Jessie LopezItem 39

And did you, I know this is an urgency ordinance, but did you and your team speak with like MPNA, OCEJ, since all of those organizations have been involved heavily?

5:11:16
Jessie LopezItem 39

And they're fine with the 500 feet?

5:11:28
UnidentifiedItem 39

They support it. They don't necessarily, they would like a long distance, but they understand the reason why the city staff is going with the 500 feet.

5:11:30
Jessie LopezItem 39

So I support the urgency ordinance because I think it's important to have in place, But I do want you and your staff to research about the 1,000 feet as opposed to the 500 feet.

5:11:37
UnidentifiedItem 39

Understand.

5:11:47
Jessie LopezItem 39

Thank you.

5:11:48
Valerie AmezcuaItem 39

Any other questions or comments? Councilman Hernandez.

5:11:50
Johnathan Ryan HernandezItem 39

Yes. I share very similar sentiments, Director Mintai. I had some members of the community reach me with the same exact concern, from 500 to 1,000. So I would like to see our staff do their due diligence in doing more research on that. So that is my direction. Thank you, sir.

5:11:54
Phil BacerraItem 39

Councilmember Bessari. Thank you, Mayor Mesquat. My question is in relation to the electric fences, especially because we're talking about railroad right-of-way. And in my ward, we have the bike trail adjacent to the railroad right-of-way. So walk me through, as far as the regulations that you're proposing, how will they impact that trail?

5:12:18
UnidentifiedItem 39

This would be for industrial property that are adjacent next to the railroad right away.

5:12:37
Phil BacerraItem 39

So for the private properties and then?

5:12:41
UnidentifiedItem 39

Correct.

5:12:43
Phil BacerraItem 39

And then in concern with Councilmember Phan's comments, you were talking about more city or public owned properties.

5:12:44
UnidentifiedItem 39

That's correct.

5:12:51
Phil BacerraItem 39

Madam Mayor, is the public hearing closed?

5:12:52
Phil BacerraItem 39

No, no. Oh, it's a business library. I'm sorry. No, no, no. Don't open it because I'll just, I'll make the motion that we approve zoning ordinance Amendment Number 2022-07 and adopt the urgency ordinance to amend the various sections of chapter 41 of the Santa Ana Municipal Code contained within and with the addition of Councilmember Lopez's request to further explore expanding that radius beyond the 500 feet. For a future. For a future. No, no, not as part of this ordinance or this urgency ordinance. Thank you for clarification. Can I get a second? I'll second.

5:12:58
Valerie AmezcuaItem 39

Before I go around for any final questions, can you give us a timeline when you'll be back with that information, please?

5:13:34
UnidentifiedItem 39

In terms of the 1,000 feet regulations, our goal was to evaluate that as part of the general plan zoning code update process so that we can conduct a more thorough research on increasing that distance so that not only can we address some of the land uses but looking at potential amortizing out some existing land uses. So what we anticipate is that, you know, the zoning ordinance would likely be completed over the next year to year and a half, and that's when we would come back with a longer distance.

5:13:41
UnidentifiedItem 39

The proposed urgency ordinance tonight will serve as a gatekeeping mechanism for staff to, on the interim, address some of these existing land uses that are most impacting our residential and sensitive land uses, such as park use and schools that are within 500 feet. What we have found is that some of the most immediately adjacent businesses that use these type of noxious uses impact these land uses the most. The additional 1,000 feet would be an additional protection, but again, we would want to substantiate it with some credible substantiated information

5:14:15
UnidentifiedItem 39

as to the reason why we would need that extended distance.

5:14:56
Valerie AmezcuaItem 39

City Manager, I'm hearing a year, year and a half. Is that what we just heard?

5:15:00
Kristine RidgeItem 39

So with the implementation of the tent.

5:15:05
Valerie AmezcuaItem 39

Let me finish real quick. So I'm hearing a year, year and a half. I'm not comfortable with that. Seems like a really long time. I don't know about the rest of the council, but I'd prefer a shorter timeline, please.

5:15:07
UnidentifiedItem 39

What I can do, Madam Mayor, is to separate that issue out from the rest of the coordinates and expedite that based on directions tonight.

5:15:18
Valerie AmezcuaItem 39

Yes, I believe that's what the council is asking for. Okay, great. Are there any other comments from any council members? Let's prepare to vote.

5:15:26
Norma OrozcoItem 39

I'm sorry, we're missing votes from council member Pinalo-Sai and Fan.

5:15:52
David PenalozaItem 39

I have it. Green.

5:15:57
Norma OrozcoItem 39

Motion passes by unanimous consent.

5:16:09
Valerie AmezcuaItem 40

Thank you. Item 40, please. Increase transparency with city labor negotiations. Any council comments or questions? Councilman Hernandez?

5:16:14
Johnathan Ryan HernandezItem 40

Yes, thank you, Mayor Mesquah. Do we have a presentation today?

5:16:26
Kristine RidgeItem 40

We do, sir. Would you like it?

5:16:31
Johnathan Ryan HernandezItem 40

Yes, that would be great.

5:16:33
Johnathan Ryan HernandezItem 40

Thank you.

5:16:35
Johnathan Ryan HernandezItem 40

I do have some comments, Mayor Mesquah, but I am going to, for the sake of educating the public, I would like to see this presentation. I have not seen it, so I am interested in seeing what we have.

5:16:37
Valerie AmezcuaItem 40

Great, thank you.

5:16:51
UnidentifiedItem 40

������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������� almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty

5:17:24
Valerie AmezcuaItem 40

almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty

5:17:50
UnidentifiedItem 40

almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty almighty On October 4th, 2022, the City of Santa Ana City Council directed staff to bring back options in regards to increasing transparency with city labor negotiations, and specifically labor negotiations with the Santa Ana Police Officers Associations. Labor negotiations are governed by the Myers-Milius Brown Act, Government Code 3500, And in part, Section 3505 states in part that the governing body of the public agency shall meet with the unions

5:17:52
UnidentifiedItem 40

and shall meet and confer in good faith regarding wages, hours, and other terms conditions of employment. How labor negotiations occur? Labor strategy is usually discussed in closed session. From the onset of labor negotiations and throughout the course of labor negotiations, We receive labor strategy and authority from this governing body in closed session, and that strategy or direction is conveyed to the labor unions in private through various negotiations, multiple negotiation sessions.

5:18:27
UnidentifiedItem 40

And so, and it's essential as the city may be negotiating with multiple labor unions simultaneously, it's essential to retain the confidentiality of the city's respective labor strategy. However, there are options to increase transparency with labor negotiations. And with that said, there's three options for ongoing and future labor negotiations. So one is to maintain the status quo for conducting labor negotiations, and that specifically we continue to receive direction, authority, and closed session, and labor negotiations

5:19:00
UnidentifiedItem 40

continue to occur in private meetings with the respective labor unions. The second option is to adopt a set of collective bargaining rules between the city and its respective labor unions in which negotiations would be conducted in an open setting so that members of the public who wish to observe can do so. And the third option is a quasi-modified style labor negotiation in which the city's labor representative would continue to receive direction in closed session, and negotiations would continue to occur with the respective labor unions in private closed meeting negotiation sessions.

5:19:38
UnidentifiedItem 40

However, after proposals and costing of said proposals between the respective parties are shared, the city would post those proposals and the costing on the city's website. In regards to option number two, if the city was to develop proposed rules for conducting deliberate negotiations in public, we would need to meet and confer with the respective unions on those terms and conditions and that would be subject to the Myers-Millies Brown Act and also the impasse procedures. In regards to option three, the city is not required to meet and confer and this option

5:20:13
UnidentifiedItem 40

could be implemented immediately for current negotiations and also future negotiations. If it is the direction of the Council to increase transparency, staff is recommending the adoption of Option 3.

5:20:49
UnidentifiedItem 40

And with that said, I'll be open for any questions at this time.

5:21:04
Valerie AmezcuaItem 40

Councillor Hernandez.

5:21:09
Johnathan Ryan HernandezItem 40

Thank you, Mayor Mascua. Thank you, Director Mastic, for the presentation today. I was a member of this Council when this item was brought forth, and it was brought forth with a great deal of concern. I want to inform the public as to why that concern was there.

5:21:10
Johnathan Ryan HernandezItem 40

The City of Santa Ana has seven governing members, and we have an open session, which the public can participate in, and in closed session, we have very difficult items to discuss. When those conversations start to become public and the public's trust is eroded, that is unfortunately why this item did come forth to the Santa Ana City Council, was to ensure that the public's trust was there and that accountability was at the forefront of labor negotiations, something that unfortunately was lacking.

5:21:30
Johnathan Ryan HernandezItem 40

And when this item was brought forward, a majority of the council supported it. And at the time, it was Mayor Vicente Sarmiento, Councilmember Tyviot, Phan, myself, and Councilmember Lopez were the majority that supported the transparency. This was not an effort to get in the way of labor negotiations or to disempower workers. It's actually quite the opposite. So, I don't see, Director Mostic, the direction of the council being presented to us today at that time.

5:22:12
Johnathan Ryan HernandezItem 40

I see something that is covering all labor groups when our recommendation was very specific to one. Now with that being said, I am supportive of us keeping the status quo because we have been successful and we have been effective in reaching labor strategies and in reaching labor agreements. I don't think that the third model that is being presented is going to be a model that is going to be good for workers, and especially we want to make sure that they're showing up to the table.

5:22:48
Johnathan Ryan HernandezItem 40

And I think that this can potentially hurt labor. I do think that the conversation that we're having later today is an important one. I think that if there's any group that is eroding the public's trust, I think that these conversations have to happen the way that they're happening today. But this isn't what we requested with the majority of the council. So I will be recommending to my colleagues today option one to keep the status quo. And that will be my motion on the floor today. Thank you.

5:23:27
Valerie AmezcuaItem 40

Thank you, Councilman. Is there a second?

5:23:59
Valerie AmezcuaItem 40

I'll second the motion. Councilman Becerra, any comments?

5:24:03
Phil BacerraItem 40

It's like you're reading my mind. Thank you, Mayor Mesquat.

5:24:08
Phil BacerraItem 40

For different reasons, I'll be supporting that motion as well. I would qualify this whole exercise as smoke looking for a fire. There was no there there. And I would say that in looking at the staff report, I think the one thing that stuck out to me, and this is very similar to my concerns last time, and that was the fact that in here it says, in Orange County, these proposals include cities like Huntington Beach and Costa Mesa. And no disrespect to those cities, but when I think of our city and our city council's relationship with labor, I don't want to emulate those cities. And so with that, I will go with option one.

5:24:12
Phil BacerraItem 40

I think that for all intents and purposes, what we're trying to accomplish, or what's been trying to be accomplished here, I think what was already said about targeting one group, I think that probably opens us up to lawsuits if we were to go down that path. So I think that, you know, maintaining the protocols, the process that we have today, I think is probably the most prudent way to move forward. And so with that, I'll be supporting option one. Thank you.

5:24:54
Valerie AmezcuaItem 40

Councilman Finn?

5:25:26
Thai Viet PhanItem 40

Councilman Finn? Excuse me. Thank you, Mayor. Yes, so when this item came forward, it was brought forward because closed session information, according to my information and belief, according to information and belief, right, was being leaked. That is a crime. That is a violation of the penal code. And it's horrifying to think that all of us colleagues are working together with staff to negotiate in the best interests of our residents and of the city. But information was being leaked to not all, but one union.

5:25:27
Thai Viet PhanItem 40

That was what brought this item forward. It's not about not negotiating with our friends in labor. It's not about punishing anyone. One, it was about making sure that as individuals, as council members with a fiduciary duty to represent our residents, that we were on a fair playing field when negotiating these MOUs. That's why I voted in support of the item. I definitely do have concern with the fact that these options are broader than one labor union. Reviewing the staff report, I understand why that's the case.

5:26:09
Thai Viet PhanItem 40

And so in my personal opinion, I do believe that that issue has been remedied based on recently occurring events. And so I would like to support option one, which is maintaining the status quo. And I believe this is a receiving file, so I'm not sure we have to do anything.

5:26:49
Kristine RidgeItem 40

It's accepting informational and seeking direction, so we would like your direction.

5:27:12
Thai Viet PhanItem 40

Okay, thank you. Then I will support option one. Thank you. Councilman Vasquez.

5:27:16
UnidentifiedItem 40

Councilman Vasquez. Councilman Vasquez.

5:27:22
Benjamin VazquezItem 40

When this was brought up, there were issues of leaking. I was not here. But there was leaks happening on one union. And one union was getting information that the rest had not been given. And there has been actions by this group to circumvent the staff to negotiate their contract. It's not being done in good faith. There is a history before these negotiations of this happening that's in public. public.

5:27:28
Benjamin VazquezItem 40

And this one group has taken it upon themselves to do as they wish, circumventing our staff to negotiate really a contract that's good for Santa Ana. The contracts that we've had have not been in the best interest of Santa Ana. So this is why this issue has been brought up.

5:28:04
Benjamin VazquezItem 40

This group spent a million dollars to have their way on this issue and I am here regardless of their actions. But I think we have to hold people accountable for not negotiating in good faith.

5:28:32
Valerie AmezcuaItem 40

Mayor, Pro Tem Lippis.

5:28:59
Jessie LopezItem 40

Thank you, Mayor. So, yes, I was part of the discussion when this item was brought forth earlier, and I explicitly stated, you know, and wrote in my report why I was bringing this item forth, and I was also very specific about the one bargaining unit that we were having issues with at the time that were had not just been a one-time occurrence as I stated in the report then you can read it if you want to learn more about the issue I am not supportive of the recommendations in the staff report because again I was very

5:29:01
Jessie LopezItem 40

clear about if we're going to move forward with this process it has to be for the one unit that was you know undermining our own bargaining team right that had information about staff position and that was essentially

5:29:41
Jessie LopezItem 40

bargaining in bad faith with the city so that is why that that item was brought forth I think that the city should always we didn't confer with our bargaining units they are workers we should support that we should hear out their concerns and we should always work together to have peace with our union with the with our bargaining laborers because they are made up of our workers, folks that live here in the city of Santa Ana. So this is not, and this was not then, smoke looking for fire. This was a genuine concern that members of this council that believe that there should be an equal playing field for

5:30:01
Jessie LopezItem 40

all bargaining units happening and that don't necessarily will say, well, you have information to this that's fine you go ahead but then everybody else should not have the same access to that kind of deal making or information so that again that is why this issue was brought forth a couple months or weeks ago at this point um and again this this was a problem that was brought forth to this council and as problem solvers we should be able to have a very hard conversation a very honest conversation about what are the solutions that we are willing to bring forth to make sure that this doesn't happen,

5:30:41
Jessie LopezItem 40

not just this year, but next year and down the line when most of us won't be here on this council. And so again, to staff, I wanna thank you for the research that you've done. I'm not happy with the three options. I would like to see other options be brought to this council or before they're even brought, discussed with us. So I will not be supporting you know the the the status quo because again in the context of my comments in the context of why I brought this forth it was for one bargaining

5:31:21
Jessie LopezItem 40

unit. I would not support it opening it up to all of them and so I would like to see options for that for for that one bargaining unit. It is my understanding that legally we can because nothing prohibits us from being able to say yes we want to increase transparency we want to increase a communication with the public and we want to have um and peace here you know in the city of sanayana so is there going to be my initial comments thank you mayor protem if i may address um

5:31:57
Kristine RidgeItem 40

your dissatisfaction with the item uh staff's recollection of the october meeting there was not majority direction to bring forth options solely for one union in fact I believe it was at that time mayor Potem Becerra and councilmember Pham that said if it's good for one it's good for all of them so the options that we brought back we were recommending it would apply to all of them because we did not have majority direction to apply it to one okay thank you for that clarification I

5:32:28
Jessie LopezItem 40

just want to reiterate that that was that my intent and those were not my

5:32:56
David PenalozaItem 40

comments. Thank you. Thank you. Councilman Paneloza. No comments. I'm just supportive of the motion on

5:33:00
Thai Viet PhanItem 40

the floor. That's it. Thank you. I do want to clarify maybe I'm mis-murmuring my own comments, but I do believe I was very specific about one union because there were comments that those of us who were supporting the item were anti-labor and that was not the case because it was specific to the disclosure of confidential information in violation of the penal code in respect to one labor union. I think there's even a voice of OC article about that. So I do want to state that for the record. So I am supporting the status quo

5:33:08
Thai Viet PhanItem 40

at this time but I'm not against continuing to look into if we still have additional problems coming back to this. Thank you.

5:33:45
Valerie AmezcuaItem 40

I am going to support the status quo as well. And I'm new up here. And no, I did not get paid a million dollars to win. I've been in this city a very long time as a school board member, as a community member, and I worked my tail off to run and to win. So I will be supporting the status quo, and let's prepare to vote.

5:33:55
Phil BacerraItem 40

Mayor Mesquite, I think all the staff was asking for was direction. Okay, great.

5:34:26
Valerie AmezcuaItem 40

And we're going to continue with the status quo. I believe that was the majority with the exception of one council member.

5:34:30
Johnathan Ryan HernandezItem 40

Two.

5:34:37
Valerie AmezcuaItem 40

Yes, Councilman Hernandez.

5:34:38
Johnathan Ryan HernandezItem 40

Yes, just for clarification. So with the council meeting that this item was initially brought forth, are you saying there wasn't a consensus of the majority then, Madam City Manager?

5:34:40
Kristine RidgeItem 40

My recollection is there was a majority for us to return with some options for you to consider. My notes were that there was not a majority to apply it just to a single union. So, I mean, if I made a mistake, I do apologize, but that's what my notes from that meeting said.

5:34:53
Johnathan Ryan HernandezItem 40

I do believe there is a mistake there. I just want the record to stand that I support the status quo because I support our working class, you know, union members that are serving our city. what I don't support is negotiating with our city in bad faith so I want to be on the record that my support at the dais when this item was originally brought forth was for us to have an isolated discussion on one bargaining group I don't not I do not see that presented today which is why I'm supporting the status quo should there ever be any mishaps that happen I can assure you that this item would be brought back. Thank you, Madam City Manager.

5:35:09
Johnathan Ryan HernandezItem 40

That concludes my comments.

5:35:50
Benjamin VazquezItem 40

There's no other comments? I want, just for future reference, I want to make sure that I am for the initial. I'm new, it's my first day, and I want to make sure that I'm in support of the initial proposal as presented by Mayor Pro Tem, Jesse Lopez.

5:35:51
Valerie AmezcuaItem 40

So, was there a different proposal? I just want, and there's confusion because you weren't here and I weren't here, but Councilman Vassa, so you can let us know.

5:36:11
Kristine RidgeItem 40

So it appears that there may be a majority that wants one of these items to apply solely to one union.

5:36:19
Valerie AmezcuaItem 40

No, that's not what it appears. It appears at status quo and that's what we agreed to appear. So we're going to leave it at that with the exception of maybe two of the rest of us are status quo, item number one.

5:36:28
Kristine RidgeItem 40

May I ask for a vote just so it can be clear? Thank you. Councilman Hernandez.

5:36:39
Johnathan Ryan HernandezItem 40

And just clarification, are we voting on status quo or are we voting on status quo plus one group?

5:36:45
Valerie AmezcuaItem 40

We're voting on status quo.

5:36:51
Johnathan Ryan HernandezItem 40

Okay. Did you, were you going to propose a vote for one group as well, Madam City Manager? It looked like.

5:36:53
Kristine RidgeItem 40

I believe, so Council Member Vasquez, with his statement, I believe there may be four of you that may want to implement one of these options only on one group. Yes. So I was just trying to seek clarification on what is the majority direction for. That's why I wanted you to vote, but I believe the motion that was raised was status quo.

5:37:00
Valerie AmezcuaItem 40

Councilwoman Ty Fenn.

5:37:22
Thai Viet PhanItem 40

So I'm happy with the status quo. As I mentioned, I think that recent events have dealt with the leak, in my opinion. And so I'm happy to move on with the status quo. But if we find issues coming back, I would like to revisit this issue. Thank you.

5:37:23
Kristine RidgeItem 40

Okay. Direction is clear then. So there is a majority support for status quo.

5:37:40
Valerie AmezcuaItem 40

That's correct. Great. Thank you.

5:37:44
Valerie AmezcuaItem 40

We're going to now go into the public hearing.

5:37:50
Valerie AmezcuaItem 40

Madam Clerk.

5:37:54
Valerie AmezcuaItem 40

Before hearing the public on item 41, Madam Clerk, please provide instructions to the public who would like to make a comment on this. I do have some speaker cards up here.

5:38:01
Norma OrozcoItem 41

Members of the public joining us by way of Zoom or conference call and would like to make comment for only public hearing item 41, please dial star 9 from your phone or select raise hand from Zoom now.

5:38:13
Valerie AmezcuaItem 41

No speakers on Zoom? Go ahead and I'll pull the speaker cards off.

5:38:34
Norma OrozcoItem 41

You could read on item 41.

5:38:56
Thai Viet PhanItem 41

Before you begin, I'd like to state my recusal from this item. I believe that Green Law Partners, out of the abundance of caution, Green Law Partners may be associated with Green Law Development. And they are a client of my employer, Rattan and Tucker. And therefore, I will leave the dais while you have this fantastic discussion. Thank you. Great. Thank you.

5:39:04
Valerie AmezcuaItem 41

Do you have them on the line?

5:39:24
Norma OrozcoItem 41

Yes, we have one speaker on line. Go ahead. Did you want to see for staff presentation?

5:39:29
Valerie AmezcuaItem 41

Thank you. All right. City manager, staff available to make a presentation and answer any questions.

5:39:56
Kristine RidgeItem 41

Yes, Honorable Mayor, we do have a presentation, and I'll turn it over to Executive Director Mintai.

5:40:01
UnidentifiedItem 41

Thank you, City Manager.

5:40:08
UnidentifiedItem 41

The action before the City Council tonight is to adopt a resolution approval of a zone change of a property, I'm sorry, an ordinance for approval of a zone change of a property from professional to light industrial and the denial of two appeals

5:40:11
UnidentifiedItem 41

and the denials of two appeals of a planning commission approval of conditional use permit for the entitlements of a proposed 91,000 square foot industrial building and the establishment of a warehouse and distribution use.

5:40:38
UnidentifiedItem 41

The property is located at 1700 through 1740 East Gary Avenue, immediately adjacent to the east side of the 55 freeway between Dyer Road and Alton Parkway. The recently updated general plan adopted in April of this year designate the properties and the surrounding area as industrial flex with a goal of transitioning the area and fostering new development of flexible industrial spaces that can accommodate a wide range of uses, such as research and development, clean manufacturing, warehouse distribution, and office and flex industrial uses. The property is currently zoned for professional.

5:40:57
UnidentifiedItem 41

This zoning classification focuses on professional and office use and became outdated with the adoption of the new general plan and is not compatible as a zoning district for implementing the Flex Industrial Land Use designation as currently designated. Furthermore, the general plan identifies the M1 zoning district as the appropriate zoning for the area, and the proposed zone change would be consistent with the general plan adopted in April of this year. The rezoning of the property would incentivize the demolition of three existing outdated industrial offices,

5:41:38
UnidentifiedItem 41

measures, measuring approximately 105,000 square feet and also will be modernizing the site to accommodate a new 91,000 square foot state of the art industrial building capable of meeting space needs of the current and future industrial uses envisioned by the general plan.

5:42:14
UnidentifiedItem 41

The proposed development also offers an integrated office manufacturing, storage and distribution capabilities all within the same building for vertically integrated or a single purpose user in addition to meeting the current development and construction standards other construction improvement include new site lighting landscaping parking and pavement and public street sidewalk and parkway improvements the site has been designed with a single building capable of accompanying up to two separate tenants oriented to face gary avenue and the 55 freeway

5:42:34
UnidentifiedItem 41

The delivery area has been tucked behind the building with parking flanking the building along the east and west elevations. In this diagram here, north is facing up. The existing driveway entry at the northwest corner of the site at Gary and Pullman will be maintained and will be designed to provide ingress and egress for all vehicle traffic to the site, including passenger and truck deliveries. A new driveway is proposed at the northeast corner of the site to provide access for passenger vehicles and meeting fire and emergency access requirements.

5:43:08
UnidentifiedItem 41

Due to concern raised by neighboring property during the public hearing process and during the outreach process regarding the potential traffic using this new driveway access to the property, the new access and drive aisle along the east side of the building have been designed with height barriers located along key access point indicated in red here on the diagram to limit vehicle movements only to passenger and emergency vehicles and include a minimum 10-foot landscape buffer along the entire perimeter of the site.

5:43:45
UnidentifiedItem 41

The project has been designed to meet all development and construction standard of the proposed M1 zoning district. Potential aesthetics and nuisance impacts stemming from the loading activities to the surrounding property have been fully mitigated by orienting and tucking the loading docks behind the building to the rear of the site. The building has also been designed for a flexible range of industrial uses to meet current and anticipate future demands. The approval of a conditional use permit would allow a distribution use on the property and and is consistent with the goal and policy of the general plan, encouraging a balance

5:44:22
UnidentifiedItem 41

of land uses that are compatible and complementary to implementing the vision of the industrial flexed land use designation. To further integrate the project and to minimize the impact to the existing built environment, the planning commission also imposed specific conditions to prohibit idling of trucks on the site as well as the adjacent public roadways, that the site be posted with a 24-hour contact so that if there are incidents, the public as well as the city can reach a contact to address and report issues. Restrict business activity to only take place within the building and not outside.

5:44:56
UnidentifiedItem 41

And it also requires any modification necessary for easement that would include parking and emergency access to be recorded prior to the building permit being issued.

5:45:36
UnidentifiedItem 41

A hearing to establish hearing process, the Planning Commission conducted a public hearing on October 22, 2022, at which time after completing its understanding and hearing of the staff report as well as taking in public comments and testimony, the condition approved the conditional use permit and also including the set conditions and recommended that the City Council approve the zone change. Subsequent to this decision of October 10th, the City received two appeal applications filed against the project appealing the Planning Commission approval of the conditional use permit.

5:45:50
UnidentifiedItem 41

The appeals asserted that the project required the preparation of a full environmental impact report in place of the CEQA exemption under Section 15183 of CEQA guidelines. The appeals also asserted that the city did not adhere to publicing protocols and that the applicant did not possess the standing to pursue the project application because they did not represent the owner. Responsive to the assertion made by the appeals, the City working with our legal team and our CEQA consultant provided a comprehensive rebuttal to

5:46:33
UnidentifiedItem 41

each appeal applications the analysis facts evidence in the City response as well as the whole of the City's record substantiate that there was a comprehensive analysis of the proposed project that was completed by the City in compliance with CEQA requirements therefore qualifying the project for an exemption under CEQA section 15183 and that the City also also are here to establish application processing requirements and hearing procedures and protocols. And we prepared a response that are attached as Exhibit 13 and 15 to the staff report to be included as part of the records.

5:47:14
UnidentifiedItem 41

The project also complied with the updated Sunshine Ordinance requiring two community meetings which were conducted in July and October 21st of 2021. As a result of the initial meeting, the site plan was designed to orient the loading docks away from the adjacent properties. The applicant has also been coordinating to further modify and including the placement of restrictive gates responsive to some of the concerns regarding potential trucking activities and to limit impact onto the surrounding buildings.

5:47:57
UnidentifiedItem 41

Public notification of our hearing process and protocols was also published and now in accordance with city and state regulations. In addition to these formal measures, staff has also been in close contact with adjacent prop winners for over a year and resulting in the input of the site plan changing and the shifting of the version ultimately that is being moved and being forwarded today for city council's consideration. While today's and prior communication that was submitted as part of this public hearing process from the adjacent property owners indicate there are unresolved easement issues,

5:48:28
UnidentifiedItem 41

the only easement in question is for the benefit of the private property to have cross-access to one another's property. And the modification of these easements as part of this discussion is a private matter between the two parties. However, to facilitate a resolution and prior to the development of the property, the Planning Commission as part of its consideration added a conditions to which the applicant has accepted that would require the applicant to resolve the easement issue but still allowing them to complete with the process application.

5:49:10
UnidentifiedItem 41

However, it has to all be resolved prior to the issues of the construction permit for the development of the site. We believe that this condition will adequately address the issue of concern for a private easement discussion and is going to be made a requisite prior to issuance of a building permit.

5:49:48
UnidentifiedItem 41

The issue as part of the appellant's discussion on this appeal included the CEQA exception and exemption determination by the city, and it was asserted that the appropriate determination was not made and that a full environmental impact analysis report should have been prepared. However, the appellant in their appeal did not provide evidence to substitute why the city analysis was insufficient. Section 15183 of the CEQA guideline is a character of exemption for when a project is consistent with a larger committee plan such as the general plan that was recently adopted.

5:50:11
UnidentifiedItem 41

And the project can rely upon the CEQA analysis and documentation completed and certified for the general plan. The use of Section 15.183 exemption require full initial study checklist which was completed for the project by city and attached as Exhibit 10 to the staff report. This type of exemption requires detailed key findings to be made and they include the project is consistent with the density established by the existing general plan or zoning and for which the EIR was certified. The new general plan and its EIR adopted and certified in April anticipate the development of this and other high intensity for this area.

5:50:53
UnidentifiedItem 41

Two, no project specific effect peculiar to the development or its site that were not in value by the general plan or EIR. The full checklist as part of the staff report indicates there are no unique or peculiar effects for this property and the site.

5:51:34
UnidentifiedItem 41

No potential significant off-site or community impact that the general plan and EIR failed to evaluate. The CEQA consultant hired for this project fully evaluated this project in the context of any other approved or pending project in this area as well. Four, there are no substantial new information which resulted in more severe impact, which the general plan EIR did not anticipate. Since the adoption of the general plan and its EIR in April, no new information came to light that would require re-evaluation of this project. And finally, the project is able to undertake feasible mitigation measures specified by the general plan EIR.

5:51:56
UnidentifiedItem 41

are, this project in this case is subject to compliance with all applicable zoning requirements for the light industrial zoning district which was prescribed by the general plan. And lastly, to provide the legal framework for using the CEQA determination, CEQA guideline states that when reviewing and using CEQA exemption 15183 for a project consistent with the general plan, the SEWA guideline mandates that projects that are found to be consistent with the development density established by the general plan policy for which an EIR was certified shall not, not may not, but shall not require additional environmental review

5:52:36
UnidentifiedItem 41

except as might be necessary to determine the specific effect that are peculiar to the project site. As stated before, there is nothing peculiar or inconsistent about the project in relation to the general plan and its adopted vision. And therefore the type of exemption is required as an environmental documentation for the project. In conclusion, staff recommends that the City Council consider adopting a resolution, denying the appeals application, and upholding the determination of the planning commission to

5:53:18
UnidentifiedItem 41

approve conditional use permit 2022-14 as condition as well as adopting an ordinance amend amending the zone change designation for this property from P to M1. That concludes staff's report. I have also the staff team at the secret consultant and our legal team as well as the APKIN in the audience and online available to answer any questions. We have also provided the City Council with a transmittal memorandum providing a full response to the comments that we received earlier today from the public.

5:53:53
UnidentifiedItem 41

While these comments have already been addressed in our staff report, we felt that was necessary for us to respond to it tonight as well to supplement the records for the project. That concludes my report. Thank you.

5:54:31
Valerie AmezcuaItem 41

Great. Thank you. DOES THE APPLICANT, ROB MITCHELL, REPRESENTING GREEN LAW PARTNERS, WISH TO SPEAK? IF SO, YOU HAVE FIVE MINUTES, SIR.

5:54:46
Valerie AmezcuaItem 41

HOW LONG DO I HAVE? YOU HAVE FIVE MINUTES, SIR. FIVE MINUTES.

5:54:58
UnidentifiedItem 41

ALL RIGHT. SEE IF I CAN GET IT DONE ALL IN FIVE MINUTES. ROB MITCHELL, GREEN LAW PARTNERS, APPLICANT, THANKS FOR YOUR TIME THIS EVENING. THANKS, STAFF, ALSO, FOR THE FANTASTIC JOB THAT THEY DID. Congratulations, Mayor, for the first woman mayor. Fantastic. I wanted to talk a little bit this evening about the project itself. I believe after Min's report, it speaks for itself on the merits of the project and what we're going to bring forward.

5:55:03
UnidentifiedItem 41

One of the things that we've been challenged to do in developing a project like this is to be able to make the neighbors happy. The neighbors are here this evening. And in doing so, as a developer, what we try to do is we come into a city and we do what the city wants to be able to develop. In this particular instance, with the general plan, we came in and followed the guidelines of exactly what the city wanted to see for that area. In doing so, we came in to be able to build a logistics facility. and after meeting with men and finding out what kind of tenant that the city

5:55:32
UnidentifiedItem 41

want to seize we've secured a tenant for the building we signed a lease and we have a tenant that wants to move in that's gonna be able to supply potentially hundreds of jobs for the city of Santa Ana and in signing this lease I'm on a timeline to be able to deliver a building and to be able to deliver a building I need to be able to get started and then going through the approvals of this project it goes back all the way to when we started in September when we came to try to do the Planning Commission to get forward in front of everybody and the Commission continued the meeting because of all the

5:56:10
UnidentifiedItem 41

concerns that the neighbors had and in doing so I've met every single concern that the neighbors have I've go above and beyond what any developer would do to be able to satisfy their concerns I'm putting in the gates putting in where the truck's direction is going to be i mean i've gone forward to have a settlement agreement with them offering them thousands of dollars each for each one of the units to be done for a total of 168 000 i've gone even further and after i speak who's going to get up here and speak tonight which is their consultants and their attorney i'm paying for i'm putting it for their consultants

5:56:47
UnidentifiedItem 41

attorneys that's not true as part of the settlement agreement i'm paying up to 50 000 for their services settlement agreement is which i thought was agreed to is ready to be signed all the documentation has been done and they've had the documentation for months now to be able to review and it keeps getting tweaked to go back and forth i'm in a position as a developer to try to deliver for the city of santa anna to bring forth a tenant i've done everything i said i'm going to do i'm a prominent owner of property in santa anna itself i mean my reputation speaks for itself i mean

5:57:22
UnidentifiedItem 41

kirsteen i go back from her all the way to the anaheim days i've done multiple ddas with cities i'm closing on a large property with the city of san with city of anaheim this next week and i want to bring forward this project and build something the city of santayana i've done everything i said i'm going to do i'm following all the rules and all the guidelines and this dispute that is going to be coming up here after is a private dispute it doesn't come into what the approval process is going to be for the city of santa anna to be able to get my

5:57:58
UnidentifiedItem 41

approvals tonight to move forward to be able to move on to my project and as min had mentioned i have to be able to finalize everything once it needs to be done before i can pull a birding a building permit the challenge i have is we continue to get postponed three times now i've tried to continue the council meeting to go on to try to get this resolved and the neighbors keep changing it they keep changing exactly but I've done everything I've come in if men could put back up on the on the screen where I put the two gates I mean I agree to do a negative easement there so they can go forward and be able to

5:58:30
UnidentifiedItem 41

enforce if something does happen I've been able to go forward with everything that they say that potentially is going to be a problem we change it and it's not a problem I don't know what else to do be able to go forward to be able hopefully to get your guys support so i can come forward to move forward with the project and to be able to bring a tenant in to supply jobs and i'm happy to answer any questions that you have about anything else that has to do with tonight but i need to get going i know the neighbors are going to get up here and say a bunch of other stuff and i'm happy to rebuttal everything that they're

5:59:07
UnidentifiedItem 41

going to say but we're ready to go paperwork is done we're ready to move forward and i i mean i'm at a standstill now of what i'm supposed to do to try to get this project approved in the city

5:59:39
Valerie AmezcuaItem 41

Thank you, you have an opportunity for a rebuttal. There are two appellants on this matter. First one is Molly Green on behalf of Supporters Alliance for Environmental Responsibility. Do you wish to speak? So you have five minutes.

5:59:49
Valerie AmezcuaItem 41

Molly Green.

6:00:09
Valerie AmezcuaItem 41

Second one is Melinda Luthan on behalf of Gary Plaza Office Park Association. Do you wish to speak? We have five minutes, ma'am.

6:00:14
UnidentifiedItem 41

Thank you for allowing me the opportunity to speak on behalf of my clients, Gary Plaza Office Park Association. One of the things that I'd like to start out with, with respect to what Mr. Mistral said,

6:00:32
UnidentifiedItem 41

the parties are attempting to negotiate the sale of an easement that my clients own, the members of my clients own, on the property that is subject to this discussion. By the way, with respect to staff, just really quickly, they seem to bounce back in the staff presentation between the appeal of the conditional use permit approval and the zoning change. And so I'm not sure whether you want us to address both at the same time, but I think that it does get confusing.

6:00:45
UnidentifiedItem 41

So I think I'd like to stick right now with the appeal of the conditional use permit approval, if that's all right. So with respect to the staff report, just really briefly, it would be nice if staff would be truthful in this presentation, but not today. One of the things that staff had stated was that the easement is a private matter. This isn't a private matter. These are two very unique pieces of property. They used to be one piece of property that got divided.

6:01:27
UnidentifiedItem 41

When they got divided, they had easements for utility purposes that are running across each other's properties that the city has not addressed or even looked at. with respect to an easement, the fact that if the easement is sold that my clients will still have access to the property, that doesn't mean anything. I have a hundred shoes in my closet but if you want to buy a pair of my shoes, of course I'll still have 99 pair of shoes in my closet but if I don't want to sell that one pair of shoes to you, I don't care how much you're gonna offer me, I don't want to sell it, I still own it.

6:02:04
UnidentifiedItem 41

Easements line grant, my clients have a deed on that piece of property. And so the city needs to recognize that it's not a private issue whatsoever. By the way, the municipal code that says the CP may not be issued until or unless a zoning change is approved, it's very clear, you've got the cart before the horse on this one. And we brought that up with the Planning Commission. The Planning Commission just kind of ignored it. City staff said, ah, yeah, that's the way we do it. We do it that way all the time. And just because staff has broken the law all the time before doesn't mean that the law doesn't exist

6:02:42
UnidentifiedItem 41

and doesn't mean that the council should say to staff, hey, listen, the Municipal Code specifically requires that you not grant or even allow for the Planning Commission, you know, presented to the Planning Commission for approval of any permit. I've stated which section that is in my comments to you today. I don't have it handy in my notes. With respect to the responses of this city, they state that the utility easements do not affect my client's property. That is absolutely incorrect. We don't know where those utilities are. They are running across both properties.

6:03:24
UnidentifiedItem 41

Those easements affect the utilities for both properties. My clients don't have to sell their ingress and egress easement. One of the other things that I wanted to briefly mention is the planning. Who is Mr. Rob Mitchell? We don't know who Rob Mitchell is, but I can tell you one thing for sure. Rob Mitchell is not the owner of the property. Greenlaw is not the owner of the property. So why is it that the city says, when we brought this up on our appeal, that Greenlaw and the owner of the property is called Gary Owners LLC.

6:04:03
UnidentifiedItem 41

And Greenlaw supposedly and Rob Mitchell supposedly are the applicants. But we've provided the city with evidence from the Secretary of State saying that Rob Mitchell has nothing to do with either one of these LLCs. The city does not have any authorization from the owner of the dirt, Gary Owners LLC, stating that Rob Mitchell or Greenlaw have any authority to get any type of permit. Guess what? If any one of you want to try to get a permit on my property, I'm going to tell you what. The city of Laguna Beach is not going to allow you to get a permit on my property. Why?

6:04:46
UnidentifiedItem 41

Because I own it and you don't. Rob Mitchell does not own that property. Who is he? We do not know. The public has the right to know. Thank you. Your time is up. The city should require knowing.

6:05:27
Valerie AmezcuaItem 41

Thank you, Ma'am. Your time is up. Thank you.

6:05:40
UnidentifiedItem 41

And I'd like the opportunity to talk a little bit of, not necessarily now, I understand that, but because of the fact that the city council.

6:05:42
Valerie AmezcuaItem 41

Your time is up. Ma'am, we need to respect the process. Thank you so very much. I really appreciate it.

6:05:49
Valerie AmezcuaItem 41

Any response by the applicant? You have three minutes.

6:05:55
UnidentifiedItem 41

Yes. To give a little lesson and maybe I'm surprised that Melinda doesn't know this, when you're developing you own properties, you own it under an entity. And in that entity, there's a managing partner of that entity that runs the property that be able to make sure the decisions on are we going to sell it, are we going to develop it, are we going to lease it. Every single property ownership has a managing partner in the operating agreement. and the managing partner of the operating agreement is green law partners so every property that we own it's in park 55 that we own here in santa ana we're the second biggest landlord in

6:06:03
UnidentifiedItem 41

orange county and every one of our properties owns an entity where we're the operating partner for investors that come in for green law partners that's the way any other developer or anybody else that owns properties how you run a property when you bring in investors you have an operating agreement that lays out what the duties of the operating agreement are and what everybody does and all the investments are silent partners so you can move forward with a business plan when you go forward to buy a property the business plan for this property was to buy it and ultimately develop it under with the guidelines of

6:06:37
UnidentifiedItem 41

what the city of the Santa Ana wanted and bring in a tent a tenant that's going to bring jobs in to the city of Santa Ana and that's exactly what we're doing under the guidelines of what we waited for the general plan to be adopted so we could move forward with the use that would be specifically designated for this area and that's exactly what we're doing.

6:07:07
Valerie AmezcuaItem 41

Thank you very much. At this time, any Council Members have comments or questions for staff? Let me start with Councilman Vasquez, please.

6:07:30
Benjamin VazquezItem 41

I just want staff to clarify, are we given a permit for the easement? Is there a permit that we're issuing to develop on the easement?

6:07:39
UnidentifiedItem 41

The request of entitlement are a zone change of the property from professional to M1 industrial to be consistent with the general plan. We would be also being asked to approve a conditional use permit to allow the establishment of the use of the building. In terms of the development of the building, that's something that the applicant has the ability to do. And the easement in question, as staff mentioned, are not related to utility, but rather they're related to access, ingress and egress, onto each other's property to be able to access to the public street.

6:07:50
UnidentifiedItem 41

The site has, both sites have adequate access, including the redesigned site. But regardless of that, that's a private matter that is negotiated between the two properties. The condition, as I mentioned, that the applicant has accepted and imposed by the Planning Commission is that no building permit would be issued until the applicant had resolved all of any private easement issue prior to construction on the site. So the answer at the final end of the process is no, we would not be issuing approval to bill on an easement.

6:08:30
Valerie AmezcuaItem 41

Do you have any other questions? Councilman Becerra, Penelosa, excuse me.

6:09:10
David PenalozaItem 41

No questions, Madam Mayor. Thank you.

6:09:16
Valerie AmezcuaItem 41

Thank you. Councilman Becerra?

6:09:18
Phil BacerraItem 41

Not at this time, thank you.

6:09:21
Valerie AmezcuaItem 41

Councilman Hernandez?

6:09:22
Phil BacerraItem 41

Not at this time, thank you.

6:09:24
Valerie AmezcuaItem 41

Thank you. At this time, there was no other questions or comments. I'm going to open up for the cards that I have for the comments.

6:09:25
Valerie AmezcuaItem 41

We have Melinda. You already spoke. Perfect. Okay. Jack Stephens. Thank you, Melinda. I appreciate it.

6:09:38
UnidentifiedItem 41

Good evening. My name is Jack Stephens. I own some of the adjacent offices. Let me explain quickly that the property that's being developed was originally an office building, and we at 1800, Gary, we are also adjacent office building, and we are remaining as an office building. And what's going to happen is that when they develop this as an industrial site, there will be a lot of traffic and there will be a lot of noise, and it will disturb us, and it will disturb all the occupants. we have 84 offices that will be affected. So this is not just one office.

6:09:54
UnidentifiedItem 41

Now I want to say quickly that we are in negotiation with Mr. Mitchell and we have in fact a proposed settlement that everybody is working on right now. And we're hoping that in fact we can settle this issue between us. But I don't want to see you go ahead and make a ruling tonight because I'd like to in peace make a settlement with Mr. Mitchell and he seems to be a reasonable person and I'm afraid that if you proceed and make a ruling and it may raise issues between us that make it

6:10:33
UnidentifiedItem 41

make it more difficult for us to reach an amicable settlement in fact if you were to go ahead and make the approval we probably will go ahead with seeking legal redress and that will drive a wedge between us and make it less likely for us to make a settlement and I think that if you could just postpone a decision until your next meeting that we and the neighbor can reach an amicable solution that will satisfy everyone now for the purpose of just in case we do have to make take some action let me refer let me remind you that this

6:11:13
UnidentifiedItem 41

project will generate an awful lot of traffic with large trucks that will result in noise pollution and air pollution and this will disturb us greatly it will also disturb there was a school in our in our building and it will disturb the children and affect their their ability to to live frankly and I also want to remind you that that no environmental report has been actually published for this project and I object to that and I also want to bring up that there are drainage issues water right now was draining from their

6:11:50
UnidentifiedItem 41

lot onto our lot and drainage issues have to be addressed and there are power issues because there are transformers both on their site and on our site and it's possible that some of the power that comes from their transformer is feeding our building, and these issues have to be settled. Now, I do believe that, again, that we can work this out amicably, and I'm just asking for you to postpone making a decision. I'm not asking for you to decide in our favor or in the other people's favor.

6:12:28
UnidentifiedItem 41

Just give us a little more time to complete the negotiations, and right now, as I say, we do have in writing a proposed settlement. I do object to some of the words, but I think that we can reach an agreement if you would just be so kind as to postpone your decision.

6:13:06
UnidentifiedItem 41

That's all I have to say.

6:13:25
Valerie AmezcuaItem 41

Thank you, Mr. Stevens. Michael Brion. I apologize if I .

6:13:26
Valerie AmezcuaItem 41

Brion, I believe it is.

6:13:35
UnidentifiedItem 41

Well, that's pretty close.

6:13:37
Valerie AmezcuaItem 41

How do you say it?

6:13:39
UnidentifiedItem 41

Michael Breon, My name is Michael Breon.

6:13:40
Valerie AmezcuaItem 41

Breon, thank you.

6:13:42
UnidentifiedItem 41

Michael Breon, Yes, very good. I'm a consultant that the association has brought on board to oversee the development of the property that's adjacent to them.

6:13:44
UnidentifiedItem 41

And my experience goes back to being a development manager like Robin Mitchell. I've handled quite large projects in either in the county of Riverside or in Henderson, Nevada, and a series of projects.

6:13:57
UnidentifiedItem 41

The one question about who is Rob Mitchell, you know, he is a development manager, and And generally, a city will require a power of attorney for him signing documents. And right now, we feel as though that entity, which is Green Law Partners, is the entity that is making an application, if you will. And we don't feel as though that there's a power of attorney that's been addressed, because the applicant's paperwork doesn't really coincide with Gary owners is the LLC.

6:14:22
UnidentifiedItem 41

But if there's a power of attorney, we could probably understand why the applicant is identified as Robin Mitchell, which is Green Law Partners. You know, I really wanted to speak to these easements.

6:15:02
UnidentifiedItem 41

The, I was brought on board in May, and these easements have been discussed at great length. And the documents that continue to be provided are inaccurate. They are not detailed enough to what the actual conditions are that we are looking for, how the easement documents do not correctly, you know, coincide with the scope of work that needs to be done. such as we're being asked to give a quick claim to them on documents or drainage

6:15:21
UnidentifiedItem 41

when we still are retaining the use of those. You know, I have sent you comments, and I would invite you to look at all those comments. Those comments are brief to the struggles that we've been having with the client, the developer to bring us accurate information so that we can review it and understand where they're going. We have concerns that if you pass the, this, give approval on this, that we are going to continue to struggle

6:16:02
UnidentifiedItem 41

getting accurate information, whether it's a letter of agreement, a settlement agreement.

6:16:42
Norma OrozcoItem 41

Thank you, speaker, your time is up.

6:16:48
UnidentifiedItem 41

Thank you very much for your time. I'm available for any questions.

6:16:49
Valerie AmezcuaItem 41

William Stevens.

6:16:54
UnidentifiedItem 41

Good evening, Mayor, Council members. Thank you for your service to the community. My name is William Stevens. I'm speaking tonight as a member of the Gary Plaza Association because I was denied that right to speak in front of the Planning Commission. I did speak as the president of the association at that time.

6:17:06
UnidentifiedItem 41

In the words of Michaela, it's not pleasant to live or work across from an industrial building. We're concerned about noise, vibrations of trucks idling. She described it as a tornado in her house. Min Tai mentioned that this project is not unique, but that's not true. The staff has acknowledged that there is no other project in all of Santa Ana where you have an industrial distribution center located directly adjacent to a professional office building. Mr. Mitchell, who's not a managing member of Green Law, according to Secretary of State, says they're going to bring hundreds of jobs.

6:17:27
UnidentifiedItem 41

But in order to bring those hundreds of jobs, they're going to have to evict 126 businesses, each of which employ multiple people.

6:18:07
UnidentifiedItem 41

The environmental checklist exemption, frankly, looks like garbage to me. They just checked off that there's no impact. Of course there's going to be an impact when you have semi-trucks. Their original plan had the trucks about 30 feet in front of my office entrance. Okay, they moved it. Good. I'm glad that they moved it. It has been pulling teeth trying to get some restrictions on where the trucks go to keep them away from the professional offices. The conditions of use issued by the Planning Commission talks about no trucks in or storage in the buffer zone easement that we want to create.

6:18:19
UnidentifiedItem 41

But Greenlaw proposed a restrictive covenant, not a restrictive easement. We need time to go through the detailed language of the documents because we don't want a fast one pulled over us. When we do quit claim the easement, we're not going to have any more recourse. We want to make sure we get this right. We ask that the council postpone the approval of anything until the parties can agree. I gave a handout that shows the gray area crisscrossing their property. 40% of their property, the builder cannot construct a building which restricts my access. It's not just ingress and egress. They say, oh, we'll give you a little driveway.

6:18:59
UnidentifiedItem 41

That is not my right. The gray area on the diagram I provided shows I got 40% and the other members of the association, if they want to buy out our easement, that's fine. We're willing to be reasonable. We want to create a buffer zone. They keep shrinking the buffer zone. We say, well, we want to have it over here. and now the conditions of use by the Planning Commission are actually different than the conditions of use before the City Council now so things got changed and we didn't get notified your time is up thank you we do have a

6:19:40
Norma OrozcoItem 41

a speaker on Zoom. Okay.

6:20:15
UnidentifiedItem 41

Caller who's...

6:20:23
Norma OrozcoItem 41

Caller Zoom ID, Victoria, please unmute from your device. You have three minutes to speak.

6:20:30
UnidentifiedItem 41

Good evening, my name is Victoria Yun. I'm an attorney at Lizzo Drury, speaking on behalf of Appellant Supporters Alliance for environmental responsibility are safer. Saber is appealing the approval of the project by the planning commission and requests that the city council remand the project application back to staff to prepare and circulate an appropriate CEQA document for public review and comment. The city has prepared streamlined review for the project pursuant to CEQA section 15183, which applies to certain projects consistent with a community plan or zoning. The city states that the project is consistent

6:20:38
UnidentifiedItem 41

with the program EIR prepared for the city's 2022 general plan update amendment and has prepared an environmental analysis to support its findings. However, as I'll discuss in the time I have left, the project does not meet the requirements of section 15183 review and the city must prepare either a negative declaration for less than significant impacts or a supplemental EIR to adequately assess the project's potentially significant air quality, health risk, and greenhouse gas impacts. First, the project may have a potentially significant health risk impact as a result of the project's diesel particulate emissions.

6:21:08
UnidentifiedItem 41

The project's potentially significant health risk impact as a result of the project's emissions of diesel particulate matter or DPM were previously discussed as significant and unavoidable impacts in the prior general plan program EIR and as such they must be analyzed in a negative declaration or since they're significant in a supplemental EIR. In support of section 15183 review the city's environmental analysis claims that the project is not required to submit a health risk assessment because mitigation measure AQ-3 included in the program EIR is not applicable to the project.

6:21:46
UnidentifiedItem 41

However, regardless of the city's claims, the California DOJ recommends that all warehouse projects prepare a quantitative HRA pursuant to the Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment. SAFER's expert prepared a screening level HRA and found that the project's DPM emissions would result in cancer risk to nearby infants, children, adults, and the project's lifetime residents that would exceed air district thresholds. Because this increased cancer risk is peculiar to the project and is a significant impact, a negative declaration or EIR is required.

6:22:21
UnidentifiedItem 41

Second, the project will result in significant greenhouse gas impacts. The project's GHG impacts were not discussed as significant impacts in the program EIR. Therefore, they must be analyzed in a negative declaration or an EIR if they're significant. SAVER's expert analyzed the project's potential GHG emissions and found that the environmental analysis and program EIR failed to adequately analyze the project's GHG impacts. First, the city's GHG analysis and subsequent less than significant impact conclusion are based on an outdated quantitative analysis threshold. Because it is currently December, 2022,

6:22:56
UnidentifiedItem 41

thresholds for 2020 are not applicable to the proposed project and should be revised to reflect the current GHG reduction target. Saber's expert prepared an updated GHG analysis.

6:23:33
Norma OrozcoItem 41

Thank you, speaker, your time is up.

6:23:43
Valerie AmezcuaItem 41

Thank you, she's got three minutes. Are there any other speakers at this time? That was the last speaker.

6:23:47
Phil BacerraItem 41

Before you close the public hearing, I'd like to ask one question. Not from you. Sir, so there's been questions about, or requests it sounds like about continuing the item. Is that something that you'd be interested in doing at this time? Okay, that's all I have, thank you.

6:23:56
Valerie AmezcuaItem 41

Any other council members have questions?

6:24:16
Valerie AmezcuaItem 41

I'm sorry, sir, your time's already been held. Thank you.

6:24:24
Valerie AmezcuaItem 41

There's no question by the council members, this public hearing is now closed.

6:24:28
Phil BacerraItem 41

Madam Mayor, I've heard plenty of things and it's interesting some of the things being said about regards to sequencing of entitlements and whatnot. I think that this use makes sense given its proximity to the freeway. One thing that I wanted to ask staff about is in regards to the elevation along the 55 freeway. I would like to see something a little more, I don't know, something that a little more artistic, something like what you see over at the Baker Block in Costa Mesa when you're coming up the 55, just south of the 405.

6:24:37
Phil BacerraItem 41

So what I'd like to ask if it's possible, excuse me, to condition this project, should my colleagues support staff's recommended action, to actually include a condition to incorporate public art. and I would ask staff to use similar circumstances that they've incorporated a public art requirement in the past, but my specific ask would be that this specific artwork is very emblematic of Santa Ana, that celebrates Santa Ana, not just something that's artistic generically, but something that is, as you're coming up to 55, it's something that, like you see the water tower,

6:25:14
Phil BacerraItem 41

like you see other things, it will become iconic, something that's very attractive. That would be my only caveat as far as this particular project. I think that staff, the work that you've done with the applicant as far as the additional conditions, landscaping, all these other items, obviously you've done a lot of work with them. And just to move things along, I will go ahead and make a motion to place the ordinance approving amendment application number 2022-01 on first reading and then adopt the resolution denying the

6:25:55
Phil BacerraItem 41

appeal applications numbers 2022-01 and 2022-02 and upholding the determination of the planning commission to approve CUP number 2022-14 as conditioned with the addition of the public art

6:26:32
Valerie AmezcuaItem 41

condition. I'll second. There are no other comments. I do like the art issue and we can get some kids from Santa Ana or Santa Unified, the VAPA program that we have to put some art on there, that would be great. So if you can let us know about that. Let's prepare to vote if there are no other questions or comments.

6:26:48
Johnathan Ryan HernandezItem 41

Yes.

6:27:11
Valerie AmezcuaItem 41

I'm sorry, I apologize.

6:27:12
Johnathan Ryan HernandezItem 41

No worries. Councilmember Becerra, would you be inclined to include an environmental study with your motion?

6:27:13
Phil BacerraItem 41

I would be okay. The only problem is I feel like when staff evaluates the project, they have to do that at the very beginning. And from everything I've read, it sounds like staff has satisfied all of that. So I don't know that there's anything additional that we can do at this point. Staff, I mean, based on everything that's in here, they've satisfied the environmental requirements at this time.

6:27:21
UnidentifiedItem 41

That's correct. Okay.

6:27:42
Phil BacerraItem 41

I like your idea. I think that staff's done that.

6:27:44
Johnathan Ryan HernandezItem 41

Director Tai, that has already been completed. There has been an environmental study. There's been an assessment as to potential risk factors.

6:27:47
UnidentifiedItem 41

The project required to complete its CEQA checklist analysis based on the CEQA requirements for evaluating the impact of the projects. The initial study was completed for the project, and the inclusion of that study is in Exhibit 10 of your staff report. It shows that the project is consistent with the environmental impacts that were analyzed by the general plan EIR and therefore qualifies for the exemption under 15.183.

6:27:56
Phil BacerraItem 41

And, Director Tai, if I may, so in analyzing that and the general plan update, that environmental assessment, that was also done because that area was one of our five focus areas. So this wasn't just an overall assessment. there were five areas that staff's environmental drilled down on, and this was one of those areas, correct? That is correct. Okay, thank you.

6:28:30
UnidentifiedItem 41

I'm hearing close.

6:28:52
Valerie AmezcuaItem 41

Got a second.

6:28:55
UnidentifiedItem 41

Prepare to vote.

6:28:56
Valerie AmezcuaItem 41

Mine is not working.

6:29:13
Norma OrozcoItem 41

Would you voice your vote? We can add it here.

6:29:15
Valerie AmezcuaItem 41

Yes. There you go. Perfect. Thank you.

6:29:18
Norma OrozcoItem 41

Council Member Pena Loza, yours is not showing.

6:29:24
David PenalozaItem 41

It's green on my end, but it's a yes.

6:29:27
Norma OrozcoItem 41

So is that a 6? Motion passes for.

6:29:34
Johnathan Ryan HernandezItem 41

Mine was a yes.

6:29:38
Phil BacerraItem 41

Madam City Attorney, if you're stepping out of the chambers, don't our rules require that your vote counts as a yes?

6:29:42
Sonia R. CarvalhoItem 41

No, only if you're abstaining, if you have a real conflict.

6:29:53
Phil BacerraItem 41

Okay. Okay.

6:29:57
Norma OrozcoItem 41

Motion passes five zero with Mayor Potem Lopez absent and five zero and with council member fan recused.

6:29:59
Valerie AmezcuaItem 41

Okay, perfect. We're good.

6:30:16
Valerie AmezcuaItem 41

Before hearing the public item, public hearing item 42, Madam Kirk, please provide instructions to the public who would like to make a comment on this item only.

6:30:23
Valerie AmezcuaItem 42

Are there any comments for item 42?

6:30:50
Norma OrozcoItem 42

Would you like to entertain the staff presentation if there is one?

6:30:56
Valerie AmezcuaItem 42

I'm sorry. It's really hard to understand.

6:31:00
Norma OrozcoItem 42

Sorry. Would you like the staff presentation if there is one?

6:31:03
Valerie AmezcuaItem 42

Would you like a presentation, ladies and gentlemen, up here on the dais? Otherwise, we're ready to move forward. We're ready to move forward. Thank you, Councilman Hernandez. Is there a motion?

6:31:07
Johnathan Ryan HernandezItem 42

We'll move the item.

6:31:18
Valerie AmezcuaItem 42

You want the presentation? You're going to move it.

6:31:19
Johnathan Ryan HernandezItem 42

I'm ready to move the item. I'll second.

6:31:21
Valerie AmezcuaItem 42

Great.

6:31:24
Johnathan Ryan HernandezItem 42

I'm so sorry. You know what? I see that we're on item 42. That's correct. I have not seen that presentation, so that would be great. Do you want to go back?

6:31:27
Valerie AmezcuaItem 42

No take backs. No take backs. All right. Let's do the presentation.

6:31:35
Kristine RidgeItem 42

Your mic. I don't think your mic is on. I'm sorry. Executive Mike Garcia will do the presentation on this one and the following one, which is the similar item. It's a Tax Equity and Financial Responsibility Act hearing for a developer to issue tax exempt debt.

6:31:43
Valerie AmezcuaItem 42

All right, Mike, let's do it.

6:31:59
UnidentifiedItem 42

Thank you, Mayor, City Council. The item before you tonight is to have the City Council serve as a TEFRA hearing agent, essentially. The city will have no financial responsibility for these bonds, any indebtedness of the city. This will basically allow the developer to use tax-exempt bonds and work with the California Municipal Finance Authority to issue tax-exempt bonds. The developer would like to move forward by the end of this year so that they can convert to permanent financing. Otherwise, they might be in a situation where their lender would be within their rights to foreclose.

6:32:02
UnidentifiedItem 42

So the action before the City Council tonight is to conduct the TEFRA hearing, a tax equity and fiscal responsibility act hearing, and approve a resolution for allowing for the issuance of bonds by the California Municipal Finance Authority in the amount of $123 million. These are for the first point apartments that are on the eastern side in this presentation. Sorry that the colors did not come out properly.

6:32:41
UnidentifiedItem 42

Metro Point, this is in the Metro Point East neighborhood, the specific plan area, the first point one. And you're going to see first point two coming up in the next public hearing item.

6:33:16
UnidentifiedItem 42

Again, we are seeking an approval of the resolution that would allow the developer to work with CMFA for the issuance of tax-exempt bonds on the affordable housing development that has 346 units with Jamboree Housing. And Michael Massey from Pacific Companies may be in the crowd still, I believe. This project provides affordability and it's already built. This financing would allow them to convert to permanent financing and take out additional funds if necessary for improvements.

6:33:31
Johnathan Ryan HernandezItem 42

I'll move the item.

6:34:09
Valerie AmezcuaItem 42

I will. Is there a second?

6:34:11
Johnathan Ryan HernandezItem 42

I'll second.

6:34:13
Valerie AmezcuaItem 42

I have a couple questions only before we vote. So these are the apartments that are close to the Tustin and First Street, correct?

6:34:14
UnidentifiedItem 42

That's correct.

6:34:23
Valerie AmezcuaItem 42

So in between, if you go back to your PowerPoint where you're showing both of them, it's slide three, please.

6:34:23
UnidentifiedItem 42

I've got to share it again.

6:34:34
Valerie AmezcuaItem 42

Oh, no. Sorry.

6:34:37
Valerie AmezcuaItem 42

Want me to hold it up for you?

6:34:41
Benjamin VazquezItem 42

There we go.

6:34:42
Valerie AmezcuaItem 42

Slide three. There you go. So can you tell me what's in between those two apartments? I know what's in between them, but I'd like you to tell the public what's in between those two buildings, those two apartment complexes.

6:34:44
UnidentifiedItem 42

I know that the developer is looking at an additional project on the site and will be going and working with planning commission staff, but I don't know specifically what's there.

6:34:57
Valerie AmezcuaItem 42

So I'm talking in between the two apartments. So one over here, the closest to Tustin Avenue, is a senior apartment. And the one that you're talking about to my left. But in the middle is a youth drug program. And I believe there's also a methadone clinic in there. So I had already met with the city manager about lighting in that area because the seniors have been accosted as they're parking two blocks away, paying $150 a month to park because there's not enough parking stalls where they live. There's not even enough handicapped stalls where they live.

6:35:09
Valerie AmezcuaItem 42

I'm not sure how that went through. But my question is, how many parking spots do you have? How many handicapped parking spots do you have there? And are you going to eliminate the street a little bit? because then when you cross over from there, it's Avila's, and then there's some motels there, and there's some, there's quite a bit of things that go on in that area. And so, in my opinion, it tends to not be safe in the evenings. And we have many seniors that live in that apartment complex that actually are employed.

6:35:50
Valerie AmezcuaItem 42

And so they get home at different hours of the night and day, and they walk. So at night when they're walking back, they can't park at the restaurant next to their apartment complex. And I've met with them now a few times because the owner of that, I believe you guys are working on that or working on with the city of Tustin to get a crosswalk there with lights. But I'm very concerned about the safety. And maybe that's a conversation you have with Jamboree about how many parking stalls are they each going to get. And is there going to be senior apartments as well in there?

6:36:31
Valerie AmezcuaItem 42

Or just apartments for families and single, one bedroom, two bedroom, three, whatnot?

6:37:08
UnidentifiedItem 42

For the future project, they are looking at senior as well.

6:37:14
Valerie AmezcuaItem 42

So can you make a note? Because one of the things that the seniors said many times to me when I was meeting with them and I was just there the other day is that the developer is putting bathtubs instead of walk-in showers. and so they cannot get in and out safely. But my biggest concern with this project is the lighting and the safety down that street. If you go down there, especially at night, for those of us that live in the city, and we drive down First Street at night, it is very dark, and the lights are very dim. I would not be walking down that street.

6:37:18
Valerie AmezcuaItem 42

And so it's sad that we have senior apartment where they have to park and pay an additional $150 to park somewhere else because there's not enough parking where they live. And then with this new one right here in front of us, are they going to have enough parking? Or is it now going to be other apartment people paying $100? somebody's making a lot of money because they're charging residents $150 a month to park. So I'm not asking you for an answer today, and I'll meet the city manager, and I know we're going to be meeting, I'll be meeting with the department heads

6:37:54
Valerie AmezcuaItem 42

because I'm new here, but it's very concerning to me because people are in fixed incomes. And so, again, right in between those two departments that you're showing is a drug program, methadone clinic, and so I believe it's a methadone clinic, I know it's a drug program. So if we could talk about that at a later date, that is my concern. The parking, the fact that people have to pay for parking, and not enough handicapped stalls, how many spots are you going to get for one bedroom? Okay, one spot, right? For a, I think it says in here, four bedrooms?

6:38:35
UnidentifiedItem 42

Let me see.

6:39:14
Valerie AmezcuaItem 42

I don't want to misspeak. Four bedrooms. How many, you know, parking spots, right? So, and I'm not asking for four of them. I'm just saying. So, it's just something I want to talk about later. So, Jonathan, Councilman Hernandez to make a motion. If anybody else has some comments.

6:39:16
Thai Viet PhanItem 42

I actually have a clarification question, and this is my fault. When reviewing the resolutions, I didn't see anything mentioned. It says that the developer is Santa Ana Pacific Associates LP, and this is First Point Apartments 1 involving PacWest Communities, Inc. How is Jamboree involved?

6:39:36
UnidentifiedItem 42

They are actually managing and on-site and overseeing the affordable housing.

6:39:56
Thai Viet PhanItem 42

Got it. So I apologize. This was not in the reso, but Jamboree, I do have to recuse myself from this item because Jamboree is a client of my employer. So I was like, oh, I don't see this, and so I want to make sure I'm not... You're like, stop! Yeah.

6:40:03
Thai Viet PhanItem 42

And so I will leave the dais and move on. I'm going to try that out. I'm going to try the next meeting. I'm going to leave the dais.

6:40:20
Valerie AmezcuaItem 42

I'm kidding with you. I'm joking with you. All right. Are there any other comments on Councilman Penelope?

6:40:27
Valerie AmezcuaItem 42

Your speaker's on. Yes.

6:40:36
David PenalozaItem 42

All right, for a minute I'm the mayor now. Just kidding. Thank you, Mayor Mesquah. And just to add some kind of context and history to that parking question, I remember when this project came before us for approval back in 2019, that was a huge conversation that we had. I'm sure City Attorney and City Manager and Min Tai, Executive Director Tai, remembers. We had a lot of reservations up here about the lack of parking that was going to come with this affordable housing complex.

6:40:45
David PenalozaItem 42

And the idea is that because people are going to live in these affordable apartments, they don't have cars, which is not true. I mean, there's a lot of people that have many cars. And we knew from day one that this was going to cause a parking issue and safety concerns with the residents that would eventually live here. I believe that the variance approval was half a parking spot per unit, which is, I mean, awful because there are three and four bedroom units. And I would like staff, if you could, go back to watch those meetings and those hearings

6:41:21
David PenalozaItem 42

of when that this project was approved because the developer at the time agreed to having off-site parking and they made arrangements with the with the complexes across the street the business complexes and they even promised from this dais that they were going to provide free shuttle service to all the residents that live there they had to park whether it was a block two three blocks away and we brought up all the safety concerns on First Street so I want to make sure that we go back and look at what was promised by the

6:41:59
David PenalozaItem 42

developer as a condition of the approval because I know that that was a huge concern and they agreed to having parking lots for with res where residents would be able to park and provide shuttle service as part of the you know I guess the services and amenities at this parking complex. So I know this isn't really about the parking issue, but just so that we...

6:42:37
Kristine RidgeItem 42

Certainly, Council Member, and I do recall exactly what you are stating. We can make... Certainly, Council Member, I do recall exactly what you were stating upon the approval of that. However, this item before you is just the TEFRA hearing. That's for your consideration.

6:43:07
David PenalozaItem 42

Right. But I know the mayor brought it up, and if that is a legit safety concern, from what I hear some of the residents have brought up, that's something that we should look at. Thank you.

6:43:22
Valerie AmezcuaItem 42

No other comments?

6:43:37
Jessie LopezItem 42

Mayor Procham? Thank you. Thank you for that clarification. I was a little, and I was outside of the room when the conversation started, so I was not

6:43:40
Jessie LopezItem 42

clear how the conversation went from Tephra to parking, but I think it was just like a side comment that was made. Council Member Hernandez, can you repeat your motion, please?

6:43:50
Johnathan Ryan HernandezItem 42

Yeah, absolutely. So my motion was to move the item.

6:44:01
Valerie AmezcuaItem 42

Okay, thank you.

6:44:06
Valerie AmezcuaItem 42

Okay, is there a second?

6:44:11
David PenalozaItem 42

I think I have a second.

6:44:14
Valerie AmezcuaItem 42

All right.

6:44:15
Valerie AmezcuaItem 42

Ready to vote? No comments?

6:44:18
Valerie AmezcuaItem 42

And you will come back with a report.

6:44:25
Norma OrozcoItem 42

Motion passes 5-1 with, who's absent? Councilmember Becerra absent and Councilmember Phan recused.

6:44:45
Valerie AmezcuaItem 42

Okay, perfect. Public hearing is now closed. We will go to item number 43. Madam Clerk, please provide instructions to the public.

6:44:59
Norma OrozcoItem 43

Members of the public joining by way of Zoom or conference call and would like to make comment for only item, public hearing item 43, please dial star 9 from your phone or select raise hand from Zoom now.

6:45:09
Norma OrozcoItem 43

There are no speakers.

6:45:24
Valerie AmezcuaItem 43

No comments? No comments. Is there a motion? Any comments by the council?

6:45:26
David PenalozaItem 43

Prepare to vote? I don't have any comments, but I'll make a motion to approve.

6:45:35
Valerie AmezcuaItem 43

I'll second.

6:45:40
UnidentifiedItem 43

Thank you.

6:45:53
Norma OrozcoItem 43

Motion passes. A 4-0 with Councilmembers Hernandez, Fran, Hernandez and Becerra absent. and Councilmember Vance Recusal.

6:46:02
Valerie AmezcuaItem 43

Perfect. Before hearing item public 44, Madam Clerk, anybody here to make public comments?

6:46:15
Norma OrozcoItem 44

Yes, we have one.

6:46:28
Norma OrozcoItem 44

Yes, there is.

6:46:32
Kristine RidgeItem 44

Hold on. Sorry. Where is my...

6:46:33
Kristine RidgeItem 44

Victor wanted to speak.

6:46:39
Valerie AmezcuaItem 44

And if there isn't, then we'll ask for presentation.

6:46:45
Norma OrozcoItem 44

Members of the public joining by way of Zoom or conference call, if you would like to make a comment only on item, public hearing item number 44, please dial star nine from your phone or select raise hand from Zoom now.

6:46:48
Norma OrozcoItem 44

We have one speaker.

6:47:11
Norma OrozcoItem 44

Caller whose phone number ends with numbers 4010. Please select star six from your phone and you have three minutes to speak. Thank you.

6:47:17
UnidentifiedItem 44

Oh, hi, can you hear me okay?

6:47:30
Norma OrozcoItem 44

Yes, we can hear you.

6:47:32
UnidentifiedItem 44

Okay, great. I'll begin now. Yeah, Victor Mendez, Ward 3. And on item 44, I'll just be very brief, because I know there's a lot to cover. But, you know, this item is about 77 pages long. And, you know, I found it ironic that you have a presentation on improving transparency in labor negotiations. and this item was buried as the last item of the last item for the year for the calendar year um with it was vaguely worded at the title of so it just kind of like it's not very transparent

6:47:35
UnidentifiedItem 44

putting aside all that and some of the um emotion if i will my i may behind this matter and i know there's a lot of issue on it on both sides of it it really should be deferred i mean I think the public across the board really should be provided the opportunity to weigh in on this, no matter how they feel about it, how they feel about the POA, et cetera. I think it's just blatantly unfair to kind of do this at a 10 o'clock before, you know, the Christmas holiday and not give everyone an opportunity to understand what the issue is and just to convey with it and let the council make a decision. And again,

6:48:14
UnidentifiedItem 44

it's just ironic for me and kind of stunning that you're talking about transparency and labor negotiations you know you're talking about a democratic process small d yet this item is just kind of like you know kind of like being gained if you will that towards some type of you know hitting an agenda and it doesn't quite go over well you know whatever happens with tonight happens um we'll just have to go forward but i just think you owe it to the public just to kind of have this air it openly, fairly, and correctly, and do it the right way, rather than try to put this vague

6:48:54
UnidentifiedItem 44

inoxidant agenda out at 10 o'clock at night when no one's listening, and let everyone know how you feel, and that's okay, and we can go from there. Anyway, I look forward to hearing how this goes, and thank you for your time, and thank you for all your work this year, and most of all, all the work you did tonight. Thank you.

6:49:32
Norma OrozcoItem 44

That was the only speaker, Madam Mayor.

6:49:53
Valerie AmezcuaItem 44

Thank you. Staff, is there a presentation or does anybody have any questions? Do you need a presentation?

6:49:56
Benjamin VazquezItem 44

I'd like to see the presentation, please.

6:50:04
Kristine RidgeItem 44

Yes, we do have a presentation. Executive Director of Human Resources, Jason Motzik.

6:50:07
UnidentifiedItem 44

This item is regarding the implementation of the city's last lesson, offer dated September 8th.

6:50:26
Valerie AmezcuaItem 44

Your mic's not on.

6:50:32
UnidentifiedItem 44

Thank you.

6:50:33
UnidentifiedItem 44

and once again good evening mayor city council this item before you is regarding the implementation of the city's last best and final offer dated september 8 2022 in regards to labor negotiations with the santa hana police officers association memorandum of understanding or in short mou between the city and the POA expired on December 31st 2021 through the course of the last year the parties have negotiated did negotiate through September 2022 and during that time the parties met 12 times that exchanged approximately 13

6:51:11
UnidentifiedItem 44

proposals the POA's initial proposal was estimated cost of approximately 23.1 million dollars to the city it included wage increase it was a one-year term with approximately 6.9% wage increases during that term along with other economic items. During the course of labor negotiations the POA did engage in regressive bargaining twice and the first time was on May 10th 2022. The city did provide them courtesy notice that they did engage in regressive bargaining and POA did remedy that proposal.

6:51:48
UnidentifiedItem 44

Subsequently, the POA once again engaged in regressive bargaining on August 3, 2022, and the city subsequently filed the unfair labor practice with PERB for the regressive bargaining and dilatory tactics. To date, that city's unfair labor practice charge is still pending with PERB. On August 24th, 2022, the POA declared impasse and requested parties participate in mediation. The POA's final proposal was an estimated cost to the city of approximately nine, slightly over $9 million. The city issued its last best and final offer to the POA on September 8th,

6:52:29
UnidentifiedItem 44

2022. After declaring impasse and requesting mediation, the parties selected a mediator and scheduled a future mediation date. That mediation was scheduled for October 18, 2022. The day prior on October 17, the POA canceled that mediation session with no reason provided. However, the mediation was subsequently rescheduled for December 5th, and the parties did participate in that mediation. However, we were unable to reach an agreement. process. Pursuant to per regulation Myers-Milius Brown Act the POA had from

6:53:11
UnidentifiedItem 44

October 12th 2022 to October 27th to submit the differences to a fact-finding panel. The POA did not make such a request during the eligible time period and as a result the POA waived the right to fact-finding. Since the POA waived did not request fact-finding and we were unable to reach an agreement through the mediation process this is simply the next step in the process is to bring for the city's last best and final offer for council to implement so approval of this item tonight will result in the invitation of the terms conditions of the city's last best and final offer made on September 8th 2022

6:53:50
UnidentifiedItem 44

the major provisions of the LBF or last best and final include is a one-year term So it's from January 1st, 2022 to December 31st, 2022. Includes a salary increase of 3% effective the first period following City Council approval of the LBF. It includes terms that the City would take over administration, the medical, dental, and long-term disability insurance benefits for active employees effective January 1st, 2024. There's updates to the discipline and grievance process language. It requires bilingual recertifications every three years for employees who receive the bilingual pay.

6:54:30
UnidentifiedItem 44

There's modifications to the sick leave accruals in respects to what can be converted to service credit and also for employees hired or appointed into the unit after approval of this last, best, and final. It also includes elimination of the full-time release of the POA president, and subsequently as a result of elimination of the POA president release time, it returns one floating holiday back to the POA represented employees. In lieu of the president release time, there's an addition of association leave bank of 1,040 hours, which is approximately a half a year, 50% release time.

6:55:10
UnidentifiedItem 44

and that would be funded through the deduction of two vacation hours per POA represented employee per calendar year. So it's at the beginning of the year the city would deduct two vacation hours from every POA represented employee and that would fund the 1,040 hours for the release time. That 1,040 hour release time is essentially a union bank. It is a union bank so the union can decide how to use that 1,040 hours. They can use it to completely present at release time. It could be used for union business, board meetings, however they determine to use that 1,040 hours.

6:55:53
UnidentifiedItem 44

And at this point, that concludes my presentation and I'm available for questions.

6:56:32
Valerie AmezcuaItem 44

Thank you. Let me start to my right, Councilman Hernandez.

6:56:39
Johnathan Ryan HernandezItem 44

Thank you, Mayor Mesquah. Well, I've been a member of this council for the past two years. And over the last two years, we have negotiated in good faith with all of our bargaining units. I'm very disheartened that this is a conversation that is happening publicly today. But I also have to be transparent that the City of Santa Ana has, in good faith, done everything that they could to establish an agreement for the Santa Ana Police Officers Association. Many of those conversations that happened in closed session, unfortunately, there was

6:56:45
Johnathan Ryan HernandezItem 44

information that was shared in private that the bargaining unit was aware of. I can only ask how that happened. I don't know who it is. But that is bad faith negotiating. and today's last best and final offer is a is a step toward transparency and it's it's the right thing to do ultimately that that is why this item is on this agenda and I think my colleague councilmember Lopez for for bringing this

6:57:25
Jessie LopezItem 44

item forth and point of clarification I did not bring this item forward staff

6:57:57
Johnathan Ryan HernandezItem 44

did staff did bring this item forward but I am very appreciative of the fact that we're having this dialogue here as a council. And the hardest challenge that we have is there are workers that are keeping our city moving all throughout the hours of the day. And we want to have these conversations about bargaining in closed session. But ultimately, this is where we're at. And I am going to be supporting staff's recommendation to implement today's last, best, and final offer. So that will be my motion on the floor.

6:58:02
Valerie AmezcuaItem 44

Councilman Peanelos and Becerra, please.

6:58:40
Phil BacerraItem 44

Go ahead and come back to me.

6:58:44
Valerie AmezcuaItem 44

Councilman Peanelos? I'm sorry.

6:58:48
Thai Viet PhanItem 44

No worries. I have a few questions. I just want some clarification.

6:58:50
Thai Viet PhanItem 44

The first is, you know, we're looking at the process, and you had mentioned that this is the next step in the process. and so what happens if we don't approve this if the council does not implement

6:58:56
UnidentifiedItem 44

the last best and final there's really two options that is one do nothing

6:59:09
UnidentifiedItem 44

nothing or direct staff back to the table okay and so what do you mean by do

6:59:18
Thai Viet PhanItem 44

nothing like there's no contract the same everything the same MOU

6:59:24
UnidentifiedItem 44

Right now, there's no agreement on any change of benefits, there's no agreement on changes of wages, so the terms and conditions of the prior MOU would just be upheld, but there's no additional benefits or wages being provided.

6:59:29
Thai Viet PhanItem 44

And then if we approve this today, when does it go into effect?

6:59:45
UnidentifiedItem 44

It would go into effect upon council adoption, and it is a one-year term as I stated, so January 1st, 2022 through December 31st. So essentially the term of the LBF would be up. So even though the LBF is implemented, we'd essentially continue to negotiate new negotiations with the POA for a successor MOU.

6:59:53
Thai Viet PhanItem 44

Okay. So because I had some confusion when this first came up, which is, you know, well, why is it backdated to January 1st, 2022? but that's because under the law, last, best, and final requires us to have a one-year term. And so if we don't approve this, there's not going to be a raise. There's not going to be changes to anyone's salary. Nothing changes status quo. And we try to go back to the table and try to negotiate something. Right?

7:00:15
Thai Viet PhanItem 44

And if we do approve it, literally the next pay cycle, there's going to be a raise for all the members in the POA.

7:00:50
UnidentifiedItem 44

First full pay period following council approval, which would be January 1st.

7:01:04
Thai Viet PhanItem 44

Right. And so for me, and then so if we do approve this, we have to go back to the table essentially right away in January, right?

7:01:08
UnidentifiedItem 44

For a new contract? Essentially the term is up and we'd be coming back to council for authority, our authority to continue negotiations for successor MOU.

7:01:19
Thai Viet PhanItem 44

And that means that the POA can choose to negotiate however they want, whatever it is. So if we implement this MOU, you get a the POA members get the raise there's the 1,000 hour leave bank some changes to the health benefits but then in the next round of negotiations they can come back and negotiate some other leave requests if they want. I just want

7:01:34
UnidentifiedItem 44

to make sure that I'm clear with the council and if the council implements the LBF when we continue negotiation it is a new it's a new negotiations like we're starting over in a new negotiation.

7:02:04
Thai Viet PhanItem 44

Right. So I guess my point is if we take no action today, no one gets a raise. Everyone's stuck at their old salary. Everything stays status quo. If we do approve this, our officers get a raise starting January 1st, and the process requires everyone to negotiate a new MOU with a blank slate. Everyone gets to throw in whatever they want at a new negotiation.

7:02:16
UnidentifiedItem 44

That is correct. It's a new negotiation.

7:02:45
Thai Viet PhanItem 44

Okay. All right. That's helpful. Thank you. Councilman Vasquez.

7:02:48
Benjamin VazquezItem 44

When is the last time staff proposed a contract agreement that came together between both bargaining parties?

7:02:56
UnidentifiedItem 44

Actually, is your question, Councilmember, when was the last time the staff brought forward an agreement with the bargaining unit with both bargaining

7:03:06
Benjamin VazquezItem 44

parties agreeing on a contract in november

7:03:14
UnidentifiedItem 44

november 15th 2022 we brought forward an agreement with the police santa ana police management association and also the seo part-time unit to the council in which it was approved by council on

7:03:16
Benjamin VazquezItem 44

number 15th for the management and the say you part-time and how about this this staff when's the last time we had a

7:03:28
Kristine RidgeItem 44

agreement set so a council member the the last time a contract was approved with this particular bargaining unit was in February of 2019 and that was the

7:03:35
Benjamin VazquezItem 44

last agreement that expired is that is that an agreement that staff worked on

7:03:48
Kristine RidgeItem 44

or is that not the staff sitting at this table so it predates both your executive director of human resource and your and your city manager okay I just

7:03:54
Benjamin VazquezItem 44

want to make sure that we're bargaining in good faith, that both sides are talking, and it seems that the regressive was pushing for time. The regressive stance was hoping that I would not be here. The regressive stance was that they would be able to get better than we probably could afford.

7:04:04
Valerie AmezcuaItem 44

That's it. Mayor Pro Tem Lopez. Sure. Thank you, Mayor.

7:04:32
Jessie LopezItem 44

So this has been a long process, right? It's been, what, a year of staff negotiating back and forth.

7:04:44
Jessie LopezItem 44

And the initial proposal was that they asked for $23 million. Is that correct?

7:04:56
UnidentifiedItem 44

They didn't ask for 20. That was the estimated cost of their initial proposal.

7:05:04
Jessie LopezItem 44

$23 million. So $1 million more than the last one, the $22 million?

7:05:08
UnidentifiedItem 44

Raise your, repeat your question. It's okay.

7:05:18
Jessie LopezItem 44

It's okay, Jason.

7:05:20
Jessie LopezItem 44

so then on that so I guess I just want to provide context to the public as to why we're here in this moment because this just didn't happen you know staff didn't just get to decide we're gonna put this item on on the agenda there's been there's been an entire process and so you know the bargaining unit that the city was bargaining with SAPOA they issued a regressive proposal which was

7:05:23
Jessie LopezItem 44

the fourth proposal to the city and that that proposal included an increase by approximately 2.57 million so instead of 23 it was do I understand that correctly it was closer to 25 million.

7:05:56
UnidentifiedItem 44

I'd have to pull up the number, council member, but it was probably slightly less because there is a proposal in between the first and the...

7:06:17
Jessie LopezItem 44

So there's been this back and forth for months. And so my understanding, and Christine or Sonia, please step in,

7:06:25
Jessie LopezItem 44

you know, their bargaining unit said we don't want to negotiate anymore. So they declared an impasse. Is that correct?

7:06:36
UnidentifiedItem 44

The POA is who declared the impasse, correct.

7:06:45
Jessie LopezItem 44

Okay, thank you. And so part of the impasse was that they were supposed to do fact finding, which they did not do. Is that correct?

7:06:48
UnidentifiedItem 44

Not required by law, but they have the ability to request fact finding under the law, and they did not.

7:07:02
Jessie LopezItem 44

Okay. And that was for that final proposal with the impasse, that was for $9 million?

7:07:07
UnidentifiedItem 44

You're asking the last proposal? Yes. Last proposal was estimated at...

7:07:16
UnidentifiedItem 44

Yes, $9.02 million.

7:07:26
Jessie LopezItem 44

$9 million for the year? For the year. Okay, thank you. And so that is why this agenda item is before us today, right? Because they declared an impasse. They essentially said we're done having communications. We want anywhere from $25 million to $9 million. Is that a fair assumption?

7:07:29
UnidentifiedItem 44

Summarizing from their first proposal to their last proposal, that would be accurate.

7:07:56
Jessie LopezItem 44

Okay. Thank you. And so I want to know because clearly we have a lot of professional staff here, from a finance perspective, what would that do to our budget? Let's just say we would have agreed to the $23 million.

7:08:00
Kristine RidgeItem 44

So finance-wise, for the current fiscal year, we had allocated $5 million for all bargaining groups for the current fiscal year. So to grant a contract to one bargaining group that had a price tag of 9 million, it would have utilized all of the money we had set aside plus an additional 4 million. Then that would have had a compounded impact in the future years as well.

7:08:20
Jessie LopezItem 44

So that means that if one bargaining group gets, you know, anywhere from 9 million to 25 million possibly other bargaining groups are not going to see an increase right and that's a hard question for you actually and I say possibly because then the question is what services is this council willing to cut to then meet the other bargaining units at where they're asking us to also match them so Mayor

7:08:47
Kristine RidgeItem 44

Chair Protem López, you're correct. There's a finite amount of resources, so it's a balancing act. It's where the policymakers want to spend the dollars. If you do spend all of the dollars allocated for labor, it would impact other labor groups. If you spend dollars more than what we have allocated for labor, it could potentially impact other areas of the city.

7:09:20
Jessie LopezItem 44

Okay, thank you.

7:09:40
Jessie LopezItem 44

So I know there's there's been talk about what other cities have done percentages of other cities but I do want to remind the public that in comparison to the city of Irvine we do not have the same tax base so we cannot you know it's I think it's incomparable in my personal opinion And so again, I'm going to reiterate that as a member of this council, I desire labor peace, but I also would want, you know, and I've said it from the very beginning, equity is a very important part of how I make decisions. And I think it is in the broader context of this

7:09:44
Jessie LopezItem 44

conversation for one unit to come in and say hey we want you know 23 million dollars and and forget the other bargaining units or forget the other resources that the city must provide is a little unfair and so again it is why we are at this place now they declared impasse we have discussed over a year we've tried our best to meet folks at the bargaining table with our team you have been designated as that. I believe that the charter also states that, city attorney. We have the power to essentially say you are bargaining not on behalf of this council,

7:10:26
Jessie LopezItem 44

but on behalf of the residents of the city of Santa Ana after all. And so those are going to be my initial comments. I'm sure that I'll have more as I hear other folks talk. But I will end my first round of comments there. Thank you.

7:11:07
Valerie AmezcuaItem 44

Councilman Panolosa.

7:11:26
David PenalozaItem 44

I have no comments. Thank you, Mayor.

7:11:30
Valerie AmezcuaItem 44

Councilman Becerra, please.

7:11:33
Phil BacerraItem 44

Thank you, Mayor Mesquat.

7:11:36
Phil BacerraItem 44

You know, what we see in Washington, where you've got negotiation over a budget, and so they go back and forth. and when they get up to a deadline they say, oh, you know what, we're going to try to continue to negotiate, let's put forth a stopgap measure and then that stopgap measure gets you through another couple of months and the idea is to keep negotiating and keep going forward. But, you know, when I look at what is on here today, you know, we are trying to, through this offer, trying to dictate the organization of a labor unit. We're basically saying this is something that you've had for 30 years and we are now changing that.

7:11:40
Phil BacerraItem 44

And by the way, that's the direction of some folks here on the council. But that isn't the unanimous belief of this council. And so I philosophically just cannot support anything that does that. Now if this was an item that for what everybody says, well, we're just trying to, you know, get the POA back to the table and have a very genuine discussion about a contract, okay. But when it comes in with such a poison pill at the very beginning, and it's been part of this for the whole time, hence why it's our last best and final offer, this is what this is about, I just can't support it.

7:12:22
Phil BacerraItem 44

And then one of my colleagues mentioned something about, well, hey, at least if this is adopted, there'll be a raise. is, yeah, for 10 days, even though the dates of the contract say back to January, it's for 10 days. It's for 10 days and then it goes on forward. But again, the idea, though, is that we're going to have negotiations, right? That's only going to be a temporary thing that's going to change. But this is not a stopgap. This is not something that I would think would motivate anybody to come back to the table. This is very transformative when it comes to the POA.

7:13:02
Phil BacerraItem 44

And I look at this and I just think, wow, what we're hearing being said versus what this actually does, in my opinion, are two different things. And I won't be supporting it. In fact, I would ask Madam Mayor, do we have a motion on the table at this point?

7:13:37
Valerie AmezcuaItem 44

We don't have one yet. I'm going to speak after you. Okay.

7:13:53
Phil BacerraItem 44

Those are, what?

7:13:56
Sonia R. CarvalhoItem 44

I thought we had a motion on the table. Did anybody second it? No second, but there was a motion on the table.

7:13:59
Phil BacerraItem 44

Okay. Well, those are my comments for now at this time. Thank you, Madam Mayor.

7:14:05
Valerie AmezcuaItem 44

Thank you. So I'm going to start first of all because you, somebody brought up the Santa Ana Police Management Association, SAPMA. So I have information here that their total increases since July of 2011 to July 1 of 2020 have been 31%. That's for management and Santa Ana PD, Santa Ana Police Management Association. So we're going to look at being fair and equitable and all those things that we talk about.

7:14:11
Valerie AmezcuaItem 44

Let's start at the top because being a county baby, this is what I have, this is what you gave me. It's the same as POA's race. Let me finish. I'm going to get there. So being a county baby and being there for 30 years, OCA, man, they went to bat for us. And if you're a member of a union, you understand that. They went to bat for us and went to bat and they fought hard. And one year, for nine years, we went without a raise. And I am a union sister through and through because they helped us. And my department went over to the sheriff's department. Whatever reason, vote was taken. We all went over there.

7:14:51
Valerie AmezcuaItem 44

And now they take great care of sworn, our officers,

7:15:28
Valerie AmezcuaItem 44

because that's what they decided to do by voting process. So the conversation always talks about being top heavy. So even though, city manager, you say it's the same as sworn of San Ed Police Officers Association, 31%, non-sworn, 23.5% since 2011 to 2021, when you compare the amount that Santa Ana Police Management receives compared to the Santa Ana officers that are working our streets, that are out there every day. And during COVID, when

7:15:34
Valerie AmezcuaItem 44

we were all home safe behind closed doors, they were all out there working. So 3% to me, and then there's no retro discussion here, so I'm not even gonna, I won't support this because as I've shared with you before, if we're going to give a raise, you know, we give what's deserving to our employees because happy employees, they do good work. And if you look at other agencies around us, nobody is saying, you know, this is your last and best final. Most police agencies already have their contracts.

7:16:11
Valerie AmezcuaItem 44

And yes, there's some, there is cancer, there is cancer going on in this police department. You have some officers over here and you have some officers over here. And for me as a community member and just getting here now as the mayor, my job and I would hope that the rest of the council members would want to work on that and make that better because that has bled into our community because there's a cancer. And I don't need to name names because they're on both sides.

7:16:51
Valerie AmezcuaItem 44

So there's a lot of reasons why I'm not going to support this. But let's talk about, you know, we're big on money, right? So you're saying that $23 million is what they're asking for?

7:17:28
UnidentifiedItem 44

No, Mayor.

7:17:41
Valerie AmezcuaItem 44

Is that what I heard?

7:17:42
UnidentifiedItem 44

No, Mayor, I didn't. They're not asking for 23.

7:17:43
Valerie AmezcuaItem 44

Where did the 23 million come from?

7:17:45
UnidentifiedItem 44

$23 million is the estimated cost of their first proposal. The last proposal they made was an estimated cost of $9 million.

7:17:46
Valerie AmezcuaItem 44

Okay. So now we're down from $23 million, we're down to $9 million. And I would be having this discussion if it was SEIU as well. So I want to be really clear with everybody. This isn't because I carry a badge that says I'm a retired officer. This is, I believe, in treating people fairly and giving them a good living wage. And when we're all running out of a building, they're running in. And so I take this very seriously. So, and if you've never been there, you don't understand, and they all have to go home with their families. So then let's look about, so 9 million. Now, I'm really interested in the budget, and that's why I want

7:17:52
Valerie AmezcuaItem 44

to meet with the department heads, including the department heads of the police department. Because if you look at how much overtime is happening in the police department, is it necessary? Can we save money? Can we move that money so that maybe we can use it for other things? And let me finish, then you can interrupt me. Maybe you can write your questions down. Okay. Please, thank you. And then things like certain units that, for example, I believe we have Career Criminal Unit, which I think is a great unit. It does a lot of great stuff. You have the Gang Unit. You have the Met Team, which is a full-time SWAT team.

7:18:32
Valerie AmezcuaItem 44

I don't know any other law enforcement agency, not even the sheriffs that have a full-time SWAT certified team they get called in when there's SWAT calls and please correct me if I'm wrong and so I just want to be clear on that and so we have and I don't see anybody here to answer my questions which is a shame because the chief of police should have stayed for this conversation because there were going to be questions so you have a full-time SWAT team slash met team why You have top officers, commanders, deputy chiefs, those that are at the office

7:19:08
Valerie AmezcuaItem 44

and at their desk with take-home cars. Nobody, see, I've been watching these meetings for a long time. Nobody talks about those things. You probably, if you've ever been there and go through the parking lot, there's all these suburbans and beautiful black cars. They're take-home cars. We pay, we as taxpayers pay for their gas. and their car. Have you looked at that? So what I'm looking for as a mayor and what I answer to my constituents is, where does every penny go and how are we using it?

7:19:48
Valerie AmezcuaItem 44

Because I am a union supporter and I always will be. And I see some of my union brothers in here, like Rich Gomez from the Carpenters. I see him sitting here. And again, as you know, I made it very clear I was a member of OCA for 30 years, the teachers. We have a full-time release, and Councilman Vasquez is very aware of this. He sat on their board. We have a full-time release for teachers. Their teachers union president is a full-time release. As a matter of fact, this year, not only is she a full-time release, the president, but the vice president is a release, and they pay for it.

7:20:26
Valerie AmezcuaItem 44

Our classified employees in Santa Ana Unified, full-time release. So I don't really, and I watch the meetings from home. I don't come in here. I wasn't coming in here.

7:21:00
Valerie AmezcuaItem 44

And I know you guys, and out of respect for the members that have been sitting up here, the council members, you guys have been trying to get them to come to the table. But for me, it's become a very personal issue from what I see with my lens.

7:21:12
Valerie AmezcuaItem 44

And it's not about this person's, I'm not going to name any names. What I am looking at is the employees, sworn and non-sworn. Because this last and best final offer is also for non-sworn, correct?

7:21:26
Valerie AmezcuaItem 44

Yes, and the POA bargaining, yes. So, and you're talking like jail staff, office, give me some names, some titles.

7:21:42
UnidentifiedItem 44

Correctional management.

7:21:55
UnidentifiedItem 44

Dispatch management? Police dispatchers?

7:22:02
Valerie AmezcuaItem 44

Police dispatchers who work very hard, just like the officers do.

7:22:06
Valerie AmezcuaItem 44

And correctional management?

7:22:13
UnidentifiedItem 44

Correctional officers, police service representatives?

7:22:15
Valerie AmezcuaItem 44

And is the correctional management part of the Police Management Association or they're part of POA?

7:22:18
UnidentifiedItem 44

Part of PMA.

7:22:25
Valerie AmezcuaItem 44

Okay. So I'm not going to support this because in watching the city of Santa Ana, you know, I'd find it interesting, it'd be like us going to the Labor Federation and telling, you know, their main person, I won't mention her name, but also we're not going to make you a full-time release You're going to have a job and handle. And you can disagree with me, but I've been in the union a long time. And so I've been sitting here just for a week. It has been really interesting for me.

7:22:27
Valerie AmezcuaItem 44

But I have been a union member for 30 plus years. And when it comes to negotiations, I hope that the council members up here understand that this is not just about the POA president, because I don't care who the POA president, Jimmy, Johnny, Michelle, Terry, Smokey, I don't care who it is. If they got work to do, they got work to do. Just like the teachers. Teachers president, she's got or he's got work to do, they got work to do. And you don't have to agree with me and you don't have to like my comments.

7:23:07
Valerie AmezcuaItem 44

And no, I'm not sitting up here and my record speaks for itself because they endorsed me because other candidates who ran for mayor were also interviewed by them. They sought out their endorsement, just to be very clear. I have always supported the unions, whether it was teachers, classified, substitute teachers under CWA, and OCA. So I'm not a fan of last and best final offers because we don't, we could just go back to the table and start all over.

7:23:45
Valerie AmezcuaItem 44

And that's, we talked, somebody up here said about bringing peace. Go back to the table. There's a new council member up here. There's a new mayor. Go back to the table. Maybe it's going to change. I don't know. And I hope it would. And that's my ask is that, and everybody's going to vote their own way, but I would ask that we go back to the table and work it out. And I will never tell the unions, whoever I represent or work for or sit up here, whether I'm here or I'm in another elected position, whatever it is, how to do their job. That's not my role.

7:24:19
Valerie AmezcuaItem 44

So I don't want, I'm not going to go in and audit their finances, because that was one of the comments made about, well, we're going to go in and audit their finances. I'm not going to audit their finances. I'm not going to go to Rich Gomez and say, hey, Carpenters, I want to audit your finances. That's none of my business. Those are for the union members. I'm not going to go to the Chinese Labor Federation, and let me audit your finances, because then it's personal, because it's personal. I'm not going to go to OCA, let me audit your finances. I'm not going to do any of those things.

7:24:59
Valerie AmezcuaItem 44

And so I don't support this because there's always a way to make there's always a way to get over that to get to that place of negotiating and you come from OCA you've been there and I've been an OCA member and whether it was CB or Nick Bernardino and Nick Bernardino was a bulldog and he would take you on and protest and march and we would strike and whatever it may be I've been out there with the teachers and they were striking so no I am NOT going to support this because it's not my job to say, well, this is your last and best final

7:25:33
Valerie AmezcuaItem 44

offer and I'm going to take this away or take that away from you. And so I just don't do that because unions are very important to all of their members, very important.

7:26:11
Valerie AmezcuaItem 44

And officers are not going to speak up because for fear of retaliation. They're not. They just had an election. Did you see the numbers? They were like through the roof. So one person I think got 89 votes. One person got almost 500 votes. So they have confidence in their POA president, whoever again it may be. I don't care, Jenny, Jenny, John, Michelle. I don't care who it is. It's not about the people. It's about our employees. So I'm not going to support this because, again, I look at this,

7:26:25
Valerie AmezcuaItem 44

and I still haven't been able to sit down and tear apart the budget, and I'm going to, and look at every single penny that goes to the police department. Because for years I've heard the community talk about the PD gets a lot of money. When I was a human relations commissioner and I was chair there, that's what they always talked about, PD got a lot of money. Well, the PD has a very unique job. And so, yes, it does cost them money. But as now sitting up here, I'm going to go through every single penny. And where can we save? And I would hope that the council members would do the same when it comes to the budget. Where can we save?

7:27:05
Valerie AmezcuaItem 44

Where can we cut? Who needs a take home car? Who doesn't? What teams do we need? What teams do we not? How many commanders do we need? How many guys on patrol? I'd rather have more guys on patrol. So when people call 911, they come.

7:27:41
Valerie AmezcuaItem 44

So there's a lot of reasons why I'm not going to support this. But again, the biggest reason for me is I am a union sister through and through.

7:27:56
Valerie AmezcuaItem 44

And I believe everybody up here was endorsed by the unions, especially by the Labor Federation and the Carpenters and the Trades and so the teachers union. And so I'm not going to, I just don't support it and I'll sit well with it. So I, and I'm new here and then for, and I appreciate you meeting with me. But that's why I asked you for like all the history so I can go back and read it and I really understand it and I have not had the time to do that because I didn't have it. And so that's why I'm not comfortable voting for this because I have not had the time

7:28:06
Valerie AmezcuaItem 44

to review everything that they have done in the last year. I believe somebody said you guys have been having a session a year. So I did ask for it to be postponed until January so that I can review it. I was told no, so that I don't have the right to ask for that.

7:28:45
Valerie AmezcuaItem 44

So that's fine. That's okay. And I probably don't. Maybe I don't procedurally. I don't know, legally. We'll discuss that later. but I needed more information. So I'm not going to support this, again, for a lot of reasons, and whether it's SEIU or all the other unions, and when I stand before my labor brothers and sisters, they can never say that I don't stand beside them. Now, if they've done something bad, I don't ever support bad cops, bad policemen, never, never, never, never. Let me make it very clear, never, never will I support bad police officers.

7:29:06
Valerie AmezcuaItem 44

If they've done something wrong, hold them accountable. Terminate them. Discipline them. Don't send them to somewhere else to hide them. Discipline them or terminate them. That's how strongly I feel about it. Just like I didn't support bad teachers. I will not ever, ever, ever support bad police officers. So nobody can write a story or a blog or an article and say, she's a POA puppet. No, I am not. I will never, ever, ever be clear, support a bad police officer. And if somebody's covering up for them, I'd want them terminated too, both of them.

7:29:46
Valerie AmezcuaItem 44

So, and I'm just one vote. So I am not going to support this. I feel very strongly about this. Again, not because of Tim, Jane, Mary, whoever is negotiating with you, but because for me, it is about treating these officers, sworn and non-sworn, with respect. It's about doing the right thing for the unions. And if they're not, okay, OCA didn't go to the table many times. The teachers didn't come many times. We did fact-finding, impasse. That's the process. That is the process. So I don't have a problem with it. And at the end of the day, we're going to come to the table,

7:30:27
Valerie AmezcuaItem 44

we're going to agree on something, and we're going to shake hands and move on. And hopefully it's the best thing for the officers. So with that, I'm not going to support this. And I'm sure that, you know, people are watching at home, and I'm not going to make everybody happy sitting up here. That's not my job up here. But my job is to my moral compass it's a certain way. And that's what I will stand by. So any other comments from any other council members? Yes, go ahead.

7:31:07
Thai Viet PhanItem 44

Thank you. Thank you so much for your comments. I do have a couple of clarification notes. First, there was a comment that the raise would only be for 10 days. For my understanding, the raise is going to start January 1st until there's a new contract approved.

7:31:35
Kristine RidgeItem 44

Thank you, Council Member Fan. That is actually correct. It's a 3% increase that continues on. And one of the other elements that may have been misstated is that the contract that expires with the LBF, if it expires on December 2022, the terms of that one carry forward. So the 3% raise continues on, and we start a fresh button on the negotiations. If the POA wants to change the terms of an expired LBF, they can do so during the negotiations, but those terms would stay in place. And the item of Union Bank and full-time release is a negotiable item.

7:31:54
Kristine RidgeItem 44

The reason POA has it is they negotiated it. They didn't always have it. It was something that was added during negotiations. So it's certainly a negotiable item.

7:32:35
Thai Viet PhanItem 44

Right. So I just want to make sure that if this last, best, and final is approved, that a whole new negotiation is on the table beginning in January, that any term, idea, issue can be negotiated between the parties legally, well, whatever is legal.

7:32:44
UnidentifiedItem 44

Correct. If the LBF is implemented, parties can re-engage in a fresh new negotiation, starting from scratch.

7:33:05
Thai Viet PhanItem 44

Okay. And then I wanted to ask about PMA and because one of the things that I understand was that the PMA agreement historically had, was it a compaction clause or something?

7:33:14
UnidentifiedItem 44

There is a compaction clause in the PMA MOU that ties it to the POA bargaining unit.

7:33:31
Thai Viet PhanItem 44

Right, so the increases from POA led to increases to PMA because they were tied together based on whoever previously negotiated these agreements back in the day.

7:33:40
UnidentifiedItem 44

Or how did that work? I can't speak to the history. I have the history of wage increases provided to the bargaining units, and the reason I hesitate is one, I wasn't here for those negotiations. to the over a 10-year span the police officer association received the sworn and the police officers received wage increases totaling 31 percent over a 10-year span the police management association received wage increases totaling 31 percent over a 10-year span but they're not all like for like the totals the total over 10 years is the same so but i can't i wasn't here

7:33:54
Thai Viet PhanItem 44

for those negotiations got it so it might not be just salary it could have been benefits or something

7:34:33
UnidentifiedItem 44

else or for one for i'll give you the prime graduate degree so january 1st 2021 poa received two percent there the pma did not receive that same increase at that time another increase that

7:34:37
Thai Viet PhanItem 44

was more at a later time got it okay that was helpful and then my other question is you know We've talked a lot about salary and the leave bank, but that's not the only thing that's changing. I think you mentioned medical was one of them. I know that one of the big concerns for folks is health insurance. I understand how expensive health insurance can be. How would it benefit our sworn employees, our POA members, to have these changes to their health insurance?

7:34:55
UnidentifiedItem 44

So currently the city contributes for active employees the city contributes $1,575 per month per employee to the POA for health but active health insurance benefits of that 1575 1419 is for medical benefits 66 is for long-term disability and $90 is for dental so do the analysis if the if the POA membership came over to the city's plans if they if you looked at the current enrollment numbers and then

7:35:31
UnidentifiedItem 44

you assume you have to make some assumptions so if you assume that they enrolled into like plans under the city plans it is actually a when you look at the total the monthly premiums of the insurance under the POA plans versus the premiums under the city's plans it would be a benefit to the city and also to the member the membership because they pay less so you're saying it would say already I wouldn't say every employee okay I can't say every employee because It also depends on employee only, employee two-party or family enrollment, and also depends if they stayed into a similar plan as they're currently enrolled. Got it.

7:36:13
UnidentifiedItem 44

If you make those assumptions, there's a benefit to the majority of their membership.

7:36:51
Thai Viet PhanItem 44

Okay. So on average, a typical member would likely save money for a similar plan.

7:36:57
UnidentifiedItem 44

Assumption is correct.

7:37:05
Thai Viet PhanItem 44

Yes. Okay. I mean, it's important for me to understand if we're comparing apples to apples, right? Because I know my husband just got a new job. We were looking at, you know, do I want to switch health insurance, and it's not all the same, even if you're saving money. So that's helpful for me.

7:37:06
Thai Viet PhanItem 44

You know, I don't see a benefit in not moving forward at this time because, you know, we go back to the table, but I guess we're still going back to the table anyway, right? In either scenario, we go back to the table, but at least by moving forward with this item, there are some changes that at least, you know, whether it's wages, whether it's saving our employees some money with the health benefits, it's happening. And again, every other item is still on the table to negotiate and I did want to ask about

7:37:25
Thai Viet PhanItem 44

just for clarification too because I think someone up here mentioned pulling the item to delay right to continue it for individuals to get more time to review but once an item is placed on the agenda madam city attorney who removes

7:38:06
Sonia R. CarvalhoItem 44

it well under the charter and the city manager form of government you're city manager prepares and posts the agenda. We do have two provisions. One is in the charter, one is by our practice. The first provision is that any council member can add an item. We used to traditionally refer to that as an item, 85A item. Or we have had a process where our mayor can add an item by talking with the city manager to do that. In terms of pulling an item we only use the informal rules of like Rosenberg's rules of order for parliamentary procedure I mean in that case if it at the city manager wants to

7:38:23
Sonia R. CarvalhoItem 44

remove an item maybe there was new information or an applicant asked for removal the city manager has that prerogative because it's her city it's her agenda otherwise anyone on the council can make a motion to remove an item from the agenda and if there's a majority vote then that item can be postponed, tabled, asked to be brought back on a date specific.

7:39:04
Thai Viet PhanItem 44

Got it. But we don't publish a new agenda within this because we have a Sunshine Ordinance that says the agenda is posted. But for emergency items based on the ordinance that we approved recently, we at the Council can say, hey, let's table, let's delay, let's continue. I've never seen her move or any city manager remove an item from an agenda in between the posting.

7:39:25
Sonia R. CarvalhoItem 44

In my 10 years of here at the City of Santa Ana, perhaps if there was a major public hearing item and we were expecting hundreds of people, we might note on the agenda that that item, the request by the developer was to continue it so that people had an expectation of not coming. But we do not republish an agenda. So that idea that you could pull an item and take it off the agenda before you get here, that doesn't happen.

7:39:48
Thai Viet PhanItem 44

Okay. But we can do that today if we wanted to.

7:40:12
Sonia R. CarvalhoItem 44

Yes, if there was a motion to postpone it, you could.

7:40:14
Thai Viet PhanItem 44

Got it. Thank you. I just want to know the process because I personally had never experienced it, and so I wanted to know for sure what to do moving forward. With that, you know, again, I just want to see us moving forward with this item and that we can continue to negotiate because we have to come back to the table. We're not going to stop coming back to the table. But by doing this, I think that it actually does have some benefits for our employees rather than still waiting to see some changes or still waiting to see what could happen. And so with that, I don't know if you got a second, Council Member?

7:40:17
Johnathan Ryan HernandezItem 44

I have a motion, yes.

7:40:57
Thai Viet PhanItem 44

So I will second the motion.

7:40:58
Valerie AmezcuaItem 44

I have some more questions. Thank you. Just a few.

7:40:59
Thai Viet PhanItem 44

And then Councilman Becerra, what else you do? May I?

7:41:02
Valerie AmezcuaItem 44

Can I just ask one question?

7:41:04
UnidentifiedItem 44

Sure, go ahead.

7:41:05
Valerie AmezcuaItem 44

So Councilman Phan asked you about medical. And we should always be prepared when we're giving presentations because this is part of what you stated. $15.75 per month is what POE gets per employee, correct? For medical is what you said. $14.19, $16 lifetime disability and $90 for dental. Comes out to $14.19. So my ask is how much is it going to cost and how many? And you said it depends. Well, that's really important to me because it depends It doesn't mean anything to me.

7:41:07
Valerie AmezcuaItem 44

So are they paying more? Because if they're paying more, then we're going to hear about it up here. I mean, we're going to get emails and calls, and they're going to be like, why did you approve that? Now I'm paying more. Or if they're paying less, we'll get that. Oh, great. Thank you. But I don't want to get that email or call. Now I'm paying more because I know how much I pay for medical. I don't know about everybody else up here, but I pay personally just for me $850 a month. That's just for me. Okay, so if I added my husband, it would be like $2,400.

7:41:48
Valerie AmezcuaItem 44

So, again, for me, $850. And I am a peace officer plant. So, I want to know those things. And the only reason I asked again, I want to be really clear, to postpone it was not because I don't approve of it or I'm going to approve of it or disapprove. I don't have all the history and you can't answer all the questions. So when we say or when Councilwoman Fanon asks you how many, you can't give us that answer. I don't know how many sworn and non-sworn are going to pay more medical insurance or less medical insurance with this.

7:42:28
Valerie AmezcuaItem 44

And then you went from 9 million, is it really 9 million or is it really 5 million when you talked earlier about how much it's going to cost us, right? So because we have a lot of, how many unfilled positions do we have at the police department?

7:43:07
Valerie AmezcuaItem 44

Unfilled, not just placeholders, because I'm very familiar with, I'm very familiar, not placeholders, how many unfilled positions?

7:43:23
UnidentifiedItem 44

It varies, but I personally don't have an exact number of the staffing levels in the PD.

7:43:35
Valerie AmezcuaItem 44

So, I mean, and those are the reasons when you give a presentation, whether again it's SCIU, I would really appreciate it. I mean, these are things I'm going to ask, because many of them live in our city.

7:43:41
Valerie AmezcuaItem 44

We all represent them. And again, I'm big on numbers. I may not look like a data, you know, queen here, but I am. And I go home and I tear this book apart and I take the budget home and I tear it apart and highlight it and follow the money. Because following the money is what it's about. Every single penny. Because we can say it's going to be 9 million, but then when you follow the money, it really doesn't, it's really not 9 million. It may be 3 million, it may be 5 million. Just like we say, well, I heard one time we have 400 officers or we approved a hiring of 100 more officers.

7:43:55
Valerie AmezcuaItem 44

I don't remember the council doing that, and I know that you guys got eight officers approved up here. So, I, again, so when she asks you how much are they going to pay for medical insurance if they come to you? And I say you, the city down at POA, and you can answer that question. So if they're going to pay more, I'm going to be really bothered

7:44:35
Valerie AmezcuaItem 44

because they're not going to be happy. And again, you know, happy employees, that's what we're about. That's what we should be about. We should be about happy employees, especially all of them, whether it's SCIU, all of them. But when you're talking about our police officers, you know, fire, again, they're running in when you all are running out and so today in this day and age I wouldn't want their job so and I appreciate all of them fire police SCIU all of them so I'll leave it at that

7:45:01
Valerie AmezcuaItem 44

and I'll let my colleagues make comments but I'm I will not be supporting this item and you don't

7:45:41
David PenalozaItem 44

need to answer any of my questions so councilman panelosa thank you mayor and the thank you city staff for this presentation and staff report. Some of the reservations I have is in regards to the medical and dental. I know that as part of the proposed MOU, the city is to now administer the medical, dental and long-term disability.

7:45:45
Kristine RidgeItem 44

Effective January 1st, 2024.

7:46:12
David PenalozaItem 44

Okay. So the city would to administer the medical, dental and long-term disability insurance effective January 2024 with what I and I like that Mayor Mesquab pointed that out that we don't know if any of the rank and file or dispatchers will see an increase in their medical insurance but we also don't know what if or how that plan could potentially change I know that I personally have the city's dental plan and it's one of the worst ever I mean it hardly covers anything so I I don't want to start messing with any city employees medical or dental

7:46:15
David PenalozaItem 44

insurance if they have something that they like you know now we're going to propose changing it and bringing it into the city it may save them a couple dollars it may not it just depends on like you said it depends I would like to see what those differences would be if they are going to be cost savings, what kind of plan it would be proposed, if it's the exact same benefits. Because I know that here we're dangling a 3% raise to our police officers, but when they find out that their expecting wife, you know, might not, you know, have

7:46:57
David PenalozaItem 44

something that they had before or in a type of medical or dental, you know, service or plan, that's troubling. I would like to see that presented. The other thing is that when this police officer's MOU was last approved, the last time we had this before us, we had a packed chamber of over 50 people speaking in opposition and in support. And now we have zero speakers and it's 11 p.m. four days before Christmas. I mean, for a community that is very sensitive to anything police related and to not have

7:47:33
David PenalozaItem 44

one single person in here to comment or talk about this proposed police MOU is troubling so I cannot support it as is I would be mainly because of that medical and dental you know benefit change that we don't know what exactly entails and our officers don't also have so I would make a sub motion to send back the negotiating team with to the negotiation table.

7:48:11
UnidentifiedItem 44

There's just two there's two comments I'd like to make.

7:48:41
UnidentifiedItem 44

You're correct Mayor and Councilmember Penaloza in the sense when I responded to Councilmember Fan you have to make some assumptions on current enrollment numbers and whether they would roll if they would maintain their current enrollment into a similar plan so you have to make those assumptions but let's just if you set that aside and anecdotally look at of the city's contribution of 1575 of that 1575 1419 is for medical contributions at 1419 is permit per POA member per employee per month that 1490

7:48:46
UnidentifiedItem 44

is very much higher than any employee-only cost employee only medical plan it is that and then where it stands it's probably very comparable for employee a two-party and then it's probably going to be too low for for a family and so if you look at that 1419 compared to the city's current contributions towards medical plans and what I mean is the city currently contributes and what's what's also in the last best and final is the city who contribute 804 for employee only,

7:49:24
UnidentifiedItem 44

1457 for employee for two-party, which is higher than the 1419.

7:50:01
UnidentifiedItem 44

And 1850 for family. So somebody who rolls in a family, city contribution would be $18.50 versus $14.19. So if you just look at that, what's in the LBF for the city contribution for two-party and family is higher than what the current $14.19 is.

7:50:11
UnidentifiedItem 44

Quick question. Sorry, the question, I can't speak. I honestly can't speak to attendance. I will say that our labor attorney, Peter Brown, did inform the POA's attorney of the staff report when it was posted. It's like they were aware I can't speak to attendance.

7:50:37
Valerie AmezcuaItem 44

Councilman Hernandez, can I just ask a real quick question before I forget? I apologize. So is that the cost for a PPO? Because let's say you have an employee, let's say you have an officer sworn or on sworn staff that's under POA and they need a PPO because maybe their spouse has cancer or very or lupus or they need to have specialized doctors and they don't want Kaiser. So what's the cost for that? And again, you don't have to tell me tonight, but those are the kind of things that's why I was asking to hold off until next month because that's what I want to know. I want

7:50:57
Valerie AmezcuaItem 44

to know you thank you um councilman panellosa for talking about the city dental i'm glad i didn't take it because if it's really bad i didn't take it right and so because that's really important braces cost like four thousand dollars so if we've got terrible dental but poa's got good dental i want to stick over here i mean i paid four thousand dollars for my daughter's braces when she was younger so i mean there's those things and again that was the only reason why I asked for it to not that I was approve it or disapprove it but I need more information to make

7:51:33
Valerie AmezcuaItem 44

you know an informative decision and so that was it and I'll stop the councilman Hernandez

7:52:08
Johnathan Ryan HernandezItem 44

thank you mayor mesqua so director mustik so the change on the city of Santa Ana's cost per employee sworn or non-sworn is increasing from 14 to 18

7:52:14
UnidentifiedItem 44

as far as what the city is paying you said how about medical benefits medical benefits correct so it what's what's in the lb last best and final if effective january 1st 20 january 1st 2024 the city would take our administration of health benefits for active employees the city's contributions towards health benefits for employee only would be 804 for employee plus one would be 1457 and for family be 1850. So without even looking at enrollment numbers the 1457 and the 1850 is higher than the city's current contribution of 1490.

7:52:28
Johnathan Ryan HernandezItem 44

So the officers would have a substantial increase not only in pay but better benefits. Assuming enrollment I can't yeah. Okay all right that concludes my question director Mastic thank you sir councilman thank you I'd like to speak

7:53:07
Valerie AmezcuaItem 44

and I've been asking for you sorry I'm sorry you gotta say mayor Musco I

7:53:26
Benjamin VazquezItem 44

apologize go ahead I'd like to ask a question we had comparables for the POA raises of 31% over 10 years can we do comparables with the other city unions and how much they've gone up during that same time the reason we had so many people out in 2019 when there was a raise it's because it wasn't a break the bank we were going to give the POA a raise without having budget for it or we were going to reduce and cut other places out folks came out and and spoke up against

7:53:30
Benjamin VazquezItem 44

that raise but the POA had secured the votes on the dais they spent half a million the previous year on a on the campaigns and I'm keep bringing it up because because follow the money we have you know follow the money follow the money follow the money what I'm trying to do like I want to make sure that we have good paid officers I want to make sure that we show that we appreciate them and we think we have the third highest paid department right and up and I make sure that they do get the raises but I want them to come to in good faith and

7:54:06
Benjamin VazquezItem 44

have a meeting with the city and that hasn't been happening so what we need to do is make sure that they're forced to come with us because they haven't been wanting to we we pay for the president of the POA he neglected to write his due diligence to where we're at now and send him paperwork when he had to but I I want to make sure that the city is able, that our city staff can work within our budget and give the officers the raises they deserve. And I am pro-labor. I'm a teacher. I'm a teacher.

7:54:47
Benjamin VazquezItem 44

I'm a teacher rep at my school. And I make sure we hadn't had raises in a few times. And thank God, now we do. And we appreciate the raises coming. but we go in knowing we're going to have to divide money with other unions

7:55:28
Benjamin VazquezItem 44

when we go into negotiations as teachers. And we want to work in good faith and make sure that we continue to be a well-paid department, that we do respect this work. But I don't feel that the staff negotiation team has been respected, and I hope we can have that moving forward.

7:55:44
UnidentifiedItem 44

Thank you.

7:56:07
Benjamin VazquezItem 44

Did you get those numbers?

7:56:08
UnidentifiedItem 44

Yes, Councilmember. So looking at over 10-year span, so we're looking at fiscal year 2011-12 through fiscal year 2021-22, the Confidential Association, CASA, received total wage increases of 24%. The Santa Ana Management Association has total increases of 24%. SEIU full-time unit total increases of 18.75% or 19.5% and that's because one year wages were based on a market analysis in 2017.

7:56:10
UnidentifiedItem 44

SEIU part-time civil service was the same 18.75% or 19.5% depending on the market study. and the service employees uh seiu part-time non-civil service was six percent um then going to the police officers association for the sworn it was 31 over that time period and non-sworn was 23 and a half percent and for the police management association or it was 31 percent I think that's a good question. Thank you. I appreciate that.

7:56:48
Valerie AmezcuaItem 44

Councilman, do you have something on this side? Do you have a comment? You, David.

7:57:25
Thai Viet PhanItem 44

Ty, do you have a comment?

7:57:36
Valerie AmezcuaItem 44

I'm sorry.

7:57:38
Thai Viet PhanItem 44

No worries.

7:57:39
Thai Viet PhanItem 44

So my question is, I think there's been a lot of conversation about this medical, and I think, Madam City Manager, you clarified it, that it does not go into effect until 2024, right? January 1st, 2024? That's correct.

7:57:43
Kristine RidgeItem 44

We do a medical enrollment on a calendar basis, and the open enrollment starts in the fall, and it's for the upcoming calendar year. So, should the POA engage at the table, if this passes and we get to press the restart and we sit down with them and they engage in good faith, you know, maybe they bargain that they want to keep their medical and it would never take the transition on July 1st, 2024.

7:57:59
Thai Viet PhanItem 44

So, that's what I wanted to follow up with.

7:58:22
Thai Viet PhanItem 44

I think the staff report reiterates that, you know, if this last, best and final goes forward and we have to go back to the table anyway for a new negotiation and everything is on the table including the leaf bank medical raises holidays whatever you want and medical health insurance is is negotiated then there may be no change at all to those benefits theoretically that

7:58:26
Kristine RidgeItem 44

That would be correct. Another item, if I can comment on, we talked a little bit about audits. One of the reasons why we did a request to see their cost for their medical is because they requested an increase in the amount that we provide. And I don't know if Peter Brown is still on the call with us, but he's an attorney that negotiates for public agencies with law enforcement officers throughout the whole state. and he has stated before that it's completely normal to see the records when they're asking for an increase for a per head payment that a public agency is making to the union. Got it and that's

7:59:00
Thai Viet PhanItem 44

helpful right if businesses come and ask for a grant or not businesses but nonprofits partners and whatnot we do and I've seen it before where you can make sure that they're financially functioning, feasible, whatever the case might be. But so again, for me, I'm interested in seeing this move forward, and that's why I wanted the clarification. It's possible that the medical issue is not a problem. But I guess I use the city's dental, and it's great. I go to the dentist four times a year because I like the cleanings.

7:59:42
Thai Viet PhanItem 44

So I guess maybe we just have a different experience. And with that, thanks for the clarification. Thank you.

8:00:17
Phil BacerraItem 44

Thank you, Mayor Mesquite. So for anybody that wanted to see what it would look like to have negotiations out in public, here it is. You've clearly been witnessing it. And anybody that wants to say that the POA may find out what we're thinking, who's thinking what? Too late. This item brought it all out there.

8:00:28
Phil BacerraItem 44

One point of clarification I want to make because I know one of my colleagues had asked staff this. So the major provisions of the last best final offer, one-year term from January 1st of this calendar year to December 31st of this calendar year. But the salary increase is effective the first pay period following the city council approval of the MOU. It's not going to be applied retro, correct? And I understand that the 3% would continue on. I get that. But it just sounds, it just looks, in my mind, disingenuous because, yes, they're getting a raise, but it's at the tail end of the calendar year going into next year.

8:00:50
Phil BacerraItem 44

You know, as we're talking about different things that could be negotiated, one of the things that could be negotiated would be retro pay, right? I've been a member of a union where I've received retro pay because negotiations took long. In fact, the union that I was a part of, negotiations went two, three years over. Nobody imposed the last, best, and final. Nobody told our union that they had to completely reconfigure their organization. So whether it's POA, SEIU, whatever it is, again, philosophically, I don't support that. So I believe there was a motion and a second on the table.

8:01:30
Valerie AmezcuaItem 44

I have one more question if you're not.

8:02:05
Phil BacerraItem 44

I just want to throw out a. Okay, go ahead. So I'd like to go ahead and actually, so rather than with this last best and final, it doesn't seem like everybody up here is completely in concurrence with it, even though it was something that came out of closed session. You wouldn't know by the discussion we had today. But I'd like to just go ahead and ask that we move forward with a one-year term with just the salary increase of 3%, nothing else, and direct city staff back to the table to negotiate with POA. So just the one item, that's it. None of the dental, medical, disability, none of that.

8:02:06
Phil BacerraItem 44

Just simply the one term and direct staff.

8:02:46
UnidentifiedItem 44

Procedurally, we couldn't do that. We cannot? In bad faith, we couldn't unilaterally impose. we presented a last, best, and final that was authorized by the majority of the City Council. And going back to Councilmember Titor, your comment on retro pay, as discussed earlier tonight on the transparency of labor negotiations, the City's labor negotiator staff, we take direction from Council or majority of the Council. So through the course of those negotiations, we have not had authority to provide retro pay.

8:02:49
Phil BacerraItem 44

I'm not saying you did. I'm just saying when we talk about all the different terms, because while the council majority gave staff direction, right, we're still having an exhaustive conversation about all these terms that comprise the last best and final offer. So I get that there has been something that staff reacted to.

8:03:21
UnidentifiedItem 44

Procedurally, we could not impose, like we presented a formal proposal authorized by the council, last, best, and final offer. We cannot just impose different terms. That would be in bad faith.

8:03:45
Phil BacerraItem 44

So help me understand something then. We've had quite the long discussion about all the different terms in this. So it was all for nothing, right? Like we can't modify anything in this offer. It's either vote to do it or not.

8:03:59
UnidentifiedItem 44

So earlier tonight Councilman or Fan had asked what are the options if we don't. So the council has three options.

8:04:11
UnidentifiedItem 44

Implement the last, best, and final that's on the table.

8:04:21
UnidentifiedItem 44

Do nothing or direct staff back to the table.

8:04:24
Phil BacerraItem 44

Okay, but to my point, we're sitting here talking about whether the dental is good or not, whether they're, you know, the amount of hours that the POA president may or may not get. It's all for naught. In other words, we can't modify this. It's package as is. It's like going to a playground. You don't get to tell them if you want less salt or cheese. It's as is. You get it. There it is.

8:04:28
UnidentifiedItem 44

You're correct, council member, in the sense that you cannot modify the last, best, and final offer. However, the council does not take action on this. As I stated, if you don't take action, you can direct staff back to the table.

8:04:50
Phil BacerraItem 44

Correct. Right. Again, and I understand that part. I'm just saying just focusing on the offer. So the offer is not something that we can, it's not a land use decision where I say, well, I like the building, but I'd like to add some more trees. There's no adding trees, there's no taking away trees from this offer. This offer is take it or leave it to be simple, correct? Correct. Okay. So since that's not an option to modify this LBFO, then my motion, my sub motion will be to direct staff to go back to the negotiating table with PLA. That's my sub motion.

8:05:02
Jessie LopezItem 44

Thank you. Mayor Brotan Lopez. Thank you, Mayor. I'm so sorry. Can you repeat your sub-motion?

8:05:36
Phil BacerraItem 44

Just a direct staff to go back to the table.

8:05:41
Jessie LopezItem 44

Okay. Thank you. I will not be supporting the sub-motion. I will be supporting the motion on the floor. And I think you said something important, Director Motsik, you know, that council members have been aware of the negotiating terms, right? They've been discussed and council members have been aware of the direction that I was moving in. And, you know, from my recollection, there wasn't a lot of protest to it. And that's part of the reason that we're here today. So thank you for

8:05:43
Jessie LopezItem 44

reminding me about that. And I also just want to state that, you know, part of my professional background has been working in really great places. And in my personal experience has been that audits are very normal. It's part of any business. It's a best practice for some just to make sure that things are functioning the way that they should be. In fact, in a lot of businesses when you don't necessarily look at your finances and people and whether you agree with the statement or not this is a business this agency is a business and so I think that's really

8:06:23
Jessie LopezItem 44

important just so that everybody understands you know to to Mayor Mesquist point like every dollar should be accounted for we should know exactly where every dollar is being spent and how it's being spent because it is public money it is taxpayer money and so I just wanted to reiterate that I know I heard that from other council members but that's gonna end my comment I'm actually ready to take a vote thank you before we take

8:07:04
Valerie AmezcuaItem 44

a vote I want to be clear because as councilmember Becerra was talking about we're negotiating up here and having a public meeting right I just want the public to know that whoever is the POA president for the last 30 years the city has not paid for the POA president the members pay and if I if it's incorrect give me the information and and please don't tell me I want to see it so you can tell me but trust but verify I want to see the documents just like when you know our city attorney talks about who can pull off who can pull items

8:07:32
Valerie AmezcuaItem 44

off the agenda is it procedurally legally is it just the majority so i want those things and i'm sure the other council members want to know as well because there may be something that you know councilman hernandez wants to pull and and you say no because it's your decision procedurally but legally right so what is where where do we all lie here so because three people work for the council it's city attorney city manager and city clerk and so i get the whole politics of

8:08:07
Valerie AmezcuaItem 44

the majority i'm very familiar with that but my my job appears to represent my constituents and so you know and when people say well i'm a member of the union i've done this i've done that i can tell you right now the teachers union went to bat we had fought hard with the teachers union And they were not going to give up their full-time release for nothing. So with that, I just want to be clear that, you know, however long it is, if it's 30, 10, 15, POA members pay for whoever the board president may be. And you can correct me if I'm wrong, and I'd like to know exactly who pays for the POA president.

8:08:44
Valerie AmezcuaItem 44

Exactly. Don't give me a, I think.

8:09:26
Kristine RidgeItem 44

If I have the opportunity to answer, Mary. Go ahead. At the time they negotiated a full-time release president, they negotiated two additional holidays for all of the members. So the city granted two holidays to each member. The members then donate that holiday back to cover the president's. Is it one? That is correct. I apologize. One holiday. They donate that back to cover the president. So the city is paying because we granted the holidays to the members, which they then grant back.

8:09:29
Valerie AmezcuaItem 44

But the members donate. That's a key word to me. They donate. As a requirement under the MOU, they don't have a choice. Okay. Just want to be clear. Okay. I'm good. And you had an amendment, Council Member Souris?

8:10:06
Phil BacerraItem 44

Actually, just for clarification, Council Member Penalosa, what was your motion or your sub-motion originally?

8:10:21
David PenalozaItem 44

Same as yours, but I'd like to offer an amendment to your sub motion to go back to negotiations, but give a 90-day, three-month deadline to get this done on both ends. I don't care who's sitting at the table across from our negotiating team, but we need this done, because this is unacceptable, and I am no way supportive of any 20-some million dollar contract. And I'm also very supportive of an audit personally. If there needs to be an audit, then let there be an audit. But one thing that I do want to say is that just for the record, I am supportive that both our larger bargaining units, SCIU full-time and PUA full-time,

8:10:27
David PenalozaItem 44

should have full-time release presidents just because of the amount of employees that they represent. To me personally, that's just my opinion. But with that, I would second your motion if you, or unless you accept that from the amendment. Yeah, I'll accept the amendments. Yeah, that would be it. And I would second it.

8:11:08
Valerie AmezcuaItem 44

And thank you for the audit. And if we're going to do an audit on POA, let's do an audit on police management as well.

8:11:32
Valerie AmezcuaItem 44

Christine, city manager, I'd like also an audit on city on police management as well. We're going to do audits. We're going to do a monologue. Please. I would highly recommend that. And I would hope that the council here would be in agreement with that.

8:11:42
Thai Viet PhanItem 44

I don't. We're not allowed to vote on that, right? Oh, okay. I'm just making a comment.

8:11:55
Valerie AmezcuaItem 44

Oh, okay. Okay. I'm making sure what I'm voting on. I know we're not voting on that. And I know people are going to be like, oh, she's making comments. I've been unelected for eight years. I understand the process. But, again, if we're going to do an audit, then let's be fair. We're up here negotiating. technically you're having a conversation about this let's just do it across the board for everybody

8:12:00
Sonia R. CarvalhoItem 44

may i just offer a procedural question just so that you understand the poa because you like to have facts and i've read the mou um there's a provision because the city makes these donations both for the retiree health and for the medical there's actually a provision that was negotiated that the POA agreed to that the city can ask for documentation. I wouldn't, you know, they use the word audit. I think that may have a negative connotation to some, but I think it's just a check and balance and update. Because we don't have the full-time release for the PMA president, we don't have that similar provision in its MOU.

8:12:19
Sonia R. CarvalhoItem 44

So just so that you understand why one has the provision and one doesn't have the provision.

8:12:57
Valerie AmezcuaItem 44

Maybe we should have it for everybody. All right. There's an amendment. There was an amendment on the table and there was a second. Are you guys ready to vote? Are there any other comments?

8:13:02
Sonia R. CarvalhoItem 44

City Clerk, just to be clear, do you want to make sure you read back that motion with the amendment?

8:13:16
Norma OrozcoItem 44

The substitute motion was to go back to negotiations and to come back within 90 days with a response to counsel.

8:13:30
Norma OrozcoItem 44

A motion by Becerra and seconded by Peñalosa.

8:13:43
Norma OrozcoItem 44

If you can please use your devices to vote.

8:13:49
Norma OrozcoItem 44

motion fails three four with council members Hernandez Lopez Van and Vasquez dissenting.

8:14:14
Valerie AmezcuaItem 44

Okay. So then what we're saying is the last and best offer. There's another motion.

8:14:27
Sonia R. CarvalhoItem 44

Yes. And if you could read back the first motion.

8:14:34
Sonia R. CarvalhoItem 44

If I can assist, it was a motion, I believe, to approve the last, best, and final offer.

8:14:43
Valerie AmezcuaItem 44

So up there it says the mask is dissenting. I just want to make sure it's clear up there. That's correct for the sub motion. But staff can clarify. I just want to make sure.

8:14:48
Norma OrozcoItem 44

Yes. Motion to approve the last best and final was motioned by Council Member Hernandez and seconded by Council Member Fan.

8:15:02
Johnathan Ryan HernandezItem 44

That is correct.

8:15:13
Johnathan Ryan HernandezItem 44

It doesn't look like my device is working. Would you like to record our vote?

8:15:18
Norma OrozcoItem 44

Yes, can we do a roll call vote? We're having some technical difficulties.

8:15:23
Norma OrozcoItem 44

Council Member Becerra?

8:15:30
Johnathan Ryan HernandezItem 44

No.

8:15:32
Norma OrozcoItem 44

Council Member Hernandez?

8:15:33
Johnathan Ryan HernandezItem 44

Yes.

8:15:35
Norma OrozcoItem 44

Council Member Peña Loza?

8:15:36
Johnathan Ryan HernandezItem 44

No.

8:15:38
Norma OrozcoItem 44

Council Member Fan? Yes. Council Member Vasquez?

8:15:39
Norma OrozcoItem 44

Mayor Pro Tem Lopez? Yes. Mayor Mescua?

8:15:46
Norma OrozcoItem 44

Motion passes 4-3 with Council Members Becerra, Pinaloza, and Mayor Mescua dissenting.

8:15:51
Valerie AmezcuaItem 44

All right, public hearing is now closed. And let's go to city manager comments. City manager, do you have any comments?

8:16:05
Kristine RidgeItem 44

Yes, honorable mayor and council members, a few items regarding our holiday hours so we are preparing for the holidays and we do have some modified hours and service delivery as follows city hall and all non-essential city facilities will be closed on monday december 26th in observance of christmas day and monday january 2nd 2023 in observance of new year's day the main library and new hope library will also be closed on monday the 26th and monday january 2nd both library locations will be open during modified hours. Public Works Central stores will be closed from December 22nd through

8:16:16
Kristine RidgeItem 44

December 30th. Communication, recreation, and senior centers will be closed during the week of the 26th through the 30th. And street sweeping is canceled on December 23rd, December 26th, and January 2nd. And then trash collection will be delayed by one day of the week of December 26th and January 2nd. And for full details I know I went over quite a bit you can visit our website santa-anna.org and I just

8:16:53
Valerie AmezcuaItem 44

want to wish everybody a wonderful holiday great thank you councilman Hernandez yes thank you

8:17:22
Johnathan Ryan HernandezItem 44

everybody for tuning in to today's meeting I hope that you have a happy holidays and a happy new

8:17:28
Phil BacerraItem 44

year take care councilman Becerra thank you mayor mesquite one thing I failed to mention this earlier So on our council agendas for land use items, it was my understanding that on those items we would have the property owner and the applicant, you know, the person that's the primary contact for the city staff, the person who's assisting with entitlements. So I looked at the item tonight that was not on the agenda.

8:17:34
Phil BacerraItem 44

For future items, I'd like that to be on there. That has been something that has been asked multiple times, and it should be on there because I think it's something for the community to know, and especially since it was such a hot topic tonight about the property owner and then who was representing the property owner. So that should have been something on the agenda or stated on the item on the agenda. Since we aren't going to meet again until January 17th, I'd like to let people know that i'll be holding my monthly community office hours on saturday january 7th at 10 a.m

8:18:07
Phil BacerraItem 44

over at george upton all access park at carl thornton park and we are so close to christmas in fact council member fan and i got to greet uh santa claus over at fire station 75 on walnut and sycamore uh just this past saturday i wanted to thank our firefighters for being such gracious as hosts to Santa here in Santa Ana. And this past Sunday night, we began Hanukkah. So I'd like to wish everybody a safe and happy holiday season. And I'm looking forward to a productive 2023. Good night, everybody.

8:18:41
Valerie AmezcuaItem 44

Council Member Vasquez.

8:19:13
Benjamin VazquezItem 44

Hello, I'm an ethnic studies teacher. And I last meeting on the swear end, I think we had a teachable moment and I don't wanna call anybody out and it's a call in. and I do this out of respect because the word boogeyman was thrown around, right? And I'm an ethnic studies teacher. And that boogeyman started with Nixon with his war on crime. And Nixon started this war on crime. It was called the Southern Strategy to Get Boats. It went on to become the war on drugs and led to mass incarceration.

8:19:17
Benjamin VazquezItem 44

It led to the prison industrial complex where not only is it getting votes now, but it's getting money. And it's to push money. And I don't want, so this boogeyman narrative, we should really, I would hope we could check our words, especially at this level and governments.

8:19:59
Benjamin VazquezItem 44

We are building now more prisons than we are universities, right?

8:20:22
Benjamin VazquezItem 44

The boogeyman turned into super predators in the 1990s, and then when Crump came down the escalator, he mentioned Mexico doesn't send its best. He sends the boogeyman, the boogeyman, the boogeyman. It was a use, it's a political use for votes and to spend money. The boogeyman takes many shapes. It depends on the narrative of from Asian hate to street vendors being attacked. And I just want us to be reflective of our words and our actions when speaking because those narratives are harmful. Those words do cause harm.

8:20:32
Benjamin VazquezItem 44

And I know somebody with a badge has a different view than I would ever have, that I don't have that kind of experience. But it does affect all of us as a community. It affects society and it has for the last 50 years. So I just want to bring that to light. That's a call in. Does this be reflective of our words and love and care for each other, Santa Ana?

8:21:12
Valerie AmezcuaItem 44

Councilman Panolosa.

8:21:39
David PenalozaItem 44

Thank you, Mayor. I want to say that I think we'd all agree that Richard Nixon was the boogeyman. He was a crook.

8:21:40
David PenalozaItem 44

You know, I know he said he wasn't a crook, but we all know history. And you know, the boogeyman also exists out here, you know. Mr. Reamer's boogeyman killed an innocent mom trying to buy pizza. So the boogeyman exists in many forms. I want to, you know, first I want to offer a very belated birthday to our Director of Public Works, Nabil Saba and our colleague Councilmember Fan happy birthday and an early birthday to

8:21:48
David PenalozaItem 44

Director Ty who I know is having a birthday soon and also want to make a mention that I know that the cities of Orange and Huntington Beach and Mayor Karen Bass in Los Angeles have all in the last couple of weeks launched a very aggressive campaign to clean up their streets, house individuals, enforce their anti-camping ordinance, and they're out there and it's

8:22:20
David PenalozaItem 44

aggressive. I know Mayor Karen Bass is on TV every morning laying out her plans and what they're going to do to clean up their city, as well as many other cities here in Orange County. I know that the minute that they start acting on those plans, we're going to see an increase of individuals flocking to our city because of our perceived lax enforcement of people out there living on our streets and camping at our parks and in our restrooms and railroad tracks.

8:22:56
David PenalozaItem 44

And I know through code enforcement and PD, we're aggressively going after them. But, you know, it's important that we start, you know, we come up with a plan because we will see that impact of all these neighboring jurisdictions beefing up their enforcement. I definitely don't want people to think that we are a safe haven for anybody that wants to come and, you know, do drugs on our streets and whatnot because that's not what we're about and we need to start protecting our residents first and foremost.

8:23:33
David PenalozaItem 44

Also, I would like to just make comment that I would hopefully in the next couple of weeks, the next meeting, bring forward an item to start an aggressive campaign on discouraging our residents from visiting the taco stands in our city, purchasing from these taco stands in our city, because I know there's hundreds of residents that complain to me every day about everything from how it looks, the smells, the noises, blocking sidewalks. I've seen these taco stands block

8:24:12
David PenalozaItem 44

sidewalks 100% and it's a safety issue. I know that just a couple of nights ago there was a site on the news, it's some neighborhood in LA, there was a truck that you know went off the road and took out a bunch of food and fruit vendors that were you know set up on the sidewalk. I would hate to see that here. So I would like to start putting out a campaign to discourage our residents from frequenting these taco stands, because it is a lot of our residents that are buying from these taco stands, which are mainly a conglomerate from L.A.,

8:24:51
David PenalozaItem 44

not mom-and-pop shops of Santa Ana residents. They're outside entities that are coming in here and using our residents to make thousands and thousands of dollars, not, you know, just enough to get by. That is it. Those are my comments. I just want to wish everybody a very Merry Christmas and Happy New Year, Happy Hanukkah, Kwanzaa. And yeah, that's basically it. See you guys next year.

8:25:30
Thai Viet PhanItem 44

Council Member Fenn. Thank you, Mayor. And thank you, Council Member Penalosa for the birthday shout out. I'm 35, so I moved up an age bracket. Not sure if I'm wiser, but I'm very grateful to be here. I want to first say Merry Christmas, Happy Holidays, all the jam, but I also want to just say thank you to my colleagues. I think if you watched our meeting today, you see that there was vigorous discussion and disagreement, but I personally felt that it was respectful, and, you know, that was a really, I guess,

8:26:02
Thai Viet PhanItem 44

a great learning experience and I hope that we continue with that sort of discussion I also want to say that this council dais is truly a change for our city our elder statesman the council member with the most experience is councilman Penalosa and he has four years and I think like two weeks of experience and so I think it's really important to recognize that all of us up here were elected for change for a new beginning and we we are doing that we're all blazing a path

8:26:43
Thai Viet PhanItem 44

forward that is going to be different that is going to be new and in my opinion a better path for our city so with all of that have a wonderful night please be safe and i'll see you in the new

8:27:20
Jessie LopezItem 44

year thank you mayor pro tem lopez thank you mayor well happy birthday nabil i hope that you enjoy your vacation and also rudy i'm sorry but you're gonna get to see how much work comes from our office and happy hanukkah to everyone that celebrates merry christmas happy new year and we are going to be taking a week off monday the 26th through the 30th my executive assistant and I will be off. We're hoping that we can spend more time with our families during that week. And I'd also like to ask this council to help close the meeting in the name of

8:27:35
Jessie LopezItem 44

Javier Villanueva, who passed away on December 3rd. Javier was a kind and selfless man who called the city of Santana home for more than 30 years. And like so many immigrants, he lived on Minnie Street when he arrived in the early 90s. And he loved this city and all of the opportunities it provided him and his family. And Javier was a man of faith and he served everyone around him without expecting anything in return. Most notably, he served as a father to the fatherless, stepping into that role for many of his nieces and nephews. And they describe him as the most noble men they

8:28:12
Jessie LopezItem 44

new and he lives on through his mother his siblings and his nieces and nephews until tonight i'd like to ask that we adjourn this meeting in his memory thank you

8:28:52
Valerie AmezcuaItem 44

all right thank you well as our first meeting together councilwoman councilmember fan thank you for your comments about us all working together um i just want to clarify something we are no longer building prisons actually we're closing them they're just in the process of closing Susanville and some other prisons because with AB 109 and Prop 57 and Prop 47, the prison population has decreased. So I just want to be clear on that. And then I will always use the term boogeyman. That is my personal experience. I'm the one who used it. I have no problem telling you honestly what I say and what I do. That is my life experience.

8:29:05
Valerie AmezcuaItem 44

I'm not a teacher, but that is my experience. And so I hold fast to that. And I will always because when you see, seeing what I've seen, not just reading books, but when you've seen it in real life, yeah, so that's the term I'm going to use. And so, apologies, I don't tell people not to use whatever term works for them. And I'm not going to because that's not my job. But I do want to wish everybody happy Hanukkah, happy holidays, Merry Christmas. Norma, thank you because I know today's your daughter's birthday. and instead of being home with her you are here with us and so I really

8:29:43
Valerie AmezcuaItem 44

appreciate that and bill happy birthday and councilwoman Ty Phan happy birthday to you I want to echo councilman Penelosa's words about the homeless one of the things that I will be asking for and I believe I can ask for is a meeting with the homeless just the decision makers I don't want to meet with the whole team and the city manager because I want to look at and that's including our police officers I want to look at what are they doing what wraparound services what does the data look like how many people are they coming in contact where are they from so many other questions and Councilman Penelos

8:30:20
Valerie AmezcuaItem 44

is right they're going to be making their way this way and through out any time I come in contact with the public they always talk about public safety and homeless public safety and homeless no matter what part of the city you live in When we talk about, you know, mini street apartments, the grandmother lives there, the mom, she wants her kids safe. You talk about the north end, the south end, they want to be safe. So I am going to be asking because, again, I'm new up here, and so I have a lot of questions about what are we doing and how much money are we using? And are we getting the best bang for our buck in serving our community?

8:30:57
Valerie AmezcuaItem 44

Also, Madam City Manager, there's pavers on 4th Street that were brought to my attention. I don't know who we can send that information to. And I'm being asked to take a look at removing them because people are not able to park there, especially with the holidays of shopping pavers. So they're blocking the parking. And I know this isn't the place, but I want to say it because before I forget, especially with the holidays coming, we want people to go down there and shop. So with that, our next meeting is on January 17th. And again, happy holidays to everybody. Happy Hanukkah, Merry Christmas, Feliz Navidad,

8:31:35
Valerie AmezcuaItem 44

and I look forward to January 17th. I also look forward to the fact that all of us up here are very different and unique in our own way, and I really appreciate that. And so thank you and have a nice evening. This meeting is adjourned.

8:32:14
UnidentifiedItem 44

Thank you.

8:32:31